Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Brain Electrodes Help Early PD, But Still Risky and Costly
15 February 2013. Electrodes inserted into specific brain areas can help some people with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) who no longer respond well to medication. Now, research in the February 14 New England Journal of Medicine suggests that the therapy, known as deep-brain stimulation (DBS), can also help at earlier stages—before motor complications get out of control. In a two-year trial of 251 PD patients, those who received brain implants had fewer motor symptoms, better quality of life, and similar rates of adverse events as participants receiving medical therapy alone. Günther Deuschl of University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany, was the study’s corresponding author; he led the work with Schleswig-Holstein colleague Karina Knudsen; Joern Rau and Carmen Schade-Brittinger of Philipps University, Marburg, Germany; and Michael Schüpbach and Yves Agid of University Pierre et Marie Curie and INSERM, Paris, France.

The new findings should “make patients and physicians consider the option of DBS surgery earlier in the course of Parkinson’s disease, before patients become disabled and before their work and social lives suffer too much,” noted Andres Lozano of Toronto Western Hospital, Canada, a DBS expert who was not involved in the study. However, because the analysis did not address long-term DBS risks, some clinicians said they would be reluctant to recommend the technology to early-stage PD patients.

Nobody quite understands how DBS helps the 2 to 5 percent of PD patients who opt for the procedure. Scientists think it may work by activating GABAergic inhibitory neurons, thereby normalizing a basal ganglia circuit that becomes hyperactive as dopamine neurons die off in PD, Deuschl said. Typically, patients who receive DBS have battled the disease for more than a decade and reached a point where dopamine-boosting medicines no longer relieve the worst motor symptoms. DBS candidates also tend to be younger, with no or little cognitive impairment.

In two previous six-month randomized trials, neurostimulation relieved symptoms more effectively than medical management alone in people with advanced PD and severe motor complications (Deuschl et al., 2006; ARF related news story on Weaver et al., 2009). The implants also improved symptoms and quality of life in early-stage PD, though that trial had just 20 participants (Schüpbach et al., 2007).

For the current study, first author W. Michael Schüpbach and colleagues enrolled 251 patients at 17 sites in Germany and France. The participants were on the young side (mean age 52-53 years), had had Parkinson’s for an average of 7.5 years with early signs of motor complications, and no dementia or major depression. They were randomized to receive neurostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or medical therapy alone, with assessments at five, 12, and 24 months.

Quality of life—the trial’s main endpoint—improved by 26 percent in DBS-treated patients, but hardly changed in the control group. The researchers saw clear improvement with DBS at the five-month timepoint, and the benefit persisted. “There was no worsening of life quality across two years,” Deuschl said. Neurostimulation also improved daily function and mobility, and relieved complications from dopaminergic drugs.

“This study is especially important because it demonstrates that DBS can be used earlier in the course of Parkinson’s disease, rather than saving it as a last resort,” wrote Kenneth Follett, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, in an e-mail to Alzforum. Jerrold Vitek of University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, agreed, calling this “an impact paper that makes people think about [using DBS] earlier.” For patients who start developing complications with medications, DBS would improve quality of life, he said.

Frances Weaver of Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, Illinois, found the data compelling, but wondered if they apply to the bulk of PD patients, who tend to be older. Based on their disease duration and average age at baseline, most trial participants would have been in their forties at the time of diagnosis, she noted. “I’m not sure how applicable the findings would be for PD patients diagnosed when older, which is more common,” Weaver said. Only 11 percent of PD cases are diagnosed before age 60. Moreover, 30 percent of PD patients, particularly older ones, have dementia, which would have excluded them from the current study, noted Caroline Tanner of Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto California, in an accompanying editorial. The current study cannot tell if DBS would work for older PD patients, she wrote.

The study also does not address long-term DBS complications, which some see as an important consideration. The risks “associated with implantation and non-physiological electrical stimulation on diverse neural brain circuitries are not known,” noted Ole Isacson of Harvard Medical School’s McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, in an e-mail to Alzforum (see full comment below). Furthermore, he thinks the trial is “too short to address the most important caveat—loss of DBS efficacy over time.” In prior studies looking at DBS patients five to 10 years post-surgery, patients showed sustained improvement in muscle rigidity, tremor, and dyskinesias, whereas gait and speech seemed to worsen with time (Fasano et al., 2010; Moro et al., 2010; Castrioto et al., 2011).

As with any treatment, the benefits of DBS must be weighed against cost and risk. The new data “aren’t compelling enough for me to recommend surgery to an early PD patient,” said Warren Olanow of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. “The procedure carries risk of infarction, infection, and side effects, not to mention cost.” A DBS device costs $20,000-$30,000. The therapy can also affect a person’s mood and emotions (see Part 2 of a four-part DBS series). Nevertheless, DBS is gaining international credibility as a suitable treatment for some high-functioning PD patients (ARF related news story). The therapy is also starting to show its mettle in other disorders. The procedure looked safe in a small Phase 1 trial in people with Alzheimer’s disease (ARF related news story on Laxton et al., 2010), is currently being tested in a Phase 2 AD trial (see ARF related news story), and appears to improve functional connectivity in AD patients (ARF related news story on Smith et al., 2012). In a prospective study published this month in the journal Neurosurgery, researchers report that DBS improves quality of life in people with neuropathic pain (Boccard et al., 2013).—Esther Landhuis.

References:
Schüpbach WM, Rau J, Knudsen K, Volkmann J, Krack P, Timmermann L, Hälbig T, Hesekamp H, Navarro S, Meier N, Falk D, Mehdorn M, Paschen S, Maarouf M, Barbe MT, Fink GR, Kupsch A, Gruber D, Schneider GH, Seigneuret E, Kistner A, Chaynes P, Ory-Magne F, Courbon CB, Vesper J, Schnitzler A, Wojtecki L, Houeto JL, Bataille B, Maltete D, Damier P, Raoul S, Sixel-Doering F, Hellwig D, Gharabaghi A, Krüger R, Pinsker MO, Amtage F, Regis JM, Witjas T, Thobois S, Mertens P, Kloss M, Hartmann A, Oertel WH, Post B, Speelman H, Agid Y, Schade-Brittinger C, Deuschl G for the EARLYSTIM Study Group. Neurostimulation for Parkinson's Disease with Early Motor Complications. N Engl J Med. 14 Feb 2013. Abstract

Tanner CM. A Second Honeymoon for Parkinson’s Disease? N Engl J Med. 14 Feb 2013. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Ole Isacson, ARF Advisor
Submitted 15 February 2013  |  Permalink Posted 15 February 2013

I think the trial is too short (two years) to address the most important caveat: the loss of DBS efficacy over time. Hence, the trial is not well conceived, in my opinion.

Another issue is that the actual rationale for DBS use—as the authors themselves state in the introduction—is to deal with serious dyskinetic side effects that develop with extended use of pharmacological therapies.

Given that DBS is not a restorative treatment—such as replacing or restoring the original neurons—this effort may drive up the use of this technology to new patient groups who are less likely to benefit from this treatment over a decade than they might from pharmacological or other therapies. And DBS brings significant risks for complications. The use of DBS, and the risks associated with the implantation and the non-physiological electrical stimulation on diverse neural brain circuitries are not known.

View all comments by Ole Isacson

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad