Comment by Thierry Nouspikel and Philip C. Hanawalt
Alzheimer Neurons Reentering the Cell Cycle: Could DNA Damage Be Both the Trigger and the Bullet?

The idea that postmitotic neurons might reenter the cell cycle raised a few eyebrows when first suggested in the late 1990s. That was based upon the observation by several groups [1] that neurons in Alzheimer's disease and a number of other neurodegenerative diseases begin to express cell cycle-related proteins before they degenerate. Skeptics may have argued that the presence of a protein does not necessarily mean that it carries on its usual function. However, in a landmark paper in 2001, the Herrup group [2] documented DNA replication by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in autopsy material from an Alzheimer’s patient. This raised two important questions: What causes neurons to reenter the cell cycle, and why do they fail at this attempt and die before dividing?

We proposed an answer to the latter, on the basis of our observation [3] that the most versatile DNA repair system, global genomic nucleotide...  Read more

Comment by Thierry Nouspikel and Philip C. Hanawalt
Alzheimer Neurons Reentering the Cell Cycle: Could DNA Damage Be Both the Trigger and the Bullet?

The idea that postmitotic neurons might reenter the cell cycle raised a few eyebrows when first suggested in the late 1990s. That was based upon the observation by several groups [1] that neurons in Alzheimer's disease and a number of other neurodegenerative diseases begin to express cell cycle-related proteins before they degenerate. Skeptics may have argued that the presence of a protein does not necessarily mean that it carries on its usual function. However, in a landmark paper in 2001, the Herrup group [2] documented DNA replication by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in autopsy material from an Alzheimer’s patient. This raised two important questions: What causes neurons to reenter the cell cycle, and why do they fail at this attempt and die before dividing?

We proposed an answer to the latter, on the basis of our observation [3] that the most versatile DNA repair system, global genomic nucleotide excision repair (NER), is greatly attenuated in neurons. However, two subsets of NER—transcription-coupled repair and differentiation-associated repair—remain proficient, although these are limited to expressed genes. We postulated [4] that this parsimonious strategy of concentrating DNA repair activity on those genes actually needed would prove fatal to neurons if they ever attempt to reactivate previously silent, heavily damaged DNA. The accumulation of DNA lesions in newly activated genes is likely to arrest RNA polymerase II, and that is known to be a strong signal for apoptosis [5].

Now, Kruman et al. [6] have provided a hypothesis for what causes neurons to reenter the cell cycle. Surprisingly enough, it seems to be DNA damage again! They have demonstrated that DNA-damaging agents that cause apoptosis also cause neurons to enter S phase, in contrast to apoptotic agents that don't damage DNA. They have further demonstrated that the ATM protein, involved in DNA damage sensing, is likely a critical player in this process.

One may wonder how DNA damage could be left unrepaired in neuronal DNA and also trigger apoptosis. The answer probably rests with the DNA repair mechanism involved. So far, only NER has been convincingly demonstrated to operate preferentially on transcribed genes [7]. The agents used by Kruman et al. may produce DNA damage repaired by other pathways, likely not linked to transcription. So we can postulate that the accumulation of such damage, which would disrupt active genes, cannot be tolerated and causes neurons to embark on their fatal journey as they stumble through the cell cycle—a journey prematurely terminated, due to the accumulation of a different kind of DNA damage in previously silent regions of the genome.

References:
1. Smith TW, Lippa CF. Ki-67 immunoreactivity in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1995 May;54(3):297-303. Abstract

Nagy Z, Esiri MM, Smith AD. Expression of cell division markers in the hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative conditions. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1997 Mar;93(3):294-300. Abstract

Vincent I, Jicha G, Rosado M, Dickson DW. Aberrant expression of mitotic cdc2/cyclin B1 kinase in degenerating neurons of Alzheimer's disease brain. J Neurosci. 1997 May 15;17(10):3588-98. Abstract

McShea A, Harris PL, Webster KR, Wahl AF, Smith MA. Abnormal expression of the cell cycle regulators P16 and CDK4 in Alzheimer's disease. Am J Pathol. 1997 Jun;150(6):1933-9. Abstract

Busser J, Geldmacher DS, Herrup K. Ectopic cell cycle proteins predict the sites of neuronal cell death in Alzheimer's disease brain. J Neurosci. 1998 Apr 15;18(8):2801-7. Abstract

Harris PL, Zhu X, Pamies C, Rottkamp CA, Ghanbari HA, McShea A, Feng Y, Ferris DK, Smith MA. Neuronal polo-like kinase in Alzheimer disease indicates cell cycle changes. Neurobiol Aging. 2000 Nov-Dec;21(6):837-41. Abstract

Ding XL, Husseman J, Tomashevski A, Nochlin D, Jin LW, Vincent I. The cell cycle Cdc25A tyrosine phosphatase is activated in degenerating postmitotic neurons in Alzheimer's disease. Am J Pathol. 2000 Dec;157(6):1983-90. Abstract

2. Yang Y, Geldmacher DS, Herrup K. DNA replication precedes neuronal cell death in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2001 Apr 15;21(8):2661-8. Abstract

3. Nouspikel T, Hanawalt PC. Terminally differentiated human neurons repair transcribed genes but display attenuated global DNA repair and modulation of repair gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Mar;20(5):1562-70. Abstract

4. Nouspikel T, Hanawalt PC. When parsimony backfires: neglecting DNA repair may doom neurons in Alzheimer's disease. Bioessays. 2003 Feb;25(2):168-73. Review. Abstract See also ARF Live Discussion

5. Ljungman M, Zhang F, Chen F, Rainbow AJ, McKay BC. Inhibition of RNA polymerase II as a trigger for the p53 response. Oncogene. 1999 Jan 21;18(3):583-92. Abstract

6. Kruman II et al. Neuron 2004;41:549.

7. Hanawalt PC. Transcription-coupled repair and human disease. Science. 1994 Dec 23;266(5193):1957-8. Review. No abstract available. Abstract

View all comments by Thierry Nouspikel

DNA Damage Mediated Cell Cycle Reentry in AD
The search to elucidate pathologic mechanisms of neuronal death in Alzheimer's disease has demonstrated that dysregulation of two major cellular processes—cell cycle control and response pathways to oxidative stress—are of paramount importance (Raina et al., 1999). The critical nature of these changes is perhaps most clearly appreciated by observing that their presence in susceptible neurons precedes the appearance of the hallmark features of AD, including intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (Vincent et al., 1998). The report by Kruman and colleagues (2004) in the latest issue of Neuron is exciting because it describes a mechanism that could represent a link between cell cycle reentry and oxidative stress. More specifically, the authors’ findings demonstrate that DNA damage caused by a variety of chemical compounds can lead to cell cycle reentry in primary neuronal cultures. Importantly, this effect could be partially blocked by the use of inhibitors to ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, a primary sensor of DNA...  Read more

DNA Damage Mediated Cell Cycle Reentry in AD
The search to elucidate pathologic mechanisms of neuronal death in Alzheimer's disease has demonstrated that dysregulation of two major cellular processes—cell cycle control and response pathways to oxidative stress—are of paramount importance (Raina et al., 1999). The critical nature of these changes is perhaps most clearly appreciated by observing that their presence in susceptible neurons precedes the appearance of the hallmark features of AD, including intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (Vincent et al., 1998). The report by Kruman and colleagues (2004) in the latest issue of Neuron is exciting because it describes a mechanism that could represent a link between cell cycle reentry and oxidative stress. More specifically, the authors’ findings demonstrate that DNA damage caused by a variety of chemical compounds can lead to cell cycle reentry in primary neuronal cultures. Importantly, this effect could be partially blocked by the use of inhibitors to ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, a primary sensor of DNA damage and activation of response mechanisms. Given that oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to result in a variety of damaged DNA and RNA moieties in AD (Corral-Debrinski et al., 1992; Nunomura et al., 1999), it is, therefore, possible that redox imbalance in AD is responsible for the apparent cell cycle reentry seen in neurons in AD (Raina et al., 2000). In summary, this finding not only puts DNA damage center stage and assigns oxidative stress a proximal role in the history of AD pathogenesis, but also opens up novel therapeutic targets to both DNA damage and cell cycle reentry, both of which are likely for the onset of this disease (Zhu et al., 2004).

References
Corral-Debrinski M, Horton T, Lott MT, Shoffner JM, McKee AC, Beal MF, Graham BH, Wallace DC. Marked changes in mitochondrial DNA deletion levels in Alzheimer brains. Genomics. 1994 Sep 15;23(2):471-6. Abstract

Kruman II, Wersto RP, Cardozo-Pelaez F, Smilenov L, Chan SL, Chrest FJ, Emokpae R Jr., Gorospe M, Mattson MP. Cell cycle activation linked to neuronal cell death initiated by DNA damage neuron. Neuron 2004;41:549-561.

Nunomura A, Perry G, Hirai K, Aliev G, Takeda A, Chiba S, Smith MA. Neuronal RNA oxidation in Alzheimer's disease and Down's syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;893:362-4. No abstract available. Abstract

Raina AK, Monteiro MJ, McShea A, Smith MA. The role of cell cycle-mediated events in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Exp Pathol. 1999 Apr;80(2):71-6. Review. Abstract

Raina AK, Zhu X, Rottkamp CA, Monteiro M, Takeda A, Smith MA. Cyclin' toward dementia: cell cycle abnormalities and abortive oncogenesis in Alzheimer disease. J Neurosci Res. 2000 Jul 15;61(2):128-33. Review. Abstract

Vincent I, Zheng JH, Dickson DW, Kress Y, Davies P. Mitotic phosphoepitopes precede paired helical filaments in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1998 Jul-Aug;19(4):287-96. Abstract

Zhu X, Raina AK, Perry G, Smith MA Alzheimer’s disease: The two-hit hypothesis. The Lancet Neurology 2004, in press.

View all comments by George Perry
View all comments by Arun Raina
View all comments by Mark A. Smith

Cell Cycle Signaling, DNA Damage and Neuronal Apoptosis
Three years ago, following an extensive review of the literature, my colleagues and I came to a hypothetical model on the relationship among cell cycle signaling, DNA damage, and neuronal apoptosis [1]. We found that the contribution of DNA damage to the reactivation of the cell cycle in neurons was not unequivocal. Park and colleagues reported that DNA-damaging agents killed sympathetic neurons by a mechanism including cell cycle components, whereas a strong oxidative stress (that likely causes DNA damage) did not [2]. Our own experiments with β amyloid showed that the reactivation of the cell cycle in neurons precedes the expression of the DNA damage sensor p53 [1,3]. These and other observations led us to hypothesize the existance of a threshold for the activation of a p53/DNA damage-dependent pathway of death in neurons [1]. Thus, we proposed that under conditions such as mild excitotoxicity, moderate DNA damage, trophic deprivation, or β amyloid, neurons require the reactivation of the cell cycle to reach...  Read more

Cell Cycle Signaling, DNA Damage and Neuronal Apoptosis
Three years ago, following an extensive review of the literature, my colleagues and I came to a hypothetical model on the relationship among cell cycle signaling, DNA damage, and neuronal apoptosis [1]. We found that the contribution of DNA damage to the reactivation of the cell cycle in neurons was not unequivocal. Park and colleagues reported that DNA-damaging agents killed sympathetic neurons by a mechanism including cell cycle components, whereas a strong oxidative stress (that likely causes DNA damage) did not [2]. Our own experiments with β amyloid showed that the reactivation of the cell cycle in neurons precedes the expression of the DNA damage sensor p53 [1,3]. These and other observations led us to hypothesize the existance of a threshold for the activation of a p53/DNA damage-dependent pathway of death in neurons [1]. Thus, we proposed that under conditions such as mild excitotoxicity, moderate DNA damage, trophic deprivation, or β amyloid, neurons require the reactivation of the cell cycle to reach the threshold for death, whereas under strong insults, which cause extensive DNA damage, neurons can reach the threshold without the contribution of a cell cycle. In our view, cell cycle-activated neuronal DNA synthesis is a potential source of replication errors which can contribute to reach the threshold for the activation of apoptosis. Accordingly, we have recently shown that a non-canonical DNA replication mediated by the error-prone DNA polymerase-beta takes place in neurons exposed to β amyloid. Interestingly, the espression of p53 is abolished in cultures treated with DNA polymerase-beta antisenses [4].

Now, Kruman and colleagues [5] compare compounds that damage the DNA (methothrexate, homocysteine, etoposide and β amyloid) to agents that do not (staurosporine and colchicine), and show that only DNA-damaging compounds promote neuronal entering into the S phase. Although this is a very elegant approach, it remains difficult to foresee potential pitfalls linked to the use of specific drugs; for example, staurosporine is able to induce a G1/S phase arrest [6]. With regard to β amyloid, the potentiation of β amyloid toxicity by the endogenous glutamate must be considered. In Kruman’s work, the combination of β amyloid and endogenous glutamate (our own experiments are performed, instead, in the presence of a cocktail of glutamate receptor antagonists) could be sufficient to trigger the DNA damage that initiates a cell cycle. How should we interprete this reentrance?

Kruman and colleagues show that the suppression of the cell cycle check-point ATM prevents both cell cycle reentry and apoptosis [5]. The authors hypothesize that ATM activates cell cycle-dependent DNA repair mechanisms that eliminate neurons loaded with unrepaired DNA damage. This is an interesting hypothesis based on existing evidence that some repair enzymes have greater activity in proliferating cells than in resting cells. Thus, cell cycle progression might be required for the activation of a trascription-coupled DNA repair machinery. However, one may wonder how neurons with unrepaired DNA damage survive in conditions of a suppressed ATM function. If the answer is that this damage is repaired by non cell cycle-dependent routes (this means that it is repairable), why should neurons engage a cycle to be eliminated? I rather think that, in conditions of low/moderate DNA damage, the reactivation of the cell cycle is restored in response to DNA repair and then incidentally contributes to the death of neurons.

References:
1. Copani A, Uberti D, Sortino MA, Bruno V, Nicoletti F, Memo M. Activation of cell-cycle-associated proteins in neuronal death: a mandatory or dispensable path? Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jan;24(1):25-31. Abstract

2. Park DS, Morris EJ, Stefanis L, Troy CM, Shelanski ML, Geller HM, Greene LA. Multiple pathways of neuronal death induced by DNA-damaging agents, NGF deprivation, and oxidative stress. J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 1;18(3):830-40. Abstract

3. Copani A, Condorelli F, Caruso A, Vancheri C, Sala A, Giuffrida Stella AM, Canonico PL, Nicoletti F, Sortino MA. Mitotic signaling by beta-amyloid causes neuronal death. FASEB J. 1999 Dec;13(15):2225-34. Abstract

4. Copani A, Sortino MA, Caricasole A, Chiechio S, Chisari M, Battaglia G, Giuffrida-Stella AM, Vancheri C, Nicoletti F. Erratic expression of DNA polymerases by beta-amyloid causes neuronal death. FASEB J. 2002 Dec;16(14):2006-8. Abstract

5. Kruman II, Wersto RP, Cardozo-Pelaez F, Smilenov L, Chan SL, Chrest FJ, Emokpae R Jr, Gorospe M, Mattson MP. Cell cycle activation linked to neuronal cell death initiated by DNA damage. Neuron. 2004 Feb 19;41(4):549-61. Abstract

6. Yamasaki F, Hama S, Yoshioka H, Kajiwara Y, Yahara K, Sugiyama K, Heike Y, Arita K, Kurisu K. Staurosporine-induced apoptosis is independent of p16 and p21 and achieved via arrest at G2/M and at G1 in U251MG human glioma cell line. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003 Apr;51(4):271-83. Abstract

View all comments by Agata Copani