Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Amyloid Fibrils as Signaling Complexes? Role in Cell Death Pathway
20 July 2012. Amyloid deposits are often thought of as junk—toxic waste products clogging up cells. A paper in today’s Cell, however, suggests that at least one type of amyloid plays a crucial role in physiologic signaling. Researchers led by Hao Wu, a structural biologist formerly at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City and now at Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, and Francis Chan, a cell death expert at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, report that protein kinases involved in necrotic cell death form amyloid fibrils. In the absence of fibril formation, necrotic signaling fails, demonstrating that the structure is a key feature of the pathway. An unanswered but tantalizing question is whether necrotic amyloids may interact in some way with the β amyloid fibrils present in Alzheimer’s disease.

“This paper is among the first to show just how important amyloid formation is in normal cellular processes in mammalian cells,” said David Teplow at the University of California, Los Angeles. He praised the thoroughness of the work, noting, “In every possible way you could imagine from a physical biochemistry point of view, [the authors] showed that these things are classic amyloid structures. It is beautiful and impressive work.”

In the last few years, accumulating evidence indicates that amyloids can serve multiple physiologic functions, particularly in yeast and bacteria. To date, known roles mainly include structural tasks such as protein storage, scaffolding, cell adhesion, and biofilm formation (see ARF related news story; ARF news story; and Ramsook et al., 2010). Amyloids have not previously been connected to regulated cell death pathways.

Programmed cell death can be either apoptotic, in which cells shrivel neatly away, or necrotic, in which dying cells rupture messily (see Vandenabeele et al., 2010). Receptor interacting protein kinases 1 and 3 (RIP1 and RIP3) act as master switches that regulate cell fate. Depending on physiological conditions, these proteins can mediate cell survival, apoptosis, or necrosis. To initiate necrosis, RIP1 and RIP3 form a protein complex known as the necrosome. The kinases then phosphorylate and activate downstream proteins in the necrotic pathway (see Sun et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2012). RIP1 and RIP3 are known to bind each other through regions called RIP homotypic interaction motifs (RHIMs), but the nature of the necrosome had never been elucidated.

To examine this structure, first author Jixi Li coexpressed tagged human RIP1 and RIP3 in cell cultures. Surprisingly, the proteins formed very large complexes. Li and colleagues used a wide variety of biochemical techniques, including electron microscopy, circular dichroism spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, to show that these complexes are amyloid fibrils. The fibrils display classic amyloidogenic properties. They bind amyloid dyes such as thioflavin T and Congo red, and are highly stable, dissolving only under harsh chemical conditions, the authors report. In addition, RIP1/RIP3 complexes can seed rapid polymerization in monomeric solutions of RIP kinases, another property of amyloid.

Structural analysis revealed that the fibrils consist of a buried amyloid core surrounded by long, flexible extensions. The RIP kinase domains are found in these extensions and likely maintain their globular shape and activity, the authors note. To define the amyloid-forming region, the researchers made short peptides from the RHIM domain of each protein. They found that fragments as short as 19 amino acids (RIP3) and 31 amino acids (RIP1) still bound each other. By mutating residues in these core regions one by one, the authors showed that only mutations in the central six or seven amino acids of each RHIM disrupted amyloid formation. This confirmed that the amyloid core is very small.

The authors then looked at function. Human cell cultures transfected with wild-type RIP kinases underwent necrosis when stimulated with the appropriate cell death signals. By contrast, cells transfected with amyloid-defective RIP mutants thrived, ignoring death signals. Likewise, treating cell cultures with amyloid dye inhibited the formation of the amyloid complex and prevented necrosis. These experiments indicate that the amyloid structure is essential for proper necrotic signaling. Intriguingly, the mutants that could not form amyloid also had little kinase activation, suggesting that amyloid formation helps turn on the kinases.

Based on these findings, the authors propose a model in which the long, disordered flanking sequences of RIP monomers hide the core RHIM sequences under normal cellular conditions, preventing the proteins from interacting with each other to form amyloid. Cell death signals switch on the kinases, and they autophosphorylate. The charged phosphate groups repel each other, opening up the proteins and exposing the RHIM regions. RIP1 and RIP3 can then bind to each other, which spurs further auto- and cross-phosphorylation, leading to even more aggregation in a feed-forward loop, the authors suggest. This model makes sense, Teplow agreed, because cells would need to control the formation of amyloid. Otherwise, the amyloid fibrils might choke the cell, or initiate unwanted cell death under normal conditions. Phosphorylation may act as a sensitive regulatory mechanism over this process.

What happens to necrotic amyloid fibrils after their original cells die? Wu does not know, but said she is investigating this question. She wonders whether these necrotic amyloid structures could cross-talk with β amyloid fibrils, perhaps helping to worsen Alzheimer’s disease. In future work, she and Chan will test this idea in vitro and in AD mouse models.

Cell death expert Peter Vandenabeele at VIB and Ghent University, Belgium, agreed, writing to ARF that there might be a link to AD: “[Because] amyloid structures may induce co-aggregation of other amyloidogenic proteins, it is conceivable that necrosis processes may contribute to AD pathogenesis.” He added that if so, it might be possible to delay AD onset with RIP kinase inhibitors (see full comment below).—Madolyn Bowman Rogers.

Reference:
Li J, McQuade T, Siemer AB, Napetschnig J, Moriwaki K, Hsiao YS, Damko E, Moquin D, Walz T, McDermott A, Chan FK, Wu H. The RIP1/RIP3 necrosome forms a functional amyloid signaling complex required for programmed necrosis. Cell. 2012 Jul 20;150(2):339-50. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Peter Vandenabeele
Submitted 20 July 2012  |  Permalink Posted 20 July 2012

Amyloid aggregation in programmed necrosis or necroptosis
Our lab was one of the first describing necrotic cell death as a programmed form of cell death implicated in many inflammatory and degenerative pathologies (Vandenabeele et al., 2010). Until recently, the prototype cell death mechanism has been thought to be apoptosis, which involves activation of a cascade of caspases and the consecutive cleavage of proteins. Nowadays, regulated or programmed necrosis, also called necroptosis, is viewed as another major type of cell death. Necroptosis is mainly driven by the combined action of receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3 kinases (Declercq et al., 2009). Targeting these RIP kinases by small-molecule inhibitors (necrostatins) (Degterev et al., 2008) has been proven as a powerful tool to block necrotic cell death both in vitro and in vivo.

Many stimuli can elicit necrotic cell death including pathogens, TNF family members, pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and also some chemotherapeutics...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad