 |
17 May 2009. Scientists remain baffled as to what causes the majority of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cases, but the key concern for people with the disease is not why they got it, but how doctors might slow it down. Two recent papers offer clues as to how ALS progresses from onset to inevitable death—usually within three to five years. In this week’s PNAS online, an international team of researchers report on a genomewide association study. They discovered a single nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter for a motor protein that extends life expectancy in people with ALS by an average of 14 months in people with two copies of the variant. And in the April 30 PLoS ONE online, scientists from the University of Strasbourg, France, describe how muscle hypermetabolism can shorten survival times in a mouse model of ALS, suggesting that muscle-targeted or nutritional therapies might be useful for motor neuron disease.
For the genomewide association study (GWAS), first author John Landers and senior author Robert Brown, both of the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, along with joint senior author Ammar Al-Chalabi of King’s College London, UK, led a group of scientists seeking genes involved in risk, age of onset, site of onset, and survival for sporadic ALS. They collected data on 1,821 people with ALS and 2,258 controls from centers in the U.S. and Europe. Among 288,357 SNPs catalogued, they found one hit, in intron 8 of the gene for kinesin-associated protein 3 (KIFAP3), which was associated with increased survival time. The researchers confirmed the statistical significance of the KIFAP3 SNP in an independent sample set of 538 people with ALS and 556 controls. The researchers found no new genes linked to risk or onset of sporadic ALS, nor did they confirm that genes fingered in other GWASs were truly relevant to disease (see ARF related news story).
“This is as mixed a population as you can get, and the numbers [of subjects] are pretty high,” said P. Hande Ozdinler of the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, who has worked with Brown in the past but was not involved in the current study. Those factors, she said, make the results convincing.
KIFAP3 is a cargo-binding subunit of a molecular motor that travels along microtubules. The SNP associated with longer survival, a cytosine instead of a thymine in intron 8, has an allele frequency of 28.9 percent, and 8.3 percent of the population is homozygous for the cytosine variant. Those homozygotes showed extended survival time, averaging 14 months, between the onset of ALS symptoms and death or need for an assistive breathing machine. (Heterozygotes showed a small benefit of two to three months.)
The intron 8 SNP led the scientists to a second SNP in the KIFAP3 promoter that is in linkage disequilibrium with their initial hit. The second SNP, 25 nucleotides up from the transcription start site, is a cytosine when linked to survival, and otherwise a guanine. The cytosine generates a putative binding site for the transcription factor family Sp1, members of which can both up- and downregulate transcription.
Landers and colleagues found evidence that KIFAP3 transcription is reduced in people homozygous for the cytosine alleles. They used quantitative RT-PCR of occipital lobe brain samples to show that KIFAP3 expression dropped by 41.1 percent in people homozygous for the cytosine variant in intron 8, compared to thymine homozygotes. Western blotting confirmed that KIFAP3 protein levels were also decreased, by 69.8 percent, in CC brain tissue compared to TT samples. In neuroblastoma cells transfected with the KIFAP3 promoter conjugated to luciferase, reporter activity dropped by 19.6 percent in the CC version, compared to the TT genotype.
The current study focused on sporadic ALS, which accounts for approximately 90 percent of cases, but could also be relevant to the familial form, the authors suggest. Among inherited cases, one-fifth are caused by mutations in the gene for superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1). In a recent paper, researchers led by Toshiyuki Araki of the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry in Tokyo, Japan, reported that mutant SOD1 binds, and may sequester, KIFAP3 in mice. KIFAP3 was associated with SOD1 aggregates in spinal cord sections from people who died from FALS as well (Tateno et al., 2009).
“Now we have something that is a direct drug target; if we could reduce [KIFAP3] in patients, there might be benefits,” Landers said. Yet his study is somewhat at odds with Araki’s, whose research indicated that KIFAP3 overexpression repaired transport deficits in cells expressing mutant SOD1—suggesting more KIFAP3, not less, is needed to combat ALS. “The transcriptional changes derived from the discovered SNP are extremely subtle,” Araki wrote in an e-mail to ARF. “In general, quantitative RT-PCR technology can be applied only to detect RNA expression differences greater than twofold; any expression changes smaller than twofold by qRT-PCR are always inconsistent and unreliable.”
Landers noted that the Western blots also showed reduction in KIFAP3, so he is confident that its transcription is genuinely reduced.
In addition, Araki pointed out that the authors did not analyze KIFAP3 expression in the corticospinal tract, the most relevant tissue for ALS. “Since there is no tissue specificity shown here regarding the reduction of KIFAP3 transcription, survival extension could well be due to non-neuronal roles of KIFAP3,” he suggested. Landers pointed out that it was challenging even to obtain brain tissue from people with the relevant genotypes, and it would be “extremely difficult” to collect spinal cord samples for similar analysis. Adding weight to Landers’s conclusions, Ozdinler noted that according to the Allen Brain Atlas, KIFAP3 is expressed in spinal motor neurons.
Axonal transport has been implicated in a number of neurodegenerative conditions (for review, see De Vos et al., 2008). Landers’s study “reinforces my belief that axonal transport is very important for motor neurons,” Ozdinler said. “Even a slight alteration may, in the long run, tip the balance” toward disease.
Modifying axonal transport, perhaps with a therapy targeting KIFAP3, might be one way to rebalance the scales. Another possibility to consider is a treatment aimed at muscle metabolism, according to the authors of the PLoS ONE paper. “Whether metabolic alterations and muscle contribute to the course of ALS is presently a hot debate in the field,” wrote Jean-Philippe Loeffler, the senior author, in an e-mail to ARF. Loeffler, first author Luc Dupuis, both of the University of Strasbourg, and colleagues studied transgenic mice that express uncoupling protein 1 under the muscle-specific promoter for creatine kinase (Couplan et al., 2002). Uncoupling protein 1, not normally expressed in muscle, causes mitochondria to produce less ATP, forcing muscle cells to ramp up their metabolism and consume lipids as fuel. This hypermetabolic state has been found in people with ALS (Desport et al., 2005).
Dupuis and colleagues found that the hypermetabolic animals suffered age-related deterioration of neuromuscular junctions leading to denervation. To further study the relationship between muscle metabolism and ALS, they crossed the hypermetabolic mice with a line expressing mutant human SOD1. Compared to single mutant mSOD1 mice, the double mutants developed disease at the same age, but progressed to end-stage approximately one week sooner than the single mutants.
“This paper is the first demonstration that altered muscle physiology is sufficient to produce a significant denervation process and motor neuron disease,” Loeffler wrote. The paper does not directly suggest a therapeutic pathway, he noted, but suggests “nutritional research may bring some help for better care of patients.”—Amber Dance.
References:
Landers JE, Melki J, Meininger V, Glass JD, van den Berg LH, van Es MA, Sapp PC, van Vught PWJ, McKenna-Yasek DM, Blauw HM, Cho TJ, Polak M, Shi L, Wills A-M, Broom WJ, Ticozzi N, Silani V, Ozoguz A, Rodriguez-Leyva I, Veldink JH, Ivinson AJ, Saris CGJ, Hosler BA, Barnes-Nessa A, Couture N, Wokke JHJ, Kwiatkowski TJ Jr, Ophoff RA, Cronin S, Hardiman O, Diekstra FP, Leigh PN, Shaw CE, Simpson CL, Hansen VK, Powell JF, Corcia P, Salachas F, Heath S, Galan P, Georges F, Horvitz HR, Lathrop M, Purcell S, Al-Chalabi A, Brown RH Jr. Reduced expression of the Kinesin-Associated Protein 3 (KIFAP3) gene increases survival in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PNAS Early Edition. 2009 May. Abstract
Dupuis L, Gonzalez de Aguilar JL, Echaniz-Laguna A, Eschbach J, Rene F, Oudart H, Halter B, Huze C, Schaeffer L, Boillaud F, Loeffler JP. Muscle mitochondrial uncoupling dismantles neuromuscular junction and triggers distal degeneration of motor neurons. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(4):e5390. Abstract
|
 |
 |
 |
Comments on Related News |
 |
  |
| |
Related News: New Gene for ALS: RNA Regulation May Be Common Culprit
Comment by: Robert Bowser
|
 |
 |
Submitted 27 February 2009
|
Posted 27 February 2009
|
 |
 |
These papers represent exciting work describing a new genetic mutation associated with familial ALS. The results further highlight the importance for RNA processing in at least familial forms of motor neuron disease. Much work remains to determine the exact mechanisms by which FUS modulates motor neuron survival. It may be related to that of TDP-43. However, the lack of cytoplasmic aggregation of TDP-43, and rare ubiquitin inclusions in the patients with FUS mutations, suggest the mechanisms may be distinct. It is interesting that FUS protein did not accumulate in the cytoplasm of motor neurons in sporadic ALS patients, again suggestive that the pathogenic mechanisms of mutant FUS-induced motor neuron degeneration may be distinct from that in sporadic ALS. View all comments by Robert Bowser
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: New Gene for ALS: RNA Regulation May Be Common Culprit
Comment by: Eric Frank
|
 |
 |
Submitted 27 February 2009
|
Posted 27 February 2009
|
 |
 |
These studies raise interesting questions about whether one problem in ALS and perhaps other neurodegenerative diseases is that RNA trafficking proteins fail to properly deliver RNAs to dendritic spines. The paper by Kwiatkowski et al. reports evidence that wild-type FUS and TDP-43 may be involved in transporting RNA into dendrites, where it mediates local protein synthesis that can be stimulated by neural activity. The clumping of the mutant form described by both new papers could therefore perturb the transport of RNA. Local protein synthesis in dendrites plays a major role in the activity-dependent modulation of synaptic strength. Changes in synaptic activity have been recently reported in the mouse model of SOD1 mutation ( van Zundert et al., 2008), so it will be worthwhile to examine this issue in the FUS mice that will certainly be developed by these investigators.
View all comments by Eric Frank
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: New Gene for ALS: RNA Regulation May Be Common Culprit
Comment by: Jeffrey D. Rothstein
|
 |
 |
Submitted 2 March 2009
|
Posted 2 March 2009
|
 |
 |
This is an extremely exiting story in the understanding of ALS pathogenesis. It actually it dates back to 1998—with the first description of mRNA processing errors in sporadic ALS ( Lin et al., 1998), which, interestingly, was made not in the SOD1 mouse model. At the same time, the spinal muscular atrophy gene was discovered. SMA is not unlike a childhood ALS, though predominately lower motor neurons are affected in that disease. The SMA gene defect is involved in RNA metabolism. So for the next 10 years, the SMA field has investigated the pathobiology of the defective protein. At the time it made the link between sporadic ALS and the SMA story intriguing. But there was no clear genetic link (or cause for the changes in sporadic ALS).
Feed forward to 2008, when Chris Shaw and others found a true genetic defect in RNA metabolism-based protein TDP-43. (Of course more work needs to be done on that.) And now another gene by the Shaw group, and now verified by the group in Boston, does set a string of targets that all focus on RNA...
Read more
This is an extremely exiting story in the understanding of ALS pathogenesis. It actually it dates back to 1998—with the first description of mRNA processing errors in sporadic ALS ( Lin et al., 1998), which, interestingly, was made not in the SOD1 mouse model. At the same time, the spinal muscular atrophy gene was discovered. SMA is not unlike a childhood ALS, though predominately lower motor neurons are affected in that disease. The SMA gene defect is involved in RNA metabolism. So for the next 10 years, the SMA field has investigated the pathobiology of the defective protein. At the time it made the link between sporadic ALS and the SMA story intriguing. But there was no clear genetic link (or cause for the changes in sporadic ALS).
Feed forward to 2008, when Chris Shaw and others found a true genetic defect in RNA metabolism-based protein TDP-43. (Of course more work needs to be done on that.) And now another gene by the Shaw group, and now verified by the group in Boston, does set a string of targets that all focus on RNA metabolism and (lower) motor neurons.
By the way, all these cases appear to predominately involve a lower motor neuron form of ALS. The hint from genetics does suggest more of a loss of function rather than gain, but cell biology will ultimately sort that out. We certainly await the generation of mouse or fly models, which are now well underway for TDP-43. However, this may be a particularly difficult target for specific, non-toxic drug therapy.
View all comments by Jeffrey D. Rothstein
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: New Gene for ALS: RNA Regulation May Be Common Culprit
Comment by: P. Hande Ozdinler
|
 |
 |
Submitted 17 March 2009
|
Posted 17 March 2009
|
 |
 |
These back-to-back papers on the identification of FUS (fused in sarcoma) gene as a new genetic component of ALS open a new era of research and direct our attention to mRNA biology with respect to disease. After the first identification of mRNA processing errors in ALS patients (Lin, Bristol et al., 1998), the discovery of TDP-43 (Neumann, Sampathu et al., 2006) and now the FUS gene clearly indicate the importance of mRNA management in neurodegenerative diseases. Defects in RNA transcription, splicing, and trafficking may be the reason for cell-type-specific degeneration of motor neurons in ALS. Motor neurons both in the cortex and spinal cord are very large excitatory neurons that extend long axons to their targets and require high levels of energy and protein integrity for survival and function. Defects in transcriptional mechanisms may result in splicing defects, which could give rise to formation of non-functional proteins that would deplete the pool of required proteins for cellular function, and these non-functional proteins may form aggregates that are toxic to neurons. In...
Read more
These back-to-back papers on the identification of FUS (fused in sarcoma) gene as a new genetic component of ALS open a new era of research and direct our attention to mRNA biology with respect to disease. After the first identification of mRNA processing errors in ALS patients (Lin, Bristol et al., 1998), the discovery of TDP-43 (Neumann, Sampathu et al., 2006) and now the FUS gene clearly indicate the importance of mRNA management in neurodegenerative diseases. Defects in RNA transcription, splicing, and trafficking may be the reason for cell-type-specific degeneration of motor neurons in ALS. Motor neurons both in the cortex and spinal cord are very large excitatory neurons that extend long axons to their targets and require high levels of energy and protein integrity for survival and function. Defects in transcriptional mechanisms may result in splicing defects, which could give rise to formation of non-functional proteins that would deplete the pool of required proteins for cellular function, and these non-functional proteins may form aggregates that are toxic to neurons. In addition, defects in the trafficking of mRNA may lead to depletion of key proteins that are in high demand locally for motor neuron function. But if FUS has a general function in mRNA transcription, splicing, and trafficking, why do mutations in this gene cause ALS and not other neurodegenerative diseases? What makes motor neurons more vulnerable in the presence of defective FUS? It could be true that in motor neurons FUS controls the transcription of a distinct set of mRNA that is expressed in a cell-type-specific manner in motor neurons, or that FUS controls the production of a key protein that is highly required in motor neurons when compared to other cell-types, and thus motor neurons may become vulnerable first. FUS seems to be the tip of the iceberg. Finding effectors, binding partners including mRNA, may lead to the identification of key components of both familial and sporadic ALS. More work is on the way!
References: Kneussel M. Dynamic regulation of GABA(A) receptors at synaptic sites. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002 Jun ;39(1):74-83. Abstract
Lin CL, Bristol LA, Jin L, Dykes-Hoberg M, Crawford T, Clawson L, Rothstein JD. Aberrant RNA processing in a neurodegenerative disease: the cause for absent EAAT2, a glutamate transporter, in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuron. 1998 Mar;20(3):589-602. Abstract
Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, Truax AC, Micsenyi MC, Chou TT, Bruce J, Schuck T, Grossman M, Clark CM, McCluskey LF, Miller BL, Masliah E, Mackenzie IR, Feldman H, Feiden W, Kretzschmar HA, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2006 Oct 6;314(5796):130-3. Abstract
Vance C, Rogelj B, Hortobágyi T, De Vos KJ, Nishimura AL, Sreedharan J, Hu X, Smith B, Ruddy D, Wright P, Ganesalingam J, Williams KL, Tripathi V, Al-Saraj S, Al-Chalabi A, Leigh PN, Blair IP, Nicholson G, de Belleroche J, Gallo JM, Miller CC, Shaw CE. Mutations in FUS, an RNA processing protein, cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 6. Science. 2009 Feb 27;323(5918):1208-11. Abstract
View all comments by P. Hande Ozdinler
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Huntingtin—Putting the Boot on Axonal Transport
Comment by: Zoia Muresan, Virgil Muresan
|
 |
 |
Submitted 14 July 2009
|
Posted 14 July 2009
|
 |
 |
I recommend the Primary Papers
We would like to comment on the interesting results of the recent study by Morfini et al. (1). Kinesin-1, a major microtubule motor that transports cargo in the plus-end direction of microtubules, is a heterotetramer consisting of two microtubule-binding, motor polypeptides (the heavy chains; KHCs) and two cargo-binding polypeptides (the light chains; KLCs). Being a soluble, cytoplasmic protein, kinesin-1 needs to bind the cargo in order to transport it. Therefore, recruitment of kinesin-1 to the cargo vesicle, and its release from it, are important regulatory steps of axonal transport. About 10 years ago, Scott Brady’s laboratory identified the first mechanism leading to the release of kinesin-1 from vesicles. According to this model, kinesin-1 is released through the action of the chaperone HSC70, and is nucleotide-dependent and NEM-sensitive (2). One year later, work from Larry Goldstein’s laboratory suggested that the premature release of kinesin-1 from cargo vesicles in neurons could impair fast axonal transport and lead to neuronal pathology and disease (3). Although the...
Read more
We would like to comment on the interesting results of the recent study by Morfini et al. (1). Kinesin-1, a major microtubule motor that transports cargo in the plus-end direction of microtubules, is a heterotetramer consisting of two microtubule-binding, motor polypeptides (the heavy chains; KHCs) and two cargo-binding polypeptides (the light chains; KLCs). Being a soluble, cytoplasmic protein, kinesin-1 needs to bind the cargo in order to transport it. Therefore, recruitment of kinesin-1 to the cargo vesicle, and its release from it, are important regulatory steps of axonal transport. About 10 years ago, Scott Brady’s laboratory identified the first mechanism leading to the release of kinesin-1 from vesicles. According to this model, kinesin-1 is released through the action of the chaperone HSC70, and is nucleotide-dependent and NEM-sensitive (2). One year later, work from Larry Goldstein’s laboratory suggested that the premature release of kinesin-1 from cargo vesicles in neurons could impair fast axonal transport and lead to neuronal pathology and disease (3). Although the mechanisms for the release of kinesin-1 from its vesicular cargos were incompletely understood at that time, the general idea that a premature release of the motor from its cargo could be at the core of the pathology in neurodegenerative diseases turned out to be correct, and generated an increased interest for research in this direction. Thus, work from the Brady and Busciglio laboratories identified at least two pathways for release of kinesin-1 from vesicles and halt of transport, which are likely to be factors leading to the axonal pathology and synaptic failure in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (4-6).
Both pathways lead to phosphorylation of the KLCs, followed by detachment of kinesin-1 from the cargo, and impairment of vesicle transport. They are initiated by the addition of soluble Aβ oligomers, or expression of FAD-linked presenilin 1 variants, which trigger aberrant activation of casein kinase 2 or glycogen synthase 3β, which phosphorylate the KLCs. Why the phosphorylated kinesin-1 is released from vesicles is still not fully understood.
Along with AD, kinesin-1 is a target for abnormal phosphorylation in other neurodegenerative diseases, such as spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) and Huntington’s disease, as revealed by the studies from the Brady laboratory, including the work featured here (1, 7). However, in this case, the phosphorylation targets the KHCs, and the activated kinase that performs the phosphorylation is the cJun-N-terminal kinease (JNK). The phosphorylation of the KHCs leads to inhibition of binding of kinesin-1 to microtubules. As a result, the kinesin-1-cargo complex is released from the microtubules, and the transport is halted. These studies showed that the abnormal activation of JNK is triggered by the pathogenic, polyglutaminated, mutant proteins characteristic for polyglutamine (polyQ) expansion diseases: polyQ-androgen receptor in SBMA) (7), and polyQ-huntingtin in Huntingon’s disease(1). As the study by Morfini et al. (1) showed, polyQ-huntingtin activates JNK3, a neuron-specific JNK, that in turn phosphorylates KHC at a serine residue critical for the microtubule-binding function of kinesin-1. While in this case JNK3 is aberrantly activated by a disease factor, it is likely that, under normal conditions, the JNK-3 pathway contributes to the regulation of axonal transport.
Interestingly, in the squid axon system used in these studies, polyQ-huntingtin inhibits, not only the anterograde (kinesin-driven), but also the retrograde (cytoplasmic dynein-driven) fast axonal transport (1). It is not clear whether this inhibition of transport in both directions is due to the fact that kinesin-1 and cytoplasmic dynein interact and coordinate each other’s function (8), or is caused by a direct effect on the dynein machinery. Other studies showed that huntingtin regulates dynein-mediated vesicle transport, and can interact with both dynein and its accessory complex, dynactin (9, 10); however, the assays used by Morfini et al. (1) did not detect an interaction of huntingtin with dynein.
Certainly, other mechanisms, besides the release of the kinesin motor from the cargo or the microtubules, could contribute to the pathogenic processes in these neurodegenerative diseases. Other potentially damaging pathways that target the intracellular transport by affecting the cytoskeleton or the supply of ATP (by disrupting mitochondrial function) have been described (reviewed in (11)). Also, the activation of the kinases is likely to lead to the abnormal phosphorylation of other protein targets as well, with detrimental consequences for the function of neurons via mechanisms that may not involve abnormal axonal transport. For now, a picture emerges where the release of kinesin-1 from either cargo or microtubules, followed by impairment of axonal transport, becomes an important component of the pathogenic process in many neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, it is the time to think of possibilities to correct the deficiencies, or to find means to enhance the disease-inflicted axonal transport.
References: 1. Morfini GA, You YM, Pollema SL, Kaminska A, Liu K, Yoshioka K, Björkblom B, Coffey ET, Bagnato C, Han D, Huang CF, Banker G, Pigino G, Brady ST. Pathogenic huntingtin inhibits fast axonal transport by activating JNK3 and phosphorylating kinesin. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jul;12(7):864-71. Abstract
2. Tsai MY, Morfini G, Szebenyi G, Brady ST. Release of kinesin from vesicles by hsc70 and regulation of fast axonal transport. Mol Biol Cell. 2000 Jun;11(6):2161-73. Abstract
3. Kamal A, Almenar-Queralt A, LeBlanc JF, Roberts EA, Goldstein LS. Kinesin-mediated axonal transport of a membrane compartment containing beta-secretase and presenilin-1 requires APP. Nature. 2001 Dec 6;414(6864):643-8. Abstract
4. Morfini G, Szebenyi G, Elluru R, Ratner N, Brady ST. Glycogen synthase kinase 3 phosphorylates kinesin light chains and negatively regulates kinesin-based motility. EMBO J. 2002 Feb 1;21(3):281-93. Abstract
5. Pigino G, Morfini G, Atagi Y, Deshpande A, Yu C, Jungbauer L, Ladu M, Busciglio J, Brady S. Disruption of fast axonal transport is a pathogenic mechanism for intraneuronal amyloid beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 7;106(14):5907-12. Abstract
6. Pigino G, Morfini G, Pelsman A, Mattson MP, Brady ST, Busciglio J. Alzheimer's presenilin 1 mutations impair kinesin-based axonal transport. J Neurosci. 2003 Jun 1;23(11):4499-508. Abstract
7. Morfini G, Pigino G, Szebenyi G, You Y, Pollema S, Brady ST. JNK mediates pathogenic effects of polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptor on fast axonal transport. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):907-16. Abstract
8. Ligon LA, Tokito M, Finklestein JM, Grossman FE, Holzbaur EL. A direct interaction between cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin I may coordinate motor activity. J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 30;279(18):19201-8. Abstract
9. Caviston JP, Ross JL, Antony SM, Tokito M, Holzbaur EL. Huntingtin facilitates dynein/dynactin-mediated vesicle transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10045-50. Abstract
10. Zala D, Colin E, Rangone H, Liot G, Humbert S, Saudou F. Phosphorylation of mutant huntingtin at S421 restores anterograde and retrograde transport in neurons. Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Dec 15;17(24):3837-46. Abstract
11. De Vos KJ, Grierson AJ, Ackerley S, Miller CC. Role of axonal transport in neurodegenerative diseases. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:151-73. Abstract
View all comments by Zoia Muresan
View all comments by Virgil Muresan
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Chromogranin B: The ApoE of ALS?
Comment by: Pico Caroni
|
 |
 |
Submitted 14 December 2009
|
Posted 14 December 2009
|
 |
 |
This important study establishes for the first time a genetic risk factor for sporadic ALS, thus providing a long-sought entry point into mechanisms and genetics of ALS. Genetic risk factors for neurodegenerative diseases will likely lead to novel insights into mechanisms of disease.
The impact of the chromogranin B mutations is slightly lower than that of the ApoE4 allele in Alzheimer disease. Because the chromogranin B mutations had an impact on onset time in familial ALS, and on risk of disease in sporadic ALS, the findings provide important support for the notion that sporadic and familial ALS are mechanistically related.
Chromogranin has been linked to mutant SOD1 by two previous studies. A frequently raised question is to what extent SOD1-based ALS mice are relevant in mimicking human disease. The association to chromogranin B in the SOD1 mouse model and now patient cohorts for both sporadic and familial ALS strongly supports the notion of converging cellular and molecular mechanisms of disease.
One important implication for scientists working on ALS is that the...
Read more
This important study establishes for the first time a genetic risk factor for sporadic ALS, thus providing a long-sought entry point into mechanisms and genetics of ALS. Genetic risk factors for neurodegenerative diseases will likely lead to novel insights into mechanisms of disease.
The impact of the chromogranin B mutations is slightly lower than that of the ApoE4 allele in Alzheimer disease. Because the chromogranin B mutations had an impact on onset time in familial ALS, and on risk of disease in sporadic ALS, the findings provide important support for the notion that sporadic and familial ALS are mechanistically related.
Chromogranin has been linked to mutant SOD1 by two previous studies. A frequently raised question is to what extent SOD1-based ALS mice are relevant in mimicking human disease. The association to chromogranin B in the SOD1 mouse model and now patient cohorts for both sporadic and familial ALS strongly supports the notion of converging cellular and molecular mechanisms of disease.
One important implication for scientists working on ALS is that the research mechanistically links SOD1 mutations to a set of mutations in chromogranin B. We now have potentially interacting mutations in two genes to study; this will likely lead to new disease models and hopefully to first elements of a molecular disease pathway. It will be interesting to determine whether there is a relationship between mutant SOD1 secretion and chromogranin B mutations. Should this be the case, it may suggest that the risk involves local secretion of misfolded proteins such as mutant SOD1. Of further interest are the implications for the role of ER stress pathways in the pathogenesis of ALS.
It will be important to determine whether other genes implicated in ALS (including the RNA metabolism genes TDP-43 and FUS) also synergize with chromogranin B mutations to promote disease. Whether chromogranin A variants link to ALS is definitely worth investigating as well.
View all comments by Pico Caroni
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
Submit a Comment on this News Article |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|