Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Stem Cell Screen Points to ALS Disease Target
19 April 2013. Therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have proven hard to develop, in part because of inadequate disease models. A new stem cell-based screening method may help. Researchers led by Lee Rubin, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, screened for compounds that sustain motor neurons derived from mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and ALS patients. As reported in the April 18 Cell Stem Cell online, the kinase inhibitor kenpaullone topped the list of potential drug candidates. It kept motor neurons alive for weeks longer than expected after trophic support was withdrawn. Kenpaullone could point to a new therapeutic target for ALS, and the screening model provides a better way to seek out future compounds, suggested the authors. “When disease-specific cells are part of the process to validate drugs, you are more likely to obtain better results,” Rubin told ARF. Others pointed out that a big leap still exists between cell models and human disease.

Before heading to clinical trials, most drugs are tested on mouse models, but that does not always guarantee success in people. ALS has seen a string of clinical trial failures. To better approximate disease processes, several groups have recently developed human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models to generate different cell types for drug screens. Although motor neurons have been tricky to obtain from iPS cells in the past (see ARF related news story), researchers now have more reliable methods (see Makhortova et al., 2011) and have used human-derived motor neurons to test a handful of compounds that might treat ALS (see ARF related news story on Egawa et al., 2012).

First author Yin Yang and colleagues grew motor neurons from the embryonic stem cells of wild-type mice or mice carrying the human superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1/G93A) mutation. SOD1 variants account for a fifth of familial ALS mutations and its misfolded protein aggregates in the disease. To mimic conditions that might cause neurodegeneration in vivo, the group starved the cells of trophic factors or inhibited the PI3K/Akt pathway, which promotes cell survival. The researchers then tested to see if any of the 5,000 compounds in their chemical library kept the cells alive.

A variety of anti-apoptotic compounds did. One in particular—kenpaullone, an inhibitor of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) and cyclin-dependent kinases—performed better than the rest. After three days of treatment, three- to fourfold more wild-type and mutant SOD1 motor neurons survived with kenpaullone treatment compared to untreated controls. Kenpaullone also maintained neuronal synapse number, structural morphology, and electrophysiological characteristics. The compounds also suppressed SOD1/G93A protein levels in neuronal cultures and reduced its aggregation and ubiquitination. Kenpaullone was first synthesized in the early 1990s, but has never been clinically tested for any disease, said Rubin. GSK-3 activation has been implicated in neurodegeneration, but no GSK-3 inhibitor has succeeded in clinical trials.

Kenpaullone may do more than just inhibit GSK-3, however, as it boosted motor neuron survival more than did other inhibitors of this enzyme or small RNAs that silence the kinase gene. Yang and colleagues found it reduced phosphorylation of both c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and c-Jun, which help drive stress-induced neuronal apoptosis. Kenpaullone also blocked activation of their upstream regulators, including MKK4, Tak1, and HPK1/GCK-like kinase (HGK), which is expressed in motor neurons. Together, the data suggest that kenpaullone tones down a cell-death signaling cascade, the authors wrote. They suggested that HGK may be a new drug target for ALS.

How does kenpaullone cut the level of SOD1 and prevent it from accumulating? “My guess is that it does not affect protein aggregation directly,” Rubin told Alzforum. Given that the compound curtails both protein levels and its ubiquitination, it probably affects general accumulation processes, he explained. “By keeping cells alive and healthier, it diminishes whatever processes cause the protein to aggregate.”

Yang and colleagues wondered if kenpaullone would affect human motor neurons the same way. To find out, the researchers made motor neurons from the iPSCs of one healthy person and two ALS patients carrying either a SOD1 or TDP-43 mutation. Kenpaullone enhanced cell survival in all three cell types. The researchers compared the compound to two others that recently failed in Phase 3 clinical trials for ALS—olesoxime (see ARF related news story) and dexpramipexole (see ARF related news story). Dexpramipexole did not enhance motor neuron survival. Olesoxime did, but less than kenpaullone and less consistently across cell lines. “We might have been able to predict the clinical trial failure if we had tried the compounds in this human cell system,” said Rubin.

Rubin’s group plans to test iPSC-derived motor neurons from other ALS patients, including those with sporadic disease and non-SOD1 mutations. He also plans to evaluate the compound in an ALS mouse model, though the kinase inhibitor has to be directly delivered into the spinal cord, as it does not easily get into the brain. Rubin has no plans to optimize kenpaullone by medicinal chemistry, but is open to doing so with interested collaborators. His group will also look into HGK as a drug target, he said.

More broadly, these experiments aim to validate this system as a way to screen for new drugs. Techniques for growing human cells are improving, and it may soon be practical to use them for high-throughput screens, said Rubin. Drugs could then be routinely tested on human cells before going into clinical trials, he said.

This comes at a time when some are questioning the value of mouse models of neurodegenerative disorders. “The use of human-derived neural cells is an important addition to drug discovery to help bridge the preclinical-clinical translational gap,” wrote Rebecca Pruss of the pharmaceutical company Trophos in Marseille, France, in an e-mail (see full comment below). Current animal models come with a high translational risk, she wrote. However, Pruss cautioned that it may be difficult to define how activity in such cell models will translate into treatments, pointing out that olexisome showed no benefit in an 18-month trial despite activity in this model. Pruss would have liked to know what riluzole—the only approved drug for ALS—did in this cell model. Rubin said they did test riluzole and it had no effect.

Richard Smith, Center for Neurologic Study, La Jolla, California, also offered cautions. “It is too early to know whether stem cell technology offers a better way to predict clinical results in trials,” he told Alzforum. “Leaping from any model, be it an animal or embryonic stem cell model, is still quite a leap. Nevertheless, anything that advances the identification of molecules that have therapeutic benefit and prove to be useful in clinical trials is extremely welcome.”—Gwyneth Dickey Zakaib.

Reference:
Yang YM, Gupta SK, Kim KJ, Powers BE, Cerqueira A, Wainger BJ, Ngo HD, Rosowski KA, Schein PA, Ackeifi CA, Arvanites AC, Davidow LS, Woolf CJ, Rubin LL. A small molecule screen in stem-cell-derived motor neurons identifies a kinase inhibitor as a candidate therapeutic for ALS. Cell Stem Cell. 2013 June 6. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Rebecca M. Pruss
Submitted 19 April 2013  |  Permalink Posted 19 April 2013

This is an exciting paper showing the ability to use a specific class of stem cell-derived neurons—motor neurons—to screen for potential neuroprotective small molecules. While the mouse ESC-derived neural cultures appear suitable for systematic screening, the authors have been able to then evaluate selected hits on human motor neurons derived from ESC- as well as control- and patient-derived iPSC cultures. I was delighted to see that olesoxime was used as a comparator and clearly promoted survival of trophic factor-deprived human motor neurons with similar potency as we found using trophic factor-deprived primary rodent motor neurons. Even though it appears less active than the selected hit, kenpaullone, the large variability in the response to trophic factors, the gold standard, makes it hard to define a maximum response or calibrate the relative response of compounds in this assay. Having human-derived neurons to use as a way of selecting compounds is an important advance for CNS drug discovery, which suffers exceptionally from the high translational risk associated with...  Read more
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad