Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Estrogen and Neuroprotection: A Matter of Time?
31 August 2007. Is estrogen neuroprotective? Laboratory studies suggest yes, but epidemiological evidence is mixed. Trumping all, the results of the Women’s Health Study—showing no benefit, but exactly the opposite with an increased risk of dementia in older women on hormone replacement therapy—dealt a body blow to both basic and clinical research on the question (Rapp et al., 2003; Shumaker et al., 2003; also see ARF Live Discussion).

For estrogen, however, evidence is mounting that timing and drug selectivity is everything. The idea that there is a window of opportunity for neuroprotection by the hormone, and that it comes early in menopause, got support this week from two papers showing that women who have their ovaries removed before menopause have a higher risk of cognitive impairment, dementia, and movement disorders later in life. The earlier the women lose their natural supply of estrogen, the higher the risk appears to be. The studies, from Walter Rocca and colleagues at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, appear in the August 29 online Neurology. Other new papers, from Rhonda Voskuhl at the University of California David Geffen School of Medicine in Los Angeles and Roberta Brinton of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, build on a growing understanding of the multiple receptors and cellular targets involved in estrogen’s actions. Their studies suggest that activating the right receptors and pathways with selective agonists also is important for harnessing neuroprotective effects of estrogen.

For the epidemiological work, Rocca and colleagues tracked nearly 3,000 women long-term, half of whom had one or both ovaries removed before menopause. Median follow-up was 25 years. Women who lost one or both ovaries before menopause had a 1.5 times increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia compared to a reference group of women who kept their ovaries. The risk increased to nearly twofold in women who had surgery before age 43. For movement disorders (parkinsonism), the same effects were seen, but were statistically weaker, and need to be confirmed in other studies.

“This study is one of the first to support the hypothesis of a critical age window for the protective effect of estrogen on the brain in humans,” the authors conclude. This fits with a growing appreciation that hormone replacement therapy that strives to really replace what’s missing—using hormone preparations that mimic natural estrogens, and deploying them early in menopause—may be the key to preserving mental capacity and possibly, preventing Alzheimer disease (see recent comment to Hao et al., 2007 on this topic).

One of the roadblocks to harnessing the neuroprotective effects of estrogen is our limited understanding of the complex pathways it activates. Estrogen acts through multiple receptors. In animal models it shows both neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory actions, but the relationship between the two is unclear. In this week’s PNAS online, Voskuhl and colleagues report using selective estrogen receptor agonists to separate the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory actions in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Their results suggest that activation of one type of estrogen receptor (ERα) is both neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory, while another (ERβ) mediates neuroprotection without affecting inflammation. The prospect that treatment with specific ERβ ligands may be neuroprotective has the added advantage such ligands might get around the cancer-causing effects of estrogen, which stem from ERα activation.

Voskuhl’s data highlight the need for selective estrogen analogs, a need that Brinton and coworkers are working to address. In the current Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Brinton and collaborators from RTI International, a private research institute in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, introduce a new estrogen receptor ligand that shows neuroprotective effects against glutamate toxicity in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Their compound also activates pathways related to neuroprotection (ERK2 and Akt kinases, and antiapoptotic proteins) and increases dendritic spine protein levels. The researchers had previously found that an FDA-approved anti-estrogenic compound (ICI 182,780), which antagonizes the ability of estrogen to drive proliferation in reproductive tissues, has estrogen receptor agonist activity in neurons (Zhao et al., 2006). Their new work shows that an analog of this compound, tailored to enhance entry into the brain, keeps its neuroprotective actions.

Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (aka SERMs) are a far cry from the concoction commonly used for estrogen replacement therapy, a mixture of conjugated hormones derived from horse urine. Estrogens clearly have neuroprotective and anti-amyloidogenic properties. Perhaps in the future, the ability to tickle the right estrogen receptor with the right ligand in the right place at the right time will unlock the hidden potential of this neuroprotective pathway.—Pat McCaffrey.

References:
Rocca WA, Bower JH, Maraganore DM Ahlskog JE, Grossardt BR, de Andrade M, Melton LJ. Increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause. Neurology. 2007 Aug 29; early online publication. Abstract

Rocca WA, Bower JH, Maraganore DM Ahlskog JE, Grossardt BR, de Andrade M, Melton LJ. Increased risk of parkinsonism in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause. Neurology. 2007 Aug 29; early online publication. Abstract

Tiwari-Woodruff S, Morales LBJ, Lee R, Voskuhl RR. Differential neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of estrogen receptor (ER)α and ERβ ligand treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Early Edition. 2007 Aug 27. Abstract

Zhao L, Jin C, Mao Z, Gopinathan MB, Rehder K, Brinton RD. Design, synthesis, and estrogenic activity of a novel estrogen receptor modulator-a hybrid structure of 17β-estradiol and vitamin e in hippocampal neurons. J Med Chem. 2007 Sep 6;50(18):4471-81. Epub 2007 Aug 14. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Primary Papers: Increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause.

Comment by:  Kathryn Bryan, Gemma Casadesus, George Perry, ARF Advisor (Disclosure), Mark A. Smith (Disclosure)
Submitted 8 September 2007  |  Permalink Posted 9 September 2007

Comment by Gemma Casadesus, George Perry, Kathryn Bryan, Mark A. Smith

Estrogen and Alzheimer Disease: Is It Really All in the Timing?
There is a wealth of evidence, including this latest study, suggesting the involvement of sex steroids in the etiology of Alzheimer disease (AD) (reviewed in Manly et al., 2000; Casadesus et al., 2004; Casadesus et al., 2005) and data indicating a positive effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT, Henderson et al., 1994; Kawas et al., 1997).

However, contradicting findings from the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study, reporting negative cognitive effects following HRT in women at an AD-vulnerable age (Henderson et al., 2003; Rapp et al., 2003; Shumaker et al., 2003; Almeida et al., 2006) have caused complete havoc in the estrogen research field and cast serious doubt on the role of sex steroid hormones in age-related cognitive decline, neuronal dysfunction, and AD etiology. One key issue that these seemingly opposing studies lead to is the importance of the timing of estrogen treatment. However, other alternative...  Read more

  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad