 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Comments on Paper and Primary News |
 |
  |
| |
Comment by: Li-Huei Tsai
|
 |
 |
Submitted 20 January 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 20 January 2006
|
 |
 |
I recommend this paper
|
 |

|
| |
Comment by: Rachael Neve
|
 |
 |
Submitted 20 January 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 20 January 2006
|
 |
 |
I recommend this paper
|
 |

|
| |
Comment by: Andre Delacourte, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Submitted 22 January 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 23 January 2006
|
 |
 |
I recommend this paper
|
 |

|
| |
Comment by: Tommaso Russo, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Submitted 25 January 2006
| Permalink
|
Posted 25 January 2006
|
 |
 |
I recommend this paper
This is an important paper, which reports relevant information to understand the functional role of the Fe65 proteins. The results clearly demonstrate that the knockout of two members of the Fe65 protein family results in a phenotype similar to that observed in the APP/APLP1/APLP2 triple knockout, thus indicating that the APP-Fe65 complex plays a crucial role during development, as previously suggested by knockout experiments in the worm (Zambrano et al., 2002).
Although the molecular mechanism of the APP-Fe65 machinery is still unclear, two conclusions can be drawn:
1. The observed phenotype does not depend on misexpression or mislocalization or altered processing of APP induced by the absence of two Fe65s (the marginal decrease of Aβ42 seems to appear only in male mice and no difference between males and females in the brain phenotype is reported).
2. While the APP knockout phenotype was observed only in the triple knockout (Herms et al., 2004), Fe65L2 alone is unable to compensate for the absence of the other two members of the family (but the presence of Fe65L2...
Read more
This is an important paper, which reports relevant information to understand the functional role of the Fe65 proteins. The results clearly demonstrate that the knockout of two members of the Fe65 protein family results in a phenotype similar to that observed in the APP/APLP1/APLP2 triple knockout, thus indicating that the APP-Fe65 complex plays a crucial role during development, as previously suggested by knockout experiments in the worm (Zambrano et al., 2002).
Although the molecular mechanism of the APP-Fe65 machinery is still unclear, two conclusions can be drawn:
1. The observed phenotype does not depend on misexpression or mislocalization or altered processing of APP induced by the absence of two Fe65s (the marginal decrease of Aβ42 seems to appear only in male mice and no difference between males and females in the brain phenotype is reported).
2. While the APP knockout phenotype was observed only in the triple knockout (Herms et al., 2004), Fe65L2 alone is unable to compensate for the absence of the other two members of the family (but the presence of Fe65L2 could prevent identification of other functions of the Fe65 protein family).
References: Zambrano N, Bimonte M, Arbucci S, Gianni D, Russo T, Bazzicalupo P. feh-1 and apl-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans orthologues of mammalian Fe65 and beta-amyloid precursor protein genes, are involved in the same pathway that controls nematode pharyngeal pumping.
J Cell Sci. 2002 Apr 1;115(Pt 7):1411-22.
Abstract
Herms J, Anliker B, Heber S, Ring S, Fuhrmann M, Kretzschmar H, Sisodia S, Muller U. Cortical dysplasia resembling human type 2 lissencephaly in mice lacking all three APP family members.
EMBO J. 2004 Oct 13;23(20):4106-15. Epub 2004 Sep 23.
Abstract
View all comments by Tommaso Russo
|
 |
 |
| |
Submit a Comment on this Paper |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
REAGENTS/MATERIAL:
Generated mice with targeted alleles for FE65 and FE65L1. Viable FE65-/-; FE65L1-/- mice are smaller than their littermates and often displayed bilateral circling.
The pan-FE65 antibody generated against a glutathione S-transferase-FE65L1 fusion protein was previously described (Chang et al, 2003). The Tuj1 (Covance), anti-NeuN (Chemicon Int.), GFAP (Sigma-Aldrich) and CD-45 (Serotec) antibodies were used to stain immature neurons, postmitotic neuronal nuclei, glia and microglia, respectively. Antibodies directed against EHS-laminin and chondroitin sulfate modifications (both from Sigma-Aldrich) were used to detect extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and reelin antibodies (G10, a gift from A Goffinet, University of Louvain, Belgium) detected secreted reelin and reelin-positive cells.APP antibodies included APP 22C11 (Chemicon Int.) and A8717 (Sigma-Aldrich). Anti-TAG-1 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) and anti-L1 antibodies (Chemicon Int.) were used to stain corticofugal and thalamocortical neurons, respectively.
|
|
|
 |