Therapy Type: Immunotherapy (passive) (timeline)
Target Type: Amyloid-Related (timeline)
Condition(s): Alzheimer's Disease
U.S. FDA Status: Alzheimer's Disease (Phase 3)
Company: Eli Lilly & Co.
Approved for: None
Solanezumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody directed against the mid-domain of the Aβ peptide. It recognizes soluble monomeric, not fibrillar, Aβ. The therapeutic rationale is that it may exert benefit by sequestering Aβ, shifting equilibria between different species of Aβ, and removing small soluble species of Aβ that are directly toxic to synaptic function. In preclinical research, a single injection of m266, the mouse version of solanezumab, reversed memory deficits in APP-transgenic mouse models while leaving amyloid plaques in place, raising the prospect of targeting the soluble pool of Aβ (see Apr 2002 news story).
In Phase 1, single doses of 0.5, 1.5, 4.0, or 10.0 mg/kg of solanezumab were well-tolerated in healthy volunteers and 19 patients with mild to moderate AD. MRI showed no evidence of inflammation, vasogenic edema, or microhemorrhage. A multiple-dose study in Japan delivered a 400 mg dose to 33 patients with mild to moderate AD intravenously every one, four, or eight weeks, also without serious adverse events related to solanezumab. Pharmacodynamic biomarker studies found changes in plasma and CSFAβ40, Aβ42, plasma pyro-Glu Aβ, and plasma and CSF N-terminally truncated Aβ, but not CSF total tau and phosphorylated tau.
In Phase 2, trials administering 100 to 1,600 mg per month of solanezumab for 12 weeks, and monitoring for safety and biomarker effects for one year, confirmed the antibody's safety and tolerability. Phase 2 showed dose-dependent increases of various Aβ species in plasma and CSF but no effects on the ADAS-Cog, i.e., no indication of clinical benefit.
In Phase 3, two trials, EXPEDITION-1 and -2, randomized 2,052 people with mild to moderate AD to receive infusions of 400 mg of solanezumab or placebo once a month for 80 weeks. Data analysis was conducted by the study sponsor and independently by the Alzheimer Disease Study Group. Solanezumab continued to be safe, but EXPEDITION overall showed no improvement on the primary outcome measures of ADAS-Cog11 and ADCS-ADL. However, a prespecified subgroup analysis of the EXPEDITION-1 trial showed that solanezumab reduced cognitive decline in mild AD when measured by ADAS-Cog 14, prompting the FDA to approve revision of the primary endpoint of EXPEDITION-2 to a single endpoint of cognition in patients with mild AD before the trial database was locked. That analysis saw a trend to improved cognition with solanezumab in people with mild AD, but it missed statistical significance. Statistically significant benefit was seen in a pooled analysis of patients with mild AD in both trials. Benefit for instrumental activities of daily living was seen also in the mild subpopulation. The benefit appeared late, grew over time, and is thus thought to be consistent with a disease-modifying effect. The effect size of the benefit is small, generally thought to be smaller than that of cholinesterase-inhibitor drugs.
In July 2013, Lilly started EXPEDITION-3, a 39-center Phase 3 trial in 2,100 patients with mild AD and demonstrated brain amyloid burden. The last patient visit is scheduled for October 2016, and topline results are expected to be announded in fall 2016. In March 2016, Lilly announced that it would change the primary outcome for this trial. The original plan registered with regulatory agencies was to use a cognitive (ADAS-Cog 14) and a functional (ADCS-iADL) battery as co-primary outcomes; however, the new plan is to use ADAS-cog as a single primary and ADCS-iADL as a secondary outcome. According to the company, this will change the trial's data analysis but not the conduct of the trial itself, see company release. On November 23, 2016, Lilly announced, based on topline results, that solanezumab had missed primary endpoint in this trial. Primary and secondary outcome results were trending in the direction of a treatment benefit but effects were small and fell short of statistical significance. Lilly will not pursue FDA approval for solanezumab in mild AD (see company release).
Solanezumab's safety record and indication of a small benefit in mild AD has prompted its selection for two secondary prevention studies. The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network (DIAN) is conducting a five-year Phase 2/3 trial to test solanezumab and Roche's passive immunotherapy gantenerumab in 210 asymptomatic and very mildly symptomatic carriers of autosomal-dominant mutations in the Alzheimer's genes APP, presenilin-1, and presenilin-2. This trial reads out biomarker effects at two years (Phase 2). Subsequently, it will advance promising drugs to a three-year (Phase 3) testing phase whose primary endpoint is a composite battery of cognitive tests shown to be sensitive at the earliest symptomatic stages.
In February 2014, the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study began a three-year trial testing solanezumab in 1,150 asymptomatic or very mildly symptomatic people 65 and older who have biomarker evidence of brain amyloid deposition, i.e., who meet a diagnosis of Phases 2 or 3 of preclinical AD as proposed by the 2011 NIA-AA diagnostic research criteria (see Sperling et al., 2011). Called A4, this secondary prevention trial uses the cognitive battery ADCS-PACC, which was developed to be sensitive at earlier clinical stages (Donohue et al., 2014). Amid a controversial leadership change, oversight of this trial has moved from ADCS to the new Alzheimer's Therapy Research Institute at the University of Southern California (August 4, 2015 press release). In June 2017, the study directors announced a quadrupling of the dose from 400 to 1,600 mg solanezumab or placebo given by IV every four weeks, based on results of the EXPEDITION program. Moreover, A4s study length also increased to four and a half years. The trial will run until early 2022.
In December 2015, Lilly began evaluating a subcutaneous formulation of solanezumab in a phase 1 trial of 130 people.
In June 2016, Lilly began a Phase 3 study in prodromal AD. Called ExpeditionPRO, this trial was to enroll 2,450 people with a clinical diagnosis of prodromal AD per IWG criteria, or of MCI due to AD per NAI-AA criteria. Participants were to have a positive amyloid PET scan and score within a defined range on the MoCA and FCSRT tests. The trial started comparing a two-year course of a monthly infusion of solanezumab to placebo for change on the ADAS-Cog14 scale; 16 listed secondary outcomes ran the gamut from clinical, cognitive, functional, psychiatric, and global measures as well as biomarkers in blood, CSF, and PET scans for both amyloid and tau pathology. This trial had started enrolling in up to 223 locations worldwide; however, in January 2017, word spread at scientific meetings that Lilly was terminating this study.
For all solanezumab trials, see clinicaltrials.gov.
Clinical Trial Timeline
- Phase 2
- Phase 2/3
- Phase 3
- Study completed / Planned end date
- Planned end date unavailable
- Study aborted
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT00329082||
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT00749216||
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT00904683||
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT00905372||
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT01148498||
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT01127633||
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT01760005||
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT01900665||
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT02008357||
|Eli Lilly & Co.||NCT02760602||
- Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, Iwatsubo T, Jack CR Jr, Kaye J, Montine TJ, Park DC, Reiman EM, Rowe CC, Siemers E, Stern Y, Yaffe K, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Morrison-Bogorad M, Wagster MV, Phelps CH. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):280-92. Epub 2011 Apr 21 PubMed.
- Donohue MC, Sperling RA, Salmon DP, Rentz DM, Raman R, Thomas RG, Weiner M, Aisen PS, Australian Imaging, Biomarkers, and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study. The preclinical Alzheimer cognitive composite: measuring amyloid-related decline. JAMA Neurol. 2014 Aug;71(8):961-70. PubMed.
- Solanezumab: Did Aβ ‘Reflux’ From Blood Confound Target Engagement in CSF?
- CTAD: Solanezumab Seen to Nudge AD Ever so Slightly
- Anti-Amyloid Results Show Modest Benefits, Mild Side Effects
- NIH Funds Four Clinical Trials in ADCS Renewal
- Solanezumab Selected for Alzheimer’s A4 Prevention Trial
- Solanezumab Heads for New Phase 3 Trial
- CTAD: New Data on Sola, Bapi, Spark Theragnostics Debate
- DIAN Trial Picks Gantenerumab, Solanezumab, Maybe BACE Inhibitor
- The Solanezumab Benefit: Oh, So Small, But Probably Real
- Phase 3 Solanezumab Trials "Fail"—Is There a Silver Lining?
- Sink or Swim?—New Take on Aβ Antibody’s Modus Operandi
- Chicago: Lilly’s Antibody Appears to Do No Harm, But Will It Help?
- Siemers ER, Friedrich S, Dean RA, Gonzales CR, Farlow MR, Paul SM, Demattos RB. Safety and changes in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta after a single administration of an amyloid beta monoclonal antibody in subjects with Alzheimer disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2010 Mar-Apr;33(2):67-73. PubMed.
- Farlow M, Arnold SE, van Dyck CH, Aisen PS, Snider BJ, Porsteinsson AP, Friedrich S, Dean RA, Gonzales C, Sethuraman G, Demattos RB, Mohs R, Paul SM, Siemers ER. Safety and biomarker effects of solanezumab in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Jul;8(4):261-71. PubMed.
- Uenaka K, Nakano M, Willis BA, Friedrich S, Ferguson-Sells L, Dean RA, Ieiri I, Siemers ER. Comparison of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of the amyloid β monoclonal antibody solanezumab in Japanese and white patients with mild to moderate alzheimer disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2012 Jan;35(1):25-9. PubMed.