Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
News Brief: ALS Drug Olesoxime Fails in Phase 3 Trial
16 December 2011. While modulating mitochondrial activity to protect neurons may be a route to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, olesoxime is apparently not the way to get there. Researchers hoped that the cholesterol-like small molecule, tested by the pharmaceutical company Trophos of Marseille, France, would save sickened neurons and prolonged lifespan in ALS. But Trophos announced on their website on 13 December that the drug failed to achieve the desired survival effect in a Phase 3 clinical trial. The company has no plans to continue ALS work, said CEO Damian Marron, but hopes olesoxime will be effective for spinal muscular atrophy and multiple sclerosis.

Trophos identified olesoxime in a screen for drugs that would support neurons stressed by the absence of trophic factors (Bordet et al., 2007). Olesoxime binds to the mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) and translocator protein (18 kDa). Both are involved in the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, which functions in metabolite uptake and oxidative stress, said chief scientific officer Rebecca Pruss. She believes that olesoxime somehow modulates those processes, but the precise mechanisms remain murky. Several lines of evidence point to mitochondria, and their role in cell death, as important participants in the demise of ALS-afflicted motor neurons (reviewed in Martin, 2010). In their earlier 2007 study, Pruss and colleagues reported that olesoxime delayed disease onset in ALS model mice—although it did not slow the disease process once the mice started to show symptoms.

“I am saddened by the result, but not too surprised to find out the biology of the disease is much more complicated than scientists tend to perceive (and perhaps more complicated than we can even comprehend),” wrote Lee Martin of Johns Hopkins University, who was not involved in the study, in an e-mail to ARF. Beyond mitochondria, there are several other possible disease mechanisms to consider, he told ARF. Alzheimer’s researchers may find this setback feels familiar: In 2010 they discovered that Dimebon, another proposed mitochondrial modulator thought to interact with the permeability transition pore, was ineffective in Phase 3 after showing apparent promise in a smaller trial (see ARF related news story; ARF news story; and Bachurin et al., 2003).

The double-blind, placebo-controlled olesoxime trial included 512 people with ALS who were already taking riluzole, the only approved drug for the disease. Riluzole extends the life of people with ALS by a few months. The desired endpoint in the Trophos trial was a 12 percent increase in the number of subjects surviving after 18 months of treatment, said chief medical officer Jean-Louis Abitbol. The researchers also evaluated participants with the 48-point ALS Functional Rating Scale. People taking olesoxime plus riluzole maintained scores a point or two higher than those taking riluzole plus a placebo, but the difference is of “doubtful clinical significance,” Abitbol said.

The Trophos team suspects timing was a factor in the drug’s failure. ALS symptoms do not appear until many motor neurons are already dead, and it can take a year beyond that point to diagnose the disease and make a person eligible for a clinical trial. In the Trophos study, participants had received an ALS diagnosis six months to three years before enrolling. “It may just be too late,” Marron said.

Another possible problem, Martin noted, is bioavailability: The drug would have to travel from the digestive system, across the blood-brain barrier, into the motor neurons to mitochondria. It is an important issue, agreed Pruss, who told ARF in an e-mail that Trophos carefully measured brain uptake in preclinical models. VDAC is found not only on mitochondria, but also on the plasma membrane (Yu et al., 1995), and it could perhaps sequester olesoxime at the neuron’s exterior, Martin speculated.

Given these disappointing results, should ALS researchers turn away from mitochondria in favor of other potential therapeutic targets? Not based on this study alone, Martin said. Lucie Bruijn of the ALA Association agreed in an e-mail to ARF, noting that there is an ongoing trial of dexpramipexole, another mitochondrial modulator (see ARF related news story on Cudkowicz et al., 2011). However, Martin noted there are plenty of other possible drug targets to consider.

The Trophos team believes that olesoxime may work on more slowly progressing diseases. They are currently testing the drug in a Phase 2 study for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III, with results due in the second half of 2013. Trophos is also raising funds for a Phase 2 trial in progressive multiple sclerosis, Marron said. In addition, the company continues to pursue the drug’s mechanism of action. They found it promotes microtubule polymerization and acts on Fas death receptors, Pruss said. At the 2011 Society for Neuroscience meeting in Washington, DC, she presented a poster on olesoxime’s ability to dampen glial activation in ALS mice. These pleiotropic effects may make interpretation of preclinical and clinical data even more difficult.—Amber Dance.

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Brigitte Pettmann
Submitted 16 December 2011  |  Permalink Posted 16 December 2011

Trophos made sure that olesoxime had all the basic criteria for a clinical trial; indeed, this molecule had yielded very convincing results on motor neuron survival in several pathological setups in animal models. Unfortunately, olesoxime did not extend survival of ALS patients. As with other unsuccessful trials, this failure underlines the difficulty of treating a progressive disease with symptoms appearing in late adulthood. I have several comments on this point.

First, this result does not jeopardize the clinical trial ongoing on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients: That SMA patients can be identified genetically, and that the disease is progressing much earlier and more slowly, allow for a more timely treatment.

Second, olesoxime, although ineffective in treating symptomatic patients, could still prove to be part of a combination of molecules in the future.

Nevertheless, these negative results, added to the numerous unsuccessful past trials, raise the question of the suitability of our experimental models, which are mostly murine (and this is true for almost...  Read more


  Comment by:  Eric Valor
Submitted 17 December 2011  |  Permalink Posted 20 December 2011

I would wonder whether addressing mitochondrial function, one of the earliest events in ALS (presymptomatic), would be overwhelmed by other factors driving disease once symptomatic and, hence, diagnosable with current methods. I am in the camp of neuroinflammation driving progression, and still think olesoxime and/or dexpramipexole (which I also suspect might suffer the same issue as olesoxime did) can be valuable ingredients of a cocktail-style treatment plan that addresses the inflammatory component as well.

View all comments by Eric Valor
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad