Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Multimodal Imaging: Structure, Function, Amyloid Not in Synch
19 November 2012. As neuroimaging advances paint ever more detailed pictures of the brain’s wear and tear during Alzheimer’s disease, a glaring problem emerges: The pictures don’t always match. In a study published in this week’s Journal of Neuroscience, Gaël Chételat, INSERM-EPHE-University of Caen, France, and colleagues compared three types of neuroimaging scans in the same AD patients. The analysis revealed distinct patterns of atrophy, hypometabolism, and amyloid accumulation across different brain areas; amyloid profiles in particular differed sharply from the other two. Besides offering a new method for comparing imaging techniques, the work suggests that non-amyloid mechanisms may underlie regional differences in pathology in AD. Chételat presented some of these data at meetings earlier this year (see ARF conference story and ARF Webinar).

In another multimodal imaging analysis reported in the same journal issue, researchers led by Dorene Rentz and Trey Hedden of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, asked if neuropathologies common to age-associated conditions—brain Aβ in AD, white matter abnormalities in cerebrovascular disease (CVD)—affect different cognitive skills in normal elderly. The team found no correlation between these two, suggesting that they reflect different biological pathways with distinct effects on cognition.

Research dating back more than a decade has shown inconsistent patterns of atrophy and hypometabolism in the brains of AD patients. To assess these patterns, Chételat and colleagues developed a statistical method to directly compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) data in the same subject. As they previously reported, certain brain areas showed similar degrees of atrophy and hypometabolism, whereas most did not (Chételat et al., 2008).

Now, first author Renaud La Joie and colleagues added a third measurement to the mix—brain Aβ assessed by florbetapir PET. Applying the same statistical method, they found that brain areas were differentially vulnerable to atrophy, hypometabolism, and amyloid buildup. For example, in the hippocampus, atrophy exceeded hypometabolism and Aβ load was low. In contrast, frontal regions had high amyloid, but minimal atrophy and hypometabolism. Posterior association areas were amyloid laden, with notable hypometabolism and moderate atrophy.

“The study presents an approach to systematically put the multimodal imaging data in the same units, which is important when comparing across modalities and investigating regional differences between them,” noted Prashanthi Vemuri of Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, in an e-mail to Alzforum (see full comment below).

Furthermore, the findings expand possibilities for exploring non-amyloid mechanisms, suggested Elizabeth Mormino, a postdoc working with Reisa Sperling of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. Determining why regional discrepancies exist has important implications, Mormino noted, “For instance, if anterior regions are, in fact, resistant to amyloid-related toxicity, understanding how these regions avoid deleterious effects may reveal ways in which amyloid might be combated.”

Chételat said the work seems consistent with recent studies suggesting that the order of AD biomarker changes during disease progression plays out slightly differently in familial AD cohorts compared to what current models propose. For example, the Alzheimer’s Prevention Initiative recently reported that young presenilin 1 mutation carriers had grey matter atrophy, even though this is usually a late symptom detected after amyloid and tau deposition (ARF related news story; see also Bateman et al., 2012; ARF Webinar on AD biomarkers), Chételat said.

In the other multimodal imaging study, the MGH researchers examined both brain Aβ and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) in the same cognitively normal elderly people. These are pathological hallmarks of AD and cerebrovascular disease, respectively, which appear to share common risk factors based on epidemiological studies (see de la Torre, 2010). However, other research suggests the biomarkers may affect cognition differently, with amyloid buildup primarily degrading memory and white matter changes weakening executive control (see Hedden et al., 2012).

Hedden and colleagues analyzed 168 healthy seniors who had PET amyloid imaging, MRI measures of white matter degradation, and neuropsychological testing as participants in the Harvard Aging Brain longitudinal study. The researchers developed a statistical algorithm—similar to the one used by Chételat’s team—that assigns global values to amyloid and WMH measurements across defined brain areas, and compares them on a common scale. They looked at each biomarker’s relation to several cognitive domains—episodic memory, executive function, and processing speed. As hypothesized, amyloid burden distinctly affected episodic memory, whereas WMH primarily influenced executive function with milder effect on other cognitive domains. The two biomarkers did not correlate with each other. The results suggest that “even before clinical impairment, amyloid burden and WMH likely represent neuropathological cascades with distinct etiologies and dissociable influences on cognition,” the authors wrote.

Adam Brickman of Columbia University, New York, praised the study’s “beautiful statistics and careful methodology.” However, he added, the effect sizes are small, and the data do not disprove the idea that amyloid and WMH might interact in some way. The authors agree, noting that selection bias could have accounted in part for the failure to detect a relationship between the two biomarkers. Seniors with a “double hit” might be more likely to suffer cognitive loss that would have excluded them from the study. In essence, this would remove the subjects who might have a correlation between amyloid and white matter changes.

Recent analyses from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) found unusually high white matter damage. This suggests that amyloid burden and WMH may indeed be linked in people with familial AD mutations (see ARF related news story)—unlike what Hedden’s team saw in elderly normals. Hedden thinks cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)—a process by which amyloid clogs the walls of blood vessels—could account for the apparent association between brain Aβ and white matter abnormalities in mutation carriers. “It is quite possible that mutation carriers have CAA as well as the cerebral amyloidosis that is more typical of AD,” Hedden said. In advanced stages of sporadic AD, he added, it is possible that amyloid could spread to blood vessels and affect white matter change through a CAA route.—Esther Landhuis.

References:
Hedden T, Mormino EC, Amariglio RE, Younger AP, Schultz AP, Becker JA, Buckner RL, Johnson KA, Sperling RA, Rentz DM. Cognitive Profile of Amyloid Burden and White Matter Hyperintensities in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. J Neurosci. 14 Nov 2012;32(46):16233-42. Abstract

La Joie R, Perrotin A, Barré L, Hommet C, Mézenge F, Ibazizene M, Camus V, Abbas A, Landeau B, Guilloteau D, de La Sayette V, Eustache F, Desgranges B, Chételat G. Region-Specific Hierarchy Between Atrophy, Hypometabolism, and β-Amyloid (Aβ) Load in Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia. 14 Nov 2012;32(46):16265-73. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Primary Papers: Region-specific hierarchy between atrophy, hypometabolism, and β-amyloid (Aβ) load in Alzheimer's disease dementia.

Comment by:  Elizabeth Mormino
Submitted 16 November 2012  |  Permalink Posted 16 November 2012

In this paper, La Joie et al. provide convincing evidence for distinct patterns of brain changes (atrophy, hypometabolism, and amyloid deposition) across different brain regions in Alzheimer’s disease.

Although the presence of regional discrepancies requires more complicated explanations, an understanding of why these discrepancies exist has important implications. For instance, if anterior regions are, in fact, resistant to amyloid-related toxicity, an understanding of how anterior regions avoid deleterious effects may reveal ways in which amyloid might be combated. These regional discrepancies also highlight the potential relevance of non-amyloid etiologies, such as neurofibrillary tangles, comorbidities, etc., which are important considerations for a field that is highly focused on amyloid.

View all comments by Elizabeth Mormino


  Comment by:  Prashanthi Vemuri
Submitted 19 November 2012  |  Permalink Posted 19 November 2012

In this study, multimodal imaging data from the same subjects provide the authors with a unique opportunity to investigate the regional specificity of different Alzheimer’s disease pathologies. The study presents an approach to systematically put the multimodal imaging data on the same scale so that comparisons between scans are valid. This is important when comparing across modalities, and allowed the authors to investigate the regional differences between modalities. The results neatly tie together the findings in the existing literature and propose a new methodology to investigate regional hierarchy of AD pathologies. It is, however, important to remember that the modality-specific regional differences they found may be due to the differences in the specificity of the imaging technology in detecting the pathological signal. Moving forward, there is a need to employ such methodologies in subjects with longitudinal follow-up as well as in subjects covering the entire cognitive spectrum to improve our understanding of the disease.

View all comments by Prashanthi Vemuri
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad