Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
Aβ40—The Anti-Amyloid?
27 January 2007. There is good cholesterol and there is bad cholesterol. Should we be thinking about amyloid-β (Aβ) in the same way? While it is well established that the slightly longer Aβ42—the “bad” Aβ—is more amyloidogenic, could Aβ40 be anti-amyloidogenic? In the January 17 Journal of Neuroscience, Eileen McGowan and colleagues at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, report that bumping up levels of Aβ40 in transgenic mice dramatically reduces the deposition of amyloid plaques. The finding suggests that the smaller of the two peptides can prevent Aβ aggregation.

The finding also speaks to a Forum Discussion held last year on gain or loss of function in mutant presenilin. Many presenilin mutations that cause early-onset familial AD increase the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, raising the fundamental question of what has greater pathological relevance, more Aβ42 or less Aβ40? As Peter Davies, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, wrote in this discussion, “Importantly, one must measure separately how each of the ratio’s components change to know what is driving the change in the ratio.” McGowan and colleagues approached this challenge genetically. They altered the levels of Aβ40 not by tweaking γ-secretase activity, but by independently expressing the peptide from an entirely different construct. Indeed, the paper delivers data on an experiment Matthew Hass and Bruce Yankner suggested during the discussion. McGowan’s new finding also ties into a second, ongoing Forum discussion on the broader question of presenilin function in neurodegenerative disease.

First author Jungsu Kim and colleagues crossed their previously described BRI-Aβ40 mice (see ARF related news story) with APP (Tg2576) and with BRI-Aβ42A transgenic mice, which both produce substantial amounts of Aβ42. Because cleavage of the BRI-chimera by furin proteases releases Aβ in a γ-secretase-independent manner, Kim was able to adjust the Aβ40 level without changing the Aβ42 levels. The authors found that in both Tg2576/BRI-Aβ40 and BRI-Aβ42A/BRI-Aβ40 mice the plaque load in the brain was substantially lower than in the single transgenic controls. Amyloid plaque load was reduced by about 80 percent in 20-month-old Tg2576/BRI-Aβ40 mice and by about 75 percent in 8-month BRI-Aβ40/BRI-Aβ42A animals. These reductions were despite increases in total Aβ (Aβ40 and Aβ42) of between two- and 10-fold, respectively, in the Tg2576 and BRI/BRI strains.

The results suggest that Aβ40 prevents amyloid aggregation. In-vitro experiments on Aβ42 aggregation in the presence or absence of Aβ40 support this idea—the authors found that an Aβ40/Aβ2 ratio of 2:1 was sufficient to prevent aggregation. However, there are reasons to question whether Aβ 40 can truly be protective. First, Aβ40 has been linked numerous times to the vascular Aβ deposits found in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (see ARF related news story), so while it may help in the parenchyma, it could be detrimental to the vasculature. Kim and colleagues found that the BRI-Aβ40 addition decreased CAA severity in the Tg2576 mice by about 60 percent, suggesting that Aβ40 may be good for the vasculature, too. Second, considerable evidence points to soluble oligomeric Aβ species as being the most toxic (see ARF related news story), and it is unclear if Aβ40 would have any effect on such oligomers. This question requires additional investigation, the authors note.

In the meantime, there is other evidence to support the “good” Aβ theory, notably the two papers that spurred last year’s Forum Discussion, one from Bart De Strooper’s lab at K.U. Leuven, and the other from Christine Van Broeckhoven and colleagues at the University of Antwerp, both in Belgium. In the former, Mostafa Bentahir and colleagues reported that some presenilin FAD mutations reduce production of Aβ40, rather than increase Aβ42, while in the second, Samir Kumar-Singh and colleagues report that the age of onset of familial AD correlates with increased Aβ42 and decreased Aβ40. The finding echoes another instance in neurodegeneration where β-synuclein somehow counteracts aggregation of its near-twin, α-synuclein (e.g., Hashimoto et al., 2001). Data that upping Aβ40 can improve learning and memory in APP mouse models would be icing on the “good Aβ” cake.—Tom Fagan.

Reference:
Kim J, Onstead L, Randle S, Price R, Smithson L, Zwizinski C, Dickson DW, Golde T, McGowan E. Abeta40 inhibits amyloid deposition in vivo. Journal of Neuroscience. 2007 Jan 17;27:627-633. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Erik Jansson
Submitted 29 January 2007  |  Permalink Posted 30 January 2007

This paper seems to skirt many years of autopsy studies finding that the senile plaques have marginal statistical capacity to distinguish normal from AD patients, such as Davis et al., 1999. Also in 1999, Lue et al. concluded that soluble Aβ posed the greatest toxicity, and that Aβ40 was particularly toxic to synapses. But the issue of deposits seems to pale in the face of new MRI studies concerning gross atrophy of the brain, that is, gross death of brain cells and connectivity. See, for example Stroub and colleagues’ 2006 article on MCI. Is the senile plaque issue becoming a tempest in the teapot?

References:
Davis DG, Schmitt FA, Wekstein DR, Markesbery WR, Alzheimer neuropathological alterations in aged cognitively normal subjects, 1999 Apr;58(4):376-88. Abstract

Lue LF, Kuo YM, Roher AE, Brachova L, Shen Y, Sue L, Beach T, Kurth JH, Rydel; RE, Rogers J, Soluble amyuloid beta peptide concentration as a predictor of soluble synaptic change in Alzheimer's disease, Am J Pathol,1999 Sept; 155(3):853-62. Abstract

Stroub TR, deToledo-Morrell L, Stebbins, GT, Leurgans S, Bennett DA, Shah RC, Hippocampal disconnection contributes to memory dysfunction in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease, Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2006 June; 103(26):10041-45. Abstract

View all comments by Erik Jansson


  Primary Papers: Abeta40 inhibits amyloid deposition in vivo.

Comment by:  Hui Zheng
Submitted 30 January 2007  |  Permalink Posted 30 January 2007

This report unequivocally demonstrates that Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides have opposite effects on amyloid deposition in vivo and that Aβ40 inhibits Aβ42-induced amyloidosis. These results nicely complement our data that reducing Aβ40, without increasing Aβ42, leads to accelerated plaque pathology (Deng et al., 2006 and Wang et al., 2006). This is a welcome addition to the Alzforum discussion initiated by Peter Davies and Bart De Strooper last year concerning the pathogenic mechanisms of the PS1 FAD mutations. All data combined support the notion that a partial reduction of Aβ40 (and γ-secretase activity) may be the primary mechanism for the amyloid pathology seen in certain PS1 patients and may indeed apply to sporadic cases, as well.

View all comments by Hui Zheng

  Primary Papers: Abeta40 inhibits amyloid deposition in vivo.

Comment by:  Matthew Hass, Bruce Yankner, ARF Advisor
Submitted 6 February 2007  |  Permalink Posted 6 February 2007

Can Some Forms of Aβ Be Good?
The generation of BRI-Aβ40 and BRI-Aβ42 transgenic mice and the crossing of these mice with the Tg2576 APP-transgenic line has enabled Kim and colleagues to determine whether the Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides could play different roles in plaque deposition. Increasing Aβ40 by crossing BRI-Aβ40 and Tg2576 transgenic mice resulted in decreased plaque deposition, in contrast to the increased deposition previously reported in the BRI-Aβ42/Tg2576 bitransgenic (McGowan et al., 2005). This anti-amyloidogenic “activity” of Aβ40 was confirmed by crossing BRI-Aβ40 with BRI-Aβ42 transgenic mice, which resulted in reduced amyloid deposition relative to BRI-Aβ42 alone. The dramatically decreased plaque number was paralleled by a similar reduction in insoluble, formic acid extractable Aβ, despite an overall increase in total Aβ. The authors then used an in vitro aggregation assay to support their suggestion that decreased amyloid deposition may relate to the ability of Aβ40 to decrease Aβ42 aggregation.

These experiments raise the possibility that Aβ40...  Read more


  Primary Papers: Abeta40 inhibits amyloid deposition in vivo.

Comment by:  Bruce Yankner, ARF Advisor
Submitted 6 February 2007  |  Permalink Posted 6 February 2007
  I recommend this paper

  Primary Papers: Abeta40 inhibits amyloid deposition in vivo.

Comment by:  Rudy Castellani, Hyoung-gon Lee, George Perry, ARF Advisor (Disclosure), Mark A. Smith (Disclosure), Xiongwei Zhu
Submitted 8 March 2007  |  Permalink Posted 8 March 2007

Amyloid: Getting Less Toxic Every Day
The Alternate Amyloid Hypothesis (1,2), whereby amyloid-β (Aβ) serves as a protective response in the pathogenesis of AD, is supported by this recent paper showing that Aβ is not responsible for the cognitive and pathological changes that are pathognomonic for AD (3). Briefly, in this study, Aβ40 dramatically reduces Aβ deposition (60-90 percent compared with Tg2576 mice) and rescues the premature-death phenotypes of Tg2576 mice. The important question is whether pathological changes observed in Tg2576 mice (e.g., gliosis, synapse degeneration, cognitive deficits) are altered in Aβ40/Tg2576 mice. Interestingly and most importantly, the same research group reported no cognitive improvement in Aβ40/Tg2576 mice compared with Tg2576 mice (4). In this regard, other studies have found that the cognitive function is relatively intact in APP transgenic mice despite massive accumulation of Aβ including soluble and insoluble forms in brain (5,6). Therefore, the role of Aβ in the pathogenesis of AD should be reassessed. It really does appear...  Read more

  Primary Papers: Abeta40 inhibits amyloid deposition in vivo.

Comment by:  Jason Eriksen
Submitted 9 October 2007  |  Permalink Posted 11 October 2007
  I recommend this paper
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad