Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
DC: Where Does TDP-43’s Toxic End Really Come From?
25 November 2011. Clearly, the C-terminal of TDP-43 has something to do with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The toxic fragments appear as aggregating, 25- and 35-kiloDalton (kDa) species that supposedly result from cleavage by caspase 3 or another, still-unknown, protease. But there is a hole in this theory, according to Shangxi Xiao of the University of Toronto, Canada, who presented a poster at the Society for Neuroscience annual meeting, held in Washington, DC, 12-16 November 2011.

The hole is 8 kDa wide—the size of the amino-terminal stub that should be left behind when the 35-kDa piece is produced. That amino terminal peptide has not been observed. “If you cut TDP-43, you should get two parts,” said Xiao, who works with Janice Robertson at the University of Toronto, Canada. These scientists present a different theory. They propose that an alternative splice form of TDP-43 mRNA allows the ribosome to begin translation at a downstream start codon to make the carboxyl-terminal fragment of 35 kDa. Xiao cannot explain the provenance of the second 25-kDa C-terminal fragment, which could still be produced by caspase cleavage, he speculated.

In his poster, Xiao detailed the following scenario: TDP-43 has an alternatively spliced form that lacks 91 base pairs from exon 2. This deletion causes a frameshift, generating a premature stop codon and shortened open reading frame (ORF). It is unclear if this ORF is translated; however, the ribosome finds a second start codon farther down the transcript. This start codon normally encodes methionine 85 in full-length TDP-43, but in this alternate splice form acts as a second translational initiation site. That would then allow the ribosome to produce a protein of approximately 35 kDa. It is this product of alternative splicing and ribosomal scanning, not caspase cleavage, that accounts for the toxic C-terminal TDP-43 fragments, Xiao believes.

How did he get to this theory? While puzzling over the absence of the amino-terminal half of the supposedly cut-up protein, as well as a report that the fragment appears even in the absence of caspase 3 (Nishimoto et al., 2010), Xiao examined the mRNA sequences reported for TDP-43 in GenBank. He noticed the alternative splice form with the deletion and the premature stop codon. Xiao amplified and cloned this alternatively spliced mRNA from spinal cord samples donated by people who had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The splice variant was four times more prevalent in 12 ALS samples than in four control samples.

Xiao suspects that the first ORF of the alternatively spliced RNA is either not translated, or that the peptide product is rapidly degraded. To find evidence for the proposed C-terminal piece produced by the second start site, Xiao engineered an antibody specific for its amino end—MDETDASSA. He also generated an antibody to the amino end of the predicted caspase-cleaved 35kDA fragment—ASSAVKVKR. The antibodies clearly distinguished the fragments from each other, said Xiao, even though the two peptides share the ASSAVKVKR sequence. In patient tissue, the antibody to the translated fragment colocalized with a polyclonal full-length TDP-43 antibody, but the caspase-cleavage antibody did not. The researchers concluded that the cleavage-specific antibody does not recognize TDP-43 aggregates—and that the only fragments present were due to the alternative start site.

Next, Xiao transfected SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells and primary motor neurons with the code for the alternative start fragment. The cells formed toxic, ubiquitinated, insoluble aggregates in the cytoplasm; these recruited full-length TDP-43, matching what goes on in disease pathology. The scientists concluded that the 35-kDa TDP-43 fragment seen in people with ALS likely arises from alternative splicing and translation of an alternative open reading frame, not from caspase cleavage. But it remains possible that the 25-kDa fragment is a cleavage product, Xiao said.

The data are “convincing,” commented both Jean-Pierre Julien of Laval University in Québec City, Canada, and David Borchelt of the University of Florida in Gainesville, in e-mails to ARF. Both saw the data at the André-Delambre Foundation Symposium on ALS held 23-24 September 2011 in Québec City, Canada. “Their specific antibody is a very nice tool to study alternative splicing further,” emailed Mahmoud Kiaei of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, who plans to collaborate with Xiao and Robertson.

Leonard Petrucelli of the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, noted that his and other groups have clearly seen a caspase-cleavage TDP-43 product (see ARF related news story; ARF news story; ARF story; and Dormann et al., 2009). If the enzyme cuts TDP-43 to make the 25-kDa piece, then it would also cut upstream to make the 35-kDa piece, he argued. As for the missing amino-terminal cleavage product, he said he has not specifically looked for it. The piece would be only 8 kDa and would run right off many standard gels. It could also be produced, but quickly degraded, he noted. But Petrucelli did not discount the possibility of alternative splicing: “Both mechanisms could exist,” he told ARF.—Amber Dance.

 
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad