 |
 |
Casas C, Sergeant N, Itier JM, Blanchard V, Wirths O, van der Kolk N, Vingtdeux V, van de Steeg E, Ret G, Canton T, Drobecq H, Clark A, Bonici B, Delacourte A, Benavides J, Schmitz C, Tremp G, Bayer TA, Benoit P, Pradier L.
Massive CA1/2 neuronal loss with intraneuronal and N-terminal truncated Abeta42 accumulation in a novel Alzheimer transgenic model. Am J Pathol.
2004 Oct;165(4):1289-300.
PubMed Abstract, View on AlzSWAN
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Comments on Related News |
 |
  |
| |
Related News: Philadelphia: The Enemy Within—Neurodegeneration From Intraneuronal Aβ
Comment by: Li-Huei Tsai
|
 |
 |
Submitted 16 August 2004
| Permalink
|
Posted 16 August 2004
|
 |
 |
The idea of intraneuronal Aβ contributing to AD pathology certainly
appears to be generating momentum, and this was evident at last
month’s conference. Compelling evidence from new and established
Aβ-related transgenic mouse models demonstrated that intraneuronal
Aβ42 is an early event which precedes, and appears to correlate
with, subsequent neuronal death. However, conflicting findings on
postmortem AD brains on whether intraneuronal Aβ is an early event
in AD, and is correlative with neuronal toxicity, needs to be resolved.
The evidence presented from the aforementioned transgenic mouse studies
gives rise to a number of important questions that may have significant
implications in understanding AD pathology. The first question that
comes to mind is, what is the site and mechanism of toxicity induced by
intraneuronal Aβ? And how does this differ from toxicity induced by
the extracellular version? In addition, with increasing evidence for
Aβ acting upstream of neurofibrillary tangle formation, it will be
interesting to examine whether the neurons containing...
Read more
The idea of intraneuronal Aβ contributing to AD pathology certainly
appears to be generating momentum, and this was evident at last
month’s conference. Compelling evidence from new and established
Aβ-related transgenic mouse models demonstrated that intraneuronal
Aβ42 is an early event which precedes, and appears to correlate
with, subsequent neuronal death. However, conflicting findings on
postmortem AD brains on whether intraneuronal Aβ is an early event
in AD, and is correlative with neuronal toxicity, needs to be resolved.
The evidence presented from the aforementioned transgenic mouse studies
gives rise to a number of important questions that may have significant
implications in understanding AD pathology. The first question that
comes to mind is, what is the site and mechanism of toxicity induced by
intraneuronal Aβ? And how does this differ from toxicity induced by
the extracellular version? In addition, with increasing evidence for
Aβ acting upstream of neurofibrillary tangle formation, it will be
interesting to examine whether the neurons containing intracellular
Aβ aggregates are prone to neurofibrillary tangle formation, as well.
Despite the known spatial disparity between amyloid plaques and
neurofibrillary tangles, the paradigm for intracellular Aβ
pathology does not preclude the notion that amyloid and neurofibrillary
pathology may exist in one and the same neuron.
View all comments by Li-Huei Tsai
|
 |
 |
| |
Submit a Comment on this Paper |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
|
 |