Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
   
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Pathways
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
The Brain Minus Microglia—No Effect on Plaques
28 October 2009. Microglia are the housekeepers of the brain, gobbling up foreign bodies and protecting neurons from damage. In culture, these cells are well known for ingesting globs of amyloid-β, and in Alzheimer disease they surround amyloid deposits. One could be forgiven for assuming that microglia have a profound effect on the growth or clearance of senile plaques. But as reported in the October 18 Nature Neuroscience online, researchers in Germany have almost completely banished microglia from the brains of APP transgenic mice, and to their surprise they found absolutely no change in plaque size or number. “We expected that something would happen, and we were not biased either way, but nothing happened. The plaques just didn’t care whether microglia were around or not,” said Mathias Jucker, University of Tubingen, and co-leader of the study together with Frank Heppner, Charite-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin. “My interpretation is that in the normal pathogenesis of amyloid formation in transgenic mice, microglia do not play any role,” Jucker told ARF.

The findings may come as a surprise, given indications that microglia can be recruited to tackle Aβ deposits (see Boissonneault et al., 2009; ARF related news story on El Khoury et al., 2007), but it gets at the fundamental question of whether resident microglia in the brain have any effect on plaque dynamics—a heavily debated issue, according to Terrence Town, University of California, Los Angeles. “This is an elegant study. I think that it definitively tells us that microglia are not important in clearance or formation of amyloid plaques,” Town told ARF, though he emphasized also that the work does not rule out the possibility that peripheral macrophages might be involved in plaque turnover or that brain microglia could be spurred into action. “While CNS resident microglia may not be able to influence plaque progression in the absence of further manipulation, that does not mean that if we devise a therapeutic or genetic strategy to manipulate these cells that that would not have an effect on plaques,” he said.

To ablate microglia from the brain, Jucker, Heppner, and colleagues made use of mice engineered to produce the “suicide” thymidine kinase from herpes simplex virus (HSVTK). The kinase converts some antiviral drugs, such as ganciclovir (GCV), into toxic nucleotide analogs that insinuate into growing DNA and kill dividing cells. Joint first authors Stefan Grathwohl and Roland Kälin crossed HSVTK mice with two AD mouse models—the APP/PS1 mouse, which has aggressive plaque pathology, and the APP23 mouse, which develops plaques more slowly. The HSVTK was driven by the CD11b promoter. This promoter restricts kinase expression to cells of the myeloid lineage including brain microglia, but the researchers generated chimeric mice carrying congenic wild-type bone marrow to keep peripheral myeloid cells alive. This ensured that only resident brain microglia were ablated in the crosses.

Grathwohl and colleagues used two different GCV treatments to ablate brain microglia in the APP/PS1-TK mice. Given orally at five months to the chimeric mice, GCV led to a 30 percent reduction in microglia in the neocortex. The morphology or number of Aβ plaques did not change as a consequence. Using a micropump to deliver GCV directly into brain ventricles (for the ventricle infusions, APP/PS1-TK mice were not bone marrow chimeric), the researchers achieved a 90 percent reduction in brain microglia over two to four weeks. Again, they found no change in plaque dynamics. The researchers also adjusted the timing of the microglial decimation to before or after plaques emerged. “It didn’t matter whether we depleted the microglia first or whether we had amyloid depositing mice with plaques and then depleted the microglia; the plaques just didn’t care whether they had microglia or not,” said Jucker.

It also didn’t matter which mouse model the researchers used. With the less aggressive APP23 crosses, the researchers also achieved about 95 percent ablation of brain microglia after pumping GCV into brain ventricles of 17- or 24-month-old mice. They found no change in congophilic-positive plaque load or the number and morphology of amyloid-associated dystrophic neurites. The latter observation argues against activated microglia being involved in neuronal damage. “This was a very carefully designed study. They used multiple approaches, two different mouse models of Alzheimer’s, and I think the results are compelling,” said Town.

One major limitation to the study is the length of observation. Because GCV eventually becomes toxic, the researchers were only able to follow its effects for up to four weeks, leaving open the question of whether a longer microglial depletion would have some effect on plaques. “That’s a fair criticism,” said Jucker but he added that studies of microglial infiltration into the brain have seen effects within two weeks (see ARF related news story on Simard et al., 2006) and that plaques can pop up literally overnight (see ARF related news story on Meyer-Luehmann et al., 2008), “so I have trouble to believe that after, say, 16 weeks we would see anything different,” he said, though he is planning to investigate longer times. Town thinks that the researchers tried their best to see a positive effect. “The time points they chose to administer GCV tended to be during the initiation phase of Aβ deposition, so you would expect that if any phase of amyloidosis would be sensitive to this kind of manipulation, it would be then,” he said.

“This is a very exciting study that gives us a lot of thought for what is really going on in the brain with amyloid, and I think we will be busy discussing this for a long time,” suggested Tony Wyss-Coray, Stanford University, California, who also wondered if resident microglia can be induced to attack amyloid. “The study shows that if you don’t do anything, then microglia are not involved in plaque turnover. But that doesn’t exclude that they could be clearing amyloid in human brains,” he suggested. Jucker said he doubts that happens in the absence of some other initiating event. “This goes back almost 20 years to the studies of Henryk Wisniewski,” said Jucker. Wisniewski found Aβ fibrils in brain microglia of AD patients only if the patients had also suffered a stroke (see Wisniewski et al., 1991), suggesting that some additional event was necessary to goad microglia into gobbling up Aβ.

What that event might be in humans is unclear, though inflammatory responses aid microglia clearance of Aβ in transgenic mice (see, e.g., Wyss-Coray et al., 2001). And just recently, Pritam Das and colleagues at the Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, reported that they can induce massive gliosis and suppression of Aβ deposition by administering the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) to transgenic animals (see Chakrabarty et al., 2009). “We are excited about that because it shows that inflammation does not promote more amyloid or more Aβ, which was the hypothesis for a long time,” said Das. Immunotherapy is currently an active therapeutic strategy and that might stimulate microglia, as well.

In vitro, too, microglia are well known for phagocytosing Aβ. Gary Landreth’s group at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, have identified specific receptors that mediate microglial responses to Aβ (see ARF related news story on Reed-Geaghan et al., 2009). “That would, of course, create hope that one could try to find the right receptor or target to activate these cells. If it is true that they are not doing anything in the brain, but they do in cell culture, they are targets I would want to pursue,” suggested Wyss-Coray.

If it is true that microglia are normally oblivious to amyloid plaques, then why do they surround them? “My own theory is that they are making a glial scar,” suggested Das. “The microglia surround the plaques, and astrocytes come on top and cordon off the area, essentially protecting the rest of the brain. If the microglia cannot remove plaques, it makes sense that they would try to protect the rest of the brain from damage.” Though ablation of microglia did not result in neurodegeneration, noted Jucker, he did agree with Das’s speculation.

Perhaps the next step is to question the role of the astrocytes, suggested Wyss-Coray. “A number of people, including us, have shown that astrocytes can degrade amyloid.” (See Wyss-Coray et al., 2003.) However, given their specialized role in modulating neurotransmission, ablating astrocytes without having catastrophic effects on the mice might be a tall order.—Tom Fagan.

Reference:
Grathwohl SA, Kalin RE, Bolmont T, Prokop S, Winkelmann G, Kaeser SA, Odenthal J, Radde R, Eldh T, Gandy S, Aguzzi A, Staufenbiel M, Mathews PM, Wolburg H, Heppner FL, Jucker M. Formation and maintenance of Alzheimer's disease beta-amyloid plaques in the absence of microglia. Nature Neuroscience 2008 October 18. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Steve Barger
Submitted 30 October 2009 Posted 30 October 2009

The demonstration by Grathwohl et al. that substantial depletion of microglia has no consequences for Aβ deposition is indeed intriguing. However, this finding must be taken in context of a good deal of data indicating that microglia do participate in the sequelae of events occurring in AD and in APP transgenic models, much of which come from studies enlisting elegant gene- or cell-ablation approaches such as those applied here. For instance, genetic ablation of Toll-like receptor 2 (Richard et al., 2008) or CCR2 (El Khoury et al., 2007) exacerbates plaque deposition.

More importantly, many hypotheses about the roles of microglia in AD involve events downstream of amyloidogenesis, such as synaptic dysregulation or frank neurotoxicity. The sole parameter assessed in this paper that has any possible link to such downstream events was APP staining in dystrophic neurites. But no compelling claims had ever been made for a connection between microglial actions and these structures; the APP staining is likely a consequence of the transgene itself. It would be more relevant to...  Read more


  Primary Papers: Formation and maintenance of Alzheimer's disease beta-amyloid plaques in the absence of microglia.

Comment by:  George Perry (Disclosure)
Submitted 5 November 2009 Posted 6 November 2009
  I recommend this paper
Comments on Related News
  Related News: Calling for Backup: Microglia from Bone Marrow Fight Plaques in AD Mice

Comment by:  Serge Rivest
Submitted 22 February 2006 Posted 23 February 2006
  I recommend the Primary Papers

I would like to thank Erene Mina and Drs. Walker and Jucker. They provide insightful comments regarding specific aspects of the study. I'd like to address a few points here.

The first one regards irradiation and its effects on the blood-brain barrier (BBB). There is not very strong evidence that irradiation alters the BBB, and brain infiltration of bone marrow-derived cells has been reported with other techniques as well. Messengale and colleagues have validated this concept using both lethal irradiation and parabiosis techniques in mice (Massengale et al., 2005). Although most (if not all) GFP cells found in the brains of chimeric mice have a microglial phenotype, the overall contributions of such cells to the brain-resident microglial populations of normal mice remain quite low (e.g., 0.5-11.5 percent of resident microglia). This is what we generally observe in our mice (Simard and Rivest, 2004). In APP mice, however, there is a robust microglial recruitment toward the plaques, and those that derive from the bone marrow are attracted at a specific time of the disease....  Read more


  Related News: Microglia—Medics or Meddlers in Dementia

Comment by:  William Van Nostrand
Submitted 27 March 2007 Posted 27 March 2007

The paper from Joseph El Khoury and colleagues presents convincing evidence that the absence of activated microglia is detrimental in the Tg2576 model. On the surface, from our study in J. Neuroscience, one may conclude that microglial activation is harmful. It likely depends on the context of how you are viewing the problem. Early on, microglial activation may be helpful by facilitating clearance of Aβ from brain; in their absence more Aβ accumulates (El Khoury). On the other hand, if Aβ is not cleared and microglia remain activated, this may lead to the chronic neuroinflammation and behavioral deficits that we observed in our model.

Another caveat that we must all recognize is what are the specific features of the models we work with. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses for studying specific aspects of Aβ pathology. For example, the widely used Tg2576 mouse expresses high amounts of Swedish mutant human APP in many cell types, producing high amounts of wild-type Aβ peptides and parenchymal amyloid plaques. The Tg-SwDI mouse expresses low...  Read more


  Related News: Microglia—Medics or Meddlers in Dementia

Comment by:  Steve Barger
Submitted 29 March 2007 Posted 29 March 2007

El Khoury et al. have produced a dataset that adds to those indicating a beneficial role for monocytic phagocytes (either activated microglia or hematogenous macrophages) with respect to the development of Alzheimer-related pathology. Some data have indicated that inflammation-related events elaborated by microglia contribute to AD pathology. This includes the overexpression of interleukin-1-β in APP-transgenic mouse models of AD, as well as attenuation of Aβ accumulation in these mice by anti-inflammatory agents such as ibuprofen and, more recently, minocycline (see Fan et al., 2007). But beginning with paradigms in which such mice are immunized against Aβ, increasing evidence has suggested that monocyte-derived cells can help to clear Aβ from the brain through phagocytosis and/or expression of Aβ-degrading proteases. For instance, Morgan and colleagues have shown that injection of the powerful inflammatory agent lipopolysaccharide into APP-transgenic mice results in Aβ clearance (DiCarlo et al., 2006), and the clearance or prevention of Aβ...  Read more

  Related News: Microglia—Medics or Meddlers in Dementia

Comment by:  Bo Hu
Submitted 5 April 2007 Posted 9 April 2007

It is odd that an effect was noted by El Khoury et al. in a Ccr2 knockout. Cedric Raines showed in a landmark paper that Ccr2 was so redundant that it made no impact on trafficking of monocyte-related cells in EAE (experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis).

References:
Gaupp S, Pitt D, Kuziel WA, Cannella B, Raine CS. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in CCR2(-/-) mice: susceptibility in multiple strains. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:139-50. Abstract

View all comments by Bo Hu

  Related News: Microglia—Medics or Meddlers in Dementia

Comment by:  Terrence Town
Submitted 7 April 2007 Posted 9 April 2007

The report by El Khoury and colleagues shows that recruitment of macrophage-like cells to the brains of Tg2576 mice via Ccr2 plays an important role in limiting AD-like pathology. This is a very interesting finding and extends the work of Stalder et al. (2005), who noted the presence of round, non-process-bearing, macrophage-like cells in APP23 mice with appreciable amyloid deposits.

El Khoury et al. have gone further by establishing that Ccr2-dependent recruitment of microglia/macrophage-like cells is important in limiting progression of cerebral amyloidosis. If taken to the logical endpoint, this would mean that microglia and/or macrophages serve to limit amyloidosis by phagocytosing/clearing amyloid deposits in AD mice in the absence of genetic manipulation (and perhaps something similar may occur in AD patients). However, careful 3D reconstruction of microglia and amyloid in APP23 or Tg2576 mice fails to show this (Stalder et al., 2001; Wegiel et al., 2004).

An alternate explanation is that microglia/macrophages secrete a soluble factor (e.g., a cytokine or...  Read more


  Related News: Popcorn Plaque? Alzheimer Disease Is Slow, Yet Plaque Growth Is Fast

Comment by:  Carol Colton, Michael Vitek, Donna Wilcock
Submitted 13 February 2008 Posted 14 February 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Meyer-Luehmann and colleagues provide new insights into the temporal sequence of events surrounding amyloid plaque formation and the brain’s cellular responses to this formation. It is exciting to see that the rapid formation of plaques that had been predicted by previously published reports using in vitro techniques (Vitek et al., 1994; Jarrett et al., 1993) actually occurs in vivo. The concept of seeding by submicroscopic Aβ particles clearly remains an important mechanism for plaque formation and deposition.

Useful insights are also provided by visualization of the microglial response to the newly formed amyloid plaques. Microglia accumulate at the plaques, indicating the presence of activating/migration signals, most likely from Aβ. This, plus the microglial morphological changes, suggest that a pre-programmed response pattern, which is typical of macrophages involved in the innate immune response, has been initiated. However, it is clear from the visual data that the term “microglia activation” needs to be reconsidered and redefined. Although functional changes...  Read more


  Related News: Popcorn Plaque? Alzheimer Disease Is Slow, Yet Plaque Growth Is Fast

Comment by:  Walter J. Lukiw
Submitted 13 February 2008 Posted 14 February 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Rapid Plaque Growth and Positive Cooperative Assembly
Amyloid-β peptides constitute an intriguing class of molecules that self-assemble into stable, ordered structures, and their formation is reminiscent of the natural phenomenon of positive cooperative assembly. In general, this cooperativity is regulated by an allosteric effect, so that interactive assemblies, once formed, support exponential rates of subsequent growth. In biology, this phenomenon is widely observed all the way from the atomic to the molecular level—from the cooperative binding of calcium ions regulating the intercellular adhesive actions of transmembrane cadherins (1) to the allosteric cooperativity of protein kinase A generated by nucleotide and substrate positioning (2).

Interestingly, allosteric cooperativity of ligand binding may be disrupted by single amino acid mutations, for example, the (Y204A) site change in protein kinase A, suggesting that relatively subtle changes in ligand topography abruptly attenuate the cooperativity mechanism. The addition to Meyer-Luehmann and...  Read more


  Related News: Popcorn Plaque? Alzheimer Disease Is Slow, Yet Plaque Growth Is Fast

Comment by:  Hiroaki Misono
Submitted 11 February 2008 Posted 25 February 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers

This is a fascinating paper, which I will be presenting in a journal club soon. I am sure there will be many answers from future studies using this imaging technique. But already it is interesting to see the rapid formation of amyloid plaques in vivo.

I wonder, however, could plaque formation happen even more rapidly in brain? The fluorescence dye used in this paper is a derivative of congo red, which may interfere with amyloid fibril formation. In this case, it is possible that the kinetics in this paper is still an underestimate. One thing that puzzles me, as a former Alzheimer researcher, is that environmental enrichment is reported to increase the number of amyloid plaques in the hippocampus of APPswe/PS1d9 mice (Jankowsky et al., 2003 powID=33494), while the same treatment also improves their learning performance (Jankowsky et al., 2005 powID=45618). How does that fit into the model?

Nevertheless, this paper has created new ground, and I assume that the authors have even more longitudinal imaging data in hand by now, hopefully for several months.

View all comments by Hiroaki Misono


  Related News: Popcorn Plaque? Alzheimer Disease Is Slow, Yet Plaque Growth Is Fast

Comment by:  Estibaliz Capetillo-Zarate, Gunnar Gouras, ARF Advisor, Michael Lin
Submitted 29 February 2008 Posted 5 March 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers

This landmark study provides many exciting new insights into the development of β amyloid plaques, and is a superb example of the importance of descriptive neuropathology research in elucidating Alzheimer disease (AD) pathogenesis. Using multiphoton microscopy to repeatedly image brain areas in transgenic mouse models of AD, the authors made several novel observations, including that plaques form within a day and remain stable in size, occur prior to microglial activation, and are not directly related to the vasculature. Another interesting new finding was that dystrophic neurites in plaque-free areas can appear and disappear.

The authors argue that their data indicate that plaques do not develop from dystrophic neurites, since plaques were not observed to form at sites of dystrophic neurites in plaque-free areas. Yet, looking closely at the brain cytoarchitecture prior to the appearance of a plaque, abundant neurites are evident, and with the limited resolution of multiphoton microscopy, early neuritic alterations could be missed spatially. They could also be missed...  Read more


  Related News: Macrophages Storm Blood-brain Barrier, Clear Plaques—or Do They?

Comment by:  Terrence Town
Submitted 10 June 2008 Posted 12 June 2008

I wanted to thank Serge Rivest, Mathias Jucker, Tony Wyss-Coray, Joseph El Khoury, and Pritam Das for their helpful and thought-provoking comments, and to address some of their questions. I find it terribly interesting that the recent report by Richard, Rivest, and colleagues showed spontaneously increased TGF-β expression in immune cells near plaques of Tg APP/TLR2-/- mice. I agree that these striking findings are in line with the interpretation that increased TGF-β1 levels in AD patient brains, as shown by Wyss-Coray, Masliah, Mucke, and colleagues, likely serve the maladaptive role of maintaining an “immune privileged” brain milieu in AD patients and in these transgenic mouse models of the disease. We believe that overcoming this non-productive immune state will likely be key in targeting beneficial immune-mediated clearance of cerebral amyloid—and what better immune cell to target than the blood-borne macrophage (Greek etymology—“big eater”)? We also agree with Joseph El Khoury that a key aspect of this therapeutic modality will be promoting the Aβ...  Read more

  Related News: Macrophages Storm Blood-brain Barrier, Clear Plaques—or Do They?

Comment by:  Milan Fiala (Disclosure)
Submitted 13 August 2008 Posted 14 August 2008

I am glad that the researchers studying transgenic models are finally confirming our results published in 2002 (Fiala et al., 2002), which showed transmigration of macrophages across the brain vessel wall and clearance of plaques by these large macrophages.

The migrating macrophages broke through ZO-1 tight junction barrier and aggregated around brain vessels similarly as in HIV encephalitis. This has been followed by a recent publication in PNAS (Fiala et al., 2007). The animal studies cannot resolve the crucial question: are macrophages of patients with AD different from those of control subjects? The answers for interested readers are available in our PNAS article and more current work presented at ICAD. Not only macrophages penetrate across the blood-brain barrier but also clear oligomeric amyloid-β from neurons.

References:
Fiala M, Liu QN, Sayre J, Pop V, Brahmandam V, Graves MC, Vinters HV. Cyclooxygenase-2-positive macrophages infiltrate the Alzheimer's disease brain and damage the blood-brain barrier. Eur J Clin Invest. 2002 May;32(5):360-71. Abstract

Fiala M, Liu PT, Espinosa-Jeffrey A, Rosenthal MJ, Bernard G, Ringman JM, Sayre J, Zhang L, Zaghi J, Dejbakhsh S, Chiang B, Hui J, Mahanian M, Baghaee A, Hong P, Cashman J. Innate immunity and transcription of MGAT-III and Toll-like receptors in Alzheimer's disease patients are improved by bisdemethoxycurcumin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 31;104(31):12849-54. Abstract

View all comments by Milan Fiala


  Related News: Death by Glia?—Chemokine Receptor Facilitates Neuron Loss in AD Mice

Comment by:  Richard Ransohoff
Submitted 26 March 2010 Posted 26 March 2010

In two parallel, separate studies, Joe El Khoury and we (a group led by Bruce Lamb and including Sungho Lee, Nick Varvel, and myself) crossed CX3CR1 KOs to APP-PS1 mice (using distinct APP-PS1 models, ours from Matthias Jucker; El Khoury’s from Dave Borchelt) and monitored amyloid deposition. Our results were entirely concordant (using slightly different methods of analysis): there was a strong, gene dosage-dependent decrease in amyloid deposition in the CX3CR1 KO mice. This decrease was not associated with evident change in APP expression, nor in processing. Further, there were fewer microglia associated with each core plaque in the CX3CR1 KOs. The hypothesis was that CX3CR1 KO microglia are more efficient at amyloid phagocytosis, therefore clearing more with fewer cells. Since then, Bruce’s lab has in vitro data to support this hypothesis. These findings (obtained independently by our lab and that of El Khoury) are neither concordant nor discordant with those from Herms et al: their assessment of insoluble Aβ appears to show a non-significant reduction in the KO...  Read more

  Related News: Death by Glia?—Chemokine Receptor Facilitates Neuron Loss in AD Mice

Comment by:  Terrence Town
Submitted 26 March 2010 Posted 26 March 2010

The recent report from the Herms group offers new insight into the enigmatic relationship between microglia and AD pathobiology. The authors have focused on whether fractalkine receptor on microglial cells participates in neuronal loss using Frank LaFerla’s 3xTg-AD model. The novelty in this paper is really twofold: demonstration of in vivo neuronal loss in real-time, and new biology showing the role of microglial fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) in mediating this neuronal death. The authors should be commended for taking such an elegant approach, utilizing two-photon intravital imaging. It is interesting that these authors observe neuronal loss within two weeks in fractalkine receptor-sufficient 3xTg-AD mice. This report comes on the heels of another recent Nature Neuroscience paper from Mathias Jücker’s group, where those authors used a ganciclovir cd11b suicide gene approach to destroy microglia in a transgenic APP/PS1 mouse model of AD for two to four weeks. Surprisingly, those authors did not detect altered cerebral amyloidosis or amyloid-associated neuritic dystrophy in AD...  Read more
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Follow on Twitter
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2010 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad