Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
DC: New γ Secretase Inhibitors Hit APP, Spare Notch
13 December 2008. Specificity is a big issue for drug makers as side effects due to unpredicted interactions can scuttle potential pharmaceuticals. In the case of γ-secretase inhibitors, the promiscuous nature of the enzyme, particularly its appetite for the Notch substrate, has produced its fair share of problems. In response, scientists have come up with a second generation of inhibitors. As reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, held 15-19 November in Washington, DC, and also at the International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease last July in Chicago, drug companies have new compounds in the pipeline that appear to block γ-secretase cleavage of APP while sparing Notch processing. Two such compounds, from Wyeth and Bristol-Myers Squibb, have entered Phase 1 clinical trials.

Researchers at Wyeth are testing GSI-953, a thiophene sulfonamide derivative. At the SfN meeting, Steven Jacobsen at Wyeth Research in Princeton, New Jersey, reported that the compound preferentially inhibits processing of APP over that of Notch. Also called Begacestat, GSI-953 was described last month in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (see Mayer et al., 2008). In cell-free and cell-based assays, the inhibitor blocks production of Aβ42/Aβ40 with an EC50 of about 10-15 nM, which is more potent than the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT (N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenylacetyl-l-alanyl)]-S-phenylglycine t-butylester), reported Jacobsen. Begacestat is less potent for Aβ reduction than Eli Lilly’s LY411575 (see ARF related news story), but is more potent than LY450139, which is in Phase 3 clinical trials. However, GSI-953 excels in selectivity. Jacobsen showed that the Notch/APP EC50 ratio is about 16.8, which beats the 0.9 and 2.4 for LY411575 and LY450139, respectively. The data “suggests that GSI-953 selectively inhibits cleavage of APP while sparing Notch processing,” said Jacobsen.

Exactly how GSI-953 works is not entirely clear, but it competes with other compounds that bind near the γ-secretase active site. In Tg2576 transgenic mice it reduces Aβ by about 40-60 percent in the CSF and brain. It works rapidly; within 15 minutes reduction in brain Aβ is apparent, said Jacobsen. This, incidentally, demonstrates that Aβ has a very short half-life. The compound also reverses contextual-fear memory deficits. Wyeth has taken the compound into Phase 1 clinical trials (see ClinicalTrials.gov), and preliminary data suggest that it causes a dose-dependent decrease in plasma Aβ in humans, followed by a rebound. This is typical for γ-secretase inhibitors and likely means that the drug has engaged its target in the periphery. “This does not necessarily reflect Aβ levels in the brain, since Aβ levels were not increased in the brain of TgAPP mice,” said Jacobsen.

Speaking at ICAD, Charlie Albright, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut, reported the same rebound plasma Aβ dynamic in both animal models and in human volunteers with BMS-708163, his company’s new Notch-sparing γ-secretase inhibitors. This compound decreases CSF Aβ40 at a safe and tolerable dose in humans, Albright told the audience. It has an IC50 for APP cleavage of 0.3 nM compared to 58 nM for Notch. The compound dose-dependently lowers Aβ in the brain of rats and dogs and similarly reduces CSF Aβ40. Perhaps in keeping with the substrate specificity, the compound had no gastrointestinal, thymus, or spleen effects in animals treated with 10-fold the dose needed to see reduction in brain Aβ. Gastrointestinal and immune system problems have been documented in γ-secretase inhibitors in the past (see ARF related news story).

According to Albright, Bristol-Myers Squibb has also taken this compound into Phase 1 clinical trials, though ClinicalTrials.gov does not list an active trial at present. (It does list a completed drug interaction study.) At ICAD, Albright reported that up to 150 mg of the compound has been given to healthy volunteers for up to 28 days. Pharmacokinetics shows that the drug disappears from the plasma in a biphasic fashion, with a second phase half-life of about 40 hours, Albright said. The researchers used continuous lumbar catheterization in humans to measure changes in CSF Aβ. They saw a dose-dependent reduction in CSF Aβ after single and multiple doses of the compound. After the 28-day study, trough levels of CSF Aβ40 and CSF Aβ42 were reduced by about 30 percent at 100 mg and 60 percent at 150 mg doses.

When asked, Albright responded that there were no serious adverse events associated with this Phase 1 trial. Of course, further study will be needed to test the efficacy and safety of both these compounds. For an up-to-date review on γ-secretase inhibitors, see Imbimbo, 2008.—Tom Fagan.

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Paul Murray
Submitted 22 December 2008  |  Permalink Posted 23 December 2008

My wife participated in an LY-450139 Phase 3 trial. She had to drop out when her legs would no longer support her. Physicians admitted her to hospital as a cardiac patient. She has DHF [diastolic heart failure].

Her Alzheimer's appeared to be stable during the months she took the trial medication. It appears to have deteriorated markedly during the few weeks since she stopped the medication.

Has anyone observed a developing weakness possibly related to LY-450139?

View all comments by Paul Murray

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad