 |
 |
News Search |
 |
 |
 |
Stockholm: Not All NSAIDs Are Equally Good When it Comes to Alzheimer’s
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
23 July 2002. Stockholm. Today at the 8th International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders, Monique Breteler and colleagues at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, Netherlands, reported the surprising result of a reanalysis of their previous paper, which had sparked controversy (see related news item, see NSAID discussion transcript). Last fall, Bas In’t Veld et al. reported that NSAID consumption protected against AD, and that this applied to all NSAIDs that were taken by the 7,983 study participants of their community-based cohort. Shortly thereafter, Sasha Weggen et al. reported in Nature that, in vitro, the NSAIDs ibuprofen, indomethacin, and sulindac, but not naproxen or diclofenac, work by lowering Aβ42 production. This triggered debate about whether the experimental data was applicable to human AD, and about which NSAIDs would work in clinical treatment trials.
Prompted by the Weggen et al. paper, Breteler then reanalyzed their data by grouping the Aβ42-lowering and non-lowering NSAIDs in separate groups. Their poster showed that the protective effect they previously reported for all NSAIDs lumped together is actually restricted mostly to those that lowered Aβ in the Weggen et al. experiments. The adjusted risk ratio for ibuprofen, indomethacin, and sulindac decreased down to 0.62 depending on how long study participants took the drugs. However, the adjusted risk ratio for diclofenac and naproxen remained around one. “Our reanalysis agrees completely with the Weggen et al. data,” said Breteler. The data is not yet published -Gabrielle Strobel.
|
 |
 |
 |
Comments on Related Papers |
 |
 |
|
Related Paper: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of Alzheimer's disease.
Comment by: Eddie Koo, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Nice study, but confirmatory nonetheless.
View all comments by Eddie Koo
|
 |
|
|
Related Paper: A subset of NSAIDs lower amyloidogenic Abeta42 independently of cyclooxygenase activity.
Comment by: Benjamin Wolozin, ARF Advisor (Disclosure)
|
 |
 |
I recommend this paper
This study suggests a novel mechanism by which NSAIDs might be protective in AD, and a potentially novel and selective mechanism for lowering Ab42 production. This is important because Ab42 is thought to be a critical factor initiating Ab aggregation. -- Benjamin Wolozin
View all comments by Benjamin Wolozin
|
 |
|
|
Related Paper: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of Alzheimer's disease.
Comment by: Larry Nault
|
 |
 |
Submitted 1 October 2002
|
Posted 1 October 2002
|
 |
 |
I recommend this paper
I believe this study has the potential to accelerate active AD prevention. I'm puzzeled that the re-analysis of data (see 23 July 2002 news story) discerning between NSAIDs is taking so long to be published. This has to be seen as a CORRECTION, and an ALERT and promptly made available.
View all comments by Larry Nault
|
 |
|
|
Related Paper: A subset of NSAIDs lower amyloidogenic Abeta42 independently of cyclooxygenase activity.
Comment by: Dominic Walsh, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Submitted 28 June 2004
|
Posted 28 June 2004
|
 |
 |
The most innovative paper from 2001, which provided a novel means of
modulating γ-secretase activity.
View all comments by Dominic Walsh
|
 |
|
|
Related Paper: A subset of NSAIDs lower amyloidogenic Abeta42 independently of cyclooxygenase activity.
Comment by: Yungfeng Liao
|
 |
 |
Submitted 5 October 2004
|
Posted 5 October 2004
|
 |
 |
I recommend this paper
|
 |
 |
 |
Comments on Related News |
 |
 |
|
Related News: Trials and Tribulations: Does ADAPT Have to Adapt?
Comment by: Eddie Koo, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Submitted 25 September 2002
|
Posted 25 September 2002
|
 |
 |
Many of Sidney Wolfe's accusations of ADAPT are unfounded although I appreciate their caution that giving these drugs to elderly individuals can be potentially dangerous. I will focus only on those aspects that concern our work as I think our results have been misrepresented or misinterpreted.
First, NSAIDs are not secretase inhibitors, as claimed in the letter. They only modulated β-secretase activity by reducing Aβ42 in favor of shorter Aβ peptides. β-secretase inhibitors have their limitations as potential therapeutics, as well, through inhibiting notch cleavage, etc.
Second, the dosage of NSAIDs we had to use to achieve this effect is very high, a key issue we have to address scientifically. What's FDA approved and what were given in the Rotterdam study are likely much lower than what we gave to the mice. Therefore, whether very high doses are necessary and achievable in humans in order to see the Aβ42 effect remains to be proven. Consequently, making a strong conclusion that our results imply that it is the Aβ42 effect that underlies the...
Read more
View all comments by Eddie Koo
|
 |
|
|
Related News: Trials and Tribulations: Does ADAPT Have to Adapt?
Comment by: Monique MB Breteler
|
 |
 |
Submitted 25 September 2002
|
Posted 25 September 2002
|
 |
 |
Dear John,
I have read the public letter sent by the US advocacy group Public Citizen to the Department of Health and Human Services, asking its secretary Tommy Thompson to suspend the ADAPT trial. I appreciate the important watchdog function of lay and patient organizations, yet if they make scientific judgments these should be thoroughly founded. I profoundly disagree with the interpretation of the existing evidence and the scientific argument in mentioned letter. The authors of the letter partly base their opinion on our research findings from the Rotterdam Study, which is why I would like to comment on their arguments and give you my current views on whether anti-inflammatory drugs might be beneficial in the prevention of Alzheimer's disease.
Public Citizen postulates that there is no longer any biological basis for the ADAPT trial. Their arguments include that 1) the inflammatory hypothesis of AD no longer holds and Aβ accumulation is central to Alzheimer's disease; 2) there is convincing evidence now that some NSAIDs do lower Aβ, whereas others do not; and...
Read more
View all comments by Monique MB Breteler
|
 |
|
|
Related News: Trials and Tribulations: Does ADAPT Have to Adapt?
Comment by: Paul Aisen
|
 |
 |
Submitted 25 September 2002
|
Posted 25 September 2002
|
 |
 |
I have read the letter and was quite distressed by it. I am not involved in the ADAPT, though I have had a number of discussions with John Breitner about it, and have shared data from the ADCS NSAID study with the ADAPT investigators. Also, I was involved with the NIA review of the ADAPT application.
I would describe the letter as an inflammatory tirade rather than a scientific argument. While it does review some relevant scientific observations, the discussion is one-sided. I do not agree with the conclusions and recommendations of the letter. Celecoxib and naproxen were chosen based on a number of considerations, including epidemiologic data suggesting that NSAIDs reduce the risk of AD, and basic research suggesting that a number of inflammatory processes, including cyclooxygenase activity, may contribute to neurodegeneration in AD, as well as tolerability issues.
The recent evidence suggesting that a subset of NSAIDs favorably influence AβPP processing is quite interesting, and may be important. But it represents one recent addition to a huge body of data on...
Read more
View all comments by Paul Aisen
|
 |
|
|
Related News: Trials and Tribulations: Does ADAPT Have to Adapt?
Comment by: Leon Thal
|
 |
 |
Submitted 25 September 2002
|
Posted 25 September 2002
|
 |
 |
The addition of a third arm with ibuprofen is a consideration. It would be logistically difficult but possible to do. The real question is does ibuprofen make any more sense than naproxen since tolerated doses over five years may well be too low to block formation of Aβ42.
View all comments by Leon Thal
|
 |
|
|
Related News: Naproxen/Rofecoxib Trial Results Published
Comment by: Alexei R. Koudinov
|
 |
 |
Submitted 5 June 2003
|
Posted 6 June 2003
|
 |
 |
I recommend the Primary Papers
NSAIDS, ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND PUBLIC CITIZEN
With regard to this news item please see my Open letter to Public
Citizen's Health Research Group on Alzheimer's disease research.
Science SAGE KE (21 Feb., 2003) [ Full
Text ] ; BMJ (27 Feb., 2003) [ Full
Text ] .
View all comments by Alexei R. Koudinov
|
 |
|
|
Related News: Naproxen/Rofecoxib Trial Results Published
Comment by: John Breitner, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Submitted 6 June 2003
|
Posted 6 June 2003
|
 |
 |
This is the fifth published trial of antiinflammatory treatments for disease modification or symptomatic improvement in Alzheimer's dementia. Two early small studies showed an encouraging suggestion of disease modification (slowing or progression) in patients randomized to indomethacin and diclofenac. These trials encountered severe difficulties, however, with high rates of dropouts, and they were too small, in any case, to produce definitive results.
More recently published trials have tested low-dose prednisone, a broad-spectrum corticosteroidal antiinflammatory agent, and hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug that is widely acknowledged to have potent antiinflammatory activity. The prednisone trial showed a predictable range of safety concerns, but the treated group showed worse performance, if anything, on their measures of disease progression. The hydroxycholoroquine trial results were null, despite that trial's having especially abundant statistical power to demonstrate a relatively modest level of benefit. This latest trial with rofecoxib and naproxen is again...
Read more
View all comments by John Breitner
|
 |
|
|
Related News: Naproxen/Rofecoxib Trial Results Published
Comment by: Todd Golde, ARF Advisor, Eddie Koo, ARF Advisor
|
 |
 |
Submitted 9 June 2003
|
Posted 9 June 2003
|
 |
 |
The study by Aisen et al. shows no benefit to rofecoxib or naproxen in patients with mild to moderate AD. Nevertheless, this negative study is an important contribution to the collective effort to evaluate therapeutic strategies to treat or prevent AD. The excellent discussion highlights the salient points and limitations of this study:
- The epidemiologic data supports a role for NSAIDs in prevention of AD and not in treatment. Thus, it is not necessarily surprising that no benefit was observed in this patient trial.
- The most consistent reduction of risk in the epidemiologic studies of NSAIDs and AD was in the group that used NSAIDs for greater than two years; thus, it is possible that a one-year study with any NSAID will not show a beneficial effect.
- Unlike some other NSAIDs (ibuprofen), rofecoxib or naproxen do not lower Ab42. They also have not been reported to have any beneficial effect in AbPP mouse models.
- Treatment trials with other NSAIDs that reduce Ab42 and are proven...
Read more
View all comments by Todd Golde
View all comments by Eddie Koo
|
 |
|
|
Related News: Surprise! Some γ-Secretase Modulators Work by Targeting APP
Comment by: Giuseppina Tesco
|
 |
 |
Submitted 18 June 2008
|
Posted 20 June 2008
|
 |
 |
I recommend the Primary Papers
The recent report by Kukar et al. provides compelling evidence that some GSMs can modulate γ-secretase activity by binding the APP-CTF. The authors propose that the binding of GSMs to the APP-CTF induces conformational changes in the PS1/γ-secretase when the GSM-bound substrate enters the complex. As pointed out by Golde and colleagues, these exciting new findings nicely support our previous studies (Tesco et al., 2005) showing that the APPV715F substitution in the APP transmembrane domain mimics the effects of Aβ42-lowering NSAIDs, by reducing the ratio of Aβ42:Aβ40. This same substitution affected AICD production and PS1 conformation in a similar way to that of NSAIDs. These data suggested that the Aβ transmembrane domain might serve as a target for γ-secretase modulation.
Phenylalanine-scanning mutagenesis of the APP transmembrane domain (TMD) had previously shown that APPV715F substitution shifts Aβ cleavage toward the production of the less fibrillogenic species Aβ38, while decreasing levels of Aβ40 and even more...
Read more
View all comments by Giuseppina Tesco
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
Submit a Comment on this News Article |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |