Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: Community
SITE POLL ARCHIVE

Important Notice: Opine Online provides an informal way for the research community to express its views on current topics. The results are not a scientific poll and do not necessarily reflect the percentages of all Alzheimer researchers who agree with these positions.

March 2007
Poll Question: What's the AD drug smith to do about the blood-brain barrier?

Study the BBB
21
BBB is overrated; any molecule can be engineered to get in
15
Serious obstacle; make penetrance first ‘kill’ criterion
9
avoid altogether; go through the nose
8
Responses: 53
Comments on Site Poll
  Comment by:  Vicki Bellon
Submitted 20 March 2007  |  Permalink Posted 21 March 2007

Remember the Mad Hatter's symptoms? Why is no one looking at mercury fillings in people's heads. Seems simple to me. When we pack mercury in people's teeth, mercury beads surface and are swallowed. How would that get out of their bodies? A small spill on the carpet and everyone panics, but it is okay to put it in your head. What about other countries that have outlawed mercury fillings? What are their stats for Alzheimers?

View all comments by Vicki Bellon

  Comment by:  J. Lucy Boyd
Submitted 16 March 2007  |  Permalink Posted 22 March 2007

I believe the answer to Alzheimer disease will be found by looking at evolutionary changes of humans. The blood-brain barrier is one of our natural defense mechanisms, and I feel the proper course is to find a way to work with it, not necessarily around it.

View all comments by J. Lucy Boyd

  Comment by:  Victorio Rodriguez (Disclosure)
Submitted 28 March 2007  |  Permalink Posted 29 March 2007

We do Alzheimer disease preclinical trials using animals, yet we know that their blood-brain barriers are incomplete. Drugs used in these trials cross the blood-brain barrier readily, so the results obtained are different from those in humans.

In preclinical trials, we should use subjects that mimic the human blood-brain barrier, if there are any.

View all comments by Victorio Rodriguez


  Comment by:  Frederic Calon
Submitted 26 March 2007  |  Permalink Posted 29 March 2007

BBB Is Overrated; Any Molecule Can Be Engineered to Get In!
Not a single drug on the market has been successfully "engineered" to get inside the brain. The BBB problem represents the number one challenge of CNS drug development. Just look at pharmaceutical companies' pipelines: the vast majority of new molecular entities (NME) including biopharmaceuticals are restricted to peripheral disease. Despite improvements in recent years, we still have the feeling that many scientists and drug companies adopt the strategy of the ostrich regarding the BBB. Worst of all: besides a few biotech companies and less than 10 academic research groups, not much is done to address those BBB-related issues. In the meantime, hundreds of millions of dollars are invested in identifying new drug targets for CNS diseases that could be useless because of the lack of non-invasive brain drug delivery systems.

What we all need is a big wake-up call....

View all comments by Frederic Calon


  Comment by:  Barbara Bennani-Baiti
Submitted 2 April 2007  |  Permalink Posted 9 April 2007

The BBB is generally underestimated - it is not just scientists who develop drugs for AD who avoid the issue of the BBB. However, why would anyone in his right mind invest so resources into the development of new molecular entities targeted at the brain and not invest into research whether and how this NME passes the BBB?

Doing BBB research myself I know it is costly and time intensive, but it is feasable and definitely necessary.

View all comments by Barbara Bennani-Baiti

Submit a Comment on this Site Poll
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this poll. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad