Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: Papers of the Week
Annotation


Coskun PE, Beal MF, Wallace DC. Alzheimer's brains harbor somatic mtDNA control-region mutations that suppress mitochondrial transcription and replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 20;101(29):10726-31. PubMed Abstract, View on AlzGene

  
Comments on Paper and Primary News
  Primary News: Promoter Bashing—Mitochondrial Ones Damaged in AD Brain

Comment by:  Michael Leski
Submitted 11 July 2004  |  Permalink Posted 12 July 2004

This is a remarkable paper. Coskun, Beal and Wallace demonstrate that many mutations to mtDNA occur near the PL region, an important regulatory region for replication of the genome. Therefore, this damage could ultimately block mitochondrial reproduction. In support of this possibility, they found a 50 percent reduction in mtDNA copy number in AD samples. Thus, their results partially explain the mitochondrial deficiencies that occur in AD.

Mitochondria constantly undergo fission and fusion, are replicated throughout the life of the cell, and autophagocytosed when their time has come. However, unlike their host, mitochondria possess multiple copies of their DNA, perhaps four or five. So, damage to one copy does not necessarily compromise the organelle, if it can be removed and disposed. That’s the catch-if the mitochondrion does not get rid of this DNA, eventually it may accrue more damaged copies.

The mitochondrial theory of aging states that enlarged and functionally disabled mitochondria gradually displace normal ones during senescence. These changes are most...  Read more


  Primary News: Promoter Bashing—Mitochondrial Ones Damaged in AD Brain

Comment by:  David Stern, Shirley ShiDu Yan
Submitted 11 August 2004  |  Permalink Posted 11 August 2004

A possible role for abnormal mitochondrial biology in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been an omnipresent theme over the last decades. Regional hypometabolism, documented by positron emission tomography and abnormalities in mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes—most consistently diminished activity of cytochrome c oxidase (COX), have been noted for some time (1-2). Furthermore, an important role for reactive oxygen species (ROS), which originate, at least in part, from mitochondria, in amyloid-β peptide (Aβ)-induced cellular perturbation has been indicated by multiple in vitro studies. In this regard, an attractive concept to consider is that of “retrograde signaling,” whereby mitochondrial generation of ROS diminishes calcium uptake by this organelle, resulting in increased oxidant stress and cytosolic-free calcium ([Ca2+]c), and subsequent activation of kinases, and activation of nuclear genes etc (3). Another close link between cellular perturbation, apoptosis and mitochondrial function is that a 75 kDa subunit of respiratory complex I (NDUFS1) is a...  Read more

  Comment by:  Anatol Kontush
Submitted 25 August 2004  |  Permalink Posted 26 August 2004

Etiology of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is unknown; the paper of Coskun et al. [1] lends further support to an exciting hypothesis that it may be caused by somatic mutations in mtDNA. Mitochondria have long been known as a major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in actively metabolic cells; AD appears to most strongly affect brain regions with the highest metabolic rate and highest expression of mitochondrial enzymes. Thus, defects in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and increased generation of ROS by defective mitochondria might mediate the relationship between late-onset AD and mtDNA mutations.

At a first glance, this mechanism is only relevant to the development of late-onset AD and seems to be unrelated to early-onset forms of the disease which are caused by point mutations in APP and presenilins; such mutations result in accelerated production of amyloid-β (Aβ). Thus, the question of major importance remains, how can we combine late-onset and early-onset AD within such mitochondrial hypothesis? Increased production of Aβ is a probable...  Read more


  Comment by:  Kazuhiro Honda, Quan Liu, Paula Moreira, George Perry, ARF Advisor (Disclosure), Mark A. Smith (Disclosure), Xiongwei Zhu
Submitted 26 August 2004  |  Permalink Posted 27 August 2004

Mitochondria and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Complex Interrelationship
Recently, Coskun and colleagues (2004) reported that brains from patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) present somatic mtDNA control-region mutations, especially in individuals older than 80 years, which supports the mitochondrial hypothesis for AD pathophysiology. However, the doubt remains whether these somatic mtDNA mutations are the cause or consequence of AD pathophysiology. If somatic mutations of mtDNA are a cause of AD, these mutations should appear in the vulnerable brain regions affected by the disease. However, this same pattern will be also observed if the somatic mutation of mtDNA is a consequence of AD pathophysiology. So, how and when do the somatic mutations of mtDNA accumulate in specific regions of brain?

A recent study suggests that DNA damage, recognized by the formation of 8-hydroxyguanosine (8OHG), a marker of nucleic acid oxidation, is markedly increased in the promoters of genes whose expression is decreased in the aged human cortex (Lu et al., 2004). Since modifications of...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this Paper
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this paper. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend this paper

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
 
 
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad