 |
News Search |
 |
 |
 |
Insulin Resistance Correlates With Plaque, But Not Tangle, Pathology
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
28 August 2010. Having diabetes seems to drive up risk for dementia, including Alzheimer disease, but the jury has been out as to how this occurs. Now, Japanese scientists propose a mechanism—insulin resistance—and find that diabetes-related readouts of this condition associate with AD pathology prior to memory loss. As reported online August 25 in Neurology, researchers led by Toru Iwaki, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, determined that insulin-resistant seniors tend to rack up more brain Aβ than people with normal insulin regulation, and that having the ApoE4 allele further heightens the risk for these brain lesions. Given epidemiological data suggesting that some two-thirds of U.S. elderly ages 65 and older are insulin-resistant (Cowie et al., 2009), the impact of this potential risk factor could be significant.
Longitudinal studies have shown that type 2 diabetics don’t fare as well cognitively (Allen et al., 2004), and develop AD at higher rates than the general population (Arvanitakis et al., 2004). However, the relationships are far from absolute. Some diabetics stay mentally sharp, most AD patients do not have diabetes, and diabetes itself develops in numerous ways, one of which is insulin resistance, which has been linked to brain amyloid accumulation (Craft, 2007). In the current paper, first author T. Matsuzaki and colleagues homed in on insulin resistance, and looked at whether it correlated with specific brain lesions in AD, namely amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. “It’s a tight study,” said Suzanne de la Monte, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, who noted that many prior investigations examined the link between diabetes and dementia without addressing underlying mechanisms, or studied associations between diabetes and cognitive impairment without focusing in particular on AD.
Matsuzaki’s team investigated 135 elderly who were among several thousand enrolled in a long-term prospective cohort study in the southern Japanese town of Hisayama. The seniors in the analyzed subset underwent autopsy after they died around the turn of the twenty-first century. They had taken an oral glucose tolerance test as part of a clinical exam 10-15 years prior. They were demographically similar to others in the cohort who were not autopsied, decreasing the possibility of selection bias. The participants were cognitively normal at the time of their glucose test. By the end of the study, only 21 of the 135 had developed AD-type dementia, whereas 88 had plaque pathology.
By three different readouts (i.e., two-hour post-load plasma glucose, fasting insulin, and a homeostatic index called HOMA-IR), insulin resistance correlated with the presence of neuritic plaques, as judged by CERAD criteria, in autopsy brain specimens. Furthermore, the relationship between insulin resistance and plaque pathology was dose dependent. Those with more severe glucose and insulin measures had correspondingly increased risk for plaque pathology. Plaque risk shot up even further in ApoE4 carriers, about 15- to 30-fold, relative to non-carriers with similar extent of insulin resistance.
Methodologically, the study draws praise for its attention to a slew of other factors that could have accounted for the findings, said Konrad Talbot, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, in an interview with ARF. The association between diabetes-related measures and plaque pathology held after the researchers controlled for age, gender, and other potential confounding variables including blood pressure, body-mass index, cholesterol, and exercise—even after excluding the 21 people who developed AD dementia by the time they died. The data suggest “insulin resistance can affect formation of plaques before you see any clinical symptoms,” Talbot said. “It could be something happening very early on.”
Perhaps just as striking as the link between insulin resistance and plaques was the complete lack of relationship with neurofibrillary tangles. Whether or not people had tau pathology, as judged by Braak staging, did not seem to correlate with the magnitude of their hyperglycemia or hyperinsulinemia.
The data run counter to an earlier study of Japanese-American men that found type 2 diabetics had increased risk for both plaques and tangles (Peila et al., 2002). However, the lack of correlation with tau pathology appears consistent with a large-scale study on insulin signaling that Talbot is preparing to submit for publication (see ARF related news story). In that study, aberrant phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), a key insulin signaling abnormality found in AD patients, is absent in tauopathies that lack plaque pathology, Talbot said.
The current paper also leaves unaddressed another issue, and that is, Which comes first—insulin resistance or plaque formation? The diabetes-related factors can presumably act upstream of the AD pathological cascade, as the authors suggest. A recent study bears out this idea by showing that insulin signaling can protect neurons from Aβ toxicity (De Felice et al., 2009 and ARF related news story). However, it’s also possible that some upstream event could drive both (see ARF Live Discussion), Talbot said, by causing brain neurons to become insulin resistant and, at the same time, more susceptible to Aβ accumulation. In his view, the methods used in the current study make it particularly challenging to make the call. Pathological reads were done some 10-15 years after assessment of insulin resistance, and yet amyloid plaques are known to develop decades in advance of symptoms.
Ultimately, the answer to whether insulin resistance can cause AD may lie in ongoing clinical trials testing insulin sensitizers in patients with mild cognitive impairment, suggested Jose Luchsinger, Columbia University, New York, in an editorial accompanying the Japanese study.—Esther Landhuis.
Reference:
Matsuzaki T, Sasaki K, Tanizaki Y, Hata J, Fujimi K, Matsui Y, Sekita A, Suzuki SO, Kanba S, Kiyohara Y, Iwaki T. Insulin resistance is associated with the pathology of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2010 Aug 25;75:764-770. Abstract
|
 |
 |
 |
Comments on News and Primary Papers |
 |
  |
| |
Primary Papers: Insulin resistance is associated with the pathology of Alzheimer disease: the Hisayama study.
Comment by: Konrad Talbot
|
 |
 |
Submitted 6 September 2010
| Permalink
|
Posted 6 September 2010
|
 |
 |
Careful reading of a very similar work (see Peila et al., 2002) reveals that there is limited new data in this paper by Matsuzaki et al. Like the latter paper, Peila et al. investigated a
large population of individuals (i.e., Japanese-Americans) participating in a longitudinal study (i.e., the Honolulu-Asia
aging study) on diabetic factors in aging. Peila et al. specifically tested the hypothesis that 1) diabetes is a risk
factor for dementia generally and for Alzheimer disease (AD) and
vascular dementia in particular; 2) that such risk is enhanced in carriers of
at least one copy of the ApoE4 allele; and 3) that diabetes
alone or in combination with an ApoE4 allele is associated with
increased neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the
cerebral cortex and/or hippocampus. The last two hypotheses are
the focus of this news study, which is in most respects a
replication of the study by Peila et al. (2002) on a different
population of Japanese origin.
In a few respects, however, Matsuzaki et al. provide some
new...
Read more
Careful reading of a very similar work (see Peila et al., 2002) reveals that there is limited new data in this paper by Matsuzaki et al. Like the latter paper, Peila et al. investigated a
large population of individuals (i.e., Japanese-Americans) participating in a longitudinal study (i.e., the Honolulu-Asia
aging study) on diabetic factors in aging. Peila et al. specifically tested the hypothesis that 1) diabetes is a risk
factor for dementia generally and for Alzheimer disease (AD) and
vascular dementia in particular; 2) that such risk is enhanced in carriers of
at least one copy of the ApoE4 allele; and 3) that diabetes
alone or in combination with an ApoE4 allele is associated with
increased neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the
cerebral cortex and/or hippocampus. The last two hypotheses are
the focus of this news study, which is in most respects a
replication of the study by Peila et al. (2002) on a different
population of Japanese origin.
In a few respects, however, Matsuzaki et al. provide some
new information. First, they establish that only relatively high
levels of insulin resistance (measured in three different ways,
see their Fig. 1) are associated with neuritic plaque densities in
the brain. Second, this association is present even in cases
without AD. Third, unlike Peila et al., they found that
elevated insulin resistance is associated with elevated neuritic
plaque densities even in the absence of ApoE4 alleles (see
Matsuzaki et al., Fig. 2), though the presence of even one such
allele greatly increases the association of insulin resistance and
plaque densities as found by Peila et al. (2002).
Why did Matsuzaki et al. find an association of high insulin
resistance with neuritic plaques, but not with neurofibrillary
tangles?
Peila et al. (2002), by studying a large number of autopsied cases (216 vs. 135 in
Matsuzaki et al.) tested closer to the time of death (<8 years vs. 10-15 years in Matsuzaki et al.), found that
diabetes (defined by the same measures of insulin resistance as in
Matsuzaki et al.) in the presence of ApoE4 was associated
with elevated neuritic plaques in the neocortex and with
neurofibrillary tangles in both the neocortex and the hippocampus.
This suggests that the association of insulin resistance to AD
pathology varies according to brain area, consistent with known
variation in insulin receptor densities (e.g., Unger et al.,
1989) and insulin-sensitive glucose
transporter 4 in the brain (El-Messari et al., 1998).
But Matsuzaki et al. provide no data on the density of plaques or
tangles in specific brain areas. It is implied that they
calculated a composite score for neuritic plaques and for
neurofibrillary tangles from semi-quantitative scores (+ to +++) in
each of at least 12 brain areas in the cerebral cortex, limbic
system, basal ganglia, basal forebrain, thalamus, midbrain, and
pons. It is not explained how they calculated such composite
semi-quantitative scores. With such scores, the authors only tested
the hypothesis that global levels of neuritic plaques and
neurofibrillary tangles are strongly associated with high insulin
resistance. Their data is insufficient to detect weaker, but
significant associations globally or in specific brain areas.
Detection of such associations requires more objective
quantitative measures of neuritic plaques (amyloid load) and
neurofibrillary tangle densities in each brain area sampled.
Peila et al. also used only semi-quantitative methods, but
they present data for specific brain areas.
Matsuzaki et al. have consequently only shown that the
association of high insulin resistance with global levels of
neuritic plaques is stronger than with neurofibrillary tangles.
This is not inconsistent with Peila et al., who
did not assess global levels of those pathologies. It is possible
that there is an association with neurofibrillary tangles in
certain brain areas. The global findings are, nevertheless,
consistent with our unpublished data that a major hippocampal
abnormality in AD associated with impaired insulin signaling
(i.e., elevated serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor
substrate 1 [IRS-1]: see Talbot et al., Alzheimer's and Dementia
2, suppl. 1: S54, 2006) is not elevated with neurofibrillary
tangles without an elevation in neuritic plaques (e.g., in
corticobasal degeneration [CBD]; Talbot et al., in preparation).
What might explain the association between high insulin
resistance and neuritic plaque levels?
One of the more interesting and novel findings of Matsuzaki et al.,
noted above, was that high insulin resistance was associated with
higher global neuritic plaque levels even in the absence of AD.
This is consistent with the view, gaining increasing acceptance,
that insulin resistance precedes clinical onset of that disorder,
a view supported by many epidemiological studies finding that type
2 diabetes (characterized by insulin resistance) is a clear risk
factor for AD (Biessels et al., 2006). It is not widely appreciated, however, that the risk goes
beyond those with a history of diabetes: it is estimated that
among those 60-74, in which the incidence of AD shows a clear
increase, 66.7 percent are insulin resistant (Cowie et al., 2009). Indeed, more than 80 percent of the AD cases
studied by Janson et al. (Janson et al., 2004) were insulin resistant, either in a diabetic or a
pre-diabetic state. That the brain itself is often insulin
resistant in AD, even without a history of diabetes, is suggested by
our finding that about 90 percent of such AD cases we have studied
postmortem display large numbers of hippocampal neurons with
abnormally phosphorylated insulin signaling molecules consistent
with insulin resistance (Talbot et al., in preparation). Many of
these abnormalities were seen to a lesser extent in a type of mild
cognitive impairment likely to progress to AD. The abnormalities
are very highly correlated with memory impairments of the cases
studied and are consistent with reduced levels of insulin
signaling found in our ex vivo stimulation experiments on
hippocampal tissue from AD cases. These findings are being
prepared for submission next month.
It should not be assumed, as Matsuzaki et al. do, that insulin
resistance necessarily leads to neuritic plaque formation. The
available data are only correlational and thus leave open the
possibility that both phenomena are the consequence of other
factors. Among these are soluble oligomers of amyloid-β
(Aβ), which are better able to account for the cognitive
impairments of AD than plaques, due to the affinity of such
oligomers for synapses. Aβ oligomer levels rise even in mild
cognitive impairment and are generated before plaques appear. They
are known to trigger all the mechanisms that lead to inactivation
of the insulin receptor and serine phosphorylation of IRS-1. The
latter effect is mediated (at least in part) by Aβ oligomer
activation of a stress molecule known as JNK, activation of which
is highly correlated with levels of IRS-1 serine phosphorylation
in hippocampal neurons of our AD cases.
All of this points to the importance of finding the roots of
neuronal insulin resistance in AD cases and mild cognitive
impairments leading to AD, because this is an important risk
factor suggesting promising new treatments for the disorder.
View all comments by Konrad Talbot
|
 |

|
| |
Comment by: Lane Simonian
|
 |
 |
Submitted 29 September 2010
| Permalink
|
Posted 1 October 2010
|
 |
 |
I recommend the Primary Papers
Insulin is not required for glucose to enter brain cells. Alzheimer's disease, then, is not a type 3 diabetes. Later in the disease, the oxidation of glucose transporters does reduce glucose levels in brain cells (Mark et al. 1997).
Insulin resistance does contribute to Alzheimer's disease as it initially increases the amount of glucose in the brain because the glucose is not being "absorbed" in other parts of the body (Jacob et al., 2002). This results in high levels of myo-inositol, the precursor molecule to Alzheimer's disease (Hauser and Finelli 1963; Huang et al., 1995) and to the activation of phospholipase C gamma-gamma, an enzyme implicated in triggering Alzheimer's disease, primarily via the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (Dequin et al., 1998; Okuda et al., 1996). Polyphenols in various fruits, vegetables, and spices, and polyunsaturated fats such as fish oil partially inhibit phospholipase C gamma and thus provide some protection against the disease (Godichaud et al. 2006; Kang et al., 2003; Sanderson and Calder, 1998; Valente et al., 2009).
References: Dequin Z, Dhillon H, Prasad MR, and Markesbery WR. Regional levels of brain phospholipase Cγ in Alzheimer's disease. Brain res. 811(1998): 161-5. Abstract
Godichaud S, Si-Tayeb K, Auge N, Desmouliere A, Balabaud C, et al. The grape-derived polyphenol reveratrol differentially affects epidermal and platelet-derived growth factor signaling in human liver myofibroblasts. Inter J of Biochem and Cell Biol 38 (2006): 629-37. Abstract
Hauser G and Finelli VN. The biosynthesis of free and phosphatide myo-inositol from glucose by mammalian tissue slices. J Biol Chem 238(1963): 3224-28. Abstract
Huang W, Alexander GE, Daly EM, Shetty HU, Krasuki JS, et al. High brain myo-inositol levels in the predementia phase of Alzheimer's disease in adults with Down's syndrome: a 1H MRS Study. J Clin Invest 95(1995): 542-6. Abstract
Kang MA, Yun SY, and Won J. Rosmarinic acid inhibits Ca[2+]-dependent pathways of T-cell antigen receptor-mediated signaling by inhibiting the PLC-y1 and Itk activity. Blood 101(2003): 3534-42. Abstract
Okuda Y, Adrogue HJ, Nakajima T, Mizutani M, Asano M, Tahci Y, et al. Increased production of PDGF by angiotensin and high glucose in human vascular endothelium. Life Sci 59 (1996): 1455-61. Abstract
Sanderson P and Calder PC. Dietary fish oil appears to prevent the activation of phospholipase Cγ in lymphocytes. Biochim et Biophys Acta 15(1998); 300-8. Abstract
Valente T, Hidalgo J, Bolea I, Ramirez B, Angeles N, et al. A diet enriched in polyphenols and polyunsaturated fatty acids, LMN diet, induces neurogenesis in the subventrical and hippocampus of adults mouse brain. J of Alzh Dis 18(2009). Abstract
View all comments by Lane Simonian
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
Submit a Comment on this News Article |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|