Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: News
News
News Search  
FRETting Pays off—NSAIDs Target Presenilins, Reduce Aβ42
30 September 2004. γ-secretase, the multiprotein complex that unleashes amyloid-β1-42 (Aβ1-42) from the amyloidβ precursor protein (AβPP), seems an obvious place to start if you want to develop a drug to prevent or slow Alzheimer disease. There’s only one problem; γ-secretase is also needed to process other proteins, including the cell surface receptors Notch and ErbB-4, so axing γ-secretase may not be the best approach. But don’t fret; all may not be lost. Recent reports have suggested that rather than cripple the protease, some NSAIDs, or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, jolt it sufficiently so that it cuts AβPP at a different spot, yielding a shorter, less toxic amyloid peptide, Aβ1-38 (see ARF related news story and ARF news story). Now, reporting in this month’s Nature Medicine, researchers from the Alzheimer Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital offer a mechanistic explanation for this selective inhibition.

Brad Hyman, Brian Bacskai and colleagues did FRET. They used a nifty technique called fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to measure the conformation of presenilin 1 (PS1), the core protease of γ-secretase, in the presence or absence of different NSAIDs. FRET is capable of measuring the proximity of one fluorescent molecule to another, but in a variation on this theme, first author Alberto Lleo and colleagues labeled the N- and C-terminal ends of PS1 with fluorophores. The ends of the protease are sufficiently close, it turns out, so that photons emitted from the donor fluorophore at the N-terminus are absorbed by, and excite, the acceptor fluorophore at the C-terminus, allowing FRET to occur intermolecularly.

FRET depends on proximity, but Lleo found that resonance transfer between the N- and C-termini of PS1 was less efficient in the presence of ibuprofen. The fluorescence lifetime of the donor jumped from 1,800 picoseconds to 2,200 picoseconds when the NSAID was added to cells expressing PS1 and AβPP, indicating that the N- and C-terminal ends of presenilin had been pushed apart. Significantly, aspirin and naproxen—NSAIDs that have not been found to alter AβPP cleavage (see ARF related news story on the failure of a naproxen clinical trial)—had no effect on the process.

The authors also found that ibuprofen (both optical isomers) reduced proteolysis at the 42 position by about 50 percent, and that this was compensated by cleavage, yielding peptides shorter than 40 amino acids. They also found that Notch processing was unaffected. To determine if NSAIDs have similar effects in vivo, Lleo and colleagues fed mice an ibuprofen diet for 15 days, fixed the brain tissue, and used fluorescent labeled antibodies to the N- and C-termini of PS1 to measure their proximity. Again, FRET showed that in PS1 exposed to ibuprofen, a conformational change pushed the termini apart.

“Our results suggest that NSAIDs have an allosteric effect on γ-secretase,” write the authors, and they offer a model whereby the distance between the N- and C-termini of PS1 is crucial in determining the proteolytic cleavage site of AβPP. This is welcome news for those who are trying to find drugs that selectively reduce Aβ1-42 but do not affect processing of other γ-secretase targets. It also helps explain why NSAIDs that do not affect AβPP processing have so far proven ineffective in halting or preventing AD (see ARF related news story and ARF news story), while ibuprofen may prove better suited (see ARF related news story).—Tom Fagan.

Reference:
Lleo A, Berezovska O, Herl L, Raju S, Deng A, Bacskai BJ, Frosch MP, Irizarry M, Hyman BT. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs lower Aβ42 and change presenilin 1 conformation. Nature Medicine. 2004 September 26. Advanced online publication. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
  Comment by:  Todd E. Golde
Submitted 30 September 2004  |  Permalink Posted 30 September 2004

The findings are significant for three main reasons:

First: They provide strong evidence that NSAIDs bind to and modulate γ-secretase function in the brain. This extends findings from Dr. Koo's and my laboratories (Weggen et al., Eriksen et al. references in paper), Greg Cole's laboratory (Lim et al.), Dave Morgan's Lab (Jantzen et al.), and Neill Kowall's laboratory (Yan et al.) that show that some NSAIDs 1) reduce Aβ deposition in transgenic mice, 2) acutely lower Aβ42 levels in the brain, and 3) appear to target γ-secretase.

Second: What this study appears to show is that despite concentrations in the brain that are well below the levels needed to lower Aβ42 in cell culture (Eriksen et al.), certain NSAIDs appear capable of altering PS conformation in the brain. This would support the notion that NSAIDs are concentrated in the compartments in the brain where γ-secretase resides. This provides direct evidence that certain NSIADs could lower Aβ42 in the brain.

Third: They utilize the FLIM technique to show that the drugs bind and induce a conformational change in...  Read more


  Comment by:  Dominic Walsh, ARF Advisor
Submitted 1 October 2004  |  Permalink Posted 1 October 2004
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Allosteric modulation of γ-secretase activity offers a new avenue for specific inhibition of Aβ42 production
Using fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM), the authors demonstrate that certain NSAIDs known to specifically reduce Aβ42 levels without altering total Aβ induce a structural rearrangement in the catalytic center of γ-secretase (presenilin, PS). Binding of these compounds also alters the interaction between PS1 and APP, thus suggesting that the allosteric rearrangement of PS allows APP to be cleaved at an alternate site. These findings are supported by recent enzyme kinetic studies that demonstrate that sulindac sulfide and R-flurbiprofen act as allosteric modulators of γ-secretase (Beher et al., 2004).

Identification of the allosteric site at which NSAIDs bind should facilitate the generation of highly specific inhibitors of Aβ42 generation and thus minimize unwanted inhibition of the γ-secretase processing of other important substrates.

Reference:
Beher D, Clarke EE, Wrigley JD, Martin AC, Nadin A, Churcher I, Shearman MS. Selected non-steroidal...  Read more


  Comment by:  Vincent Marchesi, ARF Advisor
Submitted 28 November 2004  |  Permalink Posted 29 November 2004

I agree that this is a very impressive attempt to use the power of energy transfer techniques to study the effects of NSAIDs on the organization of the presenilin/γ-secretase complex. I am concerned that the fluorophores used to measure lifetimes could conceivably be two antibody lengths away from the target antigens of the presenilin molecules, since each fluorophore was attached to secondary antibodies that were then bound to primary anti-PS1 antibodies. Since there were differences in response as a result of exposure to specific NSAIDs, something interesting is going on, but the changes in PSI conformation proposed by the authors are only one of many possible explanations.

View all comments by Vincent Marchesi
  Submit a Comment on this News Article
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Print this page
Email this page
Alzforum News
Papers of the Week
Text size
Share & Bookmark
ADNI Related Links
ADNI Data at LONI
ADNI Information
DIAN
Foundation for the NIH
AddNeuroMed
neuGRID
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad