Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Early-Stage Alternative Vaccine Reported: Better Antibody Response with Liposomes?
13 February 2002. Just as immunotherapy for Alzheimer's disease has encountered its first problems in the clinic (see Live Chat discussion), new approaches are emerging in the research pipeline. In yesterday's Early Online edition of PNAS, Claude Nicolau of Universite Louis Pasteur in Strasbourg and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, and colleagues, describe an alternative that aims to boost the ability of an Aβ peptide vaccine to generate a potent antibody response by embedding the peptide in fatty droplets called liposomes.

Nicolau et al. used the first 16 amino acids of the Aβ peptide, which researchers led by Beka Solomon, now at Tel Aviv University, had shown to dissolve A1-42 fibrils (Solomon et al, 1997.) They attached to its ends palmitoylated lysine residues that enabled them to anchor the peptide in the lipid bilayer of a liposome adjuvant. Then they immunized Balb/c, C57BL, and transgenic NORBA mice with this experimental Ab1-16 vaccine and tested the mice's sera for its ability to disaggregate amyloid in vitro. NORBA mice have Aβ-derived amyloid deposits on their pancreas, not in their brains, (Shoji et al. 1996.)

The scientists report that their vaccine generated significant antibody titers within 10 weeks after the first inoculation, much faster than was reported for previous Aβ vaccines. They also present data suggesting that the sera from the vaccinated mice dissolve fibrillar amyloid and prevent or slow plaque buildup in the pancreas of NORBA mice.

The study implies that its anti-Aβ1-16 antibody dissolves amyloid more potently than does a previous antibody by Elan Pharmaceuticals, 6C6. However, Figure 4b, which refers to Aβ1-16, 6C6, and a control antibody in the caption, does not actually present all the data necessary to directly compare anti-Aβ1-16 and 6C6 in a single experiment. The paper also does not contain a statistical analysis of the mice's reaction to inoculation with Aβ1-16.

This study does not include tests of the Aβ1-16 vaccine in more standard AD models that overproduce Aβ in the brain, and therefore also does not address whether the vaccine can prevent or improve the behavioral effects seen in these mice, as shown for other experimental vaccines (Janus et al. 2000) (Morgan et al. 2000). However, it points to a possible method to improve the antigenicity of Aβ. In general, self-peptides do not generate high antibody titers because the immune system tolerates the body's own proteins.-Gabrielle Strobel.

Reference:
Nicolau C et al. A liposome-based therapeutic vaccine against β-amyloid plaques on the pancreases of transgenic NORBA mice. PNAS 2002 Feb 19;99(4):2332-2337. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Dave Morgan (Disclosure)
Submitted 20 February 2002  |  Permalink Posted 20 February 2002

I think this is a clever approach to producing a vaccine that would seem more cost-effective than the present Elan vaccine. While the authors claim that their vaccine is highly antigenic, it is hard to know how it would compare to the Elan vaccine without a direct comparison. Clearly this is another viable route to producing anti-Aβ antibodies in vivo.

View all comments by Dave Morgan
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad