Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
   
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Pathways
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
San Diego: MHC Class I and Complement—Holding Down Second Jobs in the Synapse
Adapted from a story that originally appeared on the Schizophrenia Research Forum.

21 November 2007. It may be a surprising idea, but it is becoming clearer from work done in several labs that complement factors and MHC Class I proteins are regulators of synapse formation during fetal development, synapse plasticity, and synapse repair. This function occurs without apparent T cell involvement or any presentation of self or non-self peptides. It also now appears that these proteins may be relevant to neural disorders such as autism and schizophrenia, as discussed at the 2007 meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, held 3-7 November in San Diego, California. Lisa Boulanger of the University of California, SD, led a symposium titled "The New Neuroimmunology: Immune Proteins in Synapse Formation, Plasticity, and Repair." Parts of the research presented appeared on ARF before, see Bar Harbor Report 2006, ARF related news story, and ARF news story). Below is an update of this emerging story.

Carla Shatz of Harvard University first demonstrated that MHC Class I proteins were functionally required for development and plasticity of the CNS in 2000 (Huh et al., 2000). Today Shatz presented work from her laboratory—which primarily focuses on the visual cortex ocular dominance models of plasticity—showing that Class I proteins colocalize with PSD-95, considered by many a “master organizer of synapses” (see Goddard et al., 2007). Shatz demonstrated that Class I proteins are expressed at high levels in neurons of both somatosensory cortex as well as hippocampus. Using a double knockout mouse that lacks both β2-microglobulin (β2M) and the transporter associated with antigen processing 1 (TAP1), which dramatically reduces the surface expression of all MHC Class I proteins, Shatz and her colleagues showed that Arc (activity-regulated cytoskeletal-associated protein) induction in the visual cortex is abnormally widened after visual stimulation of the double knockout mice. These data suggest that MHC Class I proteins regulate the process of synaptic plasticity in the ocular dominance model used. Shatz proposed that the gene PirB (paired immunoglobulin-like receptor B) encodes the receptor for MHC Class I in neuronal synapses, which was shown previously to be expressed in neurons in the brain, and functions to limit experience-dependent plasticity in the visual cortex (Syken et al., 2006).

Staffan Cullheim of the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, used the same double β2M/TAP1 knockout mice to examine the role that Class I proteins play in the elimination of synapses following nerve injury (Thams et al., 2007; Cullheim and Thams, 2007). The data presented focused on the role of activated microglia and MHC Class I protein specificity in the synapse removal process after axotomy, and suggested that there may be a differential effect of these proteins in excitatory (NMDA) versus inhibitory (glycine or GABA) synapses, with more elimination of inhibitory synapses.

Ben Barres of Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, shifted the focus from MHC Class I proteins to the role of components of the complement cascade C1q and C3 to act as “punishment signals” and cause axon atrophy and withdrawal. Using a new imaging method called array tomography (Micheva and Smith, 2007), Barres showed that C1q colocalizes to developing CNS synapses using immunofluorescent staining of 70 nm sections of developing mouse brain. Barres further showed that in C1q or C3 knockout mice, synapse refinement that normally occurs in early postnatal development (P5 through P30) was defective, resulting in more synapses, not more neurons. Barres presented a model in which immature astrocytes clustering near the developing synapses release C1q and C3 into the synapse to prune and eliminate synapses. An important implication of Barres’s presentation is the tantalizing idea that inhibitors of the complement cascade may have the potential to block neurodegeneration.

The final talk of the symposium was by Lisa Boulanger. Boulanger has continued on with the work she had done as a postdoctoral fellow in Shatz’s laboratory, and has pursued studies of MHC Class I proteins in synaptic pruning and plasticity to explore the potential implications for both autism and schizophrenia. Boulanger is no stranger to the autism field, having published a thoughtful article on abnormal development of brain connectivity in autism in 2004 (Belmonte et al., 2004). In her talk, Boulanger examined the electrophysiological responses of β2M/TAP1 double knockout mice in paired pulse inhibition (an experimental model of sensory gating deficits in schizophrenia that is widely used, if not widely accepted), AMPA receptor fEPSP, and NMDA-induced chemical LTD, which is similar to low frequency stimulation induced LTD.

Surprisingly, the last test, which results in a stable LTD in wild-type mice, instead induced a robust LTP in the β2M/TAP1 double KO mice. Pursuing these studies further, Boulanger demonstrated that NMDA treatment caused a dramatic increase in surface AMPA receptor expression. Boulanger proposed that the increase in AMPA receptors was a result of increased internalization of AMPA, accompanied by a dramatic increase in recycling AMPA receptors back to the synaptic surface to cause a homeostatic shift of net increase.

Boulanger proposed that MHC proteins are tied to neural diseases, speculating that maternal immune challenge increases the risk of the unborn fetus to such diseases (see Patterson, 2007 and Schizophrenia Research Forum news story). In the model that Boulanger proposed, induction of a maternal immune response in mice increases maternal cytokines that are capable of entering the fetal blood circulation. These cytokines, if exposed to the developing nervous system of the fetus, may regulate MHC Class I levels in neurons. The question remains, Do changes in neuronal MHC Class I expression mediate changes in the development of the fetal brain?—Gwendolyn T Wong.

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Andrea Tenner
Submitted 25 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007

The data presented by Ben Barres showed that immature astrocytes stimulate the neurons to synthesize C1q, rather than the astrocytes synthesizing C1q (as suggested in the news story above.) It will be quite interesting to determine the trigger of this induced synthesis and if the synthesis of C1r, C1s, C2, and C4 (which are all required to cleave C3 and thus, presumably, mediate the synapse pruning observed) is coordinately regulated and produced by the same cell type.

View all comments by Andrea Tenner
Comments on Related News
  Related News: Complement: AD Friend or Foe? New Work Tips Balance to Former

Comment by:  P.L. McGeer
Submitted 23 June 2008 Posted 23 June 2008

The paper by Lemere and colleagues provides further evidence for the role that the complement system plays in inflammation generally, and in Aβ phagocytosis particularly. The group developed a double transgenic APP and complement C3-deficient mouse model (APP;C3-/-). The researchers then found, as one might expect, increased Aβ deposition in 17-month-old, but not 8- and 12-month-old mice, and a shift in microglial phenotype. Their results are in accord with previous results of Wyss-Coray et al. (Wyss-Coray et al., 2002), who used the slightly different strategy of developing transgenic mice overexpressing the soluble complement receptor-related protein y (sCrry) to inhibit complement. Based on such data, one might suppose that complement activation, as an important facilitator of Aβ clearance, should be stimulated to provide benefit in AD. Such stimulation can be provided by vaccination with Aβ. For transgenic mice, this is indeed the case: vaccination with Aβ produces a dramatic reduction in the Aβ...  Read more

  Related News: Complement: AD Friend or Foe? New Work Tips Balance to Former

Comment by:  Dave Morgan, ARF Advisor (Disclosure)
Submitted 23 June 2008 Posted 23 June 2008

This is a very timely and important paper that supports a more sophisticated view of the role of inflammation in amyloid deposition. Ten years ago, most in the Alzheimer research community believed that inflammation was part of the pathogenic mechanism in AD. However, increasingly, literature from the APP mice argues that the classical, M1 form of inflammation with IL-1 and TNFα expression can motivate microglia/macrophages to clear amyloid plaques. Studies ranging from LPS injections to complement inhibition (as in Maier et al.) to IL-1 overexpression demonstrate Aβ reductions associated with microglial activation (DiCarlo et al., 2001; Shaftel et al., 2007). Instead, it appears that it is the alternative, or M2 activation state of microglia, that is associated with toxicity. A key proponent of this perspective has been Carol Colton, who demonstrated increased expression of type 2 markers in AD and APP mouse brains, and enhanced toxicity when iNOS, a traditional M1 protein, was knocked out in APP mice (Colton et al., 2006a; Colton et al., 2006b). It appears that...  Read more

  Related News: Complement: AD Friend or Foe? New Work Tips Balance to Former

Comment by:  Steve Barger
Submitted 24 June 2008 Posted 25 June 2008

It would be nice to see Andrea Tenner weigh in on this discussion. She has created a mouse with "humanized" C1q. Contrary to expectations, that study indicated there are no important differences in how Aβ interacts with C1q in humans and rodents (Li et al., 2008). She also showed that addition of C1q to cultured neurons could protect against Aβ toxicity (Pisalyaput and Tenner, 2008). The latter, if I may say so, complements the papers discussed above.

References:
Li M, Ager RR, Fraser DA, Tjokro NO, Tenner AJ. 2008. Development of a humanized C1q A chain knock-in mouse: Assessment of antibody independent ss-amyloid induced complement activation. Mol Immunol. 45:3244-52. Abstract

Pisalyaput K, Tenner AJ. 2008. Complement component C1q inhibits beta-amyloid- and serum amyloid P-induced neurotoxicity via caspase- and calpain-independent mechanisms. J Neurochem. 104:696-707. Abstract

View all comments by Steve Barger


  Related News: Complement: AD Friend or Foe? New Work Tips Balance to Former

Comment by:  Terrence Town
Submitted 24 June 2008 Posted 25 June 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers

The paper by Maier, Lemere, and colleagues (2008) provides an extension of previous findings by Wyss-Coray, Masliah, and coworkers (2002) showing that inhibiting the complement cascade in aged AD model mice (in the former case by knocking out C3; in the latter by expressing the complement inhibitor, soluble complement receptor-related protein y) promotes cerebral amyloidosis, as judged by Aβ plaque load and biochemical analysis of insoluble Aβ. Maier and colleagues further noted a trend toward increased Aβ levels in blood plasma from cross-bred (APP;C3-/-) mice, reduced NeuN-positivity in crossed mouse hippocampal pyramidal neurons, and an increase in more “anti-inflammatory” microglia. These results add to the emerging complex picture of brain inflammation in the context of AD-like pathology, and offer additional insight into the beneficial role of the complement cascade in these transgenic AD model mice.

This interesting work by Maier et al. raises a number of questions regarding the interplay between innate immune cells (i.e., microglia and macrophages) and...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Follow on Twitter
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2010 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad