Get Newsletter
Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure Alzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a CureAlzheimer Research Forum - Networking for a Cure
  
What's New HomeContact UsHow to CiteGet NewsletterBecome a MemberLogin          
Papers of the Week
Current Papers
ARF Recommends
Milestone Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Drug News
Conference News
Research
AD Hypotheses
  AlzSWAN
  Current Hypotheses
  Hypothesis Factory
Forums
  Live Discussions
  Virtual Conferences
  Interviews
Enabling Technologies
  Workshops
  Research Tools
Compendia
  AlzGene
  AlzRisk
  Antibodies
  Biomarkers
  Mutations
  Protocols
  Research Models
  Video Gallery
Resources
  Bulletin Boards
  Conference Calendar
  Grants
  Jobs
Early-Onset Familial AD
Overview
Diagnosis/Genetics
Research
News
Profiles
Clinics
Drug Development
Companies
Tutorial
Drugs in Clinical Trials
Disease Management
About Alzheimer's
  FAQs
Diagnosis
  Clinical Guidelines
  Tests
  Brain Banks
Treatment
  Drugs and Therapies
Caregiving
  Patient Care
  Support Directory
  AD Experiences
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
ARF Team
ARF Awards
Advisory Board
Sponsors
Partnerships
Fan Mail
Support Us
Return to Top
Home: Community
SITE POLL ARCHIVE

Important Notice: Opine Online provides an informal way for the research community to express its views on current topics. The results are not a scientific poll and do not necessarily reflect the percentages of all Alzheimer researchers who agree with these positions.

December 2005
Poll Question: What is you favorite research model for AD? Use the Comments link to supply strain/species details

Genetically engineered mouse
32
Aged canine
2
Aged primate
9
Invertebrate
2
Single-cell organisms
0
In vitro systems
6
Other (explain)
135
Responses: 186
Comments on Site Poll
  Comment by:  Jean-Michel VERDIER
Submitted 11 January 2006  |  Permalink Posted 23 January 2006

Aged primate

Because of their permanent overexpression and the phylogenetic distance between rodents and primates, results obtained with transgenic mice may be unrelevant for humans. As a consequence, we lack an appropriate, spontaneous model to test whether the development of the pathognomonic lesions of AD are directly correlated with the cognitive changes observed during the disease.

Monkeys might be considered as the ideal natural models because of their phylogenic proximity to humans. However, their weight, size, cost, and lifespan preclude their use them as laboratory models. By contrast, we explore the potential of the lemur Microcebus murinus to be used as a natural primate model of AD.

View all comments by Jean-Michel VERDIER


  Comment by:  Thomas van Groen
Submitted 31 January 2006  |  Permalink Posted 31 January 2006

Genetically engineered mouse: all opportunities to study interactions between genes/proteins can be created and studied easily.

View all comments by Thomas van Groen

  Comment by:  Greg Hook (Disclosure)
Submitted 8 March 2006  |  Permalink Posted 8 March 2006

For studying β-secretase APP processing, we use the guinea pig model. We like that model, in part, because the β-secretase processing closely mimics that which occurs in Alzheimer disease patients. Specifically, the guinea pig has an APP β-secretase cleavage sequence identical to the human wild-type sequence, the type found in 99 percent of AD patients. Thus, for developing β-secretase inhibitors, the guinea pig is a good model because the β-secretase processing is that which occurs in the vast majority of patients.

In contrast, we believe that the more popular transgenic Swedish APP mouse model is not suitable for developing β-secretase inhibitors. That model contains a mutated APP β-secretase cleavage sequence, which occurs in only one family. That mutated APP completely alters the β-secretase processing from that which occurs in wild-type APP β-secretase processing. Thus, β-secretase inhibitors developed in this model are likely to be ineffective for treating most AD patients.

References:
Beck M, Bigl V, Rossner S. Guinea pigs as a nontransgenic model for APP processing in vitro and in vivo. Neurochem Res. 2003 Apr;28(3-4):637-44. Review. Abstract

View all comments by Greg Hook

Submit a Comment on this Site Poll
Cast your vote and/or make a comment on this poll. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Country or Territory:
*Login Email Address  
*Password    Minimum of 8 characters
*Confirm Password  
Stay signed in?  

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


*Enter the verification code you see in the picture below:


This helps Alzforum prevent automated registrations.

Terms and Conditions of Use:Printable Version

By clicking on the 'I accept' below, you are agreeing to the Terms and Conditions of Use above.
Desperately

Antibodies
Cell Lines
Collaborators
Papers
Research Participants
Copyright © 1996-2013 Alzheimer Research Forum Terms of Use How to Cite Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright
wma logoadadad