|
Pin1, Tau and the Cell Cycle in Alzheimer Disease
June Kinoshita, with Peter Davies, led this live discussion on 3 August 1999. Readers are invited to submit additional comments by using our Comments form at the bottom of the page. Paper under discussion: Lu, Pei-Jung, Wulf, Gerburg,
Zhou, Xiao Zhen, Davies, Peter, and Lu, Kun Ping. The
propyl isomerase Pin1 restores the function of Alzheimer-associated
phosphorylated tau protein. Nature 399, 784-788. 1999
Jun 24. Abstract
View Transcript of Live Discussion — Posted 5 September 1999
Background Text
By Peter Nelson
Nature is under no obligation to be simple. The complexity
of reality is underscored in the intriguing new paper
by Pei-Jung Lu and colleagues regarding a role for mitosis-related
Pin1 protein in tau protein biochemistry (ref. 7). The
paper argues for an interaction that is important in
both normal and Alzheimer's disease brain. Moreover,
it involves a (relatively) novel paradigm of protein-protein
interaction. This finding is of interest in many fields
of biosciences, but in an applied way could be most
germane to neurological conditions including Alzheimer's
disease
The purpose of this mini-review is to provide some background
into the different fields of biosciences that are pertinent
to an understanding of the abovementioned paper; to
discuss the paper itself; and to suggest some questions
and ideas for discussion on this web page and the accompanying
live chat.
When diverse scientific fields are brought together
in a novel advancement, sparks fly, and scientists rush
to the library to get background papers. The paper by
Lu and colleagues involves the biochemistry of the cell
cycle and related proteins; tau proteins, in normal
and Alzheimer states; and Pin1 and the paradigm of phosphorylation-dependent
prolyl isomerases. These separate "players" had given
some hints of interacting (e.g., as described below),
but never before in this direct manner.
The cell cycle refers to the process by which cells
and their genes regulate replication, division, differentiation
and apoptosis. There is a cyclic progression:
G0<-->G1(first "gap")-->S(DNA synth)--->G2(second
gap)--->M(mitosis)--->back to G1
This basic schema has been appreciated for years. In the past decade,
however, an almost staggering amount of information has been added to describe
how this cycle is regulated in healthy and diseased tissue. No doubt, more
will come.
Cell Cycle Proteins in Alzheimer's
Disease
The role of cell cycle proteins in Alzheimer's disease
has been both suggestive and puzzling. For one thing,
Alzheimer's disease presents clinically long after the
cell cycle in neurons "should" be frozen (in G0). Yet
cell cycle proteins have been detected via immunohistochemistry
along with Alzheimer's pathology in neurons.
For example, the following proteins have been detected
up-regulated in Alzheimer's-affected neurons relative
to controls: Ki-67 (an indicator of being out of the
G0 state), Cyclin D (at G1/S interface), and Cyclin
B1 (G2/M) (refs. 1,9,10). Other hints of mitotic activity
involve the familial Alzheimer's-related gene, presenilin
(ref. 6). If these neurons are not dividing, what are
they doing? Presumably, there is a link between how
cells divide and differentiate on the one hand, and
how they cope with injury on the other. In Alzheimer's
brain, there is apparently an up-regulation of pathways
reminiscent of cycling cells. It remains to be seen
if this response contributes to the health or further
injury of a given nerve cell, and if it exacerbates
the overall disease process.
Many of the cell cycle proteins are kinases, which attach
phosphate moieties to proteins. In 1996, Lu and colleagues
described a new paradigm for how protein "modules" (ref.6),
including so-called WW domains, can be employed to attach
one protein to another in a phosphorylation- dependent
manner (downstream of kinase action). This paradigm
had been foreshadowed by the manner in which SH2 domains
facilitate binding when one protein contains a phosphorylated
tyrosine residue. However, WW domains involve phosphorylated
serines or threonines, and the WW domain interaction
causes an "isomerase" bending of the affected protein
molecule. Since the WW domains are a module that can
attach to any protein, they are quite versatile.
Protein 1----------Phosphorylated Serine/Threonine
{protein-protein binding}
WW domain-mediated interaction----------------------Protein 2
{Change in Protein 2 function}
Pin1 (peptidyl-prolyl isomerase nucleoprotein) is an example of a versatile
protein that contains a WW domain (key references include refs.
2,3,4,6,7,8,12,13,14,15). Most of the known substrates to which Pin1 binds
through its WW domain are mitotic phosphoproteins. For example, Pin1 interacts
with phosphorylated kinases (e.g., myt1, plk1), phosphatases (e.g. Cdc27),
proteases (e.g. Nedd4), and the GTP binding protein Rab4. An important-seeming
interaction involves Cdc25 and plx1, upstream regulators of Cdc2/cyclin B, in
a manner that renders Pin1 an essential regulator of the cell cycle (too much
Pin1 leads to cell cycle arrest in G2; depletion of Pin1 causes arrest of
mitosis[ref.5]).
Summary of Paper Under Discussion
In the paper being presently discussed, Lu et al. provide
data consistent with the hypothesis that that Pin1 and
tau can interact with high specificity (ref.7). This
begs the question: is tau protein a "mitotic phosphoprotein"?
The prevailing hypotheses pertaining to tau protein
focus on its role in tubulin binding and the subsequent
seeding/bundling of microtubules. Through the effect
on microtubules, tau is thought to play a role in the
elaboration of neuronal processes (mainly the axon),
developmental axon plasticity, and the maintenance of
cell shape. However, some previous data support a connection
between tau protein and cell cycle biochemistry. Tau
protein has been shown to be:
- minimally phosphorylated in neuronal cell lines in culture during
interphase of cell division
- highly phosphorylated in the same cell lines during mitosis (ref.11)
- phosphorylated by cell cycle kinases
- present in the nuclei of cells under certain circumstances
- phosphorylated in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer's disease in the
same (as well as other) residues as during mitosis
These and other data imply a role for tau in cell cycle biochemistry
(moreover, there is a lot of data to suggest that tau proteins may play
other important roles in neuronal cell biology; remember, nature is
under no obligation to be simple!). Pei-Jung Lu and colleagues have greatly
extended the work connecting tau proteins and the cell cycle by the present
study involving Pin1 and tau (ref. 7). Their findings include:
- Tau proteins phosphorylated by mitotic Xenopus extracts (but not
by interphase extracts) bind to GST-bound Pin1 in a pull-down assay
- Likewise, AD tau but not normal tau binds GST-Pin1
- Pin-1 binds to AD neurofibrillary tangles in situ.
- Pin-1 is immunohistochemically found in normal neuronal nuclei
- Pin-1 binds with high specificity to a single phosphorylated threonine
residue on tau (pT231)
- Tau that has been phosphorylated by Cdc2 binds to GST-Pin1 via a WW
domain at pT231
- Cdc2-phosphorylated tau has reduced microtubule-forming capabilities
- Pin-1 binding of Cdc2-phosphorylated tau re-enables microtubule forming
capabilities
Kinases are differentially depleted in Alzheimer brain neurons; whereas
GSK-3-beta levels are relatively unchanged, and Cdc2 levels are increased,
Pin-1 levels are decreased by approximately a factor of 5, leading the authors
to posit that "sequestration of Pin-1 in PHFs depletes soluble Pin-1, which
itself might also have a deleterious effect."
Some Discussion Topics
Whether all of the findings in this study will "stand
up" to future critical analyses is unknown, obviously.
What does seem robust is the interaction between Pin1
and phosphorylated tau at the pT231 residue. T231 resides
in an evolutionarily well-conserved area of tau protein
N-terminal to the microtubule-binding repeats (there
are some mutations among mammalian species in residues
between T231 residue and the binding repeats) (ref.11).
This study, as good studies do, raises novel questions.
These include:
- What is the pharmacology of the interaction between Pin1 and tau (can it
be stimulated to improve the function of tau in Alzheimer's disease and
other disorders with tangles?)?
- Does this pathway have a direct role in cell death?
- How important a role does tau have in neuronal mitoses?
- Why is mitosis relevant at all in the context of mature neurons?
- Does Pin1 directly "seed" PHFs?
- What is the biochemistry of tau proteins in the nucleus, if any?
In addition to the direct relevance to Alzheimer's disease, the interaction
of Pin1 and tau is titillating to researchers interested in tau molecule
per se. Here is a novel mechanism that allows phosphorylated tau
protein to be added on, almost like a Lego piece, to any module-containing
protein. The implications are fantastic, almost limitless, to the applications
that can now be performed by tau. It could help to explain the many diverse
roles that have been suggested for tau (e.g. interactions with vesicles and
ribosomes), as it may also help to explain why tau is so finicky an antigen
in situ. It may seem complicated and daunting to think of now, but,
come to think of it, things tend to appear a bit simpler, in retrospect.
References
1. Busser J, Geldmacher DS, Herrup K. Ectopic cell cycle proteins predict
the sites of neuronal cell death in Alzheimer's disease brain. J.Neurosci.
1998 Apr 15;18:2801-2807. Abstract.
2. Campbell HD, Webb GC, Fountain S, Young IG. The human PIN1
peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase gene maps to human chromosome 19p13 and
the closely related PIN1L gene to 1p31. Genomics 1997 Sep 1;44:157-162. Abstract.
3. Crenshaw DG, Yang J, Means AR, Kornbluth S. The mitotic peptidyl-prolyl
isomerase, Pin1, interacts with Cdc25 and Plx1. EMBO J. 1998 Aug
10;17:1315-1327. Abstract.
4. Gothel SF, Marahiel MA. Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases, a
superfamily of ubiquitous folding catalysts. Cell Mol.Life Sci. 1999
Mar;55:423-436. Abstract.
5. Li,J.; Xu,M.; Zhou,H.; Ma,J.; Potter,H. Alzheimer presenilins in the
nuclear membrane, interphase kinetochores, and centrosomes suggest a role in
chromosome segregation. Cell 1997: 90:917-927. Abstract.
6. Lu KP, Hanes SD, Hunter T. A human peptidyl-prolyl isomerase essential
for regulation of mitosis. Nature 1996 Apr 11;380:544-547. Abstract.
7. Lu, Pei-Jung, Wulf, Gerburg, Zhou, Xiao Zhen, Davies, Peter, and and Lu,
Kun Ping. The propyl isomerase Pin1 restores the function of
Alzheimer-associated phosphorylated tau protein. Nature 399, 784-788. 1999 Jun
24. Abstract.
8. Lu PJ, Zhou XZ, Shen M, Lu KP. Function of WW domains as phosphoserine-
or phosphothreonine-binding modules. Science 1999 Feb 26;283:1325-1328. Abstract.
9. Nagy Z, Esiri MM, Cato AM, Smith AD. Cell cycle markers in the
hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol.(Berl.) 1997 Jul;94:6-15.
Abstract.
10. Nagy, Z, Esiri MM, Smith AD. Expression of cell division markers in the
hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative conditions.
Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) 1997 Mar; 93: 294-300. Abstract.
11. Nelson, P.T., Stefansson, K., Gulcher, J., Saper, C.B. Molecular
evolution of Tau protein: implications for Alzheimer's disease. J. Neurochem.
1996 Oct; 67:1622-1632. Abstract.
12. Preuss U, Doring F, Illenberger S, Mandelkow EM. Cell cycle-dependent
phosphorylation and microtubule binding of tau protein stably transfected into
Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol.Biol.Cell 1995 Oct;6:1397-1410. Abstract.
13. Ranganathan R, Lu KP, Hunter T, Noel JP. Structural and functional
analysis of the mitotic rotamase Pin1 suggests substrate recognition is
phosphorylation dependent. Cell 1997 Jun 13; 89:875-886. Abstract.
14. Shen M, Stukenberg PT, Kirschner MW, Lu KP. The essential mitotic
peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1 binds and regulates mitosis-specific
phosphoproteins. Genes Dev. 1998 Mar 1;12:706-720. Abstract.
15. Yaffe MB, Schutkowski M, Shen M, et al. Sequence-specific and
phosphorylation-dependent proline isomerization: a potential mitotic
regulatory mechanism. Science 1997 Dec 12;278:1957-1960. Abstract.
|
|
|
Submit a Comment on this Live Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|