 |
News Search |
 |
 |
 |
Paper Alert-cum-SfN: Bapineuzumab Published, More AN1792 Presented
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
19 November 2009. Phase 2 clinical trial data for bapineuzumab, Elan/Wyeth’s humanized monoclonal antibody against amyloid-β, were published ahead of print in yesterday’s Neurology online. Writing for the trial investigators, Stephen Salloway, Butler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, and colleagues report that there were no differences in primary outcomes between patients treated with placebo and those given various doses of intravenous bapineuzumab. The primary outcomes were the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog) and the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD). Alzforum covered the data extensively when it was presented at the 11th International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease (ICAD) in 2008 (see ARF related news story).
This was a safety and efficacy trial of 234 patients randomized to placebo (110 patients) or bapineuzumab (124 patients), given as six infusions 13 weeks apart. Among a subgroup of patients who completed the study (78 in the placebo group and 80 in the treatment group) there was significantly less decline in both the ADAS-Cog and DAD in the treatment arms. In an accompanying Neurology editorial, Dan Kaufer, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and Sam Gandy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, call this subgroup result “encouraging.” They add, “The most remarkable aspect of this study is the unanticipated effect of ApoE4 carrier status on both efficacy and safety.” The drug sponsors emphasized this in their ICAD presentation, as well. The analysis suggests that the treatment worked better in people who do not carry an ApoE4 allele, which is a strong genetic risk factor for late-onset AD. In addition, vasogenic edema (VE), a treatment-related adverse event recorded in the trial, was detected more often in ApoE4 carriers.
Whether this effect holds up in larger trials remains to be seen. Some clinical trial experts question the wisdom of attempting such analyses in what are primarily small safety studies underpowered for subgroup analysis. It seems that companies simply can’t resist taking a peek and then reporting what they see.
If the analysis does hold up (several Phase 3 trials are currently recruiting), then it could have wider repercussions. “The relative absence of therapeutic efficacy and the increased risk of VE in ApoE4 carriers make bapineuzumab a less promising candidate therapy for this group, which comprises the majority of individuals with AD,” note Kaufer and Gandy. A related question is whether the presence of an ApoE4 allele makes the disease more intractable to treatment in general. “As the most common identified AD genetic risk factor, and, as we see here, a potential impediment to drug development, ApoE4 demands greater research attention to unravel the molecular basis of its deleterious effects,” they write.
In a separate development on AD immunotherapy, Alberto Serrano-Pozo and colleagues in Brad Hyman’s group at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and elsewhere reported at the Society for Neuroscience Conference held 17-21 October 2009 in Chicago that they noticed some new pathology benefits from active immunization when they compared five brains from patients who had participated in Elan/Wyeth’s AN1792 Phase 2a study with the brains of 13 AD patients who had not. AN1792 is the first-generation vaccine that removed plaques from brain and reduced CSF tau, but is now defunct because it caused meningoencephalitis in 6 percent of participants of a Phase 2a trial. In their study, Serrano-Pozo and colleagues followed up in human brain on some previous mouse 2-photon microscopy observations that had suggested immunotherapy can straighten out abnormally curved dystrophic neurites.
On a poster, the scientists reported that, besides having lower amyloid load and fewer dense-core and diffuse plaques, the immunized group also had lower scores on other pathological markers than did fellow AD patients of similar age and Braak stage. Hyperphosphorylated neurofibrillary tangles as measured by PHF-1 positivity were decreased in hippocampus, though presumably more compacted thioflavin S positive tangles were not. Curiously, the curvature of neurites was noticeably straighter. Neuritic curvature is a measure derived from the ratio of a neurite’s total length divided by the distance between its endpoints. Previous data from the Hyman lab have shown that in both transgenic mice and postmortem human AD brain, the neurites get curvier the closer they are to plaques. The SfN poster reported a straightening out of neurite trajectories among treated patients regardless of whether the neurites were far away from or near a plaque. Even within the halo of remaining dense-core plaques, the neurites looked healthier, Serrano-Pozo et al. reported. Overall, these findings indicate that immunotherapy against Aβ may eventually be able to ameliorate a measure of neuronal damage beyond removing amyloid plaques.
Elan’s AD immunotherapy program was purchased earlier this year by JANSSEN Alzheimer Immunotherapy, a newly formed subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson; Wyeth was gobbled up by pharma giant Pfizer.—Gabrielle Strobel and Tom Fagan.
References:
Salloway S, Sperling R, Gilman S, Fox NC, Blennow K, Raskind M, Sabbagh M, Honig LS, Doody R, van Dyck CH, Mulnard R, Barakos J, Gregg KM, Liu E, Lieberburg I, Schenk D, Black R, Grundman M for bapineuzumab 201 Clinical Trial Investigators. A Phase 2 multiple ascending dose trial of bapineuzumab in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2009 November 18. Abstract
Kaufer D, Gandy S. ApoE e4 and bapineuzumab. Infusing pharmacogenomics into Alzheimer disease therapeutics. Neurology 2009 November 18. Abstract
|
 |
 |
 |
Comments on News and Primary Papers |
 |
  |
| |
Comment by: Elliott Mufson, ARF Advisor (Disclosure)
|
 |
 |
Submitted 1 December 2009
|
Posted 1 December 2009
|
 |
 |
I recommend the Primary Papers
This may be a naive question, but if amyloid deposition in the brain is a critical factor in AD-related behavioral sequelae, why is it so difficult to induce a behavioral modification of statistical relevance following Aβ vaccination, since reports show a strong amyloid plaque clearance effect? View all comments by Elliott Mufson
|
 |

|
| |
Primary Papers: A phase 2 multiple ascending dose trial of bapineuzumab in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.
Comment by: Martin Ingelsson
|
 |
 |
Submitted 30 December 2009
|
Posted 30 December 2009
|
 |
 |
Although the outcome maybe wasn’t as good as had been hoped for, the Phase 2 study on Bapineuzumab, a humanized anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody, provided novel perspectives to the field of immunotherapy against Alzheimer disease. The study enrolled 234 patients with mild to moderate disease, and these were randomly assigned to intravenous antibody infusion or placebo in four dose cohorts (0.15, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg). After completing the protocol with six infusions, the patients were assessed after 1.5 years. Although no significant differences were found in the primary efficacy analyses, slight differences in cognition could be seen among ApoE ε4 non-carriers. Unfortunately, vasogenic edema occurred in 10 percent of the treated patients and was more frequent in ApoE ε4 carriers who received the higher doses. Ongoing large separate Phase 3 studies on ε4 carriers and ε4 non-carriers, respectively, will be crucial for treatment evaluation—and teach us more about which patients can gain from passive anti-Aβ immunotherapy.
View all comments by Martin Ingelsson
|
 |
 |
 |
Comments on Related News |
 |
  |
| |
Related News: Chicago: Bapineuzumab’s Phase 2—Was the Data Better Than the Spin?
Comment by: john doe
|
 |
 |
Submitted 22 March 2009
|
Posted 24 March 2009
|
 |
 |
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Chicago: The Vampire Principle—Young Blood Rejuvenates Aging Brain?
Comment by: Ivan Goussakov
|
 |
 |
Submitted 1 December 2009
|
Posted 2 December 2009
|
 |
 |
I think another model for this kind of study (after parabiotics and vampires) could be pregnant mice.
The placental barrier between mother and fetus highly leaky, allowing the passage of, for instance, maternal antibodies (mainly IgG). It seems to me that there is a general observation that the maternal organism appears 'rejuvenated' during pregnancy. View all comments by Ivan Goussakov
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Chicago: AD and Epilepsy—Joined at the Synapse?
Comment by: Javier DeFelipe
|
 |
 |
Submitted 8 December 2009
|
Posted 9 December 2009
|
 |
 |
We have recently observed that the membrane surfaces of neurons (mainly pyramidal cells) in contact with plaques lack GABAergic perisomatic synapses (Garcia-Marin et al., 2009). Indeed, a large proportion of plaques are in contact with neurons, and of the several hundred neurons that we found to come into contact with plaques, in no cases were perisomatic terminals found at the surface of the neuron that was directly touching the plaque. Since these perisomatic synapses are thought to exert a strong influence on the output of pyramidal cells, their loss may lead to the hyperactivity of the neurons in contact with plaques. These findings are consistent with the in-vivo calcium-imaging experiments of Busche et al. (2008).
References: Busche, M.A., Eichhoff, G., Adelsberger, H., Abramowski, D., Wiederhold, K.H., Haass, C., Staufenbiel, M., Konnerth, A., and Garaschuk, O. (2008). Clusters of hyperactive neurons near amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Science 321, 1686-1689. Abstract
Garcia-Marin V, Blazquez-Llorca L, Rodriguez J, Boluda S, Muntane G, Ferrer I and DeFelipe J (2009) Diminished perisomatic GABAergic terminals on cortical neurons adjacent to amyloid plaques. Front. Neuroanat. 3:28. Abstract
View all comments by Javier DeFelipe
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Chicago: NFATs, Calcineurin—Mediators of AD, PD Pathogenesis?
Comment by: Mary Reid
|
 |
 |
Submitted 30 December 2009
|
Posted 30 December 2009
|
 |
 |
It's of interest that mRNA levels of the calcineurin inhibitor, DSCR1, are also much higher in AD brain (1). The recent study be Lee and colleagues finds that DSCR1 interacts with Tollip and positively modulates IL-1R signalling (2). Tollip is an IRAK-1 inhibitor. This would seem to suggest problems with TLR2/TLR4 signalling in AD. This is supported by the Landreth study finding that CD14 and TLR2 and TLR4 bind Aβ to stimulate microglial activation (3). The KEGG link is below for the TOLL RECEPTOR signaling pathway (4).
References: 1. Ermak G, Morgan TE, Davies KJ. Chronic overexpression of the calcineurin inhibitory gene DSCR1 (Adapt78) is associated with Alzheimer's disease. J Biol Chem. 2001 Oct 19;276(42):38787-94. Abstract
2. Lee JY, Lee HJ, Lee EJ, Jang SH, Kim H, Yoon JH, Chung KC. Down syndrome candidate region-1 protein interacts with Tollip and positively modulates interleukin-1 receptor-mediated signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Dec;1790(12):1673-80. Abstract
3. Reed-Geaghan EG, Savage JC, Hise AG, Landreth GE. CD14 and toll-like receptors 2 and 4 are required for fibrillar A{beta}-stimulated microglial activation. J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 23;29(38):11982-92. Abstract
4. Toll-like receptor signaling pathway—Homo sapiens (human)
View all comments by Mary Reid
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: PIB-PET Biomarker Study Confirms Bapineuzumab Lowers Amyloid
Comment by: P. Murali Doraiswamy (Disclosure)
|
 |
 |
Submitted 5 March 2010
|
Posted 5 March 2010
|
 |
 |
This is a very impressive study. It is the kind of pilot biomarker study that every top investigator dreams of doing, and kudos to the team that did it.
I noticed some 15 percent of AD patients were dropped from entering the trial because the scan showed they did not have sufficient amyloid in the brain. Without dropping these people, the study would likely have had no chance of showing a positive result and might have also exposed more people to risks. This shows the power of PET amyloid imaging to select people who have pathology in order to maximize your chance of a drug effect. Prior to this, we were treating AD patients blindly without knowing how much amyloid they had in their brains, a bit like treating people with a statin without knowing their cholesterol level.
With regard to the bapineuzumab therapy, the magnitude of amyloid clearance seems consistent and real, but at around 20 percent is modest. That is far less than was expected from prior autopsy studies of immunized patients or animal studies which suggested the vaccines might have a much bigger...
Read more
This is a very impressive study. It is the kind of pilot biomarker study that every top investigator dreams of doing, and kudos to the team that did it.
I noticed some 15 percent of AD patients were dropped from entering the trial because the scan showed they did not have sufficient amyloid in the brain. Without dropping these people, the study would likely have had no chance of showing a positive result and might have also exposed more people to risks. This shows the power of PET amyloid imaging to select people who have pathology in order to maximize your chance of a drug effect. Prior to this, we were treating AD patients blindly without knowing how much amyloid they had in their brains, a bit like treating people with a statin without knowing their cholesterol level.
With regard to the bapineuzumab therapy, the magnitude of amyloid clearance seems consistent and real, but at around 20 percent is modest. That is far less than was expected from prior autopsy studies of immunized patients or animal studies which suggested the vaccines might have a much bigger effect. This is a new insight and we might need to lower our expectations. The potential promise with this technology is that we might be able to test how different doses of therapy affect amyloid clearance at an early stage, allowing companies to select the most optimal dose for definitive trials.
Going beyond amyloid, at the end of the day, one can clear all the amyloid in the brain and if the patient does not improve, it still is not a useful therapy. So what's missing is for the field to now show that clearing amyloid eventually leads to a meaningful cognitive and functional benefit for the individual.
Some minor methodologic issues: differences at baseline in cognition and amyloid burden (not unexpected in small studies) between treatment groups add a bit of uncertainty as to interpretation. The method for computing standardized uptake values relative to cerebellum (i.e., the amyloid ratios) varies slightly from one study to another, and one sees different ratios being called normal or abnormal. This makes it hard to compare findings across studies and across tracers. So I think we need head-to-head comparisons and also some standardization of the way one determines a positive from a negative scan.
At HAI and AAN in Toronto, and ICAD in Honolulu, we will see lots of new data on these tracers in terms of cognitive correlates in normals and MCI subjects. I also expect AVID's florbetapir (formerly known as AV-45) will be the first to present validation data from a multicenter autopsy study. Once the validation is complete, this will really jumpstart the use of PET amyloid imaging in secondary and primary prevention trials of both drugs and lifestyle interventions. It will also give us more insight into the role of amyloid in aging and dementia, and allow us to test mechanistic hypotheses.
View all comments by P. Murali Doraiswamy
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
Submit a Comment on this News Article |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|