Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: Papers of the Week
Annotation


Jin K, Galvan V, Xie L, Mao XO, Gorostiza OF, Bredesen DE, Greenberg DA. Enhanced neurogenesis in Alzheimer's disease transgenic (PDGF-APPSw,Ind) mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 7;101(36):13363-7. PubMed Abstract

  
Comments on Paper and Primary News
  Primary News: Increased Neurogenesis in AD? Evidence from APP Mice Strengthens Case

Comment by:  Kiminobu Sugaya
Submitted 1 September 2004  |  Permalink Posted 1 September 2004

This paper is a continuation of a study the authors published in the same journal.

In their previous paper, they stated that transgenic mice expressing mutant forms of APP (22, 23) or presenilin-1 (41) show impaired, rather than increased, neurogenesis. They further stated that it is impossible to predict whether animal models that may more closely resemble AD may have enhanced neurogenesis, because none of these models fully reproduces the features of familial AD, and the molecular stimulus to neurogenesis in AD is unknown.

In the current study, they used APPSw/Ind transgenic mice, and indicate that the addition of Indiana mutation to APP produces contradictory results compared to the previous studies. They suggested that synaptic abnormalities, which can be found in this APP transgenic mouse, and further, a defect in glutamatergic transmission, may be the stimulus for neurogenesis. However, these kinds of changes may occur in other types of APP transgenic mice, and it is difficult to explain why...  Read more


  Comment by:  Takaomi Saido, ARF Advisor
Submitted 8 September 2004  |  Permalink Posted 9 September 2004
  I recommend this paper

  Comment by:  Paul Coleman, ARF Advisor
Submitted 12 September 2004  |  Permalink Posted 13 September 2004
  I recommend this paper

The concept of AD increasing neurogenesis is extremely interesting, and the proposal that this may be a compensatory response plausible. These findings directly disprove an alternative hypothesis: that the memory deficits of AD are related to the clinical phenomenon of "chemo brain," in which patients undergoing chemotherapy and consequent probable disruption of neurogenesis exhibit memory deficits.

View all comments by Paul Coleman
  Submit a Comment on this Paper
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this paper. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend this paper

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
 
 

REAGENTS/MATERIAL:

PDGF-APP (Sw,Ind) from Dr. Mucke (Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease) were used for this study.

Immunohistochemisty used mouse anti-b-amyloid 3D6 (1:100) gift of Dr. Selkoe. Brain sections were stained with mouse monoclonal anti-BrdUrd (Roche Molecular Biochemicals; 2 µg/ml) and biotinylated goat-anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, 1:200), and staining was visualized with diaminobenzidine and H2O2. Goat polyclonal anti-DCX (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:200) was also used in single-label studies. For double-label fluorescence immunohistochemistry, the primary antibodies were anti-BrdUrd and anti-DCX, as well as affinity-purified goat polyclonal anti-Neuro D (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:100). The secondary antibodies were rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and FITC-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 1:200).

Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad