20 November 2007. If our summary on Aβ oligomers from the recent conference of the Society for Neuroscience delivered an overdose of news on synaptotoxic Aβ, take this story as an antidote. Held 3-7 November in San Diego, California, the conference featured a wealth of presentations to reflect a broadening knowledge base about this disease, and the role of presenilin and calcium in AD pathogenesis is one of the exciting examples. Perturbations to the neuronal calcium balance in both aging and AD have been described for some years and have led to a calcium hypothesis of brain aging and dementia. What is new is an evolving concept tying intraneuronal calcium increases in important functional ways to known players in AD risk and pathogenesis, that is, to presenilin (PS) mutations, APP mutations, ApoE4, synaptic dysfunction, apoptosis. In particular, new research is trying to assess these links in model systems at early stages, long before visible pathologies have formed and could confound results. In essence, the new calcium research is reaching for a grasp of how subtle disease-promoting changes play against compensatory mechanisms that the neuron deploys to maintain homeostasis. “Calcinists” view the emergence of amyloid and tau pathology as the result of a breakdown of this compensation. As a conference offering, below is a summary of one such presentation by Grace (aka Beth) Stutzmann at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois. For a broader view, read her eloquent review, published last month (Stutzmann, 2007).
In her talk, Stutzmann focused on the role of presenilin (PS) mutations and the ryanodine receptor. Unlike presenilin, this receptor is not a household term among “Alzheimerologists.” In a nutshell, Stutzmann proposed that, in mice expressing mutant human presenilin 1, the ryanodine receptor is hyperexcitable. Prone to dumping large amounts of Ca2+ from ER stores preferentially into distal dendrites and synaptic spines, it tends to end up dampening the activity of those synapses.
For background, Stutzmann first reminded the audience that neurons maintain a deep valley of nanomolar Ca2+ in the cytosol vis-à-vis millimolar Ca2+ outside the cell membrane on one side, and high micromolar Ca2+ inside the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) on the other side. Multiple different calcium channels and pumps in the cell membrane and the ER membrane are necessary to keep Ca2+ distributed across these gradients. In previous work, Stutzmann had set up a system that combines whole-cell patch clamp recordings with 2-photon imaging of calcium flows. This is done in thick, 300-micron cortical slabs from various mouse models. She routinely isolates three types of calcium response:
Together, this experimental setup serves as a “holistic” system of assessing neurophysiologic consequences of specific calcium changes, Stutzmann said.
- One through the plasma membrane (where action potentials trigger calcium flow through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels)
- One through the IP3 receptor in the ER membrane (triggered by photolysis of caged IP3)
- One through the lesser-known ryanodine receptor (using its agonist caffeine and its blocker dantrolene)
Stutzmann had shown before that neurons from triple transgenic mice created in Frank LaFerla’s lab, where she had been a postdoctoral fellow, readily show much stronger calcium outflows from the ER than do those of non-transgenic mice. By comparing this strain with a different model overexpressing only mutant PS1, and with an APP/tau double transgenic, she attributed this defect in calcium management to presenilin. The present focus on the ryanodine receptor arose with the twin observations that PS1-transgenic mice have elevated levels of ryanodine receptor protein, and that blocking this receptor normalized excessive calcium outflow from the ER. In the presenilin transgenic mice, the ryanodine receptor mediated the majority of this particular calcium flow, up from 20 percent in normal mice to 70 percent in the mutant mice (Stutzmann et al., 2006).
At the conference, Stutzmann showed newer data suggesting that the ER within the distal dendrites and even spines releases the greatest relative increases in ryanodine-triggered calcium in the PS1-mutant mice; it is not the ER around the nucleus and cell body where most textbook diagrams depict it to be. (The ER is known to extend into dendrites and even into spine heads; see picture below.) Those distal ER tips show little ryanodine receptor-mediated Ca2+ release in non-transgenic mice, but in PS1-mutant they increase this flow dramatically by 10-fold. By contrast, the ER in the cell body about doubled its ryanodine receptor-mediated outflow. This suggests that the synaptic areas of the ER are functionally separate from what is going on in the cell body, Stutzmann said.
Three-dimensional Reconstruction of the Smooth ER (Purple) in a Rat Hippocampal CA1 Dendritic Segment
The left side shows that the ER in the dendrite is contiguous with the ER entering the thin neck of a dendritic spine (grey). The smooth ER in the head of the spine (right) is thought to provide synapse-specific regulation of calcium release, and modulate incoming synaptic signals (Reproduced from SynapseWeb; Spacek and Harris, 1997).
Does this mean anything to cortical neurons? These cells integrate multiple signals, and then generate a summed reaction. Stutzmann tried to model this behavior by assessing calcium release from the ER in response to either synaptic stimulation or ryanodine receptor activation alone, or both in combination. In the latter experiment, she saw a supra-additive depletion of ER calcium stores in the PS1-transgenic mice. Further experiments showed that this leads to greater membrane hyperpolarization. And this, in turn, hampered the synapses’ ability to generate trains of action potentials in response to electrical stimulation, essentially making the neuron less excitable (Stutzmann et al., 2007). “A main point here is that, depending on where it is dumped from the ER, this extra calcium will have very different functional consequences for the neuron,” Stutzmann said. (Links between ryanodine receptor function and mitochondria and apoptosis, for example, have been reported, as well.)
The existing literature indicates no change in synaptic transmission or synaptic plasticity in the triple transgenic mice at the young ages of 4 to 6 weeks, and Stutzmann’s group confirmed these findings. Yet she felt she had not looked hard enough. Maybe there was a compensatory effort hidden behind the curtain of this normal-looking output? “Calcium plays such a big role in synaptic transmission and plasticity, I don’t see how you can mess with it on a major scale and not affect those functions,” Stutzmann added. To peek behind the curtain, she blocked the ryanodine receptor with the drug dantrolene. In non-transgenic mice, this did away with about half the LTP output, but in PS1-transgenic mice it abolished LTP completely.
To Stutzmann’s mind, this suggests that the ryanodine receptor calcium stores in the dendritic tips of the ER contribute to synaptic function quite differently when there is a PS1 mutation. That the neurons at this age still manage to generate normal-looking LTP means that they are compensating, she said. This happens before any AD-like histopathology can be detected. Speculating about PS1-mutant FAD, this could imply that people are born with these different calcium dynamics and compensate well, until years of effort to maintain homeostasis exhaust the neuron and it switches from compensation to pathology. One future experiment would be to slightly dial down the ryanodine receptor over longer periods of time with drugs such as dantrolene, and ask whether that can keep AD-like pathology and behavioral deficits at bay in those models.
This summary covers but one area of active research on calcium flows in AD models. Effects of presenilin on ER calcium were established by a number of groups (Tu et al., 2006; Nelson et al., 2007; LaFerla, 2002), and the link between the ryanodine receptor, calcium, and AD is even older (Querfurth et al., 1998). Current questions focus on the relative contributions of the ryanodine versus the inositol trisphosphate IP3 receptor, as well as on how the two interact. This writer invites comments on these issues to broaden the discussion.—Gabrielle Strobel.