Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
   
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Pathways
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Heavy Methyl—DNA, Protein Modification Affect Memory, APP, and Tau
24 March 2007. They may only tip the scales at a measly 15 grams per mole, but methyl groups carry considerable weight when added to larger macromolecules such as nucleic acids and protein—methylation silences gene expression and can dramatically alter protein activity. So it is not surprising that aberrant methylation patterns are linked to a variety of neurologic disorders, including Alzheimer disease. Some recent studies strengthen the connection between methylation and the inner workings of the brain. Papers in Neuron and PNAS reveal how reversible methylation of DNA plays a crucial role in learning and memory, while a report in the Journal of Neuroscience shows that the methylation status of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) may be intimately linked to phosphorylation patterns of amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) and tau that are associated with Alzheimer pathology. The latter study also links PP2A methylation to levels of homocysteine (Hcy), which has been studied as a potential biomarker for AD.

Doing a Number on Protein Phosphatase 2A
Protein phosphatase 2A is a heterotrimer that dephosphorylates a wide range of substrates in the cell, including tau. Estelle Sontag and colleagues have shown that efficient dephosphorylation of tau by PP2A (see Sontag et al., 1996) requires that the phosphatase be methylated by a specific PP2A methyl transferase (PPMT). Methylation leaves the basal catalytic activity of PP2A unchanged, but alters its substrate specificity. Because the activity of PPMT is sensitive to levels of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), Sontag and colleagues at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas tested how these amino acid metabolites might affect the PPMT, PP2A, and tau relationship. Their findings are reported in the March 14 Journal of Neuroscience.

Sontag first tested the effects of both SAM and SAH on N2a neuroblastoma cells. She found that SAM treatment causes elevated expression of PPMT and an increase in PP2A methylation of about 25 percent. SAH, on the other hand, had no effect on PPMT expression, but it did decrease PP2A methylation. To test the consequences of these changes, the researchers looked at levels of phospho-tau. They found that addition of SAH to cell cultures causes an increase in levels of phosphorylation at serine 396/serine 404. This motif is recognized by the monoclonal antibody PHF-1, which binds paired-helical fragments, the building blocks of the neurofibrillary tangles. In contrast, SAM decreased tau phosphorylation, an effect that could be blocked by the PP2A inhibitor okadaic acid, suggesting that the SAM effect is mediated via PP2A and not some other pathway.

Next the researchers turned to APP. Because phosphorylation of the precursor protein at threonine 668 spurs cleavage to generate Aβ, any change in PP2A activity that impacts Thr-668 phosphorylation could have a major effect on pathology. Sontag and colleagues found that SAH and SAM also had opposite effects on APP, the former causing an increase in Thr-668 phosphorylation and the latter decreasing it. Overexpression of a PP2A demethylase, PME-1, also caused an increase in phosphorylated APP. These effects seemed directly linked to APP processing, since SAM, which induced PP2A methylation, also enhanced non-amyloidogenic processing of APP, as judged by changes in the soluble α-secretase cleavage product sAPPα. In contrast, expression of a methylation incompetent PP2A or PME-1 led to higher levels of sAPPβ and were associated with increased Aβ40 secretion into the culture medium.

The results suggest that decreased methylation of PP2A could have a dramatic impact on AD pathology by allowing increased phosphorylation of both tau and APP and leading to elevated paired-helical fragments and Aβ. To test the physiological relevance of this, the authors turned to a model of hyperhomocysteinemia—mice lacking the homocysteine metabolizing enzyme cystathionine-β-synthase that were fed a diet high in methionine and low in folate. Methionine is given because it drives homocysteine production via SAM and SAH, while in the absence of folate the other major means of metabolizing homocysteine, which is to methylate it back to methionine, is also blocked. Under these conditions, homocysteine accumulates.

In these animals PPMT expression was reduced by about 40 percent and PP2A methylation was decreased by about 75 percent. These changes were accompanied by about a 2.5-fold increase in phosphorylated tau in the brain and about a 3.5-fold increase in phospho-APP compared to wild-type mice on a normal diet. The findings “support the hypothesis that impaired Hcy metabolism and deregulation of critical methylation reactions can trigger the accumulation of phosphorylated tau and APP in the brain, a process that may favor neurofibrillary tangle formation and amyloidogenesis,” write the authors.

Heavy Methyl Encore—Protein Phosphatase 1 Promoter
Silencing DNA by methylation has generally been viewed as a permanent modification, ensuring that patterns of gene activity are passed from one cell generation to the next during mitosis. But the other two papers support the idea that in terminally differentiated neurons, reversible DNA methylation, including that of the protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) promoter, is linked to synaptic plasticity and the formation of memory. Writing in the March 15 Neuron, Courtney Miller and David Sweatt of the University of Alabama, Birmingham, report that DNA methylase activity is boosted in animals when new memories are being formed and that this leads to silencing of PP1, which can suppress memories. They also report that activation of the gene for reelin, a protein that helps remodel synaptic connections (see ARF related news story) and that marks neurons lost early in AD (see ARF related news story), is increased during memory formation by none other than demethylases—enzymes that remove methyl groups from DNA. The findings suggest that methylation and demethylation play a key role in how memories are formed and stored.

That idea is supported by data from Erminio Costa and colleagues at the University of Illinois, Chicago, who also found that demethylation of the gene for reelin and another protein, the 67 kDa glutamic acid decarboxylase, can be induced in mice by administering small molecules that interfere with the packaging of DNA in the nucleus. That finding is reported in the March 11 PNAS online. These new studies may not only change how we think about memory formation, but they suggest that DNA methylation, once considered permanent, is dynamic in neurons and might be exploited for therapeutic benefit.

The idea that covalent modification of the chromatin structure of DNA is involved in memories is not new. It has been established that acetylation of histone proteins, which form the chromatin scaffold upon which DNA is tightly wrapped, is linked to synaptic signal transduction. Sweatt and colleagues previously showed that activation of NMDA-type glutamate receptors leads to acetylation of histone H3 (Levenson et al., 2004), a modification that weakens the affinity of histones for nucleic acids and allows other proteins, such as those involved in gene activation, to access DNA. In fact, the histone acetyl transferase (HAT) activity of CREB binding protein, a key neuronal transcription factor, has been linked to that protein’s effects on memory (see ARF related news story), while boosting histone acetylation by inhibiting histone deacetylases enhances long-term memory as well.

Because of these links among histone acetylation, gene silencing, and memory, Miller and Sweatt wondered if methylation of DNA might have similar effects. DNA methylase activity is high in the adult mammalian brain and DNA methylation silences genes, in part by recruiting histone deacetylases. To specifically test this idea, Sweatt and colleagues inhibited DNA methyl transferases (DNMTs) in hippocampal slices. They found that this prevents induction of long-term potentiation, the activity-dependent strengthening of synapses that is crucial for learning and memory. They also found that these inhibitors reduced methylation of reelin DNA, an indication that methylation is reversible. These experiments were described last year (see Levenson et al., 2006). Now, Miller and Sweatt advance those observations by looking at methylation patterns in live mice during contextual fear conditioning, a paradigm where animals lean to associate a particular environment with an unpleasant stimulus, such as a mild shock.

The researchers report that levels of mRNA for methylases DNMT3A and DNMT3B, which are believed to be involved in de-novo methylation, are significantly increased in the hippocampus following contextual fear training. Furthermore, mice given DNMT inhibitors seemed to have trouble making memories, because when placed back into the fear context they froze in place much less frequently than did control animals.

How might DNA methylation affect mouse memories? Any number of methylation-prone DNA regions could be involved, so to narrow things down Miller and Sweatt looked at methylation of genes known to play key roles in memory. First they looked at the memory suppressor, protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), on the premise that silencing that gene might boost memory. Indeed, the researchers found that 1 hour after contextual fear training, methylation of the PP1 promoter region was increased by over 100-fold and mRNA levels of PP1 in the CA1 region of the hippocampus were slightly, though significantly reduced. For this effect the animals had to experience both the new context and the mild foot shock; alone, neither had any effect on methylation, indicating that a true memory must be formed for PP1 methylation to take place. Interestingly, DNMT inhibitors dramatically increased the fraction of PP1 promoters that were not methylated, again suggesting that demethylation may be just as important for regulation as methylation.

To address the role of demethylation, Miller and Sweatt measured how reelin DNA is altered by the learning paradigm. They found that after 1 hour of contextual fear training, reelin promoter methylation was decreased and reelin mRNA levels increased almost twofold. DNMT inhibitors led to an even greater demethylation of reelin DNA. Though DNA methylation has generally been considered a permanent modification, these results suggest that in neurons, at least, the process may be more dynamic.

The Rolling Histones
In the second paper, Costa and colleagues describe a slightly different approach to study reelin gene demethylation. They studied downregulation of reelin and the 67 kDa glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD67) in mice treated chronically with the methyl donor methionine. The suppression of the two genes under these conditions is attributed to enhanced methylation, leading to the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs), which in turn increase histone affinity for DNA, leading to gene silencing. First author Erbo Dong and colleagues wondered what might happen if they prevented that histone deacetylation.

After treating mice with methionine for a week, Dong and colleagues then gave the animals HDAC inhibitors and followed the pattern of DNA methylation. The researchers discovered that in the presence of these inhibitors demethylation of the two genes was accelerated as judged by the reduction in number of promoters that immunoprecipitated with MeCP2, a protein that binds to methylated DNA. The researchers suggest that the rapid demethylation could be due to either inhibition of a methylase or stimulation of putative demethylase activity, but they favor the latter scenario because a methylase inhibitor had no effect on the rate of demethylation.

All told, these findings point to a dynamic methylation/demethylation process that is linked to synaptic plasticity and memory formation. “An as yet unknown signaling pathway targets the nucleus and activates demethylases and DNMTs. This results in the demethylation of positive regulators of memory, such as reelin. HATs are then free to acetylate demethylated genes, releasing them from the transcriptional silencing induced by methylation. This leads to transcriptional activation of reelin and, likely, other memory-enhancing genes. Simultaneously, DNMTs target negative regulators of memory, such as PP1, for transcriptional silencing,” write Miller and Sweatt.

This new, though poorly understood regulatory mechanism may also yield new clues to various neurologic diseases such as fragile X mental retardation, Rett syndrome, and autism, which have been linked to DNA methylation. It could also lead to a better understanding of the memory losses associated with AD and other dementias.—Tom Fagan.

References:
Sontag E, Nunbhakdi-Craig V, Sontag J-M, Diaz-Arrastia R, Ogris E, Dayal S, Lentz SR, Arning E, Bottiglieri T. Protein phosphatase 2A methyltransferase links homocysteine metabolism with tau and amyloid precursor protein regulation. J. Neuroscience. 2007, March 14;27:2751-2759. Abstract

Miller CA, Sweatt JD. Covalent modification of DNA regulates memory formation. Neuron. 2007, March 15;53:857-869. Abstract

Dong E, Guidotti A, Grayson DR, Costa E. Histone hyperacetylation induces demethylation of reelin and 67-kDa glutamic acid decarboxylase promoters. PNAS. 2007, March 13;104:4676-468. Abstract

 
Comments on Related News
  Related News: For Better Memory, Try Keeping Your HAT On…

Comment by:  George M. Martin, ARF Advisor (Disclosure)
Submitted 29 June 2004 Posted 29 June 2004

Tom Fagan has done a very nice job of calling our attention to these exceptionally important and concordant sets of results supporting Robin Holliday's original proposal for a role for epigenetic modifications in long- term memory (Holliday, 1999). Robin emphasized methylations and demethylations of CpGs in his 1999 paper; less was known at that time about alterations in gene expression associated with chromatin modifications by histone acetylases and deacetylases.

The important phenotypic consequences of haploinsufficiency for the CREB binding protein provides a rationale for an investigation of potential roles of genetic polymorphisms, or better, of haplotype variations, in the modulation of long-term memory in human subjects.

PS: I also want to give special thanks to Tom Fagan for having highlighted the excellent accompanying commentary by Kelsey C. Martin and YE Sun. (Kelsey Martin is my daughter!)

View all comments by George M. Martin


  Related News: For Better Memory, Try Keeping Your HAT On…

Comment by:  Mary Reid
Submitted 30 June 2004 Posted 1 July 2004

I see that many of the signs of Rubenstein-Taybi syndrome are also reported in Down's syndrome.

The study by Branchi et al. (1) finding that overexpression of DYRK1A results in increased phosphorylation of FKHR, high levels of cyclin B1 and increased phosphorylation of CREB is of great interest.

They report increased brain weight associated with DYRK1A overexpression, yet reduced brain weight is reported in Down's syndrome.

Of further interest is the study by Daitoku et al. (2) finding that CREB-binding protein binds and acetylates FKHR and that Sir2 binds and deacetylates residues acetylated by CREB-binding protein.

Do the CBP mutations reported in RTS allow for FKHR binding?

Ironic that the CREB pathway required for learning and memory is also affected by the longevity gene, Sir2.

Is this one reason for the mental retardation and reduced lifespan reported in Down's syndrome?

References:
(1) Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology: Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 429–440. Transgenic...  Read more


  Related News: For Better Memory, Try Keeping Your HAT On…

Comment by:  Mary Reid
Submitted 2 July 2004 Posted 5 July 2004

Which of the human sirtuins might target FKHR? Might we suspect SIRT2, as North et al. (1) find that it is a tubulin deacetylase.

Hempen et al. (2) report decreased acetylated alpha-tubulin in neurofibrillary tangle-bearing neurons in AD.

Does the overexpression of DYRK1A reported by Funakoshi et al. (3), which has resulted in chromosome missegregation, suggest that it may be a downstream effect on FKHR/SIRT2 and resultant deacetylated alpha-tubulin?

Might we suspect a SIRT1/FKHR association? Takata and Ishikawa (4) report that SIRT1 associates with HES1 and HEY2.

Does the fact that DYRK1A overexpression resulting in increased phosphorylated CREB also implicate this gene product in the increased presenilin-1 levels found in Down's syndrome?

Mitsuda et al. (5) report that CREB controls expression of presenilin-1.

I see that the Sambamurti group (6) find a CREB binding site on BACE.

References:
(1) North BJ, Marshall BL, Borra MT, Denu JM, Verdin E. The human Sir2 ortholog, SIRT2, is an NAD+-dependent tubulin deacetylase. Mol Cell. 2003...  Read more


  Related News: Neurotoxic Homocysteine Metabolite Boosts Intracellular Aβ

Comment by:  Barney Dwyer, Hyoung-gon Lee, Akihiko Nunomura, George Perry, ARF Advisor (Disclosure), Mark A. Smith (Disclosure), Xiongwei Zhu
Submitted 31 May 2005 Posted 31 May 2005

Homocysteine and AD: More Than Meets the Eye
Hyoung-gon Lee, Mark A. Smith, Barney Dwyer, Aki Nunomura, George Perry, Xiongwei Zhu Increased levels of plasma homocysteine (HC), a key metabolic intermediate in sulfur amino acid metabolism, have been associated with several disorders including Alzheimer disease (AD). While HC is toxic in cell culture models including primary cortical neurons, the mechanism of HC toxicity and the role of HC in disease pathogenesis remain unclear. Hasegawa and colleagues hypothesized that homocysteic acid (HA), an oxidant product of HC, might play an important role in the pathogenesis of AD by regulating amyloid-β (Aβ) production. They demonstrate that HA dramatically decreases the extracellular level of Aβ42 but increases the intracellular level of Aβ42 in primary cortical neurons and APP-overexpressing CHO cells, and they suggest that this is associated with HA toxicity. This finding led them to show that a γ-secretase inhibitor prevents HA toxicity. While the level of HC is increased both in plasma and CSF in...  Read more

  Related News: Neurotoxic Homocysteine Metabolite Boosts Intracellular Aβ

Comment by:  Andrew McCaddon (Disclosure)
Submitted 31 May 2005 Posted 6 June 2005

Homocysteine, oxidative stress, and AD: An even more vicious cycle!
Commenting on Hasegawa et al., Dwyer and collaborators note that elevated homocysteine may participate in a vicious cycle involving iron dysregulation, resulting in oxidative stress seen in AD (Dwyer et al., 2004). Their proposed mechanism suggests that localized heme deficiency in AD brain could result in loss of cystathionine β-synthase redox responsiveness and incur increased homocysteine during periods of oxidative stress.

It is also important to note that the other major route of homocysteine metabolism, the methionine synthase reaction, is also exquisitely sensitive to oxidative stress. We have proposed a complementary mechanism whereby such stress impairs methionine synthase activity (McCaddon et al 2002; McCaddon and Kelly, 1992, and see Alzheimer Research Forum "A cobalaminergic hypothesis.")

Taken together, these two mechanisms suggest that it might be important to address oxidative stress as well as B vitamin deficiency in cognitively impaired patients presenting with...  Read more


  Related News: Neurotoxic Homocysteine Metabolite Boosts Intracellular Aβ

Comment by:  Sigfrido Scarpa
Submitted 7 June 2005 Posted 7 June 2005

I look at the results reported bearing in mind that homocysteine is one of the products of S-adenosylmethionine metabolism. It has been recently reported by my group (Scarpa et al., 2003 and Fuso et al., 2005) that both PS1 and BACE are regulated by DNA methylation and that accumulation of homocysteine, obtained by starvation of B12 and folate in the culture medium, increased amyloid production. As far as amyloid release (Fig. 1) and the ratio between intracellular and extracellular concentrations of the two Aβ species, my comment is that HA administration, by changing the methylation status of membrane lipids, among several other events, could decrease the fluidity of the membranes and therefore the secretion. Consequently, amyloid accumulates inside the cells (Fig. 3A and 4).

I think it is important to look carefully at the main metabolism in which homocysteine is involved. The main product in the pathway is S-adenosylmethionine, the donor of all the methylation reactions. The...  Read more


  Related News: Neurotoxic Homocysteine Metabolite Boosts Intracellular Aβ

Comment by:  Mary Reid
Submitted 6 June 2005 Posted 10 June 2005

Zou et al. (1) report that γ-secretase is involved in the processing of megalin. In view of the fact that megalin binds cubilin, the receptor for B12-intrinsic factor complex, and mediates uptake of the vitamin B12-transcobalamin complex (2), what are the implications for AD?

References:
1. Zou Z, Chung B, Nguyen T, Mentone S, Thomson B, Biemesderfer D. Linking receptor-mediated endocytosis and cell signaling: evidence for regulated intramembrane proteolysis of megalin in proximal tubule. J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 13;279(33):34302-10. Epub 2004 Jun 4. Abstract

2. Gliemann J. Receptors of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family in man. Multiple functions of the large family members via interaction with complex ligands. Biol Chem. 1998 Aug-Sep;379(8-9):951-64. Review. Abstract

View all comments by Mary Reid


  Related News: Neurotoxic Homocysteine Metabolite Boosts Intracellular Aβ

Comment by:  Mary Reid
Submitted 26 May 2005 Posted 18 June 2005

Does homocysteic acid also induce expression of HERP ( Homocysteine- and endoplasmic reticulum stress-inducible protein, ubiquitin-like domain-containing, 1)? Sai et al. (1) report that HERP increases the generation of amyloid beta-protein (Abeta) and that Herp interacts with presenilin (PS).

References:
FEBS Lett. 2003 Oct 9;553(1-2):151-6. The ubiquitin-like domain of Herp is involved in Herp degradation, but not necessary for its enhancement of amyloid beta-protein generation. Sai X, Kokame K, Shiraishi H, Kawamura Y, Miyata T, Yanagisawa K, Komano H. Department of Dementia Research, National Institute for Longevity Sciences, Obu, Aichi, Japan. Herp is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-stress-inducible membrane protein, which has a ubiquitin-like domain (ULD). However, its biological function is as yet unknown. Previously, we reported that a high expression level of Herp in cells increases the generation of amyloid beta-protein (Abeta) and that Herp interacts with presenilin (PS). Here, we addressed the role of the ULD of Herp in Abeta generation and intracellular Herp stability. We found that the ULD is not essential for the enhancement of Abeta generation by Herp expression and the interaction of Herp with PS, but is involved in the rapid degradation of Herp, most likely via the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Thus, the ULD of Herp most likely plays a role in the regulation of the intracellular level of Herp under ER stress. PMID: 14550564 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

View all comments by Mary Reid

  Related News: Memories—Forgotten, But Not Gone?

Comment by:  Geraldine Durrant
Submitted 3 May 2007 Posted 3 May 2007

This study’s conclusion that memory is not lost but is somehow "locked in" prompted me to write with my own experience. For the last 10 years of his life, my father lived in a care home near mine and I saw him daily.

Initially he had Parkinson disease, but in the years that followed he suffered from a series of mini-strokes and eventually cancer. During this time he also suffered from senility—whether strictly speaking Alzheimer's or not I can't say—but he was increasingly confused, forgetful, and entirely unable to carry out the most basic self care, so that ultimately he was asleep virtually all the time, waking only to be fed, and speaking very rarely.

By the time he spent his last Christmas day with us at home, he was in a most pathetic state, and had not spoken more than a word or two in many months. At 5 p.m., as we were sitting around him after opening presents, we had a most odd experience. He suddenly "came to life."

It was as though someone had flipped a switch in his brain, and for the next 45 minutes he laughed and chatted and “remembered,” and...  Read more


  Related News: Party of Three: Genes, Environment, and Epigenetics

Comment by:  Schahram Akbarian
Submitted 27 June 2008 Posted 27 June 2008

The Bjornsson et al. study provides further evidence that DNA methylation differences between individuals increase with age. However, the study not only confirms this principle, but shows that genetic factors play a role in inter-individual methylation differences. It highlights the complexities when studying DNA methylation in aging. While it is thought that "environmental" factors such as alcohol, diet, perhaps medications, etc., play a role in modifying DNA methylation patterns in the genome, genetic factors could play a role as well. Recently, we identified in a postmortem brain study 2/50 gene loci that showed significant alterations in Alzheimer's subjects, as compared to controls (Siegmund et al., 2007). Interestingly, the changes in the Alzheimer's cohort, in terms of DNA methylation, appeared to reflect an acceleration of normal aging. Therefore, one could assume that the findings of Bjornsson et al. will be of great interest for aging-related disorders, including Alzheimer disease.

View all comments by Schahram Akbarian

  Related News: Party of Three: Genes, Environment, and Epigenetics

Comment by:  Jutta Bremer
Submitted 17 July 2008 Posted 22 July 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers

These are indeed highly interesting papers.

To add to the story of epigenetic influences in the aging process, a new and fascinating study was published in PLoS ONE. The group around Axel Schumacher et al. at the Technical University Munich/Germany could show that people with late-onset Alzheimer disease have indeed an increased “epigenetic drift” in genes that may be responsible for some of the observed phenotypes. Additionally, the group found that some genes that participate in amyloid-β processing and methylation homeostasis show a significant interindividual epigenetic variability, which may contribute to disease predisposition. The observed epigenetic pattern would complement and support the aforementioned data, showing that the changes in the Alzheimer brain appeared to reflect an acceleration of normal aging. This could indicate that everybody has a certain likelihood of developing the disease.

References:
Wang SC, Oelze B, Schumacher A. Age-specific epigenetic drift in late-onset Alzheimer's disease. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(7):e2698. Abstract

View all comments by Jutta Bremer


  Related News: Drifting Toward AD—Epigenetic Changes Linked to Disease

Comment by:  Lawrence Rajendran
Submitted 23 July 2008 Posted 23 July 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers

  Related News: Drifting Toward AD—Epigenetic Changes Linked to Disease

Comment by:  J. Lucy Boyd
Submitted 24 July 2008 Posted 28 July 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Follow on Twitter
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2010 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad