 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Comments on Paper and Primary News |
 |
  |
| |
Primary News: Linking APP to Apoptosis—p53 Does the Trick
Comment by: Weiming Xia
|
 |
 |
Submitted 15 June 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 15 June 2006
|
 |
 |
To keep apoptosis in check, it may be best to avoid the ups and downs of γ-secretase. Zebrafish lacking the γ-secretase component Pen-2 induce p53-dependent apoptosis throughout the body (Campbell et al., 2006), while mice lacking the Aph-1A component demonstrate increased apoptosis in the neuroepithelium and surrounding mesoderm (Serneels et al., 2005). Now, Alves da Costa et al. have reported that a loss of γ-secretase activity, or its substrates APP and APLP2, reduces the activity of p53. Their report has clearly demonstrated an involvement of γ-secretase in mediating p53-dependent cell death, and the regulation of these pathways is extremely complicated. Previous studies from the same group and others have shown that AD mutant presenilin causes cell death or an increased sensitivity to inducers of apoptosis in cultured cells. The current study has provided further evidence linking mutant presenilin to p53-dependent apoptosis.
Whether γ-secretase inhibitors could affect p53 function and lead to tumorigenicity is an interesting topic. Alves da Costa et al. have shown that...
Read more
To keep apoptosis in check, it may be best to avoid the ups and downs of γ-secretase. Zebrafish lacking the γ-secretase component Pen-2 induce p53-dependent apoptosis throughout the body (Campbell et al., 2006), while mice lacking the Aph-1A component demonstrate increased apoptosis in the neuroepithelium and surrounding mesoderm (Serneels et al., 2005). Now, Alves da Costa et al. have reported that a loss of γ-secretase activity, or its substrates APP and APLP2, reduces the activity of p53. Their report has clearly demonstrated an involvement of γ-secretase in mediating p53-dependent cell death, and the regulation of these pathways is extremely complicated. Previous studies from the same group and others have shown that AD mutant presenilin causes cell death or an increased sensitivity to inducers of apoptosis in cultured cells. The current study has provided further evidence linking mutant presenilin to p53-dependent apoptosis.
Whether γ-secretase inhibitors could affect p53 function and lead to tumorigenicity is an interesting topic. Alves da Costa et al. have shown that overexpression of the AICD of APP in cultured cells triggers p53-dependent apoptosis, and an earlier report from Jie Shen's group has demonstrated p53-dependent neuronal apoptosis induced by Notch activation (Yang et al., 2004). Since there are more than a dozen γ-secretase substrates that have been identified, apparently AICD and NICD are not the only ICDs derived from γ-secretase cleavage of its substrates. We do not know whether other ICDs could promote/inhibit p53-dependent apoptosis; therefore, some classes of γ-secretase inhibitors may possibly be in a position to prevent tumorigenesis.
References: Campbell WA, Yang H, Zetterberg H, Baulac S, Sears JA, Liu T, Wong ST, Zhong TP, Xia W. Zebrafish lacking Alzheimer presenilin enhancer 2 (Pen-2) demonstrate excessive p53-dependent apoptosis and neuronal loss.
J Neurochem. 2006 Mar;96(5):1423-40. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
Abstract
Serneels L, Dejaegere T, Craessaerts K, Horre K, Jorissen E, Tousseyn T, Hebert S, Coolen M, Martens G, Zwijsen A, Annaert W, Hartmann D, De Strooper B. Differential contribution of the three Aph1 genes to gamma-secretase activity in vivo.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 1;102(5):1719-24. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
Abstract
Yang X, Klein R, Tian X, Cheng HT, Kopan R, Shen J. Notch activation induces apoptosis in neural progenitor cells through a p53-dependent pathway.
Dev Biol. 2004 May 1;269(1):81-94.
Abstract
View all comments by Weiming Xia
|
 |

|
| |
Primary News: Linking APP to Apoptosis—p53 Does the Trick
Comment by: Steve Barger (Disclosure)
|
 |
 |
Submitted 21 June 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 21 June 2006
|
 |
 |
Didn't you ever think it was odd that there are 155 disease-causing mutations in PS1 but only 10 in PS2? To me, that smacks of a mechanistic difference between the two gene products. And the restriction to 10 PS2 mutations is more consistent with the stringent requirements of a gain-of-function than are the 155 willy-nilly mutations in PS1. So, statistically, it would seem to make sense that PS2 activity has some negative impact on health (e.g., p53 induction) and PS1 a positive one (e.g., p53 suppression).
View all comments by Steve Barger
|
 |

|
| |
Comment by: Takaomi Saido, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Submitted 20 June 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 21 June 2006
|
 |
 |
I recommend this paper
|
 |

|
| |
Comment by: Tommaso Russo, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Submitted 19 June 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 21 June 2006
|
 |
 |
I recommend this paper
|
 |

|
| |
Primary News: Linking APP to Apoptosis—p53 Does the Trick
Comment by: Mary Reid
|
 |
 |
Submitted 14 June 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 22 June 2006
|
 |
 |
It's a very interesting question proposed by Tom Fagan. What is the immediate downstream target of AICD involved in the apoptotic pathway? I have suggested that the AICD target (KAI1) CD82 may be involved at an early stage (see comment [1]). It's of interest that Marreiros et al. report that KAI1 promoter activity is dependent on p53, junB and AP2; however, the Duriez group reports data that KAI1 expression is not significantly modulated by p53. Would the AICD be expected to influence expression of AP2 and junB? If not, might you then expect increased p53?
References: 1. See comment by Mary Reid on Stellwagen et al., 2006
2. Marreiros A, Dudgeon K, Dao V, Grimm MO, Czolij R, Crossley M, Jackson P. KAI1 promoter activity is dependent on p53, junB and AP2: evidence for a possible mechanism underlying loss of KAI1 expression in cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005 Jan 20;24(4):637-49. Abstract
3. Duriez C, Falette N, Cortes U, Moyret-Lalle C, Puisieux A. Absence of p53-dependent induction of the metastatic suppressor KAI1 gene after DNA damage. Oncogene. 2000 May 11;19(20):2461-4. Abstract
View all comments by Mary Reid
|
 |

|
| |
Primary News: Linking APP to Apoptosis—p53 Does the Trick
Comment by: Mary Reid
|
 |
 |
Submitted 19 June 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 23 July 2006
|
 |
 |
I would also like to propose that another p53 target gene which may be involved in AD is brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1(BAI1) and that AICD may be a player in the antiangiogenic pathway.
Bescond and Rahmani (1) find that DYRK1A interacts with a brain specific protein, phytanoyl-CoA alpha-hydroxylase-associated protein 1 which is reported to be a binding partner of BAI1.(2)
DSCR1 is also overexpressed in AD and the Minani group (3) describes the secondary inhibition of NF-AT signalling as a natural brake in the
angiogenic process.
Might the beneficial effects of statins be due to the stimulation of angiogenesis?
References: (1) Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005 Apr;37(4):775-83.
Dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphorylated and regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A)interacts with the phytanoyl-CoA alpha-hydroxylase associated protein 1 (PAHX-AP1), a brain specific protein.
Bescond M, Rahmani Z.
(2) Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001 Mar 5;87(2):223-37.
Characterization of mouse brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1 (BAI1) and
phytanoyl-CoA alpha-hydroxylase-associated protein 1, a novel BAI1-binding protein.
Koh JT, Lee ZH, Ahn KY, Kim JK, Bae CS, Kim HH, Kee HJ, Kim KK.
(3) J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 48, 50537-50554, November 26, 2004
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor- and Thrombin-induced Termination Factor, Down Syndrome Critical Region-1, Attenuates Endothelial Cell Proliferation and Angiogenesis*
Takashi Minami, Keiko Horiuchi, Mai Miura, Md. Ruhul Abid¶, Wakako Takabe,
Noriko Noguchi, Takahide Kohro, Xijin Ge, Hiroyuki Aburatani, Takao
Hamakubo, Tatsuhiko Kodama, and William C. Aird¶||
View all comments by Mary Reid
|
 |
 |
| |
Submit a Comment on this Paper |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
REAGENTS/MATERIAL:
Antibodies used were anti-p53 (1:500, clone sc-98, Santa Cruz), BR188 polyclonal antibody that recognizes the extreme C terminus of APP (kind gift from M. Goedert, Medical Research Council, Cambridge, UK), anti-tubulin (1:500, Sigma), anti-NTF PS1 or anti-loop PS2 polyclonal (1:1000, gift from Dr. G Thinakaran)
|
|
|
 |