Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
   
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Pathways
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Copper Mountain: Knight Vision—SIRT1 Aids ADAM10, Slays Aβ
1 February 2010. Unseasonably warm days gave way to some notable nights at this year’s Keystone Symposium, Alzheimer’s Disease Beyond Aβ, held 10-15 January at Copper Mountain, Colorado. One evening offering was a short talk from Gizem Donmez, a postdoctoral fellow in Leonard Guarente’s laboratory at MIT. Donmez reported that SIRT1, the histone deacetylase linked to longevity, might protect against AD by boosting ADAM10 (aka α-secretase) and promoting non-amyloidogenic processing of Aβ precursor protein (APP). If true, then you might want to eat more carrots because the effect seems to rely on SIRT1 playing vassal to the retinoic acid receptor.

SIRT1 is activated by caloric restriction, which protects against brain atrophy in primates (see ARF related news story). SIRT1 itself also protects against neurodegeneration in mouse models of AD (see Kim et al., 2007), and previous work from Giulio Pasinetti’s lab at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, suggested that activation of α-secretase may be responsible (see ARF related news story on Qin et al., 2006). Pasinetti and colleagues attributed the increase in α-secretase to SIRT1 inhibition of the Rho kinase ROCK1, previously linked to suppression of the non-amyloidogenic secretase (see ARF related news story). But Donmez’s work suggests that there is more to the tale.

To explore the relationship between SIRT1 and AD, Donmez and colleagues made mice with either the SIRT1 gene knocked out or overexpressed. For knockouts, Donmez used the cre/lox system driven by a nestin promoter, limiting SIRT1 loss to neurons. For overexpression, she knocked the SIRT1 gene into the β actin locus, getting a mild, twofold overexpression. Donmez tested the effects of the SIRT1 mice on Aβ pathology by crossing them with APP/PS1 transgenic animals (APPSwe/PS1ΔE9).

Donmez reported that the APP/PS1/SIRT1 knockouts die earlier than control APP/PS1 animals, and that the knockouts have increased amyloid plaques and gliosis. The increased pathology in these mice was accompanied by a reduction in α-secretase activity. In contrast, APP/PS1 mice overexpressing SIRT1 had reduced levels of Aβ42 compared to controls and increased ADAM10 and ADAM10 mRNA. Levels of Notch intracellular domain, which is produced following α-secretase processing of the transmembrane receptor, were also increased when SIRT1 was overexpressed but not when it was knocked out. The results support the theory that SIRT1 can boost expression of the secretase.

Donmez jousted with the ADAM10 promoter using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays to determine exactly how SIRT1 might exert its influence. She reported that the deacetylase attaches to the promoter very close to a binding site for the retinoic acid receptor (RAR)/retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimer. Activation of the ADAM10 gene depended on SIRT1 deacetylase activity (an inactive mutant has no effect) and also the presence of retinoic acid. The evidence suggests that SIRT1 deacetylates RAR leading to increased expression of ADAM10, presumably by allowing RAR to bind more tightly to the promoter. In support of this, Donmez found that RARβ is deacetylated in the presence of SIRT1 and that RARβ acetylation is increased in SIRT1 knockout cells. Coming back full circle, she showed that she was able to reverse the reduced production of Aβ in SIRT1-overexpressing cells by knocking down ADAM10 transcripts with RNA interference.

Donmez concluded that SIRT1 activators might be worth pursuing as potential therapeutics for AD. Resveratrol, a SIRT1 activator found in miniscule quantities in red wine, is widely promoted in the popular press as an elixir of life. It has received serious attention from the scientific community as well, since it has been shown to mimic some of the effects of caloric restriction (see ARF related news story) though other research counters that blocking SIRT1 might actually improve cognition (see ARF related news story). Resveratrol, however, does not cross the blood-brain barrier very efficiently. Amongst all of this, vitamin A, which is metabolized to retinoic acid, might be worth a closer look, too. Recent findings suggest that all-trans retinoic acid can protect APP/PS double transgenic mice against Aβ pathology, reducing levels of the peptide without affecting APP expression (see ARF related news story on Ding et al., 2008), while acitretin, a vitamin A analog, was also shown to upregulate ADAM10 (see Tippmann et al., 2009). Because acitretin crosses the blood-brain barrier and has been approved for treating psoriasis since 1997, it would appear to be a candidate for exploratory clinical or preclinical studies.—Tom Fagan.

 
Comments on Related News
  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Benjamin Wolozin, ARF Advisor (Disclosure)
Submitted 13 January 2005 Posted 13 January 2005

Statins are known to increase secretion of APP, but the mechanism by which this occurs is poorly understood [1]. The current manuscript by Pedrini et al. focuses on the effect of statins on Rho and Rho-associated coiled-coil containing kinase 1 (ROCK). The group observes that a constitutively active ROCK prevented the actions of statins on APPsα. This suggests that inhibition of ROCK plays an important role in the mechanism of action of statins. They also performed the converse experiment, and examined how dominant-negative ROCK affects secretion of APPaα. Unfortunately, this is a point where the group's story strays. The dominant-negative ROCK increases APPsα secretion on cells not exposed to statins, but does not increase the actions of statins; thus, the effects of dominant-negative ROCK are not strictly opposite to those of the constitutively active ROCK. These data suggest that ROCK can modulate the effects of statins, but do not explicitly prove that statins act on APPsα through ROCK. Nonetheless, this is a very interesting story which nicely integrates...  Read more

  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Luigi Puglielli
Submitted 13 January 2005 Posted 13 January 2005

Since the appearance of the first epidemiological and animal studies claiming a connection between cholesterol and Alzheimer disease, at least four different aspects of cholesterol metabolism have been directly linked to AD neuropathology:

(i) clustering of APP and BACE1 into lipid rafts, which facilitates β cleavage of APP (1);
(ii) intracellular cholesterol distribution, which is able to activate the amyloidogenic processing of APP (2);
(iii) ozonolysis of cholesterol, which generates peroxi-derivatives of cholesterol that accelerate the aggregation of Aβ monomers (3), and
(iv) Aβ-mediated oxidation of membrane cholesterol, which liberates H2O2 and aggravates oxidative stress (4).

Therefore, strategies aimed at the modulation of cholesterol metabolism/distribution in the brain have received wide attention for the prevention of AD. Among those, statins seem to be especially welcome, mostly because they are already available, have been widely studied for their role in the prevention of atherosclerosis, and are overall very safe. Statins were...  Read more


  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Suzana Petanceska
Submitted 13 January 2005 Posted 13 January 2005

Gary Landreth's paper in the current issue of The Journal of Neuroscience on statins reducing Aβ-induced microglial inflammatory responses is very elegant work (Cordle and Landreth, 2005). This study shows that statin treatment of microglia and monocytes leads to robust reduction of Aβ-induced Il1β and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression, as well as reduction of nitric oxide production. As isoprenoids and the Rac and Rho-GTPases are implicated as mediators of these effects, this study complements the findings by Pedrini et al.

Furthermore, in 2002, Barbara Cordell's group provided evidence that ApoE secretion from glia requires a prenylated protein entity, and that the reduction of ApoE secretion by statins is due to inhibition of the synthesis of isoprenoids (Naidu et al., 2002).

In 2003, we discussed possible mechanisms by which statins can reduce brain amyloidosis (Petanceska et al., 2003). We hypothesized...  Read more


  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Robert Peers
Submitted 15 January 2005 Posted 18 January 2005

As Sam Gandy says regarding his research on statin effects in Alzheimer disease: "If it seems like a mess, it is." Hippocrates said, "Every disease has a nature of its own, and each arises from its own natural cause." Why, 2,000 years later, is modern science unable to find a simple "natural cause" for AD?

Are we asking the right questions? Is this a modern disease, with a modern cause? How common are AD lesions in preserved brains from the 19th century? Should we examine the Yerkes and Corsellis collections?

The cholesterol-AD story has confused beginnings, and a messy ending. What government would consider mass-medicating its ageing population with statins to prevent AD, knowing that its best and most dedicated scientists had failed to find a preventable cause of the disease? Those who prefer intervention over prevention will protest that the environmental origins are so murky and multifactorial that treatment and prevention must perforce be piecemeal. It would come as a great shock to such thinking if a simple, preventable cause of the disease were found, which at...  Read more


  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Thomas Kukar
Submitted 17 January 2005 Posted 18 January 2005

This manuscript confirms and extends a previous study showing that statin treatment can increase the release of sAPPα [1]. The biochemical mechanism by which HMG-CoA reductase inhibition leads to this increase isn’t fully understood. The authors present intriguing data that suggests the small GTPase pathway may be involved. First, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor was shown to increase statin-induced sAPP shedding, implying a farnesylated GTPase may be involved. They then looked at dominant-negative (DN) and constitutively active (CA) forms of ROCK, which is an effector protein kinase of the small GTPase Rho. CA ROCK decreases sAPP release while the DN form increases sAPP release. These results suggest that statin-mediated sAPP shedding could be mediated by isoprenoids, which can regulate the amount of membrane-associated Rho and thus the extent of ROCK activation.

As the authors acknowledge in the discussion, there are a couple of inconsistencies in the data that are confusing. Their data suggests that the effects of statins are mediated at the plasma membrane. They...  Read more


  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Dora M. Kovacs, ARF Advisor
Submitted 19 January 2005 Posted 19 January 2005

Pedrini et al. identified two connected pathways with ROCK1 as the central player. Their findings indicate that ROCK1 inhibits α-secretase activity; two different statins inhibit ROCK1 via reducing isoprenylation of the Rho GTPases. Thus, statins could activate α-secretase, at least in part, via inhibition of ROCK1.

Regulation of α-secretase and γ-secretase (Zhou et al. 2003) activities by the Rho/ROCK1 phosphorylation pathway may provide interesting clues to the neuronal function of the secretases. The role of the Rho GTPases in cell motility and axon guidance is well established. In neuronal cell lines, RhoA/ROCK are activated in response to repulsive cues and lead to growth cone collapse. In contrast, attractive cues activate Cdc42 and Rac GTPases, which, in turn, promote extension of axons to appropriate targets. The growth cone integrates multiple signals to produce coordinated changes in cytoskeletal dynamics. These changes are mediated by signaling via the C-terminal tails of axon guidance molecules, such as DCC, N-cadherin, NCAM, LAR, ephrinA/B, by...  Read more


  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Gary Landreth
Submitted 19 January 2005 Posted 19 January 2005

Clincial evidence suggests that long- term use of statins is associated with a decreased risk of Alzheimer disease (AD). As these drugs block the synthesis of cholesterol, much research has been focused on the importance of cholesterol metabolism in the pathogenesis of AD. Recently, it has been appreciated that statins can also exert biological effects independently of cholesterol. HMGCoA inhibition also blocks the production of isoprenyl precursors, and these isoprenyl groups are required for the proper function of Rho family GTPases. For example, it has been shown that inhibition of Rho contributes to the in vitro antiinflammatory effects of statins (Cordle et al., 2005).

In their recent paper, Pedrini et al. address an important issue by looking at cholesterol-independent effects of statins on APP metabolism. This group has previously shown that, in vitro, treatment of neuroblastoma cells with statins leads to an increase in shedding of sAPPα (Parvathy et al., 2004). In the present work, they expand on this theme by showing that the effects of statins on APP...  Read more


  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Steven Paul, Yan Zhou
Submitted 21 January 2005 Posted 21 January 2005

Sam Gandy’s group’s study underscores an emerging role for isoprenoid-mediated regulation of APP processing and its possible relationship to Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Over a year ago, we reported that GGPP, one of the isoprenoids synthesized in the mevalonate biosynthetic pathway, preferentially increases the generation of the more amyloidogenic Aβ species, Aβ42 (Zhou et al., Science 2003). Based on our experiments using dominant-negative and constitutively active Rho, as well as the ROCK inhibitor Y27632, we concluded that GGPP mediates an increase of Aβ42 through activation of the Rho/ROCK pathway, possibly by modulating γ-secretase.

In our opinion, the most important finding reported in our paper is the one showing that physiological lipids, such as GGPP, can regulate the generation of the amyloidogenic species Aβ42. Interestingly, isoprenoids are generated not only endogenously but also can be taken up through the diet. Thus, dietary isoprenoids could also regulate APP processing and Aβ...  Read more


  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Robert Peers
Submitted 23 January 2005 Posted 26 January 2005

I sincerely thank Alzforum for publishing my provocative comment on AD and cholesterol, albeit somewhat sanitized of its original pungency! If my theory about refined oils causing sporadic AD is correct, then "stripped" oil (containing little or no vitamin E, after prolonged heating) would be a good means of inducing neuronal lipid peroxidation in culture, which should generate both measurable 4-hydroxynonenal and reduced formation of secreted APP (sAPP), along with a mysterious rise in Aβ. My best wishes go to anybody who may care to do this experiment! Let us fortify ourselves with three observations that should encourage us:

1. Safflower oil, given as 20 percent of the diet, caused learning impairment in weaned rat pups (Harman et al., 1976). When the experiment was repeated with vitamin E supplementation, no harmful effects were seen on learning. Harman's safflower oil may have been typical steam-refined oil, which has about 0.45 mg of vitamin E per gm of essential fatty acids, compared with 0.65 mg in cottonseed oil,...  Read more


  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Alexei R. Koudinov
Submitted 24 January 2005 Posted 4 February 2005
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Please see our commentary on this important study at PLoS Medicine eLetters page

View all comments by Alexei R. Koudinov

  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  Mary Reid
Submitted 7 February 2005 Posted 7 February 2005

BRG1 and BRM are subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex which have been implicated in the regulation of gene expression, cell cycle control, and oncogenesis.

The Liu group [1] reports that the BAF (BRG1 associated factor) complex results in promoter activation of CSF-1 and promotes Z-DNA formation. A conformational change from B-DNA to Z-DNA in the hippocampus in AD is reported by Suram et al. [2], as is increased serum CSF-1 [3]. This might lead us to expect increased BRG1 in AD, and consequently increased ROCK1.

The Emerson group [4] reports that BRG1 binds to zinc finger proteins through a unique N-terminal domain that is not present in BRM. BRM interacts with two ankyrin repeat proteins that are critical components of Notch signal transduction. SWI/SNF BRG1 complexes, but not BRM, bind to the CREB transcription factor only when CREB is phosphorylated. DYRK1A, a gene in the Down syndrome critical region, has been found to phosphorylate CREB.

The findings by the Emerson lab would seem to provide a targeted therapy in AD as well as DS. They state...  Read more


  Related News: Statins Boost α-Secretase, but Not Through Cholesterol

Comment by:  David Drachman
Submitted 9 March 2005 Posted 9 March 2005

The role of statins in modifying both cholesterol- and isoprenoid-related Abeta production is of consierable interest, as reported here. Alternatively, however, the effects of statins on endothelial integrity and function (via increase of eNOS and decrease of Endothelin-1, e.g.) may be especially important in sporadic Alzheimer's disease. There is extensive evidence for the key role of vascular risk factors in sporadic AD; and endothelial-secreted cytokines have been shown (for example) to be important for development and division of neural stem cells. The pleiotropic effects of statins raise many possibilities regarding which of their effects on cholesterol, Abeta, or other signalling pathways may account for their effectiveness in vascular disorders, and their potential efficacy in AD may well involve more than Abeta.

References:
Breteler, M. Vascular risk factors for Alzheimer's disease: an epidemiologic perspective. Neurobiol Aging. 2000, 21:153-60. Seshadri, S. et al. Plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer's disease. New Engl. J Med,2000; 346:476-483 Shen, Q et al. Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science, 2004; 304:1338-1340 Laufs, U and Liao, JK. Post-transcriptional regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase mRNA stability by Rho GTPase. J Biol Chem, 1998; 273: 24266-71

View all comments by David Drachman

  Related News: Aging, Acetate, and Aβ: Sirtuins Regulate Metabolism and More

Comment by:  Bjoern Schwer
Submitted 5 July 2006 Posted 6 July 2006
  I recommend the Primary Papers

I enjoyed reading your news article on "Aging, Acetate, and Aβ: Sirtuins Regulate Metabolism and More." I would like to point your attention to our article, "Reversible lysine acetylation controls the activity of the mitochondrial enzyme acetyl-CoA synthetase 2" (published online in PNAS on June 20, 2006), which describes the connection among mitochondria, sirtuins, and acetyl-CoA synthetase 2.

View all comments by Bjoern Schwer

  Related News: Aging, Acetate, and Aβ: Sirtuins Regulate Metabolism and More

Comment by:  Thimmappa Anekonda
Submitted 20 July 2006 Posted 20 July 2006

Calorie restriction (CR) or dietary restriction (about 60 percent of ad libitum or normal calorie consumption) has been known to possess numerous useful benefits for aging (Cohen et al., 2004; Wood et al., 2004) and age-related disorders such as Alzheimer disease (Mattson et al., 2003; Patel et al., 2005). The recent paper by Qin et al. is a valuable addition to the growing literature on the beneficial effects of CR on AD mechanisms. Qin et al. explains how CR relates to the activation of the mammalian sirtuin protein SIRT1 and, in turn, how this activation promotes a non-amyloidogenic, α-secretase pathway for amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing and reduces amyloid-β production in Tg2576 mice. The authors also elegantly utilized viral transfection systems to show that SIRT1 expression in Tg2576 neurons and CHO-APPswe cells significantly attenuates the production of amyloid-β peptides. Most interestingly, they demonstrated that increased SIRT1 expression following a CR regimen reduces expression levels of the Rho kinase ROCK1, and that reduced ROCK1 levels...  Read more

  Related News: Dietary Intake: New Results to Ponder on Vitamin A, Folate

Comment by:  Andrew McCaddon (Disclosure)
Submitted 9 November 2008 Posted 9 November 2008

Methylation and Tau
The wealth of reports in the last decade confirming an association between homocysteine and Alzheimer disease hint that disturbed methylation might somehow relate to AD pathology (Smith, 2008; McCaddon and Hudson, 2007). A link between impaired methylation and neurofibrillary tangle formation was first proposed by Scott and Vafai in 2002 (Vafai and Stock, 2002). In support of this elegant hypothesis Obeid et al. found an association between phospho-tau and the ratio of the methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and its demethylated product S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) in the CSF of 182 patients with various neurological disorders (Obeid et al., 2007).

SAH is a potent inhibitor of methyltransferase reactions, and last year Sontag et al. found that exposing neuroblastoma cells to SAH led to reduced methylation of PP2A (Sontag et al., 2007). Sontag’s group now show that folate deprivation downregulates PP2A carboxymethyltransferase expression in these cells, ultimately resulting in cell death. Protection is afforded by overexpressing either the...  Read more


  Related News: Sirtuin Inhibitor Boosts Cognition, Reduces Phospho-tau

Comment by:  David Sinclair (Disclosure)
Submitted 11 November 2008 Posted 11 November 2008

One must be careful when calling nicotinamide an "inhibitor" in this experiment. While it is true that our lab showed that nicotinamide is a direct inhibitor of SIRT1 enzyme, it is also a precursor of NAD+, and NAD+ is a co-substrate (i.e., activator) of SIRT1.

In vivo, there is an abundant enzyme called Nampt in cells and serum that initiates the conversion of nicotinamide to NAD+. Therefore we should entertain the possibility that nicotinamide is activating SIRT1 in vivo, not inhibiting it. This would fit with other papers showing that SIRT1 is neuroprotective.

View all comments by David Sinclair


  Related News: Dietary Intake: New Results to Ponder on Vitamin A, Folate

Comment by:  J. Lucy Boyd
Submitted 12 November 2008 Posted 14 November 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers

  Related News: Sirtuin Inhibitor Boosts Cognition, Reduces Phospho-tau

Comment by:  William Polsky
Submitted 15 November 2008 Posted 18 November 2008

The experimental dose used in the study was 200 mg/kg/day. This would translate to a daily dose of nearly 14,000 mg for a 70 kg (154 lb.) person. Yet in the proposed clinical trial the experimental group will be receiving a daily dose of 3,000 mg. How does one explain the lower dose being used in the clinical trial?

View all comments by William Polsky

  Related News: Sirtuin Inhibitor Boosts Cognition, Reduces Phospho-tau

Comment by:  Will Block
Submitted 19 November 2008 Posted 21 November 2008

I am responding to William Polsky's comment on computation of the human dose of nicotinamide.

Following the publication of a study on the use of resveratrol in mice to improve their health and maximum lifespan, the press reported that a human would have to consume an enormous amount of wine or supplements to gain similar benefits. This statement shows a lack of understanding of the appropriate criteria for dosage translations between species.

There are a number of acceptable ways to compute the human equivalent dose from animal studies. The key is to consider energy-expenditure differences between species. Energy expenditure is a measure of metabolic rate. The method favored by the FDA (see www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/dose.htm) uses the body surface area (BSA) normalization method. Basal metabolic rate is directly related to surface area. As the FDA notes, the BSA method correlates well across several mammalian species with several parameters of biology, including oxygen utilization, caloric expenditure, basal...  Read more


  Related News: Dietary Intake: New Results to Ponder on Vitamin A, Folate

Comment by:  Wolfgang Herrmann, Rima Obeid
Submitted 15 January 2009 Posted 15 January 2009

Tauopathies are a group of diseases characterized by accumulation of tau protein. Tau protein has a novel physiological function in the brain—stabilizing the neurons. Alterations in the amount or the structure of tau protein might destabilize the microtubules, thus causing changes in subcellular structures like the lysosomes (1) or the mitochondria (2). Tau can be structurally modified by phosphorylation, glycosylation, oxidation, and crosslinking. These pathological forms of tau tend to form self-aggregates and thus forming the neurofibrilary tangles (NFTs). NFTs are typical findings in all tauopathies containing paired PHF comprising hyperphosphorylated tau (3).

Alzheimer disease (AD) is the best known tauopathy that is characterized by accumulation of NFTs in the brain. In an animal model of neurodegenerative diseases, mice developed progressive accumulation of NFTs, neuronal loss, and memory decline (4). Suppressing the transgenic tau caused improvement in memory function, and neuron numbers stabilized. Unexpectedly, NFTs continued to accumulate. The authors...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Follow on Twitter
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2010 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad