Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Research Brief: Evidence Supports Model of AD Biomarker Progression
16 December 2011. A popular model of Alzheimer’s disease progression proposes an ordered sequence by which the main biomarkers change: β amyloid first, then tau, followed by hippocampal volume and cognitive function (see ARF Webinar). Researchers led by Cliff Jack at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, have now provided some evidence in support of this hypothetical cascade. The data, first presented at the 2011 Alzheimer’s Association International Conference in Paris, France, and published online August 8, are now in print in the December Archives of Neurology.

To validate the paradigm, Jack and colleagues analyzed data from about 400 participants in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative whose average age was in the late seventies. Roughly half the participants had mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a quarter had AD, and the rest were cognitively normal. The researchers focused on three biomarkers: Aβ42 levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); CSF total tau levels; and hippocampal volume (adjusted for intracranial volume) as measured by structural MRI. For each biomarker, the authors used a cutoff value to score the trait as either normal or abnormal in each participant. They took cutoff values for Aβ42 (192 pg/mL) and total tau (92 pg/mL) from published work (see ARF related news story on Shaw et al., 2009 and ARF related news story on De Meyer et al., 2010). For adjusted hippocampal volume, the authors established a cutoff value based on a cohort of about 50 Mayo Clinic patients whose AD status was verified by autopsy.

As expected, in the AD group a greater proportion of participants had abnormal scores for each biomarker, and the average score drifted further from the norm than in the MCI group. Ditto for people with MCI compared to controls, confirming that all three biomarkers progress along with the disease. However, in all three groups, many participants had abnormal Aβ scores, while fewer people approached cutoff values for total tau and hippocampal volume, supporting the hypothesis that Aβ changes first of those three.

About three-quarters of the participants provided samples at a one-year follow-up appointment. The authors report that the proportion of people with abnormal Aβ42 scores did not change in any group, nor did the average Aβ42 level. This jibes with the model’s prediction that β amyloid changes peak early in the disease course, well in advance of any cognitive symptoms. By contrast, the proportion of people with abnormal tau scores, as well as their average tau level, jumped in the cognitively normal group alone, showing that this biomarker is dynamic only in presymptomatic people. The proportion of people with abnormal hippocampal volumes grew only in the MCI group. Tau moves before atrophy, but hippocampal volume catches up during the MCI phase, the authors conclude. Although this study supports the proposed biomarker progression model, the authors note that final validation awaits long-term longitudinal studies. Other studies testing the staging model are ongoing and may sharpen it in time.—Madolyn Bowman Rogers.

Reference:
Jack CR Jr, Vemuri P, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Aisen PS, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM, Bernstein MA, Petersen RC, Weiner MW, Knopman DS; for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Evidence for ordering of Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Arch Neurol. 2011 Dec;68(12):1526-1535. Abstract

 
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad