Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
U.S. Study Questions the Value of CJD Test
26 June 2003. Soon after the World Health Organization bestowed its approval on the protein 14-3-3 as an important diagnostic marker for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD), reports began to come in that its sensitivity and specificity might not be all that was advertised. Serving as an example of the woes and complexities that beset the search for reliable diagnostic tests for neurodegenerative diseases overall, a report in the current Archives of Neurology echoes this suspicion, finding that the test only identified 53 percent of sporadic CJD cases referred to a major U.S. medical center.

The family of 14-3-3 proteins, found in all mammalian cells, play normal roles in modulating signal transduction. They have been implicated in responses to stress, cell cycle control, and apoptosis. There are even hints that they might play a role in regulating the abnormal aggregation of proteins in neurodegenerative disease (see ARF related news story). .

In approving elevated 14-3-3 levels as a CJD marker, the WHO was acting on studies that had indicated 14-3-3 had over 90 percent sensitivity and specificity for cases of sporadic CJD. However, subsequent studies have pointed out that many other disorders, ranging from encephalitis to stroke, result in elevated CSF 14-3-3, suggesting that the protein is a nonspecific marker for different sorts of neuronal injury. The sensitivity of the test has also been called into question.

The authors of the present study, led by Michael Geschwind of the University of California, San Francisco, used only pathology-proved cases of sCJD and included results from seven different laboratories. They acknowledge that their finding of low sensitivity could be the result of a lack of uniform laboratory standards for the test in the United States; the studies that found higher sensitivity for the test were conducted in centralized laboratories in Europe. Geschwind and colleagues argue that if inaccurate U.S. tests are the problem, then the test should not be used as a diagnostic marker in this country, as the chances of a false negative are too great. Even so, they are not convinced that the laboratory tests were inaccurate. They write that the 14-3-3 test does not deserve the prominence placed on it by the WHO guidelines, which suggested it could substitute for an electroencephalogram. In an accompanying editorial, Allen Aksamit of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, agrees with these conclusions, but argues that patient selection and laboratory and methodologic differences may have skewed the results of the study somewhat. He suggests that 14-3-3 is still a valuable adjunct test.-Hakon Heimer.

References:
Geschwind MD, Martindale J, Miller D, DeArmond SJ, Uyehara Lock J, Gaskin D, Kramer JH, Barbaro NM, Miller BL. Challenging the clinical utility of the 14 3 3 protein for the diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt Jakob disease. Arch Neurol. 2003 Jun;60(6):813 6. Abstract

Aksamit AJ. Cerebrospinal fluid 14-3-3 protein: Variability of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, laboratory standards, and quantitation. Arch Neurol. 2003 Jun;60(6):803-4. Abstract

See also FerlLab.

 
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad