Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Mapping Protein Networks in the Roundworm
3 January 2004. Genome, transcriptome, proteome, and now we have the interactome, the full complement of protein-protein interactions that can occur in the cell. Marc Vidal and colleagues from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, and numerous other research centers, report in today's Sciencexpress the mapping of a substantial part of the C. elegans interactome network.

Interactomes get us closer to the business end of cell biology, but elucidating all the interactions among thousands of proteins is a Herculean task, as evident by the 10 first authors that cooperated to make this work happen. Together, Siming Li and colleagues identified more than 4,000 interactions using just over 3,000 protein "baits" in yeast two-hybrid screens.

The data Li and colleagues collected allowed them to describe highly connected networks of proteins that are likely to function in common cellular processes. As an example, the authors chose to feature two proteins, C49A1.4 and VAB-3, which are orthologs of the Eyes Absent and Eyeless transcription factors that regulate eye development in Drosophila. Li and colleagues found that the two C. elegans proteins, which share many binding partners, interact with eight proteins that are predicted to be involved in membrane function. These novel interactions suggest that membrane biology may play a role in regulating eye development.

These types of study, exemplified previously by the recent work of John Chant and colleagues who mapped over 7,000 interactions in Drosophila (see ARF related news story), represent the potential of "interactomics" to uncover novel protein partnerships that may help researchers understand pathogenesis and perhaps identify therapeutic targets.—Tom Fagan.

Reference:
Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N, Ge H, Milstein S, Boxem M, Vidalain PO, Han JD, Chesneau A, Hao T, Goldberg DS, Li N, Martinez M, Rual JF, Lamesch P, Xu L, Tewari M, Wong SL, Zhang LV, Berriz GF, Jacotot L, Vaglio P, Reboul J, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Li Q, Gabel HW, Elewa A, Baumgartner B, Rose DJ, Yu H, Bosak S, Sequerra R, Fraser A, Mango SE, Saxton WM, Strome S, Van Den Heuvel S, Piano F, Vandenhaute J, Sardet C, Gerstein M, Doucette-Stamm L, Gunsalus KC, Harper JW, Cusick ME, Roth FP, Hill DE, Vidal M. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science. 2004 Jan 2 [Epub ahead of print]. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Chris Link
Submitted 5 January 2004  |  Permalink Posted 5 January 2004

Although this paper represents a tremendous amount of work, it is not as strong a study as the similar one conduced recently in the fruit fly (Giot et al., 2003). Li et al. used only about one-fifth the number of bait targets as used in the fly work, so their interaction map is presumably less extensive than that constructed for the fly. Of more concern is the authors' own estimation that they have recapitulated only 10 percent of the already known interactions in their test set. The authors also make some comparisons between their data and the published C. elegans microarray data that don't seem compelling, although it is unclear if this indicates weaknesses in the data or a general lack of (biological) concurrence between protein interaction and transcriptional profiles.

The real question is whether the high-throughput protein interaction datasets are really useful for understanding disease-associated protein function and pathology. In a simple test, I looked for interactions found for the fly and...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad