After messenger RNA, there were microRNAs, small noncoding RNAs that control the fate of messenger RNAs, and with them the growth and development of cells and organisms. Now there is a new RNA on the block. Longer than microRNAs but still noncoding, these abundant molecules were thought by some to be biologically relevant, and by others to represent transcriptional noise. An analysis of in-situ hybridization patterns for more than a thousand of these transcripts suggests that indeed many do have a functional role in the brain. The paper, published in PNAS Early Edition this week, comes from the lab of John Mattick from the University of Queensland in Australia.
Dual first authors Tim Mercer and Marcel Dinger looked at the expression of noncoding RNAs in the Allen Brain Atlas, a collection of in-situ hybridization data on mouse brain (Lien et al., 2007). In that dataset, researchers from the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle, Washington, cataloged the expression patterns of roughly 20,000 genes. By analyzing the probe sequences, Mercer and Dinger determined that 1,328 of the probes most likely matched RNAs that did not encode proteins. Of these, 849 turned out to be functionally interesting, in that they were expressed in brain in a region-restricted or cell-specific manner, or were restricted to specific subcellular locations, just like many protein-coding RNAs. The transcripts came from a variety of genomic regions, including intergenic and intronic regions. Many overlapped with, or were transcribed antisense to genes known to function in the brain.
The analysis only looked at a small portion of the known noncoding transcripts in the brain, and the investigators estimate there could be up to 20,000 ncRNAs there that are processed and have a biological role. The study, they write, “represents an important early step in appreciating the significance of ncRNA in brain biology and not only provides compelling evidence that many of these transcripts are intrinsically functional, but also identifies many for future study.” To facilitate that future work, the investigators have compiled the data into a searchable, freely accessible online database.—Pat McCaffrey
- Lein ES, Hawrylycz MJ, Ao N, Ayres M, Bensinger A, Bernard A, Boe AF, Boguski MS, Brockway KS, Byrnes EJ, Chen L, Chen TM, Chin MC, Chong J, Crook BE, Czaplinska A, Dang CN, Datta S, Dee NR, Desaki AL, Desta T, Diep E, Dolbeare TA, Donelan MJ, Dong HW, Dougherty JG, Duncan BJ, Ebbert AJ, Eichele G, Estin LK, Faber C, Facer BA, Fields R, Fischer SR, Fliss TP, Frensley C, Gates SN, Glattfelder KJ, Halverson KR, Hart MR, Hohmann JG, Howell MP, Jeung DP, Johnson RA, Karr PT, Kawal R, Kidney JM, Knapik RH, Kuan CL, Lake JH, Laramee AR, Larsen KD, Lau C, Lemon TA, Liang AJ, Liu Y, Luong LT, Michaels J, Morgan JJ, Morgan RJ, Mortrud MT, Mosqueda NF, Ng LL, Ng R, Orta GJ, Overly CC, Pak TH, Parry SE, Pathak SD, Pearson OC, Puchalski RB, Riley ZL, Rockett HR, Rowland SA, Royall JJ, Ruiz MJ, Sarno NR, Schaffnit K, Shapovalova NV, Sivisay T, Slaughterbeck CR, Smith SC, Smith KA, Smith BI, Sodt AJ, Stewart NN, Stumpf KR, Sunkin SM, Sutram M, Tam A, Teemer CD, Thaller C, Thompson CL, Varnam LR, Visel A, Whitlock RM, Wohnoutka PE, Wolkey CK, Wong VY, Wood M, Yaylaoglu MB, Young RC, Youngstrom BL, Yuan XF, Zhang B, Zwingman TA, Jones AR. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2007 Jan 11;445(7124):168-76. PubMed.
No Available Further Reading
- Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Sunkin SM, Mehler MF, Mattick JS. Specific expression of long noncoding RNAs in the mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15;105(2):716-21. PubMed.