Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: Papers of the Week
Annotation


Kosmidis S, Grammenoudi S, Papanikolopoulou K, Skoulakis EM. Differential effects of Tau on the integrity and function of neurons essential for learning in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 13;30(2):464-77. PubMed Abstract

Comments on Paper and Primary News
  Comment by:  Andre Delacourte
Submitted 24 January 2010  |  Permalink Posted 26 January 2010
  I recommend this paper

  Comment by:  Jurgen Goetz, ARF Advisor
Submitted 27 January 2010  |  Permalink Posted 28 January 2010
  I recommend this paper

This is interesting, also in the context of the Steinhilb/Feany publication (which is discussed in the article) on concerted action of tau phosphorylation sites rather than specific sites playing a role.

View all comments by Jurgen Goetz

  Comment by:  Ayodeji Asuni
Submitted 29 January 2010  |  Permalink Posted 1 February 2010
  I recommend this paper
  Submit a Comment on this Paper
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this paper. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend this paper

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
 
 

REAGENTS/MATERIAL:
Immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections was performed essentially as described previously. Rabbit anti-LEO/Leonardo (Skoulakis and Davis, 1996) was used at 1:4000 and rabbit anti-DRK (Moressis A, Friedrich AR, et al, 2009) at 1:1500. Sections from all strains were obtained and processed in parallel in each experiment and were evaluated for MB morphology without knowledge of the genotype. The anti-ELAV (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) was used at 1:200 and anti-DAC was used at 1:8.
For Western blotting, Drosophila tissue (adult heads, embryos, or larvae) were homogenized in 1x Laemli's buffer, and the extracts were heated for 10 min at 95°C, centrifuged at 8000 x g for 5 min, and separated in SDS-acrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and probed with mouse monoclonal anti-Tau 46 (Zymed Laboratories), which targets the C terminus of the protein at 1:3000, and mouse monoclonal TAU5 (Calbiochem), which targets the proline-rich domain (PRD), mouse monoclonal anti-tau AT100 (Pierce Endogen) at 1:250, the polyclonal rabbit antibodies anti-tau pS262, anti-tau pS356, and anti-Paired Helical Filament (PHF) (Biosource), and monoclonal antibody AT8 (kindly provided by A. Mudher) was used at 1:200. To normalize for sample loading, the membranes were concurrently probed with mouse monoclonal anti-syntaxin (8C3) (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). Proteins were visualized with chemiluminescence.
We thank A. Mudher (University of Southampton, Southampton, UK), and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA) for antibodies.

Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad