 |
 |
Schroeter S, Khan K, Barbour R, Doan M, Chen M, Guido T, Gill D, Basi G, Schenk D, Seubert P, Games D.
Immunotherapy reduces vascular amyloid-beta in PDAPP mice. J Neurosci.
2008 Jul 2;28(27):6787-93.
PubMed Abstract
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Comments on Paper and Primary News |
 |
  |
| |
Comment by: Roxana O. Carare, Roy O. Weller
|
 |
 |
Submitted 15 July 2008
| Permalink
|
Posted 15 July 2008
|
 |
 |
Prevention Rather Than Cure of CAA May Be the Best Way Forward
Increased severity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) has been highlighted as a complication of immunotherapy for Alzheimer disease in both human subjects (1) and in transgenic mouse models (2). In their paper in The Journal of Neuroscience, Sally Schroeter et al. showed that passive immunization of 12-month-old PDAPP transgenic mice with the 3D6 antibody directed against the N-terminal of the Aβ molecule prevented deposition or cleared Aβ from artery walls in a dose-dependent manner. At the moment, however, it is not clear whether Aβ was eliminated from artery walls by macrophages, analogous to the removal of Aβ plaques from brain parenchyma by microglia (1), or by some other mechanism. Perivascular microhemorrhages were increased in animals treated with the higher dose of the antibody. Fewer hemorrhages were detected at lower doses of the 3D6 antibody, although clearance of Aβ was not as complete.
By treating the PDAPP transgenic mice with passive immunization at the relatively early age of 12...
Read more
Prevention Rather Than Cure of CAA May Be the Best Way Forward
Increased severity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) has been highlighted as a complication of immunotherapy for Alzheimer disease in both human subjects (1) and in transgenic mouse models (2). In their paper in The Journal of Neuroscience, Sally Schroeter et al. showed that passive immunization of 12-month-old PDAPP transgenic mice with the 3D6 antibody directed against the N-terminal of the Aβ molecule prevented deposition or cleared Aβ from artery walls in a dose-dependent manner. At the moment, however, it is not clear whether Aβ was eliminated from artery walls by macrophages, analogous to the removal of Aβ plaques from brain parenchyma by microglia (1), or by some other mechanism. Perivascular microhemorrhages were increased in animals treated with the higher dose of the antibody. Fewer hemorrhages were detected at lower doses of the 3D6 antibody, although clearance of Aβ was not as complete.
By treating the PDAPP transgenic mice with passive immunization at the relatively early age of 12 months, Schroeter and her colleagues have emphasized the importance of preventing the deposition of Aβ in vessel walls rather than removing it. CAA appears to have two major complications. One is the replacement of smooth muscle cells by Aβ that may result in intracerebral hemorrhage or may interfere with autoregulation of cerebral blood flow. The other complication is the blockage of pathways by which interstitial fluid and solutes drain from the brain.
Basement membranes between vascular smooth muscle cells are the perivascular route by which interstitial fluid and solutes, such as Aβ, drain out of the brain (3). In the early stages of CAA, fibrils of insoluble Aβ are deposited within vascular basement membranes and disrupt the structure of the basement membranes involved (4,5). The effects of basement membrane disruption in CAA on the drainage of fluid and solutes from the brain has not been quantified, but it does seem to be associated with deposition of Aβ plaques in gray matter and with increased fluid retention in cerebral white matter (6). It is probable that the elimination of other brain metabolites, in addition to Aβ, is blocked in CAA, leading to a loss of homeostasis of the neuronal environment and possible neuronal malfunction. Thus, it could be vital for normal functioning of the brain to preserve the structure of vascular basement membranes by preventing the deposition of Aβ. In this way, the integrity of the drainage pathways for solutes and fluid from the brain would be maintained. Preserving vascular basement membranes is one reason why the approach of Schroeter et al. in preventing CAA could be so valuable in the management of Alzheimer disease.
References: 1. Nicoll JA, Wilkinson D, Holmes C, Steart P, Markham H, Weller RO. Neuropathology of human Alzheimer disease after immunization with amyloid-beta peptide: a case report. Nat Med 2003;9:448-52. Abstract
2. Wilcock DM, Rojiani A, Rosenthal A, Subbarao S, Freeman MJ, Gordon MN, Morgan D. Passive immunotherapy against Abeta in aged APP-transgenic mice reverses cognitive deficits and depletes parenchymal amyloid deposits in spite of increased vascular amyloid and microhemorrhage. J Neuroinflammation 2004;1:24. Abstract
3. Carare RO, Bernardes-Silva M, Newman TA, Page AM, Nicoll JAR, Perry VH, Weller RO. Solutes, but not cells, drain from the brain parenchyma along basement membranes of capillaries and arteries. Significance for cerebral amyloid angiopathy and neuroimmunology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2008;34:131-44. Abstract
4. Preston S D, Steart PV, Wilkinson A, Nicoll JAR, Weller RO. Capillary and arterial amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer's disease: Defining the perivascular route for the elimination of amyloid beta from the human brain. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2003;29:106-17. Abstract
5. Weller RO, Subash M, Preston SD, Mazanti I, Carare RO. Perivascular Drainage of Amyloid-beta Peptides from the Brain and Its Failure in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Alzheimer's Disease. Brain Pathol 2008;18:253-66. Abstract
6. Roher AE, Kuo Y-M, Esh C, Knebel C, Weiss N, Kalback W, Luehrs DC, Childress JL, Beach TG, Weller RO, Kokjohn TA. Cortical and leptomeningeal cerebrovascular amyloid and white matter pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Med 2003;9:112-22. Abstract
View all comments by Roxana O. Carare
View all comments by Roy O. Weller
|
 |

|
| |
Comment by: Dave Morgan (Disclosure)
|
 |
 |
Submitted 15 July 2008
| Permalink
|
Posted 15 July 2008
|
 |
 |
The manuscript by Schroeter et al. demonstrates that even in middle-aged mice, anti-Aβ immunotherapy can cause increased vascular leakage. Importantly, the Schroeter et al. report indicates that high dose antibody treatment can prevent the formation of new vascular deposits and clear the existing deposits when treatment is continued for six months. Critically, they demonstrate that low doses of antibodies do not appear to increase microhemorrhage, although both the highest and the intermediate antibody doses did reduce/prevent the vascular deposits. Unfortunately, it appears from figure 3 and the results mentioned in the text that only the highest antibody dose succeeded in clearing the parenchymal deposits, presumably the target of anti-amyloid therapy. Prior reports showed that older mice harboring significant parenchymal amyloid deposits developed microhemorrhage when treated with one of several different anti-Aβ antibodies (Pfeifer et al., 2002; Wilcock et al., 2004; Racke et al., 2005; Wilcock et al., 2006). In some, but not all instances this modest amount of vascular...
Read more
The manuscript by Schroeter et al. demonstrates that even in middle-aged mice, anti-Aβ immunotherapy can cause increased vascular leakage. Importantly, the Schroeter et al. report indicates that high dose antibody treatment can prevent the formation of new vascular deposits and clear the existing deposits when treatment is continued for six months. Critically, they demonstrate that low doses of antibodies do not appear to increase microhemorrhage, although both the highest and the intermediate antibody doses did reduce/prevent the vascular deposits. Unfortunately, it appears from figure 3 and the results mentioned in the text that only the highest antibody dose succeeded in clearing the parenchymal deposits, presumably the target of anti-amyloid therapy. Prior reports showed that older mice harboring significant parenchymal amyloid deposits developed microhemorrhage when treated with one of several different anti-Aβ antibodies (Pfeifer et al., 2002; Wilcock et al., 2004; Racke et al., 2005; Wilcock et al., 2006). In some, but not all instances this modest amount of vascular leakage was associated with increased vascular amyloid deposits.
James Nicoll has mentioned that in autopsy cases from the Phase 1 Elan-Wyeth vaccine trial, both increased vascular amyloid and microhemorrhage were found at one to two years after the vaccine treatment. In fact, these observations were used as evidence that active clearance was occurring in those regions (presentation at New York Academy of Sciences, 24 March 2008). However, two patients coming to autopsy four years or more after the treatments had no apparent hemorrhages and both vascular and parenchymal amyloid deposits were cleared.
A major question regards whether the clearance of pre-existing parenchymal Aβ deposits by immunotherapy will lead to increased vascular deposits and/or microhemorrhage, especially in older individuals where vessels are less compliant. The available data, including those of Shroeter et al., suggest that effective clearance of parenchymal deposits leads initially to localized vascular leakage around vessels, possibly associated with increased vascular amyloid, but ultimately all deposits can be cleared, and the evidence of prior hemorrhage gradually disappears. Shroeter et al. argue that one can titrate the antibody dose to achieve sufficiently slow rates of clearance that the increased vascular leakage does not occur. However, they still do not provide evidence for a dosage that effectively reduces the parenchymal deposits without resulting in microhemorrhage. It would also be of value to have examined shorter survival times to check for an increase in vascular deposits earlier in the therapy.
Given these data, it is commendable that the Elan-Wyeth bapineuzumab trial is using low doses of antibody with infrequent dosing (every 90 days). While they run the risk of insufficient antibody exposure for a therapeutic effect, they also diminish the likelihood of adverse events associated with development of hemorrhage. I believe everyone hopes immunotherapy can be made safe and successful. The procedures to achieve this goal are already underway.
References: Pfeifer M, Boncristiano S, Bondolfi L, Stalder A, Deller T, Staufenbiel M, Mathews PM, Jucker M (2002) Cerebral hemorrhage after passive anti-Abeta immunotherapy. Science 298:1379. Abstract
Racke MM, Boone LI, Hepburn DL, Parsadainian M, Bryan MT, Ness DK, Piroozi KS, Jordan WH, Brown DD, Hoffman WP, Holtzman DM, Bales KR, Gitter BD, May PC, Paul SM, DeMattos RB (2005) Exacerbation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-associated microhemorrhage in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice by immunotherapy is dependent on antibody recognition of deposited forms of amyloid beta. Journal of Neuroscience. 19;25:629-636. Abstract
Wilcock DM, Rojiani A, Rosenthal A, Subbarao S, Freeman MJ, Gordon MN, Morgan D (2004) Passive immunotherapy against Abeta in aged APP-transgenic mice reverses cognitive deficits and depletes parenchymal amyloid deposits in spite of increased vascular amyloid and microhemorrhage. J Neuroinflammation 1:24. Abstract
Wilcock DM, Alamed J, Gottschall PE, Grimm J, Rosenthal A, Pons J, Ronan V, Symmonds K, Gordon MN, Morgan D (2006) Deglycosylated anti-amyloid-beta antibodies eliminate cognitive deficits and reduce parenchymal amyloid with minimal vascular consequences in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice. Journal of Neuroscience 26:5340-5346. Abstract
View all comments by Dave Morgan
|
 |
 |
 |
Comments on Related News |
 |
  |
| |
Related News: AD Clinical Pipeline: Immunotherapy Woes, Dimebon Boons
Comment by: Donna M. Wilcock
|
 |
 |
Submitted 18 July 2008
| Permalink
|
Posted 18 July 2008
|
 |
 |
The paper by Holmes et al. examines pathology and cognition of eight patients from the AN1792 Aβ vaccination trial. Despite the suspension of this trial in 2002, the patients continued to be followed clinically. Two patients showed almost complete removal of amyloid in the brain. The important finding of the current report is that cognitive decline was identical to placebo-treated patients despite the pronounced removal of amyloid. While these data contrast with the many mouse studies showing cognitive improvement and indeed suggest a more limited role for Aβ in the progression of Alzheimer disease, extensive speculation from such a small cohort should be avoided. In contrast to the current report, the 2003 report from Hock et al. showed slowed cognitive decline in a group of 30 patients over a year following treatment; however, this was correlated with a modified antibody titer; the TAPIR assay (tissue amyloid plaque immunoreactivity; the ability of circulating antibodies to bind to amyloid plaques on tissue) (Hock et al., 2003). In the current study the authors suggest several...
Read more
The paper by Holmes et al. examines pathology and cognition of eight patients from the AN1792 Aβ vaccination trial. Despite the suspension of this trial in 2002, the patients continued to be followed clinically. Two patients showed almost complete removal of amyloid in the brain. The important finding of the current report is that cognitive decline was identical to placebo-treated patients despite the pronounced removal of amyloid. While these data contrast with the many mouse studies showing cognitive improvement and indeed suggest a more limited role for Aβ in the progression of Alzheimer disease, extensive speculation from such a small cohort should be avoided. In contrast to the current report, the 2003 report from Hock et al. showed slowed cognitive decline in a group of 30 patients over a year following treatment; however, this was correlated with a modified antibody titer; the TAPIR assay (tissue amyloid plaque immunoreactivity; the ability of circulating antibodies to bind to amyloid plaques on tissue) (Hock et al., 2003). In the current study the authors suggest several scenarios for the lack of clinical efficacy: 1) amyloid plaques initiate but do not maintain progressive neurodegeneration, 2) very slow plaque removal, 3) inability to remove oligomeric Aβ, and 4) overactivation of the innate immune system.
An important effect of immunization that has not been reported on in the current study is cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and microhemorrhage. It has been shown that passive immunotherapy increases CAA in transgenic mice (Wilcock et al., 2004) and causes increased incidence of microhemorrhage (Pfeifer et al., 2001, Wilcock et al., 2004, Racke et al., 2005). We also reported that these adverse events occurred with active vaccination (Wilcock et al., 2007). Indeed, the authors of the current report use CAA and Aβ accumulation around capillaries as histopathological factors used to determine the degree of amyloid clearance. It also seems the microhemorrhage occurrence will be difficult to overcome. The recent report from Schroeter et al. showed that even low doses of antibody, which were associated with essentially no amyloid removal, resulted in an apparent subtle increase in microhemorrhage (Schroeter et al., 2008; control mice had no animals with microhemorrhage rated 2 or 3 while the lowest dose of 3D6 had three mice rated 2 or 3). Accumulation of CAA and associated microhemorrhage likely contributes significantly to the clinical progression of disease. Additionally, as the authors suggest, a change in inflammatory state could certainly contribute to further cognitive decline. Recent data show that the inflammatory profile of Alzheimer’s and transgenic mouse brain is highly complex (Colton et al., 2006). It is likely that Fcγ receptor activation affects the inflammatory state.
These data highlight the significant differences between human and mouse studies. Since neurodegeneration is not abundant in the majority of mouse models, it has not been possible, to date, to study this. It is likely that while amyloid may initiate the cascade, neurodegeneration may be self-perpetuating and neuroprotection may also be critical for successful anti-amyloid therapeutics. It has been suggested that passive immunization will overcome some of the limitations of active vaccination, and we certainly eagerly anticipate the data from Elan’s passive immunization trial of bapineuzumab.
References: Colton CA, Mott RT, Sharpe H, Xu Q, Van Nostrand WE, Vitek MP. Expression profiles for macrophage alternative activation genes in AD and in mouse models of AD. J Neuroinflammation. 2006 Sep 27;3:27. Abstract
Hock C, Konietzko U, Streffer JR, Tracy J, Signorell A, Müller-Tillmanns B, Lemke U, Henke K, Moritz E, Garcia E, Wollmer MA, Umbricht D, de Quervain DJ, Hofmann M, Maddalena A, Papassotiropoulos A, Nitsch RM. Antibodies against beta-amyloid slow cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Neuron 2003 May 22;38(4):547-554. Abstract
Pfeifer M, Boncristiano S, Bondolfi L, Stalder A, Deller T, Staufenbiel M, Mathews PM, Jucker M. Cerebral hemorrhage after passive anti-Abeta immunotherapy. Science 2002 Nov 15;298 (5597):299. Abstract
Racke MM, Boone LI, Hepburn DL, Parsadainian M, Bryan MT, Ness DK, Piroozi KS, Jordan WH, Brown DD, Hoffman WP, Holtzman DM, Bales KR, Gitter BD, May PC, Paul SM, DeMattos RB. Exacerbation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-associated microhemorrhage in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice by immunotherapy is dependent on antibody recognition of deposited forms of amyloid beta. J Neurosci 2005 Jan 19;25(3):629-636. Abstract
Schroeter S, Khan K, Barbour R, Doan M, Chen M, Guido T, Gill D, Basi G, Schenk D, Seubert P, Games D. Immunotherapy reduces vascular amyloid-β in PDAPP mice. J Neurosci 2008 Jul 2; 28(27): 6787-6793. Abstract
Wilcock DM, Rojiani A, Rosenthal A, Subbarao S, Freeman MJ, Gordon MN, Morgan D. Passive immunotherapy against Abeta in aged APP-transgenic mice reverses cognitive deficits and depletes parenchymal amyloid deposits in spite of increased vascular amyloid and microhemorrhage. J Neuroinflammation 2004 Dec 8;1(1):24. Abstract
Wilcock DM, Jantzen PT, Li Q, Morgan D, Gordon MN. Amyloid-beta vaccination, but not nitro-nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment, increases vascular amyloid and microhemorrhage while both reduce parenchymal amyloid. Neuroscience. 2007 Feb 9;144(3):950-60. Abstract
View all comments by Donna M. Wilcock
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: AD Clinical Pipeline: Immunotherapy Woes, Dimebon Boons
Comment by: Delphine Boche, Clive Holmes, James Nicoll, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Submitted 18 July 2008
| Permalink
|
Posted 18 July 2008
|
 |
 |
Our study was a six-year follow-up of patients in the original Elan AN1792 study of active immunization of AD patients with full-length Aβ42 peptide. We have confirmed that Aβ immunization can result in plaque removal from the AD brain. The extent of plaque removal is quite variable—ranging from no demonstrable plaque removal to essentially complete removal of plaques from the brain. The extent of plaque removal correlated at least to some extent with the titers of antibodies to Aβ in the serum. Two patients had almost complete removal of plaques from the brain, and yet they still had a progressive decline in cognitive function to profound end-stage dementia shortly before they died. All patients who had postmortem neuropathology had extensive tangles—Braak stages V/VI, consistent with AD. Although our findings are based on small numbers of patients, they seem to demonstrate that the presence of plaques is not a prerequisite for progressive cognitive impairment in AD.
We suggest a number of possible explanations for our findings:
1. The presence of Aβ plaques is required...
Read more
Our study was a six-year follow-up of patients in the original Elan AN1792 study of active immunization of AD patients with full-length Aβ42 peptide. We have confirmed that Aβ immunization can result in plaque removal from the AD brain. The extent of plaque removal is quite variable—ranging from no demonstrable plaque removal to essentially complete removal of plaques from the brain. The extent of plaque removal correlated at least to some extent with the titers of antibodies to Aβ in the serum. Two patients had almost complete removal of plaques from the brain, and yet they still had a progressive decline in cognitive function to profound end-stage dementia shortly before they died. All patients who had postmortem neuropathology had extensive tangles—Braak stages V/VI, consistent with AD. Although our findings are based on small numbers of patients, they seem to demonstrate that the presence of plaques is not a prerequisite for progressive cognitive impairment in AD.
We suggest a number of possible explanations for our findings:
1. The presence of Aβ plaques is required to initiate, but not to maintain the progressive neurodegeneration in AD.
2. Amyloid plaques are an epiphenomenon, and extracellular soluble/oligomeric or intraneuronal forms of Aβ are responsible for the neurodegeneration in AD.
3. Immunization activates microglia, which may be beneficial (by removing plaques) but at the same time neurotoxic.
4. The plaques could have been removed shortly before the patients died, after their cognitive function had declined—this seems rather unlikely.
A major driver of the immunization strategies currently in clinical trials has been to avoid a T lymphocyte reaction in the belief that this is what underlay the side effect noted in the second study of AN1792. Passive immunization, in particular, should theoretically not be able to provoke a T cell response and has the additional benefit that the bioavailability of the antibodies can be controlled. However, it is not clear by what mechanism lymphocytes in the leptomeninges, identified in patients with the side effect, can cause changes in the cerebral white matter (a consistent feature on brain imaging of the affected patients). An alternative explanation for the side effect is that it was due to disaggregation and solubilization of plaque Aβ which then tracks to the cerebral vasculature, increasing the severity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). We know from previous studies that severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy is associated with abnormalities in the white matter. Interestingly, the new information from the current Elan trial of passive immunization (bapineuzumab) seems to be showing evidence of white matter abnormalities which are occurring more frequently in patients with ApoE4—known to be associated with more severe CAA.
On the basis of our findings, we would predict that other immunization protocols (e.g., passive immunization and active immunization with truncated versions of the Aβ peptide) will also be effective in clearance of plaques. A number of current studies have before and after immunization in vivo plaque imaging, for example, with PIB, built into their design. We would predict that these will demonstrate plaque clearance following immunization. However, on the basis of our findings, we would speculate that plaque removal will not correlate well with any changes in cognitive function.
It is possible that some of the new immunization protocols will have a different balance of effects on the different forms of Aβ (e.g., plaque, soluble, oligomeric, intraneuronal) and may therefore have different effects on cognitive function. One of the approaches being trialled involves passive immunization with an Fc-truncated antibody, and this may have the potentially beneficial effect of not provoking microglial activation.
Using immunization as prevention rather than treatment would likely avoid these complications which seem to be due to the presence of substantial quantities of Aβ already being present in the brain. On the basis of the animal studies, immunization at a young age can prevent the formation of plaques in later life. Of course, we don’t yet know if this can be done safely in humans—we don’t know the physiological function of Aβ and if immunization might interfere with this function. A study to determine if Aβ immunization at a young age could prevent the development of AD later in life would be the ultimate test of the Aβ hypothesis.
View all comments by Delphine Boche
View all comments by Clive Holmes
View all comments by James Nicoll
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: AD Clinical Pipeline: Immunotherapy Woes, Dimebon Boons
Comment by: Rudy Castellani, Hyoung-gon Lee, George Perry, ARF Advisor (Disclosure), Mark A. Smith (Disclosure), Xiongwei Zhu
|
 |
 |
Submitted 21 July 2008
| Permalink
|
Posted 22 July 2008
|
 |
 |
Comment by Rudy J. Castellani, George Perry, Xiongwei Zhu, Hyoung-gon Lee, Mark A. Smith
The Next Phase: Prevention. Where Do I Sign Up?
The Aβ vaccination strategy failed because it was not used early enough in the course of the disease.
Come again?
We know this apparently because Aβ oligomers, which are artifacts of ultracentrifugation, when injected into the ventricles of mice, cause mice to navigate water mazes poorly, and press levers inappropriately. We know this because when hippocampal slices are bathed in a suspension of the artifact, they demonstrate electrophysiological abnormalities. And we know this because transgenic mice, which are engineered to overproduce Aβ, and then administered antibodies against it, improve in their ability to navigate water mazes and press the appropriate levers.
We apparently also must set aside the ad hoc revisions and contortions of the amyloid cascade hypothesis over the years (1-3), and the plethora of problems with experimental AD models, from lack of cognitive dysfunction, to lack of neuronal loss,...
Read more
Comment by Rudy J. Castellani, George Perry, Xiongwei Zhu, Hyoung-gon Lee, Mark A. Smith
The Next Phase: Prevention. Where Do I Sign Up?
The Aβ vaccination strategy failed because it was not used early enough in the course of the disease.
Come again?
We know this apparently because Aβ oligomers, which are artifacts of ultracentrifugation, when injected into the ventricles of mice, cause mice to navigate water mazes poorly, and press levers inappropriately. We know this because when hippocampal slices are bathed in a suspension of the artifact, they demonstrate electrophysiological abnormalities. And we know this because transgenic mice, which are engineered to overproduce Aβ, and then administered antibodies against it, improve in their ability to navigate water mazes and press the appropriate levers.
We apparently also must set aside the ad hoc revisions and contortions of the amyloid cascade hypothesis over the years (1-3), and the plethora of problems with experimental AD models, from lack of cognitive dysfunction, to lack of neuronal loss, to necessity of multiple mutations, to hyperphysiologic production of a target protein. We set this aside because we apparently now know that synaptic damage, a process never directly assessed, and which probably has the same specificity as gliosis, is the pathological substrate for this laboratory artifact in AD (1).
So a strategy, founded in the analysis of a pathological lesion (once said to be toxic and now discarded as a distraction, except of course for the two subjects who found to be “cleared” of plaques at autopsy), based on an ad hoc modification of a hypothesis that a laboratory artifact specifically causes nonspecific damage that has never been analyzed directly, verified in a transgenic mouse construct that generally does not lose neurons, and which was tested and failed in human disease subjects, must now be used on normal people. Where do I sign up?
References: 1. Castellani RJ, Lee HG, Zhu X, Perry G, Smith MA. Alzheimer disease pathology as a host response. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2008;67:523-531. Abstract
2. Castellani RJ, Lee HG, Zhu X, Nunomura A, Perry G, Smith MA. Neuropathology of Alzheimer disease: pathognomonic but not pathogenic. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;111:503-509. Abstract
3. Smith MA, Casadesus G, Joseph JA, Perry G. Amyloid-beta and tau serve antioxidant functions in the aging and Alzheimer brain. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;33:1194-1199. Abstract
View all comments by Rudy Castellani
View all comments by Hyoung-gon Lee
View all comments by George Perry
View all comments by Mark A. Smith
View all comments by Xiongwei Zhu
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: AD Clinical Pipeline: Immunotherapy Woes, Dimebon Boons
Comment by: Todd E. Golde
|
 |
 |
Submitted 23 July 2008
| Permalink
|
Posted 23 July 2008
|
 |
 |
The recent follow-up to the AN1792 study by Holmes et al. is a thought-provoking study that reinforces but certainly does not prove speculation by many in the field, including myself (Golde, 2006; Golde, 2003), that therapeutic targeting of Aβ may have limited impact on the clinical disease (Golde, 2006; Golde, 2003). Because of the small number of subjects and the unknown possible untoward consequences of an active vaccination targeting an auto-epitope, I think that this data is simply provocative but certainly not definitive.
I have often used the analogy that anti-Aβ therapy for AD is analogous to treating patients whose coronary arteries are 99 percent clogged with a statin and hoping for a clinical effect. These new data raise the possibility that anti-Aβ immunotherapy is more like trying to treat somebody with massive myocardial contraction deficits following multiple MIs with a statin and a bypass. So much damage has been done that targeting the trigger, by itself, is simply too little too late. Indeed, we would not approach the treatment of a patient in severe...
Read more
The recent follow-up to the AN1792 study by Holmes et al. is a thought-provoking study that reinforces but certainly does not prove speculation by many in the field, including myself (Golde, 2006; Golde, 2003), that therapeutic targeting of Aβ may have limited impact on the clinical disease (Golde, 2006; Golde, 2003). Because of the small number of subjects and the unknown possible untoward consequences of an active vaccination targeting an auto-epitope, I think that this data is simply provocative but certainly not definitive.
I have often used the analogy that anti-Aβ therapy for AD is analogous to treating patients whose coronary arteries are 99 percent clogged with a statin and hoping for a clinical effect. These new data raise the possibility that anti-Aβ immunotherapy is more like trying to treat somebody with massive myocardial contraction deficits following multiple MIs with a statin and a bypass. So much damage has been done that targeting the trigger, by itself, is simply too little too late. Indeed, we would not approach the treatment of a patient in severe cardiac dysfunction that has resulted from multiple MIs as a result of long-standing atherosclerotic disease with a statin alone. It simply is not going to work, though it might have some benefit in combination with other therapeutic agents.
Though a small and vociferous group of colleagues are publicly using such data to refute the role of Aβ aggregation in AD and thus indirectly attempting to invalidate it, Aβ or Aβ aggregates, as a target, I think a more parsimonious approach and one discussed to an extent by the authors is to really think carefully about these data and how we as a field might modify our approach to AD therapy and research based on such studies. Although there are numerous potential implications of these data, I will limit myself to a few issues that I see as most important. Obviously, the following comments may be tempered somewhat by any future demonstration of efficacy in Phase 3 studies of anti-Aβ therapies, but I think they will likely hold even in that event.
From a basic research point of view, this ups the ante on two critical issues.
In order to enable better preclinical studies, we still need better animal models of AD that fully recapitulate all the features of the human disease—especially neuronal loss. Given that this appears very difficult to do in APP mice, we probably need to consider looking at other species. Indeed, this report suggests the AN1792 trial appears to have “worked” in humans as it did in mice. Of course, APP mice are good models of Aβ deposition but not real models of AD. If we had a complete animal model of AD, we might be better able to evaluate therapeutic paradigms for impact on neurodegeneration. Tau mice might be better predictors for effects on neuronal loss, but obviously aren’t much use for testing anti-Aβ therapies. Hopefully they will be predictive of clinical outcomes when novel anti-tau therapies are moved into the clinic.
We need a real understanding of why neurons die in AD, and we need to identify additional therapeutic targets that will protect or restore neuronal function. Indeed, though my own research is Aβ-centric, I believe it is of paramount importance to identify targets beyond Aβ and, for that matter, tau. I think that it is more important to explicitly state that we need additional targets than to try and invalidate current ones.
From a clinical perspective, I think this reinforces our need to figure out how to prophylactically treat AD. We need to directly confront and overcome the challenges that distinguish therapeutic trials from prevention trials. We also need to figure out whether a trial of MCI of the AD type to AD conversion is really a prevention trial or just a very early therapeutic trial. Current predictive AD biomarker initiatives will certainly help to frame and define some aspects of the problem in more detail, but we also need to find common ground on how to actually execute a prophylactic trial that is economically feasible, ethical, and appropriately powered. Such trials will almost certainly require the joint efforts of academic, government, and commercial sectors, and of course, “safe agents.” Indeed, the true test of the Aβ “aggregate/amyloid” hypothesis of AD is a trial to prevent Aβ deposition in humans, not a therapeutic treatment of patients with clinical symptoms.
On a final, more technical note, following the initial report (Nicoll et al., 2003) of plaque clearance in one patient, I was less than convinced that there was clearance. The new data do make me more convinced. However, I would like to see some rigorous biochemical analysis of Aβ levels in the brains of these subjects. Even in mouse models, “plaque loads” seem to overestimate reductions in Aβ as compared to biochemical measures. I am also struck by what appears to be patchy clearance. I find it hard to rationalize how patchy clearance can occur with an antibody-mediated mechanism and wonder whether cellular immune responses play some role in the actual clearance.
References: Golde TE. Alzheimer disease therapy: can the amyloid cascade be halted? J Clin Invest. 2003 Jan;111(1):11-8. Abstract
Golde TE. Disease modifying therapy for AD? J Neurochem. 2006 Nov;99(3):689-707. Abstract
Nicoll JA, Wilkinson D, Holmes C, Steart P, Markham H, Weller RO. Neuropathology of human Alzheimer disease after immunization with amyloid-beta peptide: a case report. Nat Med. 2003 Apr;9(4):448-52. Abstract
View all comments by Todd E. Golde
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: AD Clinical Pipeline: Immunotherapy Woes, Dimebon Boons
Comment by: Terrence Town
|
 |
 |
Submitted 27 July 2008
| Permalink
|
Posted 28 July 2008
|
 |
 |
This report is an interesting follow-on from a case report that showed evidence of Aβ plaque removal following immunization with the Elan/Wyeth AN1792 Aβ vaccine (Nicoll et al., 2003). Holmes and coworkers (2008) now extend the findings of the original case report to eight additional cases, which demonstrated varying degrees of histological evidence of Aβ plaque clearance. What I found most interesting about this report is that, even within this relatively small sample, the cases that had the most prominent (so-called “very extensive”) evidence of Aβ plaque removal also had the highest Aβ antibody titers. This further cements the relationship between Aβ-directed immunity and plaque clearance, which has now been observed by us and by many others in AD mice.
There are a few issues that I’d like to comment on. I find it noteworthy that seven out of eight cases had MMSE scores of zero when last screened. The authors point out that these were “end stage” AD cases—and judging from the MMSE scores, that’s an understatement. I agree with Todd Golde that AD immunotherapy in this...
Read more
This report is an interesting follow-on from a case report that showed evidence of Aβ plaque removal following immunization with the Elan/Wyeth AN1792 Aβ vaccine (Nicoll et al., 2003). Holmes and coworkers (2008) now extend the findings of the original case report to eight additional cases, which demonstrated varying degrees of histological evidence of Aβ plaque clearance. What I found most interesting about this report is that, even within this relatively small sample, the cases that had the most prominent (so-called “very extensive”) evidence of Aβ plaque removal also had the highest Aβ antibody titers. This further cements the relationship between Aβ-directed immunity and plaque clearance, which has now been observed by us and by many others in AD mice.
There are a few issues that I’d like to comment on. I find it noteworthy that seven out of eight cases had MMSE scores of zero when last screened. The authors point out that these were “end stage” AD cases—and judging from the MMSE scores, that’s an understatement. I agree with Todd Golde that AD immunotherapy in this small, severely affected cohort is not a robust test of the amyloid cascade hypothesis in humans. But, I don’t believe that this detracts at all from the provocative nature of the findings, and from the message to keep an open mind and to critically consider the etiological contribution of Aβ to AD. More than likely, what these data are telling us is that there is a cutoff beyond which severe neuronal damage/loss has already occurred, and removing Aβ from the equation will have little if any effect clinically. This has prompted a number of researchers to conclude that prevention by immunotherapy is a more viable strategy. That may be true, but when should vaccination be initiated—five, 10, 20, or more years before symptoms manifest? Also, what biomarkers should be used to determine those at risk: APOE genotype, CSF Aβ, CSF tau, plasma Aβ? At this stage, a preventative Aβ vaccine seems much more viable for the <5 percent of individuals genetically predisposed to familial AD, but again—when would treatment need to be initiated and how often would it need to be given to be efficacious and safe?
It is unfortunate that an adjuvant-alone (placebo) treatment group could not be evaluated side-by-side with the AN1792-treated cases, and that historical non-vaccinated AD cases had to be used as controls. It is possible that the inflammatory side effects of the Th1-biasing vaccine adjuvant (QS-21) negatively impacted cognitive function and/or survival independently of the synthetic Aβ42 peptide. Along those lines, the authors comment that “only one patient had clinical features of meningoencephalitis….” Did the authors evaluate CD4+ T cells in these vaccinated cases, and if so, were they present in greater quantity than in the historical non-vaccinated AD cases?
In summary, this paper represents a timely, thought-provoking examination of the clinical and pathological correlates of Aβ vaccination. As we move forward in this exciting time of AD therapeutics, it will be important to view the results of such clinical trials with open eyes and without bias toward whichever AD pathogenic hypothesis we hold close to our hearts.
References: Holmes C, Boche D, Wilkinson D, Yadegarfar G, Hopkins V, Bayer A, Jones RW, Bullock R, Love S, Neal JW, Zotova E, Nicoll JA. Long-term effects of Abeta42 immunisation in Alzheimer’s disease: follow-up of a randomized, placebo-controlled phase I trial. Lancet 2008 July 19;372:216-223. Abstract
Nicoll JA, Wilkinson D, Holmes C, Steart P, Markham H, Weller RO. Neuropathology of human Alzheimer disease after immunization with amyloid-beta peptide: a case report. Nat Med. 2003 Apr;9(4):448-52. Abstract
View all comments by Terrence Town
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: AD Clinical Pipeline: Immunotherapy Woes, Dimebon Boons
Comment by: Stephen D. Ginsberg, Elliott Mufson, ARF Advisor (Disclosure)
|
 |
 |
Submitted 5 August 2008
| Permalink
|
Posted 8 August 2008
|
 |
 |
This paper is a jarring wake-up call to all Alzheimer disease investigators that placed all their research marbles in the amyloid hypothesis basket, as the clinical pathological findings suggest serious rethinking of the Aβ42 vaccination approach. Based on this report and the mounting evidence from Aβ vaccination trials spoken about at the ICAD meeting, it is becoming clear that an amyloid vaccination mono-therapeutic approach to AD treatment is simply not the sole answer. It can be argued that adding more subjects to the Holmes et al. study is appropriate for further clarification, but both clinical trial and neuropathologic studies of the brain of folks who have come to autopsy with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) provide extensive evidence that amyloid is not a strong correlative of cognitive decline (Mufson et al., 1999; Forman et al., 2005).
Data derived from our ongoing clinical molecular pathologic investigations of MCI using the cholinotrophic basal forebrain system as a model for neuronal selective vulnerability has shown that these neurons display a myriad of...
Read more
This paper is a jarring wake-up call to all Alzheimer disease investigators that placed all their research marbles in the amyloid hypothesis basket, as the clinical pathological findings suggest serious rethinking of the Aβ42 vaccination approach. Based on this report and the mounting evidence from Aβ vaccination trials spoken about at the ICAD meeting, it is becoming clear that an amyloid vaccination mono-therapeutic approach to AD treatment is simply not the sole answer. It can be argued that adding more subjects to the Holmes et al. study is appropriate for further clarification, but both clinical trial and neuropathologic studies of the brain of folks who have come to autopsy with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) provide extensive evidence that amyloid is not a strong correlative of cognitive decline (Mufson et al., 1999; Forman et al., 2005).
Data derived from our ongoing clinical molecular pathologic investigations of MCI using the cholinotrophic basal forebrain system as a model for neuronal selective vulnerability has shown that these neurons display a myriad of biochemical and molecular alterations, which appear to be unrelated to amyloid deposition (Counts and Mufson, 2004). For example, cholinergic neurons are simultaneously undergoing re-expression of cell cycle markers, alterations in neurotrophic support and the ratio of tau epitopes but not changes in APP or presenilin expression. The molecular signature of these neurons is commensurate with a hypothesis related to multiple cellular and connectivity-based dysregulation, which probably begins several decades before the onset of clinical symptoms. What initiates neuronal dysfunction remains unknown, and merits serious research in relevant animal models as well as in well-characterized postmortem human brain tissues. In this regard, it would be of interest to examine the molecular pathology of the cholinergic basal forebrain (CBF) neurons in the same vaccine treated brains examined by Holmes et al. to determine whether amyloid removal from cortical and hippocampal parenchymal projection sites of the CBF neurons rejuvenates these cell bodies.
To anyone who has ever examined the brain of a patient with AD, it is evident that the disease is not simply an amyloidosis. AD is a multi-neuronal system disconnection syndrome of unknown etiology, with pronounced selective cell loss, synaptic dysfunction, atrophy, vascular pathology, tau pathology, in addition to intracellular Aβ disturbances and extracellular amyloid deposition, among other problems that may yet be discovered. It is not our intention to advocate any singular hypothesis of AD, rather to suggest that other treatment approaches and modalities should be pursued with a solid federal and private funding base in addition to amyloid-based clinical trials. An effective treatment will ultimately be a poly-pharmaceutical approach that targets both mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration as well as symptoms of cognitive decline until the etiology of AD is revealed.
References: Forman, M.S. Mufson, E.J., Leurgans, S., Pratico, D., Joyce, S., Leight, S., Lee, V.M.-Y. and J.Q. Trojanowski: Cortical Biochemistry in MCI and Alzheimer Disease, Neurology, 68: 757-763, 2007. Abstract
Mufson, E. J., Chen, E-Y., Cochran, E. J., Beckett, L. A., Bennett, D. A. and Kordower, J. H.: Entorhinal cortex beta amyloid load in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Exp. Neurol., 158, 469-490, 1999. Abstract
Counts, S.E. and Mufson, E. J.: The role of nerve growth factor receptors in cholinergic basal forebrain degeneration in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease, J. Neuropath. Exper. Neurol., 64, 263-272, 2005. Abstract
View all comments by Stephen D. Ginsberg
View all comments by Elliott Mufson
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: DC: Primate, Mouse Studies Sustain Aβ Immunotherapy Hopes
Comment by: Jean-François Foncin
|
 |
 |
Submitted 1 December 2008
| Permalink
|
Posted 16 December 2008
|
 |
 |
I think that the explanation of microhemorrhages in the brain of vaccinated transgenic mice by the "washing out" of vascular or perivascular amyloid, and the recommendation of early treatment, "before amyloid deposition," is lacking rationale. Lumping all forms of vascular amyloid deposits into "CAA" does not take into account the difference between so-called "congophilic angiopathy," with amyloid inside the wall of medium-sized vessels, and "dysoric angiopathy," so named because amyloid seems to leak out of capillaries (in fact, the converse is probably true).
The first one is contemporary to the initiation of AD; I have seen it (Foncin, 1974; Foncin et al., 1985) in a cortical biopsy of a 42-year-old woman who died demented aged 51; she was the index case of FAD4 (Sherrington et al., 1995); congophilic angiopathy is seen prominently in AD with lobar hemorrhages. On the opposite, dysoric angiopathy is probably secondary.
My conclusion is what is called AD really is the result of the lumping together of various conditions with various pathogenies, and inferences for AD...
Read more
I think that the explanation of microhemorrhages in the brain of vaccinated transgenic mice by the "washing out" of vascular or perivascular amyloid, and the recommendation of early treatment, "before amyloid deposition," is lacking rationale. Lumping all forms of vascular amyloid deposits into "CAA" does not take into account the difference between so-called "congophilic angiopathy," with amyloid inside the wall of medium-sized vessels, and "dysoric angiopathy," so named because amyloid seems to leak out of capillaries (in fact, the converse is probably true).
The first one is contemporary to the initiation of AD; I have seen it (Foncin, 1974; Foncin et al., 1985) in a cortical biopsy of a 42-year-old woman who died demented aged 51; she was the index case of FAD4 (Sherrington et al., 1995); congophilic angiopathy is seen prominently in AD with lobar hemorrhages. On the opposite, dysoric angiopathy is probably secondary.
My conclusion is what is called AD really is the result of the lumping together of various conditions with various pathogenies, and inferences for AD therapy in general drawn from any particular mouse model are hazardous at best.
References: FONCIN J.-F. (1974): Angiopathie amyloïde et maladie d'Alzheimer familiale. In "Biologie et pathologie des parois artérielles et artériolo-capillaires" Lyon, ACEML, pp. 49-50.
Foncin JF, Salmon D, Supino-Viterbo V, Feldman RG, Macchi G, Mariotti P, Scoppetta C, Caruso G, Bruni AC. Démence présénile d'Alzheimer transmise dans une famille étendue. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1985;141(3):194-202. Abstract
Sherrington R, Rogaev EI, Liang Y, Rogaeva EA, Levesque G, Ikeda M, Chi H, Lin C, Li G, Holman K. Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 1995 Jun 29;375(6534):754-60. Abstract
View all comments by Jean-François Foncin
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |