Ramírez BG, Blázquez C, Gómez del Pulgar T, Guzmán M, de Ceballos ML.
Prevention of Alzheimer's disease pathology by cannabinoids: neuroprotection mediated by blockade of microglial activation.
J Neurosci. 2005 Feb 23;25(8):1904-13.
PubMed.
This is an excellent paper and it markedly focuses on the importance of both reactive gliosis and the cannabinoid receptor involvement in Alzheimer disease. Targeting reactive gliosis may represent a new, promising approach to inhibit progression of Alzheimer disease (AD). It should be interesting to see in the future the effect of β amyloid on reactive gliosis and relative CB2 expression in specific hippocampal areas. Moreover, a possible cross-talk between specific CA1, CA2, and CA3 neurons with reactive microglia needs further investigation.
This is probably the best paper on the subject I have seen yet. If CB1 receptors in the brain could be utilized in programmed cell death we could have a brilliant first step in finding a cure for AD. And since antibodies and complement proteins are involved in response to amyloid, CB2 receptors could be manipulated to downregulate cytokines MHC, HLA, and MAC (major histocompatibility molecule, human leuokocyte antigen, membrane attack complex, respectively).
Furthermore, this could also provide a new way of changing expression of protein kinases, phosphatases, ER response to stress. THC could prove very useful in preserving, returning, and even increasing neuronal functions and thus memory and functioning in society. On a final note, glia have been found themselves to be imperative to learning and transmitting messages to neurons. Superb paper!
Considering data from Ramírez et al. (2005), we can effectively conclude that the endocannabinoid system may be a promising therapeutic target in Alzheimer disease (AD). This report shows the first functional evidence on neuroprotective effects of CB1 and CB2 agonists in in vivo and in vitro models of AD. Further, these authors have found that both CB1 and CB2 agonists are capable of preventing amyloid-β-induced microglial activation and improving behavioral performance in a rat model of AD. Although difficult to connect with results obtained in rats, data from human samples showed a decrease in CB1 functional coupling. The authors also indicate that CB1 protein seems to be decreased in neuronal elements located on the vicinity of BA plaques.
This paper contains some discrepancies with previous data reported by us and others. For instance, while we recently reported CB2 expression in microglial cells in amyloid-β plaques (Benito et al., 2003), Ramírez et al. show only neuronal staining for these receptors. Further, these new data add more controversy to the precise role(s) that CB1 and CB2 receptors may play in pathological conditions. Specifically, the pro- or antiinflammatory effect of CB2 activation is a hot issue. Cece Hillard´s (Carrier et al., 2004) and Nephi Stella´s (Walter et al., 2003) groups have reported increased in vitro proliferation and migration of microglia, respectively, while Klegeris et al. (2003) have postulated CB2 receptors as mediators of antiinflammatory events.
One important question that should be addressed is the role of endogenous cannabinoids in AD. As we suggested in a previous paper (Pazos et al., 2004), these arachidonic acid-related compounds may have a double-sided role as, together with their recognized antiinflammatory properties, they may also be easily metabolized to arachidonic acid derivatives, well-known for their proinflammatory actions.
Researchers working on cannabinoids are used to the amplification of experimental results by mass media. In fact, sometimes we all get benefits from it. Other times, however, misleading information may result. I agree this may be the case for a sentence like, “Marijuana may block Alzheimer´s.”
References:
Ramírez BG, Blázquez C, Gómez del Pulgar T, Guzmán M, de Ceballos ML.
Prevention of Alzheimer's disease pathology by cannabinoids: neuroprotection mediated by blockade of microglial activation.
J Neurosci. 2005 Feb 23;25(8):1904-13.
PubMed.
Benito C, Núñez E, Tolón RM, Carrier EJ, Rábano A, Hillard CJ, Romero J.
Cannabinoid CB2 receptors and fatty acid amide hydrolase are selectively overexpressed in neuritic plaque-associated glia in Alzheimer's disease brains.
J Neurosci. 2003 Dec 3;23(35):11136-41.
PubMed.
Carrier EJ, Kearn CS, Barkmeier AJ, Breese NM, Yang W, Nithipatikom K, Pfister SL, Campbell WB, Hillard CJ.
Cultured rat microglial cells synthesize the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol, which increases proliferation via a CB2 receptor-dependent mechanism.
Mol Pharmacol. 2004 Apr;65(4):999-1007.
PubMed.
Walter L, Franklin A, Witting A, Wade C, Xie Y, Kunos G, Mackie K, Stella N.
Nonpsychotropic cannabinoid receptors regulate microglial cell migration.
J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;23(4):1398-405.
PubMed.
Klegeris A, Bissonnette CJ, McGeer PL.
Reduction of human monocytic cell neurotoxicity and cytokine secretion by ligands of the cannabinoid-type CB2 receptor.
Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;139(4):775-86.
PubMed.
Pazos MR, Núñez E, Benito C, Tolón RM, Romero J.
Role of the endocannabinoid system in Alzheimer's disease: new perspectives.
Life Sci. 2004 Sep 3;75(16):1907-15.
PubMed.
Comment by Pat McGeer and Andis Klegeris
Ramirez et al., in their paper on prevention of Alzheimer disease pathology by cannabinoids, concluded that “cannabinoids succeed in preventing the neurodegenerative process occurring in the disease.” This conclusion is open to question. It is based on a series of experiments demonstrating the antiinflammatory effects of stimulating CB2 receptors. However, the authors did not investigate the effects of stimulating selectively CB1 receptors.
Cannabinoids such as Δ-9 THC stimulate both CB1 and CB2 receptors. CB1 agonists are toxic to several types of neuronal cells in vitro (Blevins and Regan, 1976; Chan et al., 1998; Klegeris et al., 2003; Lew, 1996). In vivo data show that Δ-9 THC can cause neuronal death after prolonged exposure periods (Scallet, 1991). Heavy use of cannabis is also known to have deleterious effects on cognition and memory (Pope and Yurgelun-Todd, 1996; Solowij et al., 2002), despite some reports of the neuroprotective effects of cannabinoids (for review see Guzman et al., 2001).
Ramirez et al. reported a reduction of CB1-expressing neurons in AD, which would be consistent with the previous data on the deleterious effects of CB1 stimulation. Destruction of neurons in AD could be enhanced by endogenous CB1 agonists such as anandamide.
Ligands selective for CB2, such as JWH 015 and indomethacin morpholinylamide are a safer class to pursue in search of antiinflammatory agents for the treatment of AD. CB2 is strongly expressed by immune system cells (Cabral and Dove Pettit, 1998; Klein et al., 1998), including human and rodent microglia (Klegeris et al., 2003; Walter et al., 2003), but it is not expressed by human neuroblastoma SH SY5Y cells (Klegeris et al., 2003). Agonists of CB2, but not CB1, prevent activated microglia from secreting neurotoxic materials into culture supernatant (Klegeris et al., 2003), reinforcing previous reports of their antiinflammatory activity.
In summary, cannabis ingredients stimulate both CB1 and CB2, so they have the potential to damage neurons directly, even though they may also protect them indirectly. The best approach is to concentrate on selective CB2 agonists.
References:
Blevins RD, Regan JD.
delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol: effect on macromolecular synthesis in human and other mammalian cells.
Arch Toxicol. 1976 Mar 11;35(2):127-35.
PubMed.
Cabral GA, Dove Pettit DA.
Drugs and immunity: cannabinoids and their role in decreased resistance to infectious disease.
J Neuroimmunol. 1998 Mar 15;83(1-2):116-23.
PubMed.
Chan GC, Hinds TR, Impey S, Storm DR.
Hippocampal neurotoxicity of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol.
J Neurosci. 1998 Jul 15;18(14):5322-32.
PubMed.
Guzmán M, Sánchez C, Galve-Roperh I.
Control of the cell survival/death decision by cannabinoids.
J Mol Med (Berl). 2001;78(11):613-25.
PubMed.
Klegeris A, Bissonnette CJ, McGeer PL.
Reduction of human monocytic cell neurotoxicity and cytokine secretion by ligands of the cannabinoid-type CB2 receptor.
Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;139(4):775-86.
PubMed.
Klein TW, Newton C, Friedman H.
Cannabinoid receptors and immunity.
Immunol Today. 1998 Aug;19(8):373-81.
PubMed.
Lew GM.
Tau protein after delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in a human neuroblastoma cell line.
Gen Pharmacol. 1996 Oct;27(7):1141-3.
PubMed.
Pope HG, Yurgelun-Todd D.
The residual cognitive effects of heavy marijuana use in college students.
JAMA. 1996 Feb 21;275(7):521-7.
PubMed.
Scallet AC.
Neurotoxicology of cannabis and THC: a review of chronic exposure studies in animals.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991 Nov;40(3):671-6.
PubMed.
Solowij N, Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Babor T, Kadden R, Miller M, Christiansen K, McRee B, Vendetti J, .
Cognitive functioning of long-term heavy cannabis users seeking treatment.
JAMA. 2002 Mar 6;287(9):1123-31.
PubMed.
Walter L, Franklin A, Witting A, Wade C, Xie Y, Kunos G, Mackie K, Stella N.
Nonpsychotropic cannabinoid receptors regulate microglial cell migration.
J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;23(4):1398-405.
PubMed.
Pat McGeer makes an interesting point, but further review of the research shows that agonists of CB1 receptors can in fact be neuroprotective. It is quite possible to manipulate CB1 receptors to induce apoptosis in affected neurons (i.e. those with amyloid deposits). In vivo experiments have suggested possible therapeutic treatments utilizing CB1 receptors.
Some experiments point to damge caused by overstimulation of CB2 receptors, as well, but more research is needed to properly utilize agonist/antagonist signals to manipulate the immune response in AD patients. Check out some of the research coming out of Canada as early as 1998. Fatty acid cannabinoid-like brain chemicals show much promise in helping treat AD, slowing progression, and possibly devloping new preventive measures.
This is a very well-designed study that adds up to the accumulating evidence on cannabinoid-mediated neuroprotection. It shows many aspects of their beneficial effects, in experimental models (both in-vitro and in-vivo), and highlights the effect of cannabinoids on activated microglia, namely, on inflammatory processes. The experimental findings are supported by findings from clinical material of AD patients, and the authors propose that attenuation of long-lasting inflammatory reaction by cannabinoids may prevent neurodegenerative processes.
Studies from our own (Panikashvili et al. 2001; 2005) and many other laboratories well agree with this concept. Yet, in contrast to the large body of evidence suggesting a neuroprotective role of cannabinoids, another paper should be cited that, like Pat McGeer’s group, reports the toxic effect of anandamide {“The dark side of endocannabinoids” : A neurotoxic role for anandamide, (Cernak et al., 2004)). I am not sure yet how to reconcile between these conflicting data.
Our group is interested in the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and we study the role of cannabinoids, both endogenous and exogenous, in closed head injury, a mouse model of TBI. We have reported that the levels of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) increased 10-fold within 4 hours after injury in mice, and that when injected after injury, the synthetic 2-AG improved outcome (Panikashvili et al., 2001). We extended our studies and showed that this effect is indeed CB1 receptor mediated by using CB1 knockout (KO) mice. The recovery of the KO mice was slower than that of the wild-types, and they did not respond to treatment with exogenous 2-AG (Panikashvili et al. 2005 ). The mechanism proposed in our recent study (Panikashvili et al. 2005) is that 2-AG inhibits the activation (nuclear translocation) of the transcription factor NF-kappaB, which is a “master” regulator of the inflammatory response. NF-kappaB has been shown to be involved in brain damage and to promote neuronal cell death in in-vitro and in in-vivo models of ischemic and neurodegenerative neurological diseases. Thus, the inhibition of TNFαrelease reported by Ramirez et al. is well explained by the inhibition of NF-kappaB, as shown for 2-AG (our own findings) and HU-211 (dexanabinol) by Juttler et al. (2004). However, the latter authors show that inhibition of NF-kappaB by cannabinoids is not mediated via the CB1 or CB2 receptors. In addition, we found (Panikashvili et al., abstract presented at 2004 Neuroscience meeting, and full paper submitted for publication) that 2-AG inhibited the acute (1-4 h) post traumatic expression of the main proinflammatory cytokines: TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6.
In conclusion, the study by Ramirez et al is an important contribution to the field of cannabinoids as neuroprotective agents, and, supported by others, strongly favors its anti-inflammatory effects as one of its mechanism of action.
References:
Cernak I, Vink R, Natale J, Stoica B, Lea PM 4th, Movsesyan V, Ahmed F, Knoblach SM, Fricke ST, Faden AI.
The "dark side" of endocannabinoids: a neurotoxic role for anandamide.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004 May;24(5):564-78.
PubMed.
Jüttler E, Potrovita I, Tarabin V, Prinz S, Dong-Si T, Fink G, Schwaninger M.
The cannabinoid dexanabinol is an inhibitor of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B).
Neuropharmacology. 2004 Sep;47(4):580-92.
PubMed.
Panikashvili D, Simeonidou C, Ben-Shabat S, Hanus L, Breuer A, Mechoulam R, Shohami E.
An endogenous cannabinoid (2-AG) is neuroprotective after brain injury.
Nature. 2001 Oct 4;413(6855):527-31.
PubMed.
Panikashvili D, Mechoulam R, Beni SM, Alexandrovich A, Shohami E.
CB1 cannabinoid receptors are involved in neuroprotection via NF-kappa B inhibition.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005 Apr;25(4):477-84.
PubMed.
Comments
Faculty of Pharmacy University "Federico II"
This is an excellent paper and it markedly focuses on the importance of both reactive gliosis and the cannabinoid receptor involvement in Alzheimer disease. Targeting reactive gliosis may represent a new, promising approach to inhibit progression of Alzheimer disease (AD). It should be interesting to see in the future the effect of β amyloid on reactive gliosis and relative CB2 expression in specific hippocampal areas. Moreover, a possible cross-talk between specific CA1, CA2, and CA3 neurons with reactive microglia needs further investigation.
View all comments by Giuseppe Espositobio-chemistry-psychology/neuroscience graduate.
This is probably the best paper on the subject I have seen yet. If CB1 receptors in the brain could be utilized in programmed cell death we could have a brilliant first step in finding a cure for AD. And since antibodies and complement proteins are involved in response to amyloid, CB2 receptors could be manipulated to downregulate cytokines MHC, HLA, and MAC (major histocompatibility molecule, human leuokocyte antigen, membrane attack complex, respectively).
Furthermore, this could also provide a new way of changing expression of protein kinases, phosphatases, ER response to stress. THC could prove very useful in preserving, returning, and even increasing neuronal functions and thus memory and functioning in society. On a final note, glia have been found themselves to be imperative to learning and transmitting messages to neurons. Superb paper!
View all comments by Jacob MackConsidering data from Ramírez et al. (2005), we can effectively conclude that the endocannabinoid system may be a promising therapeutic target in Alzheimer disease (AD). This report shows the first functional evidence on neuroprotective effects of CB1 and CB2 agonists in in vivo and in vitro models of AD. Further, these authors have found that both CB1 and CB2 agonists are capable of preventing amyloid-β-induced microglial activation and improving behavioral performance in a rat model of AD. Although difficult to connect with results obtained in rats, data from human samples showed a decrease in CB1 functional coupling. The authors also indicate that CB1 protein seems to be decreased in neuronal elements located on the vicinity of BA plaques.
This paper contains some discrepancies with previous data reported by us and others. For instance, while we recently reported CB2 expression in microglial cells in amyloid-β plaques (Benito et al., 2003), Ramírez et al. show only neuronal staining for these receptors. Further, these new data add more controversy to the precise role(s) that CB1 and CB2 receptors may play in pathological conditions. Specifically, the pro- or antiinflammatory effect of CB2 activation is a hot issue. Cece Hillard´s (Carrier et al., 2004) and Nephi Stella´s (Walter et al., 2003) groups have reported increased in vitro proliferation and migration of microglia, respectively, while Klegeris et al. (2003) have postulated CB2 receptors as mediators of antiinflammatory events.
One important question that should be addressed is the role of endogenous cannabinoids in AD. As we suggested in a previous paper (Pazos et al., 2004), these arachidonic acid-related compounds may have a double-sided role as, together with their recognized antiinflammatory properties, they may also be easily metabolized to arachidonic acid derivatives, well-known for their proinflammatory actions.
Researchers working on cannabinoids are used to the amplification of experimental results by mass media. In fact, sometimes we all get benefits from it. Other times, however, misleading information may result. I agree this may be the case for a sentence like, “Marijuana may block Alzheimer´s.”
References:
Ramírez BG, Blázquez C, Gómez del Pulgar T, Guzmán M, de Ceballos ML. Prevention of Alzheimer's disease pathology by cannabinoids: neuroprotection mediated by blockade of microglial activation. J Neurosci. 2005 Feb 23;25(8):1904-13. PubMed.
Benito C, Núñez E, Tolón RM, Carrier EJ, Rábano A, Hillard CJ, Romero J. Cannabinoid CB2 receptors and fatty acid amide hydrolase are selectively overexpressed in neuritic plaque-associated glia in Alzheimer's disease brains. J Neurosci. 2003 Dec 3;23(35):11136-41. PubMed.
Carrier EJ, Kearn CS, Barkmeier AJ, Breese NM, Yang W, Nithipatikom K, Pfister SL, Campbell WB, Hillard CJ. Cultured rat microglial cells synthesize the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol, which increases proliferation via a CB2 receptor-dependent mechanism. Mol Pharmacol. 2004 Apr;65(4):999-1007. PubMed.
Walter L, Franklin A, Witting A, Wade C, Xie Y, Kunos G, Mackie K, Stella N. Nonpsychotropic cannabinoid receptors regulate microglial cell migration. J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;23(4):1398-405. PubMed.
Klegeris A, Bissonnette CJ, McGeer PL. Reduction of human monocytic cell neurotoxicity and cytokine secretion by ligands of the cannabinoid-type CB2 receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;139(4):775-86. PubMed.
Pazos MR, Núñez E, Benito C, Tolón RM, Romero J. Role of the endocannabinoid system in Alzheimer's disease: new perspectives. Life Sci. 2004 Sep 3;75(16):1907-15. PubMed.
View all comments by Julian RomeroComment by Pat McGeer and Andis Klegeris
Ramirez et al., in their paper on prevention of Alzheimer disease pathology by cannabinoids, concluded that “cannabinoids succeed in preventing the neurodegenerative process occurring in the disease.” This conclusion is open to question. It is based on a series of experiments demonstrating the antiinflammatory effects of stimulating CB2 receptors. However, the authors did not investigate the effects of stimulating selectively CB1 receptors.
Cannabinoids such as Δ-9 THC stimulate both CB1 and CB2 receptors. CB1 agonists are toxic to several types of neuronal cells in vitro (Blevins and Regan, 1976; Chan et al., 1998; Klegeris et al., 2003; Lew, 1996). In vivo data show that Δ-9 THC can cause neuronal death after prolonged exposure periods (Scallet, 1991). Heavy use of cannabis is also known to have deleterious effects on cognition and memory (Pope and Yurgelun-Todd, 1996; Solowij et al., 2002), despite some reports of the neuroprotective effects of cannabinoids (for review see Guzman et al., 2001).
Ramirez et al. reported a reduction of CB1-expressing neurons in AD, which would be consistent with the previous data on the deleterious effects of CB1 stimulation. Destruction of neurons in AD could be enhanced by endogenous CB1 agonists such as anandamide.
Ligands selective for CB2, such as JWH 015 and indomethacin morpholinylamide are a safer class to pursue in search of antiinflammatory agents for the treatment of AD. CB2 is strongly expressed by immune system cells (Cabral and Dove Pettit, 1998; Klein et al., 1998), including human and rodent microglia (Klegeris et al., 2003; Walter et al., 2003), but it is not expressed by human neuroblastoma SH SY5Y cells (Klegeris et al., 2003). Agonists of CB2, but not CB1, prevent activated microglia from secreting neurotoxic materials into culture supernatant (Klegeris et al., 2003), reinforcing previous reports of their antiinflammatory activity.
In summary, cannabis ingredients stimulate both CB1 and CB2, so they have the potential to damage neurons directly, even though they may also protect them indirectly. The best approach is to concentrate on selective CB2 agonists.
References:
Blevins RD, Regan JD. delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol: effect on macromolecular synthesis in human and other mammalian cells. Arch Toxicol. 1976 Mar 11;35(2):127-35. PubMed.
Cabral GA, Dove Pettit DA. Drugs and immunity: cannabinoids and their role in decreased resistance to infectious disease. J Neuroimmunol. 1998 Mar 15;83(1-2):116-23. PubMed.
Chan GC, Hinds TR, Impey S, Storm DR. Hippocampal neurotoxicity of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol. J Neurosci. 1998 Jul 15;18(14):5322-32. PubMed.
Guzmán M, Sánchez C, Galve-Roperh I. Control of the cell survival/death decision by cannabinoids. J Mol Med (Berl). 2001;78(11):613-25. PubMed.
Klegeris A, Bissonnette CJ, McGeer PL. Reduction of human monocytic cell neurotoxicity and cytokine secretion by ligands of the cannabinoid-type CB2 receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;139(4):775-86. PubMed.
Klein TW, Newton C, Friedman H. Cannabinoid receptors and immunity. Immunol Today. 1998 Aug;19(8):373-81. PubMed.
Lew GM. Tau protein after delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in a human neuroblastoma cell line. Gen Pharmacol. 1996 Oct;27(7):1141-3. PubMed.
Pope HG, Yurgelun-Todd D. The residual cognitive effects of heavy marijuana use in college students. JAMA. 1996 Feb 21;275(7):521-7. PubMed.
Scallet AC. Neurotoxicology of cannabis and THC: a review of chronic exposure studies in animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991 Nov;40(3):671-6. PubMed.
Solowij N, Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Babor T, Kadden R, Miller M, Christiansen K, McRee B, Vendetti J, . Cognitive functioning of long-term heavy cannabis users seeking treatment. JAMA. 2002 Mar 6;287(9):1123-31. PubMed.
Walter L, Franklin A, Witting A, Wade C, Xie Y, Kunos G, Mackie K, Stella N. Nonpsychotropic cannabinoid receptors regulate microglial cell migration. J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;23(4):1398-405. PubMed.
View all comments by Pat McGeerbio-chemistry-psychology/neuroscience graduate.
Pat McGeer makes an interesting point, but further review of the research shows that agonists of CB1 receptors can in fact be neuroprotective. It is quite possible to manipulate CB1 receptors to induce apoptosis in affected neurons (i.e. those with amyloid deposits). In vivo experiments have suggested possible therapeutic treatments utilizing CB1 receptors.
Some experiments point to damge caused by overstimulation of CB2 receptors, as well, but more research is needed to properly utilize agonist/antagonist signals to manipulate the immune response in AD patients. Check out some of the research coming out of Canada as early as 1998. Fatty acid cannabinoid-like brain chemicals show much promise in helping treat AD, slowing progression, and possibly devloping new preventive measures.
View all comments by Jacob MackThe Hebrew University School of Pharmacy
This is a very well-designed study that adds up to the accumulating evidence on cannabinoid-mediated neuroprotection. It shows many aspects of their beneficial effects, in experimental models (both in-vitro and in-vivo), and highlights the effect of cannabinoids on activated microglia, namely, on inflammatory processes. The experimental findings are supported by findings from clinical material of AD patients, and the authors propose that attenuation of long-lasting inflammatory reaction by cannabinoids may prevent neurodegenerative processes.
Studies from our own (Panikashvili et al. 2001; 2005) and many other laboratories well agree with this concept. Yet, in contrast to the large body of evidence suggesting a neuroprotective role of cannabinoids, another paper should be cited that, like Pat McGeer’s group, reports the toxic effect of anandamide {“The dark side of endocannabinoids” : A neurotoxic role for anandamide, (Cernak et al., 2004)). I am not sure yet how to reconcile between these conflicting data.
Our group is interested in the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and we study the role of cannabinoids, both endogenous and exogenous, in closed head injury, a mouse model of TBI. We have reported that the levels of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) increased 10-fold within 4 hours after injury in mice, and that when injected after injury, the synthetic 2-AG improved outcome (Panikashvili et al., 2001). We extended our studies and showed that this effect is indeed CB1 receptor mediated by using CB1 knockout (KO) mice. The recovery of the KO mice was slower than that of the wild-types, and they did not respond to treatment with exogenous 2-AG (Panikashvili et al. 2005 ). The mechanism proposed in our recent study (Panikashvili et al. 2005) is that 2-AG inhibits the activation (nuclear translocation) of the transcription factor NF-kappaB, which is a “master” regulator of the inflammatory response. NF-kappaB has been shown to be involved in brain damage and to promote neuronal cell death in in-vitro and in in-vivo models of ischemic and neurodegenerative neurological diseases. Thus, the inhibition of TNFαrelease reported by Ramirez et al. is well explained by the inhibition of NF-kappaB, as shown for 2-AG (our own findings) and HU-211 (dexanabinol) by Juttler et al. (2004). However, the latter authors show that inhibition of NF-kappaB by cannabinoids is not mediated via the CB1 or CB2 receptors. In addition, we found (Panikashvili et al., abstract presented at 2004 Neuroscience meeting, and full paper submitted for publication) that 2-AG inhibited the acute (1-4 h) post traumatic expression of the main proinflammatory cytokines: TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6.
In conclusion, the study by Ramirez et al is an important contribution to the field of cannabinoids as neuroprotective agents, and, supported by others, strongly favors its anti-inflammatory effects as one of its mechanism of action.
References:
Cernak I, Vink R, Natale J, Stoica B, Lea PM 4th, Movsesyan V, Ahmed F, Knoblach SM, Fricke ST, Faden AI. The "dark side" of endocannabinoids: a neurotoxic role for anandamide. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004 May;24(5):564-78. PubMed.
Jüttler E, Potrovita I, Tarabin V, Prinz S, Dong-Si T, Fink G, Schwaninger M. The cannabinoid dexanabinol is an inhibitor of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B). Neuropharmacology. 2004 Sep;47(4):580-92. PubMed.
Panikashvili D, Simeonidou C, Ben-Shabat S, Hanus L, Breuer A, Mechoulam R, Shohami E. An endogenous cannabinoid (2-AG) is neuroprotective after brain injury. Nature. 2001 Oct 4;413(6855):527-31. PubMed.
Panikashvili D, Mechoulam R, Beni SM, Alexandrovich A, Shohami E. CB1 cannabinoid receptors are involved in neuroprotection via NF-kappa B inhibition. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005 Apr;25(4):477-84. PubMed.
View all comments by Esther ShohamiMake a Comment
To make a comment you must login or register.