Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: Papers of the Week
Annotation


Head E, Pop V, Vasilevko V, Hill M, Saing T, Sarsoza F, Nistor M, Christie LA, Milton S, Glabe C, Barrett E, Cribbs D. A two-year study with fibrillar beta-amyloid (Abeta) immunization in aged canines: effects on cognitive function and brain Abeta. J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 2;28(14):3555-66. PubMed Abstract

  
Comments on Paper and Primary News
  Comment by:  Dave Morgan (Disclosure)
Submitted 5 April 2008  |  Permalink Posted 5 April 2008

I have a couple of thoughts. First, there is no good evidence, other than correlative, that age-related memory declines in canines are secondary to amyloid accumulation. Rats and mice show age-associated loss of memory without amyloid accumulation. Perhaps the aging-related changes causing memory loss in these mammals also lead to Aβ accumulation in dogs.

Second, neither dogs nor mice/rats show much neuron loss with age. In AD the neuron loss leads to severe cognitive deterioration requiring institutionalization. Animals in this state would succumb (or, more humanely, be euthanized).

Third and most importantly, there is a critical difference in the amyloid deposits found in dogs versus Alzheimer humans and APP transgenic mice. They are not senile plaques, but only diffuse deposits (which the authors are careful to indicate in the text, although still referring to the deposits as plaques). The diffuse deposits do not have dystrophic neurites, microglial activation, astrocyte reactivity, or a host of other clear manifestations of pathology. ...  Read more


  Comment by:  David Cribbs, Elizabeth Head
Submitted 8 April 2008  |  Permalink Posted 11 April 2008

We appreciate the thought-provoking comments by Dave Morgan. We would like to clarify some of the features of the canine model and agree conceptually with some of the comments provided.

We agree with Dr. Morgan that there is a positive correlation between the extent of diffuse Aβ and learning and memory error scores in aged dogs (Cummings, 1996; Head et al., 1998). The current study was originally designed to selectively reduce Aβ in order to test the hypothesis that Aβ causes cognitive dysfunction in aged dogs. It would appear then that reducing Aβ in dogs can have a cognitive benefit over the long term through maintenance of function. However, immediate effects of Aβ removal on cognition appear to be minimal. It is difficult to tease out with the current experimental design whether the cognitive impairments we see when Aβ is already present in old beagles is directly due to the Aβ or the consequence of Aβ being present for extended periods of time (in our case, Aβ can show up in canine prefrontal cortex as young as eight years of age, and thus may have been present in the...  Read more


  Primary News: Immunotherapy: Old Dogs, New Tricks

Comment by:  Rudy Castellani, Hyoung-gon Lee, Akihiko Nunomura, George Perry, ARF Advisor (Disclosure), Mark A. Smith (Disclosure), Xiongwei Zhu
Submitted 11 April 2008  |  Permalink Posted 11 April 2008

Comment by Mark A. Smith, Rudy J. Castellani, Hyoung-gon Lee, Akihiko Nunomura, Xiongwei Zhu, and George Perry

Amyloid-β: The Beginning of the End and the End of the Beginning
The paper by Head and colleagues (2008) should serve as a major warning for those hoping that removing amyloid will be effective in the treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) or age-related cognitive impairment. So far, aside from transgenic mice engineered to overproduce amyloid, the record for amyloid immunotherapy has been one of abject failure: 1) trial suspension (human) and 2) no improvement (dogs). At minimum, these studies indicate that our current mouse models of AD are inadequate and, being amyloidocentric, naturally respond to amyloidocentric therapies. By contrast, rather than being driven by a transgene, the amyloid in aging or AD is there for a physiological or pathological reason (Nunomura et al., 2001), and removal of amyloid will not remove these precipitating factors. Moreover, we suspect that the production of amyloid, in response to a primary disease etiology, may...  Read more


  Comment by:  Michael G. Agadjanyan
Submitted 11 April 2008  |  Permalink Posted 11 April 2008

I'd like to discuss the similarities between data generated in APP/Tg mice vaccinated with an AD vaccine, AN1792 trials, and results reported here in canines by Head and coauthors. Experimental dogs immunized 25 times with a high dose (500 mg/injection/dog) of fibrillar human Aβ42 peptide formulated in Th2-type adjuvant Alum induced high (n = 3), moderate (n = 3), and low (n = 3) titers of anti-Aβ42 antibodies. Although the authors did not detect concentrations of antibodies specific to Aβ42 peptide, they demonstrated that higher titers of these antibodies (which are likely specific to the N-terminus of Aβ42, see [1]) correlated with lower levels of prefrontal insoluble and soluble and insoluble Aβ42 and insoluble Aβ40. These data were somewhat similar to results reported in the AN1792 studies (2) and data generated in APP/Tg 2576 mice immunized with a peptide epitope vaccine (3). This indicates that to be effective, any AD vaccine should induce high titers of antibodies even in elderly people with immunosenescence, without generating autoreactive T cells and microhemorrhages....  Read more

  Primary News: Immunotherapy: Old Dogs, New Tricks

Comment by:  Tyler A. Kokjohn, Alex E. Roher
Submitted 21 April 2008  |  Permalink Posted 21 April 2008

The experiments described by Head et al. may not elucidate the role played by senile plaques in AD dementia, but they do bolster the idea that amyloid disruption therapy is likely to be most efficacious when administered early in the course of the disease or provided on a preventative basis.

The intimate association of vascular disease and AD suggests that in many patients with early signs of dementia, amyloid disruption therapy may be complicated by impaired perfusion and drainage. Such conditions may explain the outcomes observed following the first human vaccination trial in which senile plaques were disrupted, but the amyloid remnants did not exit the brain. That makes the data of Nikolic et al. exciting, as these experiments suggest another means to actually eliminate and/or effectively alleviate the effects of toxic Aβ molecules.

Successful disruption of amyloid plaques will mitigate and perhaps eliminate the cascade of consequential destruction associated with these deposits. But great uncertainties remain regarding the ultimate risks posed by the chronic...  Read more


  Comment by:  Gjumrakch Aliev
Submitted 28 April 2008  |  Permalink Posted 30 April 2008

I want to bring to the attention of Alzforum readers my view that continuing support for the amyloid theory, which currently dominates AD research fields, is unnecessary and should be stopped. I believe this issue should be taken into consideration by scientists as well as the National Institutes of Health. I hope this audience has heard recent news concerning treatment strategies based on the amyloid theory. Vaccination of humans against amyloid-β, able to remove amyloid deposition from the brain, induced brain shrinkage and inflammation at great risk to the patient. I do not think we need to continue down this road.

In addition, Phase 2 clinical trials with Dimebon indicate that alternate drugs based on the non-amyloid theory have more success. I believe the field should stop animal experimentation for amyloid-based studies, especially the use of dogs, who should not be subjected to this fruitless research. Finally, requesting additional funding to continue research based on the "golden amyloid" theory appears to me to be wasting public money and blocking alternate...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this Paper
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this paper. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend this paper

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
 
 
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad