Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: Research: Forums: Live Discussions
Live Discussions

Updated 25 May 2007

The AD8: A Brief Screening Tool for Very Mild Dementia


Jim Galvin
Jim Galvin and colleagues at Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, have developed a simple tool to discern very early dementia in routine clinical settings. The field overwhelmingly agrees that dementia should be detected as early as possible, yet commonly used tests, such as the MMSE, tend to miss dementia until it is well established. In the rush of daily practice very mild cases often go undiagnosed, and when a person finally gets a diagnosis of possible AD, the spouse or adult child says that they began noticing changes years earlier. A key problem is that routine tests compare a person’s performance to group norms. Galvin and colleagues believe it’s better to gauge incipient dementia through loss of the person’s own prior abilities, not by comparing them to a norm.

This month, Galvin and colleagues reported results of further evaluation of the AD8 interview in back-to-back papers in Archives of Neurology. One new paper notes that combining the AD8 interview with brief psychometric tests boosts its ability to discern a cognitive impairment in people who do not meet formal clinical criteria for dementia, and the combined procedure is still short enough to be administered in everyday clinical practice. The other paper reports that when there is no informant available, the patient him- or herself can take the AD8, especially when the dementia is still very mild and the patient has insight into their condition.

Jim Galvin led this Webinar on 30 May 2007. Readers are invited to submit additional comments by using our Comments form at the bottom of the page.

View Video Recording

Galvin JE, Roe CM, Coats MA, Morris JC. Patient’s Rating of Cognitive Ability: Using the AD8, a Brief Informant Interview, as a Self-rating Tool to Detect Dementia. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:725-730. View PDF

Galvin JE, Roe CM, Morris JC. Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Combining Brief Informant and Performance Measures. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:718-724. View PDF

AD8 Dementia Screening Interview, Guidelines


Background Text
By James Galvin

The diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) and related dementias remains a clinical one, based on intra-individual decline in cognition with interference in accustomed daily activities. Typically, we think of memory impairments as the earliest signs of AD; however, formal neuropsychological assessments are time-consuming, costly, and not readily available in all clinical situations. Consequently, early-stage Alzheimer disease is often missed in community health settings. We therefore began efforts to develop a sensitive and specific cognitive screening tool that is valid, easy to administer, and minimally time-consuming (Galvin et al., 2005). Brief cognitive tests such as the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) may help differentiate cognitively normal older adults from those with moderate dementia. While these brief objective measures are easily applicable in clinical practice, the MMSE and other brief tests lack the sensitivity and specificity to detect very mild impairment and may not be culturally sensitive. Brief cognitive tests also may be limited in their ability to detect change because baseline testing is often unavailable. Lastly, it is unclear how helpful many of these brief measures would be in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or non-amnestic forms of dementia. We have found informant-based assessments of intra-individual change such as the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) to be more sensitive than brief performance-based measures that rely on inter-individual norms to detect cognitive change. However, the time-consuming nature of informant interviews precludes their use in many clinical settings. We therefore used this premise to develop a much briefer informant interview, the AD8, which distinguishes individuals with very mild dementia from those without dementia.

The AD8 is an informant-based measure that validly and reliably differentiates non-demented from demented individuals. It is sensitive to the earliest signs of cognitive change as reported by an informant. The AD8 is highly correlated with our gold standard, the CDR and its sum of boxes, as well as performance on objective measures of memory, visuospatial skills, attention, and executive function. The AD8 took the clinical staff less than 3 minutes to complete, and it can be reliably administered either in person or over the phone. The reliability and validity of a brief informant interview such as the AD8 suggests that dementia may be detected at the earliest stages by placing emphasis on intra-individual, rather than inter-individual comparisons. A key concern is that deviation from the patient’s baseline and accustomed activities often is not readily assessed by comparison to a scale determined on the basis of group norms.

We also found that combining the AD8 with brief psychometric tests further improved the ability to screen for the presence of dementia. The addition of the 10-item word list recall improved discrimination to 97 percent between non-demented adults and those with dementia. Using cut-offs of two or greater on the AD8 and five or fewer words on the word list recall resulted in excellent sensitivity (94 percent) and specificity (82 percent).

In general practice, a reliable informant may not always be available. We wished, therefore, to test whether there is value in asking individuals to self-rate their cognitive abilities. Self-rating scales for dementia have not gained common use because of the perception that dementia patients lack insight and deny cognitive problems, even in mild forms of dementia. The AD8, although developed as an informant rating, may also serve as a self-rating tool to discriminate older adults without dementia from those with even the mildest forms of dementia. The self-rated AD8 corresponded to gold standards for this study (the CDR and CDR-SB) and to brief global assessments of cognition (MMSE and SBT) and had adequate agreement with the informant’s AD8 rating. The participants were able to complete the AD8 within 3 minutes without additional instructions.

Subjective cognitive complaints are common in older adults, found in up to 88 percent of people over age 85. These complaints are often attributed to depression. A short scale addressing self-rating of cognitive abilities may be preferable to asking a single question about memory self-perception to assess memory complaints (i.e., “Are you having a problem with your memory?”).

In summary, the AD8 is a brief screening tool that may discriminate healthy older adults from those with very mild dementia. The AD8 is administered preferably to an informant. In the absence of an informant, the AD8 can be administered to the patient. If the patient endorses any of its questions, further evaluation is warranted. The AD8 may be applicable as a screening tool in community settings and primary care to assist in the detection of dementia in the older adult.

We suggest these questions for discussion:

1. What patients do you evaluate for cognitive disorders?

2. What screening tools do you currently use for detecting dementia?

3. Are you satisfied with the currently available tools for diagnosing dementia?

4. What are the potential barriers to screening patients for dementia?

5. How does the AD8 compare to the MMSE?

6. What will it take for the field to adopt the AD8?

References:
Galvin JE, Roe CM, Powlishta KK, Coats MA, Muich SJ, Grant E, Miller JP, Storandt M, Morris JC. The AD8: A brief informant interview to detect dementia. Neurology. 2005;65:559–564. View PDF

Galvin JE, Roe CM, Xiong C, Morris JC. Validity and reliability of the AD8 informant interview in dementia. Neurology. 2006;67:1942–1948. View PDF

Galvin JE, Roe CM, Coats MA, Morris JC. Patient’s Rating of Cognitive Ability: Using the AD8, a Brief Informant Interview, as a Self-rating Tool to Detect Dementia. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:725-730. View PDF

Galvin JE, Roe CM, Morris JC. Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Combining Brief Informant and Performance Measures. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:718-724. View PDF



  Submit a Comment on this Live Discussion
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this live discussion. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
 


Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
Live Discussion FAQs

Webinar: A Webinar is a seminar conducted remotely over the Web. Attendees view the slides through their Web browser and hear the presentations over their own telephones.

Registration: All participants are to register by clicking on the "Register for the Webinar" link.

Access: After you register, you will receive an e-mail with a link to the Webinar and a phone number.

View Webinar Instructions

Early Detection Survey Results
The Alzheimer Disease Early Detection Surveys were designed to gauge perceptions and knowledge of early detection of Alzheimer disease as a follow-up to our Early Detection Webinar. The surveys were developed in collaboration with the Geoffrey Beene Foundation.
View Researcher Survey Results [.pdf].
View Public Survey Results [.pdf].
AlzPossible Initiative
The AlzPossible Initiative is an innovative "center without walls" that enables skilled individuals to share their knowledge about best practices in Alzheimer caregiving through this open forum.
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad