The largest Alzheimer’s GWAS yet has netted 42 new risk loci. The haul, described in a preprint on medRxiv, comes from an enormous collaborative effort by Alzheimer’s geneticists, with 354 authors. They combined findings from multiple European datasets, ultimately mining 111,326 cases and 677,663 controls to unearth 75 risk associations. Of these, 33 were known. In most of the 42 new loci, the scientists were able to pinpoint a likely causal gene. These fell into established pathways—amyloid and tau metabolism, endocytosis, innate immunity. Their protein products interacted with those of known AD genes. In addition, the investigators combined all 75 loci into a polygenic risk score, which accurately predicted progression to dementia in multiple observational cohorts.
- A massive GWAS meta-analysis netted 42 new risk loci for AD.
- Candidate genes in these loci fell into familiar pathways such as immunity and APP metabolism.
- A polygenic risk score based on all known AD variants predicted progression to dementia with high accuracy.
“Because of the number of genes characterized, this is a turning point in genetics,” corresponding author Jean-Charles Lambert at the Institut Pasteur de Lille in France told Alzforum. Some of these data were previously presented at last year’s Alzheimer’s Association International Conference (Jul 2020 conference news).
Carlos Cruchaga at Washington University in St. Louis called the work a tour de force. “The genes identified in these studies are instrumental for understanding the pathways implicated in disease, and will lead to drug targets,” he wrote to Alzforum (full comment below). He was not involved in the study.
Pile on the Genes. Manhattan plot shows 75 loci linked to AD that passed statistical muster (dotted red line). The 42 red ones are new. [Courtesy of Bellenguez et al.]
Meanwhile, a recent GWAS meta-analysis, described in the February 15 Nature Genetics, turned up three of the same new genes: TSPAN14, CCDC6, and NCK2, along with one additional one, SPRED2. That analysis also confirmed 30 known AD risk loci. Researchers led by Andrew Bassett at the Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, England, U.K., searched for causal variants in all 34 loci using fine-mapping techniques. Their methodology confirmed many AD genes but also turned up some surprises, nominating a new candidate.
Bigger Is Better
GWAS have been trending bigger for years. A meta-analysis in 2013 pulled together 17,000 cases and turned up 19 risk loci, 11 of them new (Oct 2013 news). Geneticists at the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s Project analyzed more than 35,000 cases to find five new loci (Mar 2019 news). A separate effort went broader by including UK Biobank samples from people with family histories of dementia, known as genome-wide association-by-proxy (GWAX); it uncovered nine new genes among almost 72,000 diagnosed and proxy cases (Apr 2018 news).
For this study, geneticists took a hybrid GWAS/GWAX approach. Like the previous effort, they tapped genetic samples from the UK Biobank, but they combined these with numerous European GWAS, including the European Alzheimer’s Disease Biobank, the European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative, GERAD/PERADES, the Spanish study GR@ACE, the Norwegian study DemGene, the Rotterdam study, and the Bonn study. Altogether, this meta-analysis brought together 39,106 clinically diagnosed AD cases, 46,828 proxy AD cases, and 401,577 controls for the discovery cohort. Lambert noted that about 30,000 of these cases and proxy cases had never been included in a GWAS before. He believes the number of new cases, as well as the size and power of the study, explains how it was able to find so many new disease associations.
The seven joint first authors are Céline Bellenguez at the Institut Pasteur de Lille; Fahri Küçükali at the University of Antwerp, Belgium; Iris Jansen at Vrije University, Amsterdam; Victor Andrade at the University of Cologne, Germany; Sonia Moreno-Grau at the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya in Barcelona, Spain; Najaf Amin at Erasmus MC in Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and Adam Naj at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. The scientists analyzed more than 21 million SNPs, imputing missing data using the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine reference panel. This new panel is more comprehensive than previous haplotype references, being based on whole-genome sequencing of more than 90,000 people (Kowalski et al., 2019).
“Usage of the TOPMed reference panel may have enhanced imputation accuracy, resulting in the identification of the new risk signals,” Nancy Ip at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology wrote to Alzforum (full comment below). She was not involved in the study.
The authors tested the hits in a second large cohort of 25,392 AD cases and 276,086 controls from the combined ADGC, FinnGen, and CHARGE GWAS. In addition to confirming the 42 new loci, they also found 39 signals in 33 known AD loci that replicated in both cohorts.
Lambert notes that a number of regions of the genome seem to harbor more than one risk variant. However, researchers tend to focus on just a single candidate gene. “It likely means we are underestimating the impact of several loci, because we’re unable to capture the full genetic information in each locus,” he told Alzforum. Tracking down these multiple independent signals will be a crucial next step, he added.
The researchers attempted to home in on candidate genes in the new loci by chasing coding variants, eQTLs that control expression, splicing variants, or methylation changes. For 34 of the 42 new regions, they were able to nominate a single candidate gene. Many fall into the expected molecular pathways. Several are involved in APP processing; they include APP itself, the lysosomal gene CTSB, ADAM17, and TSPAN14, which regulates the known AD gene ADAM10, aka α-secretase. ADAM10 also turned up in this study. It shunts APP into a non-amyloidogenic pathway.
There were no tau-interacting proteins among the 42 new genome-wide significant hits. Intriguingly, numerous loci containing such genes had suggestive associations with AD. This list includes the kinase Fyn, the kinase GSK3β, microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), and microtubule-affinity regulating kinase 4 (MARK4).
In agreement with other studies, lysosomal and endosomal genes cropped up repeatedly. The 42 new loci included the sorting receptors SORT1 and SNX1, the endosomal regulator WDR81, the lysosomal protease cathepsin H (CTSH), the lysosomal hydrolase IDUA, and the lysosomal trafficking regulator TMEM106B. Lipid metabolism made an appearance as well, with genes such as the transcriptional repressor JAZF1, which suppresses lipid production, and the cholesterol pump ABCA1.
As expected, immune-related genes represented one of the biggest categories. In particular, the study highlighted a role for the Linear Ubiquitination Assembly Complex. LUBAC inhibits TNF-α signaling, dousing inflammation. Two of its component proteins, RBCK1 and SHARPIN, showed up as AD-related, along with OTULIN, a de-ubiquitinase that regulates LUBAC. Other immune-related genes included TNIP1, RHOH, BLNK, SIGLEC11, LILRB2, LIME1, and progranulin.
Julie Williams at Cardiff University, Wales, U.K., a co-author, believes the 42 new associations likely represent genuine AD risk factors. “These are not random genes,” she told Alzforum. “They tell a coherent story that builds on previous publications that implicated these processes in AD.” In line with this, a recent study combined proteome-wide association data with GWAS results to identify 10 new AD genes. Four of these— ICA1L, PLEKHA1, DOC2A, and CTSH—also showed up among the 42 new loci in the meta-analysis, demonstrating that different methods are converging on the same genes and pathways (Feb 2021 news).
Gene expression analyses showed the 42 new loci contained an unusual number of microglial genes, with 13 of the new candidates expressed exclusively or primarily in these cells. These included many of the immune genes, such as OTULIN, SHARPIN, RHOH, BLNK, SIGLEC11, LILRB2, and progranulin. But there were also microglial genes related to other processes, including JAZF1, TSPAN14, the adaptor protein NCK2, the lysosomal peptidase cathepsin B, the signaling protein RASGEF1C, and the transcription factor MAF. That said, candidate genes were expressed in many other brain cell types too. “There is clearly cross talk between cell types in AD,” Lambert noted.
Some of the new candidate AD genes associate with other neurodegenerative diseases as well, such as IDUA with Parkinson’s disease, and progranulin and TMEM106B with frontotemporal dementia. A co-localization analysis of the AD and PD signals determined that the AD risk variant near IDUA was probably independent of the PD signal. However, the variants near progranulin and TMEM106B likely contribute to risk for both disorders, the authors found. Cruchaga noted that other studies have implicated TMEM106B in AD (Li et al., 2020).
After all this, how many AD genes remain to be discovered? This is unknown, researchers agreed. One recent study estimated there might be around 100 AD genes total, though other researchers dispute this (Zhang et al., 2020). “This would suggest that GWAS are potentially reaching the limit of discovering new loci associated with AD. However, our knowledge of the genetic architecture underlying AD is still far from complete,” Shea Andrews at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, wrote to Alzforum. He was not involved in the study.
What percentage of total AD genetic risk do the 75 known loci represent? This is also unknown, because case-control studies are not designed to answer this question. Researchers also do not know how much of the AD risk in a population is inherited, versus due to other factors such as lifestyle. Without knowing the heritability, geneticists can’t determine if they have found all variants that explain it. And since AD prevalence rises with age, heritability is hard to determine. “Estimates of heritability are extremely problematic in diseases with age-dependent penetrance,” John Hardy at University College London wrote to Alzforum (full comment below).
A related question is how well the known variants predict disease. On this, the scientists got more traction. They combined 83 independent variants from the 75 loci into a polygenic risk score and tested its predictive power in numerous observational studies, adjusting for age, sex, and APOE genotype. On average, the presence of one risk variant upped a person’s odds of developing AD by 5 percent. Multiple variants had a cumulative effect, such that a person who inherited 18 to 20 risk variants would have the same increased risk as someone with one APOE4 allele, or about 200 percent, Lambert told Alzforum.
This polygenic risk score was about 84 percent accurate in predicting progression, Williams told Alzforum. Lambert noted, “I was surprised it worked so well.” The variants had the same effect on progression to dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment as they did in healthy elderly people. In other words, the risk did not depend on disease stage.
Besides Lambert, senior authors on this study were Mikko Hiltunen at the University of Eastern Finland in Kuopio, Kristel Sleegers at UAntwerp, Gerard Schellenberg at UPenn, Cornelia van Duijn at the Nuffield Department of Population Health at Oxford University, U.K., Rebecca Sims at Cardiff, Wiesje van der Flier at Amsterdam University, Agustín Ruiz at Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, and Alfredo Ramirez at University of Cologne.
Lambert believes GWAS can grow bigger yet. He’d like to combine all known datasets into one massive meta-analysis for maximum power. Even so, Williams noted that GWAS overlook rare and structural variants. For those, geneticists need additional familial studies and specialized techniques such as long-read sequencing, which enable them to detect insertions and deletions.
Nab Those Causal Variants. At 37 loci linked to AD, an analysis of protein-coding changes, co-localization with eQTLs, distance to nearby genes, and interaction with AD gene networks spat out putative causal genes. Model score shows the likelihood of each gene being causal. [Courtesy of Schwartzentruber et al., Nature Genetics.]
For their part, Bassett and colleagues performed a smaller meta-analysis, combining data from a previous UK Biobank GWAX with the latest GWAS data from IGAP (Jansen et al., 2019; Kunkle et al., 2019). This identified 34 genome-wide risk loci, four of them new. The one that did not appear in the Bellenguez study, SPRED2, regulates the MAP kinase cascade.
First author Jeremy Schwartzentruber made use of numerous lines of evidence to nominate likely causal variants and genes in each of the 34 loci, plus three with suggestive associations to AD. For each SNP, Schwartzentruber and colleagues considered its distance to nearby genes, whether it abutted an eQTL for that gene, and whether the gene was connected to known AD genes through protein-interaction networks. For eQTL data, they used multiple samples and cell types, including primary microglia, blood immune cells, and different brain cortical samples. The authors also fine-mapped each locus using data on open chromatin structure to find variants likely to affect gene expression.
“This is impressive work,” Williams noted. “Using a variety of tissues was novel and very informative.”
For many AD loci, such as BIN1, PICALM, and SORL1, the analysis confirmed the likely involvement of that gene. For other loci, however, the authors nominated new candidates. In the presumed ADAMTS4 locus, they suggested the microglial gene FCER1G might be the causal factor instead, and for the EPHA1 locus, the microglial gene zyxin. In the SLC24A4 locus, they found evidence for endocytic gene RIN3 being the functional variant, as have other recent studies (Aug 2017 news; Aug 2019 news; Nov 2019 news). In the CLNK locus, they proposed HS3ST1, a heparan sulfate sulfotransferase, which facilitates uptake of tau by cultured cells and was recently associated with AD (Zhao et al., 2020).
Overall, larger GWAS and multiple methods appear to be homing in on the same large set of genes involved in AD. “We are obtaining a full picture of locations in the genome that may harbor important genetic variants that would facilitate the ability to identify potential targets for drug development,” Richard Mayeux at Columbia University Medical Center in New York wrote to Alzforum (full comment below). He is a co-author on the Bellenguez paper.—Madolyn Bowman Rogers
- Doubling Down on Sequencing Serves up More Alzheimer’s Genes
- Paper Alert: New Alzheimer’s Genes Published
- Paper Alerts: Massive GWAS Studies Published
- GWAS, GWAX: bioRχiv Hosts Bonanza of Alzheimer’s Genetics
- PWAS x GWAS? Proteome Analysis Nets 10 New Alzheimer’s Genes
- The Search for the Missing AD Heritability Turns Up New Rare Variants
- AD Genetic Risk Tied to Changes in Microglial Gene Expression
- Single-Cell Expression Atlas Charts Changes in Alzheimer’s Entorhinal Cortex
- Kowalski MH, Qian H, Hou Z, Rosen JD, Tapia AL, Shan Y, Jain D, Argos M, Arnett DK, Avery C, Barnes KC, Becker LC, Bien SA, Bis JC, Blangero J, Boerwinkle E, Bowden DW, Buyske S, Cai J, Cho MH, Choi SH, Choquet H, Cupples LA, Cushman M, Daya M, de Vries PS, Ellinor PT, Faraday N, Fornage M, Gabriel S, Ganesh SK, Graff M, Gupta N, He J, Heckbert SR, Hidalgo B, Hodonsky CJ, Irvin MR, Johnson AD, Jorgenson E, Kaplan R, Kardia SL, Kelly TN, Kooperberg C, Lasky-Su JA, Loos RJ, Lubitz SA, Mathias RA, McHugh CP, Montgomery C, Moon JY, Morrison AC, Palmer ND, Pankratz N, Papanicolaou GJ, Peralta JM, Peyser PA, Rich SS, Rotter JI, Silverman EK, Smith JA, Smith NL, Taylor KD, Thornton TA, Tiwari HK, Tracy RP, Wang T, Weiss ST, Weng LC, Wiggins KL, Wilson JG, Yanek LR, Zöllner S, North KE, Auer PL, NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium, TOPMed Hematology & Hemostasis Working Group, Raffield LM, Reiner AP, Li Y. Use of >100,000 NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium whole genome sequences improves imputation quality and detection of rare variant associations in admixed African and Hispanic/Latino populations. PLoS Genet. 2019 Dec;15(12):e1008500. Epub 2019 Dec 23 PubMed.
- Li Z, Farias FH, Dube U, Del-Aguila JL, Mihindukulasuriya KA, Fernandez MV, Ibanez L, Budde JP, Wang F, Lake AM, Deming Y, Perez J, Yang C, Bahena JA, Qin W, Bradley JL, Davenport R, Bergmann K, Morris JC, Perrin RJ, Benitez BA, Dougherty JD, Harari O, Cruchaga C. The TMEM106B FTLD-protective variant, rs1990621, is also associated with increased neuronal proportion. Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Jan;139(1):45-61. Epub 2019 Aug 27 PubMed.
- Zhang Q, Sidorenko J, Couvy-Duchesne B, Marioni RE, Wright MJ, Goate AM, Marcora E, Huang KL, Porter T, Laws SM, Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study, Sachdev PS, Mather KA, Armstrong NJ, Thalamuthu A, Brodaty H, Yengo L, Yang J, Wray NR, McRae AF, Visscher PM. Risk prediction of late-onset Alzheimer's disease implies an oligogenic architecture. Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 23;11(1):4799. PubMed.
- Jansen IE, Savage JE, Watanabe K, Bryois J, Williams DM, Steinberg S, Sealock J, Karlsson IK, Hägg S, Athanasiu L, Voyle N, Proitsi P, Witoelar A, Stringer S, Aarsland D, Almdahl IS, Andersen F, Bergh S, Bettella F, Bjornsson S, Brækhus A, Bråthen G, de Leeuw C, Desikan RS, Djurovic S, Dumitrescu L, Fladby T, Hohman TJ, Jonsson PV, Kiddle SJ, Rongve A, Saltvedt I, Sando SB, Selbæk G, Shoai M, Skene NG, Snaedal J, Stordal E, Ulstein ID, Wang Y, White LR, Hardy J, Hjerling-Leffler J, Sullivan PF, van der Flier WM, Dobson R, Davis LK, Stefansson H, Stefansson K, Pedersen NL, Ripke S, Andreassen OA, Posthuma D. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer's disease risk. Nat Genet. 2019 Mar;51(3):404-413. Epub 2019 Jan 7 PubMed.
- Kunkle BW, Grenier-Boley B, Sims R, Bis JC, Damotte V, Naj AC, Boland A, Vronskaya M, van der Lee SJ, Amlie-Wolf A, Bellenguez C, Frizatti A, Chouraki V, Martin ER, Sleegers K, Badarinarayan N, Jakobsdottir J, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Moreno-Grau S, Olaso R, Raybould R, Chen Y, Kuzma AB, Hiltunen M, Morgan T, Ahmad S, Vardarajan BN, Epelbaum J, Hoffmann P, Boada M, Beecham GW, Garnier JG, Harold D, Fitzpatrick AL, Valladares O, Moutet ML, Gerrish A, Smith AV, Qu L, Bacq D, Denning N, Jian X, Zhao Y, Del Zompo M, Fox NC, Choi SH, Mateo I, Hughes JT, Adams HH, Malamon J, Sanchez-Garcia F, Patel Y, Brody JA, Dombroski BA, Naranjo MC, Daniilidou M, Eiriksdottir G, Mukherjee S, Wallon D, Uphill J, Aspelund T, Cantwell LB, Garzia F, Galimberti D, Hofer E, Butkiewicz M, Fin B, Scarpini E, Sarnowski C, Bush WS, Meslage S, Kornhuber J, White CC, Song Y, Barber RC, Engelborghs S, Sordon S, Voijnovic D, Adams PM, Vandenberghe R, Mayhaus M, Cupples LA, Albert MS, De Deyn PP, Gu W, Himali JJ, Beekly D, Squassina A, Hartmann AM, Orellana A, Blacker D, Rodriguez-Rodriguez E, Lovestone S, Garcia ME, Doody RS, Munoz-Fernadez C, Sussams R, Lin H, Fairchild TJ, Benito YA, Holmes C, Karamujić-Čomić H, Frosch MP, Thonberg H, Maier W, Roschupkin G, Ghetti B, Giedraitis V, Kawalia A, Li S, Huebinger RM, Kilander L, Moebus S, Hernández I, Kamboh MI, Brundin R, Turton J, Yang Q, Katz MJ, Concari L, Lord J, Beiser AS, Keene CD, Helisalmi S, Kloszewska I, Kukull WA, Koivisto AM, Lynch A, Tarraga L, Larson EB, Haapasalo A, Lawlor B, Mosley TH, Lipton RB, Solfrizzi V, Gill M, Longstreth WT Jr, Montine TJ, Frisardi V, Diez-Fairen M, Rivadeneira F, Petersen RC, Deramecourt V, Alvarez I, Salani F, Ciaramella A, Boerwinkle E, Reiman EM, Fievet N, Rotter JI, Reisch JS, Hanon O, Cupidi C, Andre Uitterlinden AG, Royall DR, Dufouil C, Maletta RG, de Rojas I, Sano M, Brice A, Cecchetti R, George-Hyslop PS, Ritchie K, Tsolaki M, Tsuang DW, Dubois B, Craig D, Wu CK, Soininen H, Avramidou D, Albin RL, Fratiglioni L, Germanou A, Apostolova LG, Keller L, Koutroumani M, Arnold SE, Panza F, Gkatzima O, Asthana S, Hannequin D, Whitehead P, Atwood CS, Caffarra P, Hampel H, Quintela I, Carracedo Á, Lannfelt L, Rubinsztein DC, Barnes LL, Pasquier F, Frölich L, Barral S, McGuinness B, Beach TG, Johnston JA, Becker JT, Passmore P, Bigio EH, Schott JM, Bird TD, Warren JD, Boeve BF, Lupton MK, Bowen JD, Proitsi P, Boxer A, Powell JF, Burke JR, Kauwe JS, Burns JM, Mancuso M, Buxbaum JD, Bonuccelli U, Cairns NJ, McQuillin A, Cao C, Livingston G, Carlson CS, Bass NJ, Carlsson CM, Hardy J, Carney RM, Bras J, Carrasquillo MM, Guerreiro R, Allen M, Chui HC, Fisher E, Masullo C, Crocco EA, DeCarli C, Bisceglio G, Dick M, Ma L, Duara R, Graff-Radford NR, Evans DA, Hodges A, Faber KM, Scherer M, Fallon KB, Riemenschneider M, Fardo DW, Heun R, Farlow MR, Kölsch H, Ferris S, Leber M, Foroud TM, Heuser I, Galasko DR, Giegling I, Gearing M, Hüll M, Geschwind DH, Gilbert JR, Morris J, Green RC, Mayo K, Growdon JH, Feulner T, Hamilton RL, Harrell LE, Drichel D, Honig LS, Cushion TD, Huentelman MJ, Hollingworth P, Hulette CM, Hyman BT, Marshall R, Jarvik GP, Meggy A, Abner E, Menzies GE, Jin LW, Leonenko G, Real LM, Jun GR, Baldwin CT, Grozeva D, Karydas A, Russo G, Kaye JA, Kim R, Jessen F, Kowall NW, Vellas B, Kramer JH, Vardy E, LaFerla FM, Jöckel KH, Lah JJ, Dichgans M, Leverenz JB, Mann D, Levey AI, Pickering-Brown S, Lieberman AP, Klopp N, Lunetta KL, Wichmann HE, Lyketsos CG, Morgan K, Marson DC, Brown K, Martiniuk F, Medway C, Mash DC, Nöthen MM, Masliah E, Hooper NM, McCormick WC, Daniele A, McCurry SM, Bayer A, McDavid AN, Gallacher J, McKee AC, van den Bussche H, Mesulam M, Brayne C, Miller BL, Riedel-Heller S, Miller CA, Miller JW, Al-Chalabi A, Morris JC, Shaw CE, Myers AJ, Wiltfang J, O'Bryant S, Olichney JM, Alvarez V, Parisi JE, Singleton AB, Paulson HL, Collinge J, Perry WR, Mead S, Peskind E, Cribbs DH, Rossor M, Pierce A, Ryan NS, Poon WW, Nacmias B, Potter H, Sorbi S, Quinn JF, Sacchinelli E, Raj A, Spalletta G, Raskind M, Caltagirone C, Bossù P, Orfei MD, Reisberg B, Clarke R, Reitz C, Smith AD, Ringman JM, Warden D, Roberson ED, Wilcock G, Rogaeva E, Bruni AC, Rosen HJ, Gallo M, Rosenberg RN, Ben-Shlomo Y, Sager MA, Mecocci P, Saykin AJ, Pastor P, Cuccaro ML, Vance JM, Schneider JA, Schneider LS, Slifer S, Seeley WW, Smith AG, Sonnen JA, Spina S, Stern RA, Swerdlow RH, Tang M, Tanzi RE, Trojanowski JQ, Troncoso JC, Van Deerlin VM, Van Eldik LJ, Vinters HV, Vonsattel JP, Weintraub S, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Wilhelmsen KC, Williamson J, Wingo TS, Woltjer RL, Wright CB, Yu CE, Yu L, Saba Y, Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC),, European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (EADI),, Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium (CHARGE),, Genetic and Environmental Risk in AD/Defining Genetic, Polygenic and Environmental Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease Consortium (GERAD/PERADES),, Pilotto A, Bullido MJ, Peters O, Crane PK, Bennett D, Bosco P, Coto E, Boccardi V, De Jager PL, Lleo A, Warner N, Lopez OL, Ingelsson M, Deloukas P, Cruchaga C, Graff C, Gwilliam R, Fornage M, Goate AM, Sanchez-Juan P, Kehoe PG, Amin N, Ertekin-Taner N, Berr C, Debette S, Love S, Launer LJ, Younkin SG, Dartigues JF, Corcoran C, Ikram MA, Dickson DW, Nicolas G, Campion D, Tschanz J, Schmidt H, Hakonarson H, Clarimon J, Munger R, Schmidt R, Farrer LA, Van Broeckhoven C, C O'Donovan M, DeStefano AL, Jones L, Haines JL, Deleuze JF, Owen MJ, Gudnason V, Mayeux R, Escott-Price V, Psaty BM, Ramirez A, Wang LS, Ruiz A, van Duijn CM, Holmans PA, Seshadri S, Williams J, Amouyel P, Schellenberg GD, Lambert JC, Pericak-Vance MA. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat Genet. 2019 Mar;51(3):414-430. Epub 2019 Feb 28 PubMed.
- Zhao J, Zhu Y, Song X, Xiao Y, Su G, Liu X, Wang Z, Xu Y, Liu J, Eliezer D, Ramlall TF, Lippens G, Gibson J, Zhang F, Linhardt RJ, Wang L, Wang C. 3-O-Sulfation of Heparan Sulfate Enhances Tau Interaction and Cellular Uptake. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Jan 27;59(5):1818-1827. Epub 2019 Dec 10 PubMed.
- Bellenguez C, Küçükali F, Jansen I, Andrade V, Moreno-Grau S, Amin N, Naj AC, Grenier-Boley B, Campos-Martin R, Holmans PA, Boland A, Kleineidam L, Damotte V, van der Lee SJ, Kuulasmaa T, Yang Q, de Rojas I, Bis JC, Yaqub A, ... Lambert, JC. New insights on the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s and related dementia. medRxiv. 2020 Dec 14. medRxiv
- Schwartzentruber J, Cooper S, Liu JZ, Barrio-Hernandez I, Bello E, Kumasaka N, Young AM, Franklin RJ, Johnson T, Estrada K, Gaffney DJ, Beltrao P, Bassett A. Genome-wide meta-analysis, fine-mapping and integrative prioritization implicate new Alzheimer's disease risk genes. Nat Genet. 2021 Mar;53(3):392-402. Epub 2021 Feb 15 PubMed.