Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Stayin’ Alive—Huge Study Quickens Quest for Plasma AD Biomarker
2 October 2009. Identifying people on the verge of dementia before they actually succumb has become somewhat of a Holy Grail for Alzheimer disease research—finding cheap and reliable methods for this even more so. Toward that end, a prospective study involving thousands of French elderly sustains hope that the bewildering hunt for plasma AD biomarkers may not be for naught. Led by Jean-Charles Lambert of the Institute Pasteur in Lille, France, scientists report that seniors diagnosed with dementia at two years of follow-up had low baseline plasma Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratios. The team also measured truncated forms of plasma Aβ, and found that low plasma Aβ(n-42)/Aβ(n-40) ratios were associated with increased risk of mixed/vascular dementia but not AD. Lambert presented these data in July at the International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease (ICAD) in Vienna (see ARF conference story). The full report appears in the September 15 issue of Neurology.

This study “contributes to the growing evidence that we may be able to find a plasma biomarker, which would be, from a population perspective, much more usable than cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or brain imaging measures,” Nicole Schupf of Columbia University, New York, told ARF. Though the latter measures, at this point, offer more predictive and diagnostic value, spinal taps and brain scans are expensive and invasive, fueling interest in AD biomarkers that could be evaluated from a simple blood draw.

Thus far, the search for blood-based biomarkers can be characterized by sprinkles of promise awash with confusion. Plasma Aβ concentrations rise with age and are elevated in people with pathogenic mutations in presenilin or amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) (Ringman et al., 2008). However, data from studies of sporadic AD have been all over the map, with various groups reporting that disease risk associates with high plasma Aβ42 levels (e.g., Schupf et al., 2008 and ARF related news story) or with low Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratios (e.g., van Oijen et al., 2006), or that correlations with plasma Aβ were too weak to be useful (e.g., Lopez et al., 2008; Hansson et al., 2008 and ARF related news story).

The current paper was an epidemiological tour de force involving 8,414 non-institutionalized elderly (ages 65 and up) in Bordeaux, Montpellier, and Dijon. Funded primarily by the French government as well as several non-government organizations and pharmaceutical companies, the Three-City (3C) Study was designed to determine the influence of vascular factors in dementia, Lambert said. Scientists collected baseline blood samples from participants randomly chosen from electoral rolls of each city between 1999 and 2001, and did follow-up assessments, including neuropsychological testing, two and four years later.

From the initial cohort, 257 developed incident dementia during the four-year follow-up period, and 1,185 were selected randomly as non-demented controls. Lambert and colleagues used a new xMAP-based assay developed by Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium, to measure full-length and truncated Aβ peptides in the blood samples. Controlling for various factors including age, gender, education, diabetes, cholesterol, and APOE genotype, they found that people in the upper Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 tertile had half the risk of developing AD and a 2.9-fold lower risk of mixed/vascular dementia, compared to those in the lowest tertile. However, the upper tertile for truncated Aβ, i.e., n-42/n-40, was only associated with reduced (3.7-fold) risk of mixed/vascular dementia but not AD.

“Maybe these truncated species are more involved in vascular amyloidosis than they are in forming plaques,” Schupf said. In a recent study led by Richard Mayeux at Columbia University, New York, Schupf and colleagues analyzed more than 1,100 seniors in northern Manhattan and found that those with high baseline levels of plasma Aβ42 were three times as likely to develop AD over four to six years of follow-up (Schupf et al., 2008).

At a glance, these findings seem to clash with the 3C Study, which found that high Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratios correlated with lower AD risk. However, the New York study found that conversion to AD coincided with a drop in plasma Aβ42, which Schupf sees as “highly consistent” with the association Lambert and colleagues report at two years of follow-up. “You don't really know where those guys were five years ago. Two years is quite a short period of time. They may have been en route [to dementia/AD],” she told ARF. “It would be of interest to know how many of those who converted to AD had mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at their initial examination.”

On this point, Lambert noted that MCI was still a relatively new concept at the time the 3C Study was designed, making systematic diagnoses extremely challenging for large epidemiological studies. “However, we can postulate that some of the individuals who developed dementia at two or four years of follow-up likely presented MCI at inclusion,” he wrote in an email to ARF. In the future, baseline MCI status could likely be addressed in one of the three cities to make the sample size more manageable, he noted.

While large sample size is clearly a strength of the 3C Study, it can also cause problems for interpretation. “Usually more is better, but I wonder if it holds any meaning for individual diagnosis,” Anne Fagan of Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, said of the new work. “If you study enough people, you'll find an association somewhere.” She suggested that timing may be critical in studies of plasma Aβ and dementia. “I found it curious that the associations were restricted to individuals diagnosed at two years of follow-up and not at four years,” Fagan told ARF. She notes previous work showing that CSF levels of the β-secretase enzyme BACE1 are elevated in MCI, relative to healthy people, but dip during conversion to dementia (see ARF related news story). “This plasma story could be the same thing,” Fagan said. “Maybe you have to catch it at a certain timepoint in the course of disease in order for it to be meaningful diagnostically and predictively.” Schupf agrees, stressing that plasma Aβ studies need to be longitudinal, with repeated peptide measures in elders who start off free of cognitive impairment. “If Aβ was high and then goes down with onset, it’s not going to look different from non-demented in a cross-sectional study,” she said.

Another problem with plasma Aβ studies is that variations in the techniques for measuring plasma Aβ make it hard to compare results from different labs. Such challenges were highlighted in a recent study showing highly variable recovery rates for Aβ40 and Aβ42 in spiked samples sent to various U.S. labs using different protocols to measure Aβ peptide concentrations (Okereke et al., 2009 and ARF related news story). The use of different assays may not necessarily cause problems, though. Lambert noted that the 3C findings essentially reproduced those of a similar, large Dutch study that did not use xMAP-based technology to measure plasma Aβ (van Oijen et al., 2006).

Barring methodological concerns, a fundamental problem with plasma Aβ studies is the uncertainty about what is being measured. “We don't know, in fact, whether the plasma Aβ peptides are coming directly from brain, from vascular cells, or from other organs in the body,” Lambert said. New data by Fagan and colleagues seem to suggest that plasma Aβ measurements may not reflect changes in brain Aβ as closely as CSF measures or positron emission tomography (PET) using the amyloid tracer Pittsburgh compound-B (PIB). Consistent with past work by her group (Fagan et al., 2006) and others, “everybody who was PIB-positive had low CSF Aβ42 levels, but the majority of PIB-negative people had high CSF Aβ42,” Fagan said of her new study, which is currently in press at EMBO Molecular Medicine. However, plasma Aβ concentrations did not seem to correlate with brain amyloid load assessed by PIB-PET, or with CSF Aβ, she said.

These data would seem to strengthen the case for relying on brain scans and CSF samples for AD biomarkers. “But when the day comes where we have treatments, we're going to want to have large-scale screening of predictors that allow us to intervene before people develop symptoms,” Schupf said. “On a population basis, that really is a blood test. I don't think we're there yet. I think this [study] helps to suggest that we might get there.”

Masood Kamali-Moghaddam of Uppsala University, Sweden, expects the new data to intensify efforts “to detect and identify other toxic isomers of Aβ, such as Aβ oligomers in blood.” (See full comment below.) Scientists described some attempts in this direction at the ICAD meeting in July (see ARF related conference story).—Esther Landhuis.

Reference:
Lambert JC, Schraen-Maschke S, Richard F, Fievet N, Rouaud O, Berr C, Dartigues JF, Tzourio C, Alpérovitch A, Buée L, Amouyel P. Association of plasma amyloid beta with risk of dementia: the prospective Three-City Study. Neurology. 2009 Sep 15;73(11):847-53. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Masood Kamali-Moghaddam
Submitted 2 October 2009  |  Permalink Posted 2 October 2009

The paper is well written and the study seems to be carried out very well, at least in regard to the data analysis. (Though an experimental scientist that I am, I was a bit surprised to see only half of the name of one of the used kits—the INNO-BIA kit—without further information on the experimental procedures.) In addition, the study is one of the biggest of its kind, and similar to the Rotterdam Study, although with different methodology.

Previously, different studies have reported increased Aβ1-40 and decreased Aβ1-42, and also decreased Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratios in CSF, but there are conflicting data on the level of these Aβ species and the ratio of these species in blood.

Another striking thing is the decreased level of Aβ1-42 with progression of dementia (that has not been commented on in the paper), which is usually speculated to be due to absorption to the senile plaques in the brain. But some recent studies have demonstrated that this might depend on the methodology used. In an ELISA-based assay, the Aβ1-42 level is decreased, while in a denaturing Western blot...  Read more


  Comment by:  Luc Buee, Susanna Schraen
Submitted 13 October 2009  |  Permalink Posted 13 October 2009

First, we would like to thank Dr Kamali-Moghaddam for his comments. Regarding the methodology, we apologize about the name of the kit used which is not fully written (INNO-BIA plasma Aβ forms). The strength of such a study is the use of a commercially available kit. Thus, experimental procedures are the manufacturer’s instructions. We did not think that it was necessary to add them in the materials and methods. However, for Alzforum readers, here is the experimental procedure. All plasma samples were diluted 1/3 with a buffer containing detergent before analysis.

Quantification of Aβ isoforms in plasma was performed using INNO-BIA plasma Aβ forms assays (Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium), a multiplex microsphere-based Luminex xMAP technique that allows simultaneous analysis of Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 (module A) an Aβn-40 and Aβn-42 (module B).

The monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 21F12 and 2G3, which specifically bind Aβ peptides ending at 42 and 40, respectively, were used as capture antibodies. The capture MAbs were covalently coupled to carboxylated beads of different regions...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad