Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Structure-Based Approach Yields Tau Inhibitors
17 June 2011. Since amyloid fibers are presumed molecular culprits in Alzheimer’s and many other diseases, scientists have worked to find or create molecules that block growth of these peptide assemblies. Many endeavors relied more on luck and intuition than on rational design, in part because it is hard to determine the structure of amyloidogenic proteins. Now, in a June 15 Nature paper published online, researchers show that with structural insight they can build highly specific peptide inhibitors of tau fibrillization. “It’s the first structure-based design of a fibrillization inhibitor,” said lead investigator David Eisenberg of the University of California at Los Angeles. Though the compounds have not been tested in a biological system, the research hints that a structure-based approach to limiting fibrillization may work for a variety of amyloid-forming proteins.

Without firm data on amyloid structure, prior efforts to block fibril formation used two basic approaches—screening for molecules that disrupt the process in solution, or devising compounds to interfere with the “sticky” portions of amyloidogenic proteins. “We tried a third approach,” Eisenberg said. “Starting with the atomic structure of a piece of tau protein, we asked what sort of molecule we could build that would cap a tau fiber so it won’t grow any further.”

Reaching the starting point was a feat in itself. Full-length tau does not crystallize, making it impossible to solve its atomic structure. Instead, the researchers focused on previously identified short peptides that drive protein self-aggregation. These short peptides can themselves grow into fibers. Furthermore, some of those hexapeptides formed crystals amenable to structural analysis, revealing an intriguing characteristic of amyloid fibrils: The side chains of hydrophobic amino acids on paired β-sheets interlocked tightly to form “steric zippers” (ARF related news story on Nelson et al., 2005). Tau protein also has these features (Sawaya et al., 2007).

For the current study, Stuart Sievers and colleagues focused on one such zipper—a hexapeptide (VQIVYK) that drives assembly of tau into pathological filaments (von Bergen et al., 2000). With this peptide as a template, Sievers worked with co-first author John Karanicolas of David Baker’s group at the University of Washington, Seattle, to design an inhibitor to cap elongating tau fibers. Howard Chang, Anni Zhao, and Lin Jiang of the Eisenberg lab also contributed equally to the work. The team used software developed in the Baker lab to identify candidate blockers, then showed that they work in solution to slow fibrillization of the template hexapeptide, as well as 150- and 128-residue tau fragments. To improve the inhibitors’ stability, researchers built them using non-natural D-amino acids. “Our bodies are filled with proteases trained to chew up [L-amino acid] peptides that are not normally in cells. That’s why we chose non-natural amino acids,” Eisenberg said. In a recent study, Aβ-binding D-enantiomeric peptides reduced plaque load and improved cognition in AD transgenic mice (Funke et al., 2010), suggesting D-amino acid peptides may be well suited for drug development.

“It’s an awesome protein engineering paper,” said Torleif Härd of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. Dieter Willbold of the Institute of Structural Biology and Biophysics in Jülich, Germany, cited specificity as a key advantage of inhibitors designed using the structure-based approach (see full comment below). Mark Findeis of Satori Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, called the work “a really nice step forward,” adding that its methods could be used to design an inhibitor for “anything that has known structural data. You could apply it to models of other proteins, even if you didn’t have firm structural data like what’s available for tau,” he told ARF.

Sievers and colleagues used their computational method to build inhibitors not only for tau fibrils, but also for an amyloidogenic protein (prostatic acid phosphatase) that enhances human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The latter blocked formation of phosphatase fibrils and, importantly, prevented HIV infection in a functional assay.

The tau inhibitors, on the other hand, are not expected to work in a biological setting because they do not penetrate the brain, Eisenberg said. His group is currently using the inhibitors as tools for finding other tau fibrillization blockers that may be more brain penetrant.

In a PLoS Biology paper published earlier this week (Landau et al., 2011), Eisenberg and colleagues report the first atomic-level structures of small molecules bound to amyloid forms of tau and Aβ. “These pictures begin to map out what’s called the amyloid pharmacophore—a collection of sites on a protein that define how ligands bind to it. That’s a step to drug design,” Eisenberg said.

As for whether blocking fibrillization will be able to help AD patients, only time will tell. Several Aβ aggregation inhibitors have looked promising in Phase 2 trials. One (Elan Corporation’s scyllo-inositol) is heading toward Phase 3 (see ARF related news story). Another (tramiprosate, aka Neurochem’s Alzhemed) failed in a Phase 3 trial (see ARF related news story). Meanwhile, at least one study questions the whole premise by suggesting that some small-molecule amyloid inhibitors work by forming colloids that generally disrupt protein-protein interactions, even the good ones (ARF related news story on Feng et al., 2008).—Esther Landhuis.

Reference:
Sievers SA, Karanicolas J, Chang HW, Zhao A, Jiang L, Zirafi O, Stevens JT, Münch J, Baker D, Eisenberg D. Structure-based design of non-natural amino-acid inhibitors of amyloid fibril formation. Nature. 2011 June 15. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Primary Papers: Structure-based design of non-natural amino-acid inhibitors of amyloid fibril formation.

Comment by:  Susanne Aileen Funke, Dieter Willbold
Submitted 17 June 2011  |  Permalink Posted 17 June 2011

Small molecule ligands rationally designed to complement β-sheet hydrogen-bond patterns present in fibrils, but that halt continuation of the β-sheet, e.g., aminopyrazole derivatives, have been known for some time (1,2). These β-sheet-complementing substances, however, lack specificity for fibrils built of a certain protein or peptide.

Sievers and colleagues report a very elegant study on the rational, 3-dimensional structure-based design of small peptide ligands that specifically bind to their target molecules in fibrillar conformation. Their decisive advantage over the aforementioned β-sheet-complementing substances is specificity. Sievers et al. clearly show that they arrive at peptides that bind specifically and show interesting activities in vitro.

The researchers combine the advantages of β-sheet-complementing compounds with those of substances that can specifically bind a certain amyloidogenic peptide or protein—more or less irrespective of its conformation.

Recently, we described a distantly similar approach when we covalently linked a classical...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad