Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
   
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Pathways
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
ALS: T Cells Step Up
19 September 2009. As amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ravages motor neurons, causing paralysis, the immune system does not sit idly by. It sends out its troops to battle the internal threat—but some of those same soldiers may also turn against the neurons they were sent to protect. In the past few years, most attention has focused on the role of innate immunity in ALS: microglia, the nervous system’s resident immune representatives, can both assist and harm motor neurons depending on the circumstances (see ARF News story). Now, scientists have noticed that the adaptive side of the immune system, too, gets into the act in ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases. But the adaptive immune system may also fall victim to the disease, as a handful of papers show diminished immune responses in animal models as well as in people with ALS. “It is becoming a hot-button issue,” said Howard Gendelman of the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha. “It is a new paradigm to look at these diseases.”

The most recent bit of evidence tying adaptive immunity to ALS comes from the laboratory of Michal Schwartz at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel (Seksenyan et al., 2009). T cells are born in the bone marrow and migrate to the thymus, where they undergo a maturation that involves rearranging their gene for the antigen receptor and discarding the DNA that is no longer necessary. Those waste bits remain in cells circulating in the bloodstream and serve as markers for mature T cells. The Israeli scientists reported that there were fewer such remnants in the blood of people with ALS, suggesting that fewer T cells were reaching maturity. The blood cells of people with ALS also showed reduced activity in key immune genes. In three people with ALS who underwent MRI or X-ray, Schwartz and colleagues found that the thymus was essentially gone; the chunk of tissue in its place lacked the organ’s characteristic layered texture. “The ALS patient shows an immune system like an 80-year-old,” Schwartz said.

The most common animal model for ALS is based on the fact that in one fifth of familial ALS cases, the person possesses a mutant form of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1). ALS model mice overexpressing human mutant SOD1 also show evidence of reduced immune function. Even before the animals exhibited motor neuron symptoms, Schwartz and colleagues found thymic abnormalities including fewer T cell progenitors. In this and a previous study by another group, researchers have shown that the spleen of mSOD1 mice is reduced in size and lymphocyte numbers, as well (Banerjee et al., 2008 ).

Two-Faced T Cells
Schwartz has been promoting the positive role of adaptive immunity in nervous system maintenance and repair since the late 1990s, when she and colleagues showed that macrophages and T cells are involved in injury repair in the CNS (Rapalino et al., 1998 ; Moalem et al., 1999). “The community thought that we were crazy,” she said. The conventional wisdom was that the brain and spinal cord were separated from immune cells by the blood-brain barrier, and that any immune cells infiltrating the central nervous system must be evidence of a pathologically leaking barrier.

A trio of recent publications from three different labs supports Schwartz’s ideas in the case of ALS. A few years back, Schwartz said, she suggested to Stanley Appel of the Methodist Hospital System in Houston, Texas, that he make ALS mice devoid of T cells. When he and colleagues crossed mSOD1 mice with a strain lacking functional T cells, the progeny sickened faster. Bone marrow transplants that produced T cells reversed the effect (see ARF News story on Beers et al., 2008).

Similarly, researchers led by Isaac Chiu in the Harvard Medical School lab of Michael Carroll in Boston, Massachusetts, crossed mSOD1 mice with animals deficient in T cell receptors. The progeny showed accelerated ALS disease (Chiu et al., 2008). In another report, Gendelman and colleagues also found evidence that T cells fight ALS, showing that providing activated T cells to mSOD1 animals delayed the onset of symptoms and slowed disease progression (Banerjee et al., 2008 ).

This role for the immune system in ALS is one of amplification, Appel said, and is distinct from pathological autoimmunity in diseases such as multiple sclerosis or lupus. Schwartz has proposed that long before noticeable symptoms of ALS appear, the immune system is busily protecting the neurons (Schwartz and Ziv, 2008): T cells flow to damaged or ailing areas to manage the healing process, dampen inflammation, or prevent cell death. But at some point, the disease overwhelms the immune system. “The onset will be when you pass the threshold between what the immune system can provide and what the central nervous system needs,” she said. Similarly, the immune system battles tumor cells, but when it can no longer withstand them, cancer develops. The same could be true for other neurodegenerative diseases, Schwartz suggested. In the case of Alzheimer disease, the symptoms may appear as the aging immune system can no longer hold the pathology in check.

Schwartz’s full theory remains controversial: “As far as I know, there is no compelling evidence to support such a system,” said Serge Przedborski of Columbia University in New York City. He would also like to see independent confirmation of the thymus deficits Schwartz reported. If people with ALS have weakened immune systems, Przedborski said, they should show high rates of infection, but he is unaware of such a correlation. That does not mean that the immune system is not involved at all. “It is good [that Schwartz] pushes us to think about it,” he said.

The protective adaptive immunity is not the whole story, Appel said. As with innate immunity, the same system that protects motor neurons may turn on them. T cells are a heterogeneous group that can produce a variety of outcomes. “Depending on probably a little bit of black magic, a little bit of things that we don’t understand, they can maybe go one way or another,” Przedborski said. Appel put it this way: Just as damaged neurons may cry out, ‘Repair me,’ neurons that are too far gone may instead send signals saying ‘Take me out.’ In that case, the immune system’s white knights could morph into dark riders. As evidence for the dual nature of immunity, Appel pointed to a clinical trial he led in the 1980s, testing the powerful immunosuppressant cyclosporine in people with ALS (Appel et al., 1988 ). “If in fact the immune cells are only good guys and you suppress the immune system, you would expect that everyone would do a whole lot worse—and they did not,” he said. In a more recent trial, the anti-inflammatory drug minocycline did appear to accelerate disease in ALS patients, supporting the hypothesis that the immune response does some good (Gordon et al., 2007).

T Cells Targets
If the suffering of the immune system is a secondary factor in ALS pathology, then immune-boosting treatments could help. “[Schwartz and I] have been saying for a long time that the immune system is playing an important role here,” Appel said. “Both of us feel strongly that this may be a relevant way to go.”

One immunomodulator scientists have tried is glatiramer acetate, marketed as Copaxone for people with multiple sclerosis. The compound is a synthetic random copolymer based on the amino acid content of myelin basic protein, which is likely to be released in damaged neural tissue. It is supposed to act as a sort of vaccine, inducing a beneficial immune response to the damaged nervous system. Schwartz’s early studies in ALS mice with weak mSOD1 expression showed some promise for glatiramer acetate treatment (Angelov et al., 2003), although animals with higher mSOD1 levels received less benefit in that and another study with a different strain (Habisch et al., 2007). The initial experiments also used complete Freund’s adjuvant, which is not suitable for people. The vaccine failed to pan out in later experiments (Haenggeli et al., 2007). The drug appears to be safe in humans (Gordon et al., 2006), but failed in a clinical trial for ALS run by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, headquartered in Petah Tivka, Israel (see Teva press release). Inspired in part by data from the Weizmann Institute, this trial led to a lawsuit brought by it co-licensing partner, New York-based ProNeuron Biotechnology (see news story, blog account.)

“Now I understand why it did not work,” Schwartz said, suggesting that a vaccine cannot prime an immune system that is no longer there. Other conditions might still be amenable to glatiramer acetate treatment. For example, the compound reduced plaque load and cognitive decline in AD model mice (see ARF News story on Butovsky et al., 2006). Schwartz said she is currently planning a glatiramer acetate trial for Alzheimer’s at the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California.

An alternative would be to mimic some of the mouse studies and provide fresh new T cells—or even a new thymus—to people with ALS. Such cells might come from fetal tissue or from the patient’s own cells, expanded and primed for action in the lab and then returned to the body. This method is not as simple in people as in lab mice, cautioned Przedborski, who finds expensive, invasive transplants less appealing than a simple vaccine. Additionally, doctors would have to be careful to promote only the positive immune response, noted Oleg Butovsky of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. The ideal solution, Butovsky suggested, would be to combine transplanted T cells with a vaccine strategy. “You need to educate these T cells,” he said, so they will travel to the right spot and be neuroprotective.

Taking on T Cells
Research on adaptive immunity in ALS is in its early stages. One open question is which specific antigens activate T cells and recruit them to dying neurons. They might be normal peptides leaking out of damaged neurons, Przedborski suggested. The immune system normally deletes any T cells specific for self antigens, but these peptides might not normally be present in the blood stream and thus exempt from this selection process. Or, Appel suggested, the antigens might be fragments of the rogue proteins that aggregate in neurodegenerative disease: SOD1 in ALS, Aβ in Alzheimer’s, α-synuclein in Parkinson disease. “What is not clear is whether there are rogue proteins in sporadic cases” of ALS, he noted. “If it is not the SOD1 itself that is misfolded, there could be other rogue proteins that are active.”

Another quandary is how neurodegenerative disease dampens the immune response. “We have no idea at this point,” Przedborski said. ALS model mice express mSOD1 in every cell in their body, but motor neurons seem to be exquisitely sensitive to the effects; Przedborski suggested that T cells could be, too. Oxidative stress, common in neurodegenerative disease, could infiltrate the T cell army from within.

“We have more questions than answers at this point,” Butovsky said. Chiu, from Carroll’s lab, is curious about which of the multitude of known T cell flavors are involved in different stages of disease. Appel wonders if varied immune responses might be responsible for the huge range of speed in disease progression among people with ALS. Schwartz is sure of one thing, however: “I think it is time to educate the neurologists about the immune system.”—Amber Dance.

 
Comments on Related Papers
  Related Paper: Nasal vaccination with a proteosome-based adjuvant and glatiramer acetate clears beta-amyloid in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease.

Comment by:  Tommaso Russo, ARF Advisor
Submitted 23 August 2005 Posted 23 August 2005
  I recommend this paper
Comments on Related News
  Related News: Do Kinder, Gentler T Cells Promote Neurogenesis?

Comment by:  Joanna Jankowsky
Submitted 21 January 2006 Posted 21 January 2006

The paper by Ziv et al. brings together two often disparate fields of study: immunology and neuroscience. The group of Michal Schwartz is one of a relatively few in the world who draws on tools of both trades to study how the immune and nervous systems intersect to influence brain function.

The authors propose the interesting hypothesis that the hippocampal (and olfactory) neurogenesis required for optimal functioning of the adult brain is dependent on cues from peripheral immune cells. It had been shown previously that inflammatory activation of the peripheral immune system can diminish neurogenesis in the brain. This work suggests that the converse, that is, that neurogenesis depends in some way on immune support, may also hold true.

The authors' use of SCID and nude mice for these studies is quite innovative, and the experiments carefully control for differences in genetic background that are known to influence adult neurogenesis. The decrement in BrdU+ cells, and specifically BrdU/DCX and BrdU/NeuN cells, in the immune-deficient mice is consistent with their...  Read more


  Related News: Do Kinder, Gentler T Cells Promote Neurogenesis?

Comment by:  Teresita Briones
Submitted 23 January 2006 Posted 23 January 2006

Excellent article, and studies done were well-controlled. This article provides further validation of the communication between the central nervous system and the immune system. In this article, the authors showed that T cells (of the immune system) that reside in the central nervous system (CNS) can influence both neurogenesis and cognitive functioning independently. Under normal conditions, the resident T cells and microglia in the CNS are barely detectable, but when neurogenesis was enhanced by housing rats in an enriched environment, both T cells and microglia were activated. When neurogenesis was examined in mutant mice deficient in T cells, the authors found that neurogenesis was decreased compared to the control mice. It is interesting that even when the mutant mice were housed in the enriched environment, this did not help in increasing neurogenesis, as is usually seen in normal animals. However, when the mutant mice were injected with "splenocytes" containing replenished T cells, increased neurogenesis was seen when compared to mice depleted for T cells. Furthermore, the...  Read more

  Related News: Glia—Absolving Neurons of Motor Neuron Disease

Comment by:  Ben Barres, ARF Advisor
Submitted 23 April 2007 Posted 23 April 2007

In the recent papers from the groups of Przedborski and Eggan, provocative evidence is reported that spinal motor neurons may die in SOD1 mutant mice because of soluble toxic factors released by SOD1 mutant astrocytes. This result is surprising because previous studies with chimeric SOD1 mutant mice have shown that expression of mutant SOD1 in microglia but not astrocytes is implicated in the neuron death. However, profound reactive astrocytosis occurs very early in mouse and human motor neuron diseases. This is true in the SOD1 mutant mice, where reactive astrocytosis is a dramatic feature of the disease, with prominent reactive astrocytosis occurring long before much motor neuron death occurs (Carlos Pardo, personal communication).

The new studies provide striking evidence that astrocyte-conditioned medium from SOD1 mutant astrocytes is toxic, as wild-type spinal motor neurons survive longer in culture when cultured alone or with wild-type astrocyte conditioned medium than with mutant astrocyte- conditioned medium. Thus, the lower survival of the spinal motor neurons...  Read more


  Related News: Glia—Absolving Neurons of Motor Neuron Disease

Comment by:  David M.A. Mann
Submitted 7 May 2007 Posted 7 May 2007

These two papers by Nagai et al. (2007) and Di Giorgio et al. (2007) independently provide strong evidence that glial cells, and perhaps specifically astrocytes, bearing SOD1 mutations are responsible for degeneration and death of motor neurons in embryonic stem cell (ESC)-based co-cultures of primary neurons and glial cells. Motor neurons bearing SOD1 mutation did not degenerate in the absence of mutant glial cells.

While these elegant findings provide important insights into the interdependency between neurons and glial cells, and provide key data concerning the pathogenesis of human ALS associated with SOD1 mutation, their relevance to sporadic and other non-SOD1 related forms of human ALS is uncertain. Increasingly, it is becoming recognized that SOD1- associated ALS, and non-SOD1 forms of ALS may be driven through different pathogenetic cascade mechanisms. In SOD1 ALS, the accumulated protein within the conglomerated ubiquitinated inclusion bodies is mutated SOD1. In other, non-SOD1 forms of familial ALS, and sporadic ALS, the filamentous or skein-like ubiquitinated...  Read more


  Related News: ALS-TDI Scours Transcriptome, Targets CD40L

Comment by:  Michal Schwartz
Submitted 31 March 2010 Posted 31 March 2010

This article elegantly shows the strength of transcriptome analysis for the rapid discovery of a new drug. In this study, the authors identified the therapeutic potential of modulating CD40L in ALS using an animal model.

Through transcriptome analysis, this group identified the upregulation of CD40L-related pathway in three tissues that are all relevant to motor neuron degeneration: muscle, spinal cord, and sciatic nerve. This signaling pathway related to CD40L activation became more prominent as the disease progressed; this finding justifiably led the investigators to test its implication to therapy. The therapeutic potential was tested in mSOD1 mice, and anti-CD40L was found to be effective with respect to both disease onset and progression. The authors compared the results to those observed in inflammatory diseases and, based on Mac-1 expression and T cell activation, suggested that the therapy acts in the animal model of mSOD1 as anti-inflammatory treatment; such a conclusion should be taken with caution, and more so when it comes to clinical translation.

CD40L was...  Read more


  Related News: ALS-TDI Scours Transcriptome, Targets CD40L

Comment by:  Terrence Town
Submitted 31 March 2010 Posted 31 March 2010

Against the backdrop of sometimes disappointing results from genomewide association studies of the transcriptome (GWAS-T), the work by Lincecum and colleagues represents a triumph for this approach. The authors applied transcriptome analysis to the high-copy SOD1 transgenic mouse model of ALS. Importantly, they thoroughly investigated central and peripheral tissues from SOD1 mice at timepoints prior to, during, and after disease onset. Their GWAS-T results pointed to co-stimulatory immune and inflammatory molecules as being centrally associated with ALS-like pathology in this system, and they utilized a sophisticated statistical algorithm to arrive at the CD40-CD40L interaction as a candidate treatment target. They then treated SOD1 mice with a neutralizing CD40L antibody and found benefit by virtually any index of ALS-like disease: the biologic therapy improved body weight maintenance and survival, reduced inflammatory lesions, decreased motor neuron loss, and attenuated expression of immune co-stimulatory genes.

I read this work with enthusiasm and excitement, because over...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Follow on Twitter
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2010 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad