Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Stockholm: Could a Whiff of NAP Nip Brain Inflammation in the Bud?
25 July 2002. Stockholm. Last Sunday at the 8th International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders here, Illana Gozes presented a poster with the latest data in her investigation of NAP. This intriguing peptide of eight amino acids lies within a glia-derived protein called activity-dependent neuroprotective protein, ADNP, which Gozes et al. first cloned in 1999. NAP protects neurons in vitro at femtomolar concentrations, said Gozes. Most currently prescribed drugs work in the nanomolar range at best. Gozes, who is at Tel Aviv University, did this work in collaboration with Douglas Brenneman at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland.

Studies published prior to the international conference in Stockholm showed that NAP is neuroprotective in different in-vitro systems against a variety of toxins, including Aβ, excitotocity, and gp120 of the HIV virus. NAP protects against oxidative stress by increasing glutathione levels in neurons, said Gozes. In a previous study, Gozes and colleagues rescued cultured cells that were dying following pre-treatment with a glutathione inhibitor. NAP also inhibits cell death following hydroxyperoxide treatment, and in 2000, the scientists reported glutathione increase and neuroprotection in a NAP-treated mouse model of severe oxidative stress, Gozes said.

At the Stockholm conference, Gozes et al. reported a preventive in-vivo inflammation experiment that was not specific to AD but is relevant to neurodegeneration. The scientists injected newborn mouse pups daily with NAP for three weeks, and at four months of age inflicted a head trauma, widely seen as a risk factor for dementia. NAP-treated mice recovered faster, and a five-day Morris water maze experiment with the injured mice showed that only those pre-treated with NAP found the submerged platform. In addition, NAP-treated mice had decreased mRNA levels of the inflammatory marker Mac-1. Alternatively, injecting a single dose of NAP 15 hours after injury into mice that had not received it postnatally also kept Mac-1 expression low, Gozes said.

Last April, Gozes and her colleagues published that NAP is neuroprotective in a rat model of stroke when injected four hours after the insult. And last year, they reported that administering NAP through the nose protected mice into whose cerebral ventricles the researchers had previously injected a toxin that slowly kills cholinergic neurons. The researchers again saw a difference in water maze performance.

"In the toxicology we have done until now, we found no side effects, though we still need to do pharmacokinetic and other studies," said Gozes. In general, peptides make poor drugs because they are degraded by proteases and do not penetrate their target cells sufficiently well at safe concentrations. Gozes said, however, that this peptide is unusually stable and appears to penetrate the brain well when administered intranasally. No clinical trial is imminent, though the ADCS in San Diego is considering the approach. Even if all went smoothly in future trials, (which is rare), this peptide would take years before becoming widely available.-Gabrielle Strobel.

 
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad