 |
See other stress stories 2 and 3.
9 June 2007. It is widely recognized that chronic stress—be it psychological or physical—is bad for one’s health. Yet people may be surprised to hear that it may also predispose to Alzheimer disease. Two papers out this week report how stress alters processing of amyloid-β precursor protein. This story summarizes the findings of David Holtzman and colleagues at Washington University, St. Louis, who have studied the effects of acute and chronic psychological stress in mouse models of AD. An upcoming companion story details work led by Rudy Tanzi and colleagues at Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, who found that physical stress in the form of cerebral ischemia can enhance β-secretase activity. Next week we will cover a third paper slated for publication, which links stress to mild cognitive impairment, often a precursor to AD.
Holtzman and colleagues previously reported that stress impairs learning and memory performance and increases deposition of Aβ in Tg2576 transgenic mice (see Dong et al., 2004). Why stress exacerbated Aβ pathology was a puzzle. In this week’s PNAS online, first author Jae-Eun Kang and colleagues report that both acute and chronic stress appear to increase production of Aβ, and that this may result from elevated neuronal activity.
Kang and colleagues used microdialysis to measure interstitial fluid (ISF) Aβ in the brains of transgenic mice that were either housed for long periods in relative isolation or acutely stressed by physical restraint. Both stressors led to significant increases in Aβ. After 3 months of isolation, ISF Aβ concentration was 85 percent higher than in controls. In the acute test, 3 hours of restraint were enough to bump up levels by about 20 percent in as little as an hour, with Aβ peaking at 32 percent higher than normal about 13 hours after the test began. In the case of chronic stress, analysis of whole hippocampus extracts by ELISA showed that soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 concentrations were both increased (by 38 and 59 percent, respectively), though the Aβ40/42 ratio remained unchanged. Not surprisingly, since the researchers used young animals for this test, they detected no plaques. Nevertheless, the authors conclude that an increase in ISF Aβ probably accelerates deposition of the peptide seen in older stressed mice.
Is the Aβ increase due to greater production or poorer clearance? Holtzman and colleagues favor the former. In the stressed animals, Kang and colleagues detected no changes in levels of insulin-degrading enzyme or neprilysin, two enzymes that degrade Aβ. This does not preclude enhanced degradation by other enzymes or more rapid clearance of whole peptide. However, the authors found that tetrodotoxin, a potent inhibitor of neural activity, blocked the restraint-induced Aβ increase. This fits with the idea that Aβ release is coupled to neural activity, and that heightened neural activity in response to stress drives production of more Aβ.
What might drive the increases in neural activity? The researchers initially examined glucocorticoid hormones, which mediate stress responses, but failed to detect a spike in ISF Aβ after administering acute corticosterone to the mice. Next, they turned to what happens upstream of glucocorticoid release. Release is governed by corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF), best known for being produced in the hypothalamus and stimulating the pituitary to release adrenocorticotropic hormone. But CRF is also made locally in the brain in response to stress, and it can bind to specific CRF receptors and stimulate excitatory neurotransmission (see review by Baram and Hatalski, 1998). It appears as if locally produced CRF mediates the effects of stress on Aβ, at least for chronic stress. That’s because infusing CRF into the brain elevated ISF Aβ in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, acute stress elevated CRF, while infusion of a CRF inhibitor prevented the restraint-induced elevation in Aβ. By contrast, in the case of chronic stress, the researchers find no increase in ISF CRF, suggesting that another mechanism may be at play.
How these findings relate to human stress remains to be seen. However, it is established that repeated acute physical stress, such as head trauma, can lead to AD-like pathology, including deposition of Aβ (see ARF related news story). “The relationship among stress, CRF, and ISF Aβ levels suggests that CRF may play a role in AD pathogenesis and that CRF and CRF signaling pathways are therapeutic targets to modulate processes that affect Aβ metabolism,” conclude the authors. Regular doses of rest and relaxation may not go amiss, either.—Tom Fagan.
Reference:
Kang J-E, Cirrito JR, Dong H, Csernansky JG, Holtzman DM. Acute stress increases interstitial fluid amyloid-beta via corticotrophin-releasing factor and neuronal activity. PNAS. 2007, June 4. Early online edition. Abstract
|
 |
 |
 |
Comments on Related News |
 |
  |
| |
Related News: Butting Heads—Autopsies Fuel Debate on Football and Neurodegeneration
Comment by: James Vickers
|
 |
 |
Submitted 24 January 2007
|
Posted 26 January 2007
|
 |
 |
I recommend the Primary Papers
We have argued for some years that neurofibrillary pathology, such as tangles and dystrophic neurites, are not particularly Alzheimer disease-specific, as they represent the prolonged aberrant reaction of nerve cells to ongoing or repeated structural injury (Vickers et al., 2000). In the case of “garden-variety” Alzheimer disease, we have proposed that plaque formation may cause enough compression of the neuropil to effectively squeeze axons. This would result in the stimulation of the stereotypical reaction to such interruption in axoplasmic flow, including the abnormal regenerative changes throughout the nerve cell that ultimately lead to classic neurofibrillary pathology.
In this regard, any prolonged or repeated structural injury to axons, as you see in younger people with repeated head injury (e.g., Hof et al., 1991), would be predicted to have a similar outcome. This may be why the early axonal pathology associated with plaque formation is easy to model in experimental models involving axonal shear or transection (Dickson et al., 2000; Chung et al., 2005; Dickson et...
Read more
We have argued for some years that neurofibrillary pathology, such as tangles and dystrophic neurites, are not particularly Alzheimer disease-specific, as they represent the prolonged aberrant reaction of nerve cells to ongoing or repeated structural injury (Vickers et al., 2000). In the case of “garden-variety” Alzheimer disease, we have proposed that plaque formation may cause enough compression of the neuropil to effectively squeeze axons. This would result in the stimulation of the stereotypical reaction to such interruption in axoplasmic flow, including the abnormal regenerative changes throughout the nerve cell that ultimately lead to classic neurofibrillary pathology.
In this regard, any prolonged or repeated structural injury to axons, as you see in younger people with repeated head injury (e.g., Hof et al., 1991), would be predicted to have a similar outcome. This may be why the early axonal pathology associated with plaque formation is easy to model in experimental models involving axonal shear or transection (Dickson et al., 2000; Chung et al., 2005; Dickson et al., 2005). However, true neurofibrillary pathology may take a much longer time to develop, as it relies on the perikaryal response that builds up due to the prolonged or repeated axonal injury. In this regard, most neurofibrillary tangles in the neocortex in Alzheimer disease are still intracellular, further indicating a long period of time leading to degeneration. I would be interested in this report about more detail on the type of axonal pathology still present, and also if the tangles were largely intracellular.
References: Dickson TC, Adlard PA, Vickers JC. Sequence of cellular changes following localized axotomy to cortical neurons in glia-free culture.
J Neurotrauma. 2000 Nov;17(11):1095-103.
Abstract
Dickson TC, Chuckowree JA, Chuah MI, West AK, Vickers JC. alpha-Internexin immunoreactivity reflects variable neuronal vulnerability in Alzheimer's disease and supports the role of the beta-amyloid plaques in inducing neuronal injury.
Neurobiol Dis. 2005 Mar;18(2):286-95.
Abstract
Chung RS, Staal JA, McCormack GH, Dickson TC, Cozens MA, Chuckowree JA, Quilty MC, Vickers JC. Mild axonal stretch injury in vitro induces a progressive series of neurofilament alterations ultimately leading to delayed axotomy.
J Neurotrauma. 2005 Oct;22(10):1081-91.
Abstract
Hof PR, Knabe R, Bovier P, Bouras C. Neuropathological observations in a case of autism presenting with self-injury behavior.
Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1991;82(4):321-6.
Abstract
Vickers JC, Dickson TC, Adlard PA, Saunders HL, King CE, McCormack G. The cause of neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer's disease.
Prog Neurobiol. 2000 Feb;60(2):139-65. Review.
Abstract
View all comments by James Vickers
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Butting Heads—Autopsies Fuel Debate on Football and Neurodegeneration
Comment by: Gabrielle Strobel
|
 |
 |
Submitted 2 February 2007
|
Posted 2 February 2007
|
 |
 |
Note from the Alzforum editor: Today's New York Times followed up its initial article of 18 January on neurodegenerative consequences of repeated concussions in professional football with the story of yet another player. According to the NYT, Ted Johnson, the New England Patriot's middle linebacker until his retirement in 2005, forgets people's names, misses appointments, and suffers from depression. Johnson sustained repeated concussions in close succession in 2002. The news article cites Johnson's neurologist as saying that Johnson shows the cognitive impairment that is characteristic of early Alzheimer disease. Johnson is 34 years old. View all comments by Gabrielle Strobel
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Stress and Aβ—The Apoptosis Connection
Comment by: DC Kerr
|
 |
 |
Submitted 12 June 2007
|
Posted 12 June 2007
|
 |
 |
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Stress and AD—Taking a Toll on Tau
Comment by: Mary Reid
|
 |
 |
Submitted 26 June 2007
|
Posted 3 July 2007
|
 |
 |
Sawchenko reports that tau phosphorylation is abrogated in the absence of CRFR1. Bale and colleagues report reduced ACTH in CRFR1-deficient mice; therefore, I find it interesting that Nasman and colleagues report a blunted ACTH response to CRF in AD (1,2). I had expected already reduced CRFR1 expression in AD. I have proposed that reduced expression of ACTH due to chronic hypercortisolism in AD may result in the reported reduced levels of the ACTH responsive, seladin-1 (3). A new study by Lamsa and colleagues report that there may be an association with DHCR24 which encodes seladin-1 and AD (4). It will be interesting to see the ACTH levels following antalarmin treatment in AD and furthermore, whether seladin-1 is affected.
References: 1. Bale TL, Picetti R, Contarino A, Koob GF, Vale WW, Lee KF. Mice deficient for both corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (CRFR1) and CRFR2 have an impaired stress response and display sexually dichotomous anxiety-like behavior. J Neurosci. 2002 Jan 1;22(1):193-9. Abstract
2. See comment by Mary Reid
3. Näsman B, Olsson T, Fagerlund M, Eriksson S, Viitanen M, Carlström K. Blunted adrenocorticotropin and increased adrenal steroid response to human corticotropin-releasing hormone in Alzheimer's disease. Biol Psychiatry. 1996 Mar 1;39(5):311-8. Comment in: Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Sep 1;44(5):374-6. Abstract
4. Lämsä R, Helisalmi S, Hiltunen M, Herukka SK, Tapiola T, Pirttilä T, Vepsäläinen S, Soininen H. The association study between DHCR24 polymorphisms and Alzheimer's disease. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2007 May 17; [Epub ahead of print] Abstract
View all comments by Mary Reid
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Sleep Settles Strained Synapses, Keeps Aβ Levels at Bay?
Comment by: J. Lucy Boyd
|
 |
 |
Submitted 14 April 2009
|
Posted 21 April 2009
|
 |
 |
I recommend the Primary Papers
|
 |

|
| |
Related News: Sleep Deprivation Taxes Neurons, Racks Up Brain Aβ?
Comment by: Eric Blalock
|
 |
 |
Submitted 16 October 2009
|
Posted 16 October 2009
|
 |
 |
I recommend the Primary Papers
The recent report by Kang et al. suggests not only that amyloid may serve an important role in sleep regulation, but also further highlights the need for additional studies on its physiological role. The study shows that amyloid is at least a biomarker of sleep, but it is interesting to note that it may also provide a mechanistic link mediating orexinergic signaling that pushes brain systems toward sleep. These findings are especially compelling considering other identified physiological effects of amyloid/APP, for example, Aβ feedback synaptic inhibition ( Hsieh et al., 2006) or amyloid-enhanced potassium channel conductance ( Furukawa et al., 1996). These physiological effects may be linked to slow wave sleep oscillations and neuronal quiescence ( Vyazovskiy et al., 2009).
However, it is also important to note that there are likely to be multiple players in sleep regulation. For example, earlier work indicates BDNF and Homer1a also...
Read more
The recent report by Kang et al. suggests not only that amyloid may serve an important role in sleep regulation, but also further highlights the need for additional studies on its physiological role. The study shows that amyloid is at least a biomarker of sleep, but it is interesting to note that it may also provide a mechanistic link mediating orexinergic signaling that pushes brain systems toward sleep. These findings are especially compelling considering other identified physiological effects of amyloid/APP, for example, Aβ feedback synaptic inhibition ( Hsieh et al., 2006) or amyloid-enhanced potassium channel conductance ( Furukawa et al., 1996). These physiological effects may be linked to slow wave sleep oscillations and neuronal quiescence ( Vyazovskiy et al., 2009).
However, it is also important to note that there are likely to be multiple players in sleep regulation. For example, earlier work indicates BDNF and Homer1a also play roles (Faraguna et al., 2008; Mackiewicz et al., 2008), and it will be interesting to see what specific role amyloid may play in the molecular networks associated with sleep. Future studies combining multiple techniques (for instance, EEG, cognition, and microarray) may be particularly well suited for elucidating interactions among complex networks regulating sleep and the consequences of its disruption.
View all comments by Eric Blalock
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
Submit a Comment on this News Article |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|